Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Travellers Autobarn.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
55 Valid Reviews
The Travellers Autobarn experience has a total of 56 reviews. There are 55 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 55 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Travellers Autobarn valid reviews is 87.82% and is based on 55 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
7 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 55 valid reviews, the experience has 7 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 7 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Travellers Autobarn face-to-face reviews is 85.71% and is based on 7 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Anh Phan||8/10||106 days||93.31||96%|
|Jessica Rose||10/10||137 days||97.03||100%|
|Arnold van der Linden||5/10||256 days||72.59||73%|
|JC Oli||10/10||287 days||86.95||89%|
|Anne Wallace||10/10||288 days||86.86||89%|
|Karen Gething||8/10||288 days||82.51||84%|
|Christian Cippis||10/10||318 days||83.98||86%|
|João Carvalho||10/10||562 days||50.02||49%|
|laurent twardowski||9/10||562 days||50.02||49%|
|Tim Pellenkoft||8/10||593 days||42.69||41%|
|yvonne smolders||10/10||594 days||44.77||43%|
|Pieterjan Tuybens||8/10||621 days||38.57||36%|
|Sasa Jamsek||9/10||621 days||40.6||39%|
|Allyson Ekin||9/10||652 days||36.1||34%|
|Alexandra Alles||7/10||652 days||32.85||30%|
|Gillian Laing||10/10||683 days||31.9||29%|
|Kate Brandist||10/10||683 days||31.9||29%|
|Matt McCloskey||7/10||696 days||27.51||24%|
|Jorg Luypaert||9/10||713 days||28.12||25%|
|Bryn Howells||7/10||713 days||25.59||22%|
|Sam Ye||10/10||713 days||28.12||25%|
|Jennie Tollerton||9/10||715 days||27.88||25%|
|Hannibal Winther||7/10||719 days||24.94||22%|
|Carl von Horstig||8/10||728 days||25.03||22%|
|Carly Walton||9/10||744 days||24.52||21%|
|Ilse Haakman||10/10||774 days||21.33||18%|
|AMIRUL AZRAI ZOHARI||10/10||774 days||21.33||18%|
|Kennie Pritchard||10/10||774 days||21.33||18%|
|Brent Lebeter||9/10||774 days||21.33||18%|
|Tytti Turpeinen||1/10||775 days||15.5||11%|
|Thomas Hill||10/10||805 days||18.33||14%|
|Robby Thomas||9/10||805 days||18.33||14%|
|Bach ADBA||10/10||805 days||18.33||14%|
|Sarah Dawes||10/10||836 days||15.63||12%|
|Kerrod Moller-Nielsen||10/10||836 days||15.63||12%|
|Bill Grainger||7/10||897 days||10.2||6%|
|Megan Raymond||10/10||897 days||11.21||7%|
|Franz Russ||10/10||927 days||9.47||5%|
|Stefanie and Yvonne||9/10||948 days||8.42||4%|
|Ashley Hatch||3/10||958 days||6.14||1%|
|Claire Presland||10/10||958 days||7.97||3%|
|Lynda Ky||10/10||979 days||7.13||2%|
|David R||10/10||1017 days||5.96||1%|
|Thomas Hartley||10/10||1017 days||5.96||1%|
|Jared Campbell||10/10||1017 days||5.96||1%|
|Mike Stafford||10/10||1017 days||5.96||1%|
|Sam Bateman||10/10||1017 days||5.96||1%|
|Rebecka Ekman||9/10||1017 days||5.96||1%|
|Sallie Gregory||10/10||1078 days||5.05||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Travellers Autobarn experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner. There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days.
The Travellers Autobarn experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Travellers Autobarn experience has been adjusted for 91 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.