Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Wellington isite Visitor Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
73 Valid Reviews
The Wellington isite Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 73 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 73 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 17 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.59% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Wellington isite Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 79.59% and is based on 73 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
69 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 73 valid reviews, the experience has 69 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 69 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Wellington isite Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 79.57% and is based on 69 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.18%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jamie Serieux | 9/10 | 3847 days | 100% |
| Chalie Dotesek | 10/10 | 3943 days | 80% |
| Matthias Bohmert | 9/10 | 4256 days | 11% |
| Marie Weber | 10/10 | 4264 days | 9% |
| Dominik Rehbaum | 9/10 | 4278 days | 6% |
| Lea Karl | 10/10 | 4307 days | 0% |
| Lagarde | 9/10 | 4562 days | 95% |
| Lola | 9/10 | 4563 days | 95% |
| Claudia de Winter | 7/10 | 4566 days | 89% |
| Mattias | 7/10 | 4566 days | 89% |
| Janek Belcher | 9/10 | 4572 days | 95% |
| Carolin Siegert | 10/10 | 4572 days | 96% |
| Jan Legein | 10/10 | 4572 days | 96% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 4573 days | 95% |
| Christina | 10/10 | 4577 days | 96% |
| Carla Oyarzun | 8/10 | 4577 days | 94% |
| Paolo Cases | 3/10 | 4577 days | 45% |
| Jenny Finch | 10/10 | 4591 days | 96% |
| Adele Grandguillot | 8/10 | 4592 days | 94% |
| Hadler | 2/10 | 4596 days | 35% |
| Christine Helleiner | 4/10 | 4596 days | 57% |
| Felicitas | 4/10 | 4596 days | 57% |
| Miriam Grund | 10/10 | 4599 days | 96% |
| Andreas Jung | 10/10 | 4602 days | 96% |
| Aurelien Noailly | 6/10 | 4603 days | 81% |
| Julie Ledanois | 8/10 | 4606 days | 94% |
| Pierre Gentile | 9/10 | 4606 days | 95% |
| Cindy Benayoum | 6/10 | 4606 days | 81% |
| Olivia | 7/10 | 4607 days | 89% |
| Jennifer Garner | 3/10 | 4608 days | 45% |
| Bernhard Fulterer | 6/10 | 4611 days | 81% |
| Klaus Petersen | 5/10 | 4613 days | 70% |
| Kristina | 8/10 | 4613 days | 94% |
| Joy Lambez | 10/10 | 4620 days | 96% |
| Vincent Schaeflier | 9/10 | 4621 days | 95% |
| Dan Lawson | 8/10 | 4635 days | 94% |
| Sina Sacranie | 7/10 | 4635 days | 89% |
| Arnaud Memay | 7/10 | 4647 days | 89% |
| Marine | 10/10 | 4651 days | 96% |
| Alexandra Kupper | 8/10 | 4657 days | 94% |
| Romina Bolz | 7/10 | 4659 days | 89% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 4659 days | 96% |
| Mike and Caroline | 4/10 | 4929 days | 57% |
| Annika Schmidt | 8/10 | 4934 days | 94% |
| Verena | 9/10 | 4951 days | 95% |
| Ben Martin | 8/10 | 4953 days | 94% |
| Cloarec Guillaume | 9/10 | 4955 days | 95% |
| Steen Rausmussen | 9/10 | 4958 days | 95% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4960 days | 95% |
| Hannah Lia-Isis Kubillus | 10/10 | 4964 days | 96% |
| Brendon Furney | 5/10 | 4964 days | 70% |
| Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4965 days | 96% |
| Jean Raisin | 8/10 | 4966 days | 94% |
| Janine Kohlgrueler | 8/10 | 4967 days | 94% |
| David Lee | 9/10 | 4972 days | 95% |
| Elodie and jo | 8/10 | 4983 days | 94% |
| Bene | 9/10 | 5036 days | 95% |
| Julien Bocherens | 10/10 | 5036 days | 96% |
| Lauret Stulemeyer | 5/10 | 5038 days | 70% |
| Moorman | 7/10 | 5041 days | 89% |
| Jan Sjoerdtje | 8/10 | 5041 days | 94% |
| Alexandra van den Brack | 6/10 | 5047 days | 81% |
| Marian | 8/10 | 5052 days | 94% |
| Ron | 8/10 | 5054 days | 94% |
| Reinhard Stahl | 9/10 | 5055 days | 95% |
| Reinhard Stahl | 9/10 | 5055 days | 95% |
| Doan | 8/10 | 5055 days | 94% |
| Milena Heinrich | 10/10 | 5056 days | 96% |
| Faassen | 7/10 | 5058 days | 89% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 5061 days | 94% |
| Julia Ramseier | 8/10 | 5062 days | 94% |
| Lisa Blake | 7/10 | 5066 days | 89% |
| Megan Child | 10/10 | 5067 days | 96% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Wellington isite Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.69% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.