Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Riverjet NZ.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Riverjet NZ
Valid Reviews
65 Valid Reviews
The Riverjet NZ experience has a total of 66 reviews. There are 65 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 54 |
|
83% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
14% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
98.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Riverjet NZ valid reviews is 98.00% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
9 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 9 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 9 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
22% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
67% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
11% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Riverjet NZ face-to-face reviews is 91.11% and is based on 9 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
97.51%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Zink | 10/10 | 1307 days |  |
4.59 | 100% |
| Mark Rosenberg | 10/10 | 1486 days | 4.23 | 92% | |
| Josef Biller | 9/10 | 1694 days | |
3.83 | 83% |
| Peter Bateman | 10/10 | 1699 days | 3.82 | 83% | |
| Richard | 10/10 | 1730 days | 3.76 | 82% | |
| Anna Herd | 10/10 | 1822 days | 3.58 | 78% | |
| Rhonda McKinney | 10/10 | 1944 days | 3.34 | 73% | |
| Dan Vaughan | 8/10 | 2064 days | 2.95 | 64% | |
| Aida Azlan | 10/10 | 2095 days | 3.04 | 66% | |
| Lisa Aitken | 10/10 | 2187 days | 2.86 | 62% | |
| Joel Burken | 10/10 | 2309 days | 2.62 | 57% | |
| Laina Black | 9/10 | 2400 days | |
2.45 | 53% |
| Ricky White | 9/10 | 2400 days | |
2.45 | 53% |
| Rob Van Proemeren | 10/10 | 2429 days | 2.39 | 52% | |
| Phil & Tanya Thompson | 10/10 | 2460 days | 2.33 | 51% | |
| Karrie Stephens | 10/10 | 2460 days | 2.33 | 51% | |
| Jen Unsworth | 10/10 | 2491 days | 2.27 | 49% | |
| Yumiko Kawano | 10/10 | 2521 days | 2.21 | 48% | |
| Sabbsilein | 10/10 | 2552 days | 2.15 | 47% | |
| PeterCollins | 10/10 | 2735 days | 1.79 | 39% | |
| Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 2766 days | 1.73 | 38% | |
| Rebecca | 10/10 | 2766 days | 1.73 | 38% | |
| Cassandra Rakei | 10/10 | 2766 days | 1.73 | 38% | |
| Courtney Quintrell | 9/10 | 2773 days | |
1.72 | 37% |
| Katie Quantrell | 9/10 | 2794 days | 1.68 | 37% | |
| johannesivarsson | 10/10 | 2825 days | 1.61 | 35% | |
| jess | 10/10 | 2917 days | 1.43 | 31% | |
| BrendaC | 10/10 | 2917 days | 1.43 | 31% | |
| Jenn | 10/10 | 2917 days | 1.43 | 31% | |
| kirstyrose | 10/10 | 2917 days | 1.43 | 31% | |
| Sophie13 | 10/10 | 3039 days | 1.2 | 26% | |
| pbau | 10/10 | 3070 days | 1.14 | 25% | |
| TheHoon | 10/10 | 3100 days | 1.08 | 23% | |
| Lisa Carey | 9/10 | 3117 days | |
1.04 | 23% |
| dbr | 10/10 | 3131 days | 1.02 | 22% | |
| Asha | 10/10 | 3191 days | 0.9 | 20% | |
| shezabear | 10/10 | 3222 days | 0.84 | 18% | |
| rach_taylor | 10/10 | 3252 days | 0.78 | 17% | |
| lindahealey | 10/10 | 3252 days | 0.78 | 17% | |
| someone | 10/10 | 3405 days | 0.48 | 10% | |
| lisabraden | 10/10 | 3466 days | 0.36 | 8% | |
| T Chapman | 9/10 | 3520 days | |
0.25 | 6% |
| Lynnie | 9/10 | 3525 days | 0.24 | 5% | |
| smegs | 10/10 | 3556 days | 0.18 | 4% | |
| saramaria | 10/10 | 3617 days | 0.06 | 1% | |
| adfc416 | 10/10 | 3617 days | 0.06 | 1% | |
| UlsterOgre | 10/10 | 3617 days | 0.06 | 1% | |
| Fred | 10/10 | 3709 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| fayz | 10/10 | 3740 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| sheppy99 | 10/10 | 3740 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| fdrspins | 10/10 | 3801 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| beans44 | 10/10 | 3890 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Sue Pond | 10/10 | 4105 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Di Christie | 10/10 | 4135 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Towtz | 10/10 | 4166 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| ozpete | 10/10 | 4221 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| vanessa hateley | 10/10 | 4233 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| etb | 10/10 | 4244 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Philip | 8/10 | 4245 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| emma weir | 10/10 | 4253 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| stuart and sue barnetson | 10/10 | 4447 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Guilfords | 10/10 | 4448 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Peter Lonsdale | 10/10 | 4561 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Mie Toft Pedersen | 10/10 | 4592 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Amanda McCaig | 10/10 | 4592 days | 0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Riverjet NZ experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.18% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 70 days. However the Riverjet NZ experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Riverjet NZ experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.14% |
| 198 | -3.15% |
| 199 | -3.17% |
| 200 | -3.18% |
| 201 | -3.20% |
| 202 | -3.22% |
| 203 | -3.23% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
94%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.