Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Travellers Autobarn.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
55 Valid Reviews
The Travellers Autobarn experience has a total of 56 reviews. There are 55 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 55 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Travellers Autobarn valid reviews is 87.82% and is based on 55 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
7 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 55 valid reviews, the experience has 7 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 7 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Travellers Autobarn face-to-face reviews is 85.71% and is based on 7 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Anh Phan||8/10||48 days||94.65||95%|
|Jessica Rose||10/10||78 days||99.04||100%|
|Arnold van der Linden||5/10||198 days||75.97||75%|
|JC Oli||10/10||229 days||91.69||92%|
|Anne Wallace||10/10||229 days||91.69||92%|
|Karen Gething||8/10||229 days||87.11||87%|
|Christian Cippis||10/10||260 days||89.29||90%|
|João Carvalho||10/10||504 days||59.75||58%|
|laurent twardowski||9/10||504 days||59.75||58%|
|Tim Pellenkoft||8/10||535 days||51.91||49%|
|yvonne smolders||10/10||535 days||54.64||52%|
|Pieterjan Tuybens||8/10||563 days||47.36||45%|
|Sasa Jamsek||9/10||563 days||49.85||47%|
|Allyson Ekin||9/10||594 days||44.77||42%|
|Alexandra Alles||7/10||594 days||40.74||37%|
|Gillian Laing||10/10||625 days||40.0||37%|
|Kate Brandist||10/10||625 days||40.0||37%|
|Matt McCloskey||7/10||637 days||34.8||31%|
|Jorg Luypaert||9/10||655 days||35.68||32%|
|Bryn Howells||7/10||655 days||32.47||29%|
|Sam Ye||10/10||655 days||35.68||32%|
|Jennie Tollerton||9/10||656 days||35.54||32%|
|Hannibal Winther||7/10||660 days||31.84||28%|
|Carl von Horstig||8/10||669 days||32.07||28%|
|Carly Walton||9/10||686 days||31.51||28%|
|Ilse Haakman||10/10||716 days||27.76||23%|
|AMIRUL AZRAI ZOHARI||10/10||716 days||27.76||23%|
|Kennie Pritchard||10/10||716 days||27.76||23%|
|Brent Lebeter||9/10||716 days||27.76||23%|
|Tytti Turpeinen||1/10||716 days||20.27||15%|
|Thomas Hill||10/10||747 days||24.19||20%|
|Robby Thomas||9/10||747 days||24.19||20%|
|Bach ADBA||10/10||747 days||24.19||20%|
|Sarah Dawes||10/10||778 days||20.92||16%|
|Kerrod Moller-Nielsen||10/10||778 days||20.92||16%|
|Bill Grainger||7/10||839 days||14.0||9%|
|Megan Raymond||10/10||839 days||15.39||10%|
|Franz Russ||10/10||869 days||13.09||8%|
|Stefanie and Yvonne||9/10||889 days||11.72||6%|
|Ashley Hatch||3/10||900 days||8.49||3%|
|Claire Presland||10/10||900 days||11.03||6%|
|Lynda Ky||10/10||920 days||9.85||4%|
|David R||10/10||959 days||7.93||2%|
|Thomas Hartley||10/10||959 days||7.93||2%|
|Jared Campbell||10/10||959 days||7.93||2%|
|Mike Stafford||10/10||959 days||7.93||2%|
|Sam Bateman||10/10||959 days||7.93||2%|
|Rebecka Ekman||9/10||959 days||7.93||2%|
|Sallie Gregory||10/10||1020 days||5.89||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Travellers Autobarn experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner. There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days.
The Travellers Autobarn experience has 2 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Travellers Autobarn experience has been adjusted for 33 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.