Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Wellington isite Visitor Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Wellington isite Visitor Information Centre
Valid Reviews
73 Valid Reviews
The Wellington isite Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 73 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 73 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 17 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.59% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Wellington isite Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 79.59% and is based on 73 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
69 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 73 valid reviews, the experience has 69 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 69 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Wellington isite Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 79.57% and is based on 69 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
81.62%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jamie Serieux | 9/10 | 3666 days | 100% |
| Chalie Dotesek | 10/10 | 3762 days | 81% |
| Matthias Bohmert | 9/10 | 4075 days | 15% |
| Marie Weber | 10/10 | 4083 days | 14% |
| Dominik Rehbaum | 9/10 | 4097 days | 10% |
| Lea Karl | 10/10 | 4126 days | 4% |
| Lagarde | 9/10 | 4381 days | 58% |
| Lola | 9/10 | 4382 days | 58% |
| Claudia de Winter | 7/10 | 4385 days | 51% |
| Mattias | 7/10 | 4385 days | 51% |
| Janek Belcher | 9/10 | 4391 days | 58% |
| Carolin Siegert | 10/10 | 4391 days | 59% |
| Jan Legein | 10/10 | 4391 days | 59% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 4392 days | 58% |
| Christina | 10/10 | 4396 days | 59% |
| Carla Oyarzun | 8/10 | 4396 days | 57% |
| Paolo Cases | 3/10 | 4396 days | 10% |
| Jenny Finch | 10/10 | 4410 days | 59% |
| Adele Grandguillot | 8/10 | 4411 days | 57% |
| Hadler | 2/10 | 4415 days | 0% |
| Christine Helleiner | 4/10 | 4415 days | 21% |
| Felicitas | 4/10 | 4415 days | 21% |
| Miriam Grund | 10/10 | 4418 days | 59% |
| Andreas Jung | 10/10 | 4421 days | 59% |
| Aurelien Noailly | 6/10 | 4422 days | 44% |
| Julie Ledanois | 8/10 | 4425 days | 57% |
| Pierre Gentile | 9/10 | 4425 days | 58% |
| Cindy Benayoum | 6/10 | 4425 days | 44% |
| Olivia | 7/10 | 4426 days | 51% |
| Jennifer Garner | 3/10 | 4427 days | 10% |
| Bernhard Fulterer | 6/10 | 4430 days | 44% |
| Klaus Petersen | 5/10 | 4432 days | 33% |
| Kristina | 8/10 | 4432 days | 57% |
| Joy Lambez | 10/10 | 4439 days | 59% |
| Vincent Schaeflier | 9/10 | 4440 days | 58% |
| Dan Lawson | 8/10 | 4454 days | 57% |
| Sina Sacranie | 7/10 | 4454 days | 51% |
| Arnaud Memay | 7/10 | 4466 days | 51% |
| Marine | 10/10 | 4470 days | 59% |
| Alexandra Kupper | 8/10 | 4476 days | 57% |
| Romina Bolz | 7/10 | 4478 days | 51% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 4478 days | 59% |
| Mike and Caroline | 4/10 | 4748 days | 21% |
| Annika Schmidt | 8/10 | 4753 days | 57% |
| Verena | 9/10 | 4770 days | 58% |
| Ben Martin | 8/10 | 4772 days | 57% |
| Cloarec Guillaume | 9/10 | 4774 days | 58% |
| Steen Rausmussen | 9/10 | 4777 days | 58% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4779 days | 58% |
| Hannah Lia-Isis Kubillus | 10/10 | 4783 days | 59% |
| Brendon Furney | 5/10 | 4783 days | 33% |
| Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4784 days | 59% |
| Jean Raisin | 8/10 | 4785 days | 57% |
| Janine Kohlgrueler | 8/10 | 4786 days | 57% |
| David Lee | 9/10 | 4791 days | 58% |
| Elodie and jo | 8/10 | 4802 days | 57% |
| Bene | 9/10 | 4855 days | 58% |
| Julien Bocherens | 10/10 | 4855 days | 59% |
| Lauret Stulemeyer | 5/10 | 4857 days | 33% |
| Moorman | 7/10 | 4860 days | 51% |
| Jan Sjoerdtje | 8/10 | 4860 days | 57% |
| Alexandra van den Brack | 6/10 | 4866 days | 44% |
| Marian | 8/10 | 4871 days | 57% |
| Ron | 8/10 | 4873 days | 57% |
| Reinhard Stahl | 9/10 | 4874 days | 58% |
| Reinhard Stahl | 9/10 | 4874 days | 58% |
| Doan | 8/10 | 4874 days | 57% |
| Milena Heinrich | 10/10 | 4875 days | 59% |
| Faassen | 7/10 | 4877 days | 51% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 4880 days | 57% |
| Julia Ramseier | 8/10 | 4881 days | 57% |
| Lisa Blake | 7/10 | 4885 days | 51% |
| Megan Child | 10/10 | 4886 days | 59% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Wellington isite Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.58% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.