Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Albert Town Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
155 Valid Reviews
The Albert Town Camping Ground experience has a total of 158 reviews. There are 155 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 155 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 32 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 46 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 21 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 14 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
77.16% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Albert Town Camping Ground valid reviews is 77.16% and is based on 155 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
24 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 155 valid reviews, the experience has 24 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 24 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.42% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Albert Town Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 80.42% and is based on 24 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
78.28%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 8/10 | 58 days | 100% |
| Sol | 9/10 | 120 days | 100% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 150 days | 99% |
| James Bendun | 7/10 | 181 days | 93% |
| jo | 7/10 | 334 days | 89% |
| laurie M haysom | 9/10 | 334 days | 94% |
| Jacinta | 7/10 | 364 days | 88% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 364 days | 92% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 364 days | 94% |
| Marguerite | 10/10 | 395 days | 93% |
| Laurie | 8/10 | 395 days | 91% |
| Harry | 6/10 | 423 days | 79% |
| Frances | 4/10 | 423 days | 60% |
| Oscar | 5/10 | 454 days | 69% |
| Dora | 10/10 | 454 days | 90% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 485 days | 88% |
| Sandy Penny | 1/10 | 485 days | 36% |
| golden menu | 9/10 | 515 days | 86% |
| Jen | 10/10 | 515 days | 86% |
| Bart | 8/10 | 515 days | 85% |
| Ellie | 10/10 | 546 days | 85% |
| Aaron | 5/10 | 546 days | 64% |
| Keith Fitzgerald | 8/10 | 546 days | 83% |
| Helene | 3/10 | 760 days | 37% |
| Christophe | 7/10 | 760 days | 64% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 760 days | 68% |
| Madge | 7/10 | 820 days | 58% |
| max | 10/10 | 820 days | 63% |
| Jo | 8/10 | 820 days | 62% |
| Maren | 8/10 | 851 days | 59% |
| Agnete | 10/10 | 851 days | 60% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 8/10 | 881 days | 56% |
| SK camper | 1/10 | 881 days | 23% |
| Cholly | 7/10 | 912 days | 50% |
| Dylan | 7/10 | 973 days | 44% |
| Etoile Rose | 8/10 | 1065 days | 38% |
| Niff | 8/10 | 1095 days | 35% |
| Vicky | 7/10 | 1126 days | 31% |
| Julia | 5/10 | 1185 days | 22% |
| Vish | 6/10 | 1185 days | 25% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 1185 days | 28% |
| Charlotte Houël | 8/10 | 1185 days | 28% |
| Maxime Dube | 5/10 | 1185 days | 22% |
| Arnon Meshoulam | 6/10 | 1216 days | 23% |
| Hanna | 1/10 | 1216 days | 11% |
| Becky | 6/10 | 1246 days | 21% |
| Caolan Harvey | 8/10 | 1246 days | 24% |
| Lewis | 6/10 | 1460 days | 11% |
| James | 8/10 | 1491 days | 11% |
| Suzanne | 9/10 | 1795 days | 5% |
| Sierra | 3/10 | 1825 days | 3% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 1915 days | 5% |
| Sophia | 9/10 | 1946 days | 5% |
| Dan | 6/10 | 1976 days | 4% |
| Lydia | 10/10 | 1976 days | 5% |
| Cam | 8/10 | 2037 days | 5% |
| Linda | 7/10 | 2221 days | 4% |
| Maria | 6/10 | 2221 days | 4% |
| Antonio | 10/10 | 2250 days | 4% |
| Drew | 6/10 | 2281 days | 4% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2281 days | 4% |
| Jason | 9/10 | 2281 days | 4% |
| Lauren Smith | 10/10 | 2373 days | 4% |
| Libby | 7/10 | 2373 days | 4% |
| Ashley | 4/10 | 2434 days | 3% |
| Alfie | 9/10 | 2434 days | 4% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 2465 days | 4% |
| ScoutnIndi | 8/10 | 2495 days | 4% |
| Rebecca | 8/10 | 2556 days | 4% |
| JirkaR | 8/10 | 2587 days | 3% |
| Pat Burns | 7/10 | 2587 days | 3% |
| Marty | 4/10 | 2615 days | 2% |
| Warrick | 2/10 | 2615 days | 2% |
| Jeremy | 7/10 | 2646 days | 3% |
| Zoe | 7/10 | 2646 days | 3% |
| Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2646 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2677 days | 3% |
| Henk Sjon | 7/10 | 2677 days | 3% |
| Mitchell | 10/10 | 2706 days | 3% |
| Robin Norris | 10/10 | 2707 days | 3% |
| Sebaten | 9/10 | 2707 days | 3% |
| Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2738 days | 3% |
| Jonas R. | 7/10 | 2738 days | 3% |
| Andres | 9/10 | 2799 days | 3% |
| Laura Clay | 10/10 | 2952 days | 3% |
| Louis Goring-Morris | 5/10 | 2978 days | 1% |
| Meijerelske | 8/10 | 3017 days | 3% |
| Nadene Wheatley | 5/10 | 3068 days | 2% |
| Laura Delaney | 9/10 | 3089 days | 3% |
| Jenny Jaye | 8/10 | 3106 days | 2% |
| Calo Taranto | 7/10 | 3147 days | 2% |
| Alex Umbers | 8/10 | 3201 days | 2% |
| Judy Aspinall | 8/10 | 3271 days | 2% |
| Julie Yu | 10/10 | 3301 days | 2% |
| Emily Livesey | 8/10 | 3306 days | 2% |
| Jos Tolboom | 8/10 | 3371 days | 2% |
| Agnes Khyn | 9/10 | 3372 days | 2% |
| Madi | 8/10 | 3401 days | 1% |
| Shaylene Noble | 10/10 | 3472 days | 2% |
| Jessica Stokes | 9/10 | 3551 days | 2% |
| Lauren Roitman | 8/10 | 3620 days | 1% |
| Kathy Hart | 7/10 | 3620 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 8/10 | 3623 days | 1% |
| Connie Hopper | 8/10 | 3638 days | 1% |
| Anna Carins | 8/10 | 3647 days | 1% |
| Max | 8/10 | 3660 days | 1% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 8/10 | 3675 days | 1% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 8/10 | 3691 days | 1% |
| Berenike Wissinger | 10/10 | 3692 days | 1% |
| Stephan Friedrich | 7/10 | 3696 days | 1% |
| Lauren | 2/10 | 3710 days | 1% |
| Juste B | 9/10 | 3736 days | 1% |
| Jo Batt | 9/10 | 3777 days | 1% |
| Caro G | 9/10 | 3808 days | 1% |
| Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3816 days | 1% |
| Chantal Heemink | 9/10 | 3819 days | 1% |
| Mitchell Henderson | 7/10 | 3893 days | 1% |
| Wyklicky | 7/10 | 4021 days | 1% |
| Jess Rose | 9/10 | 4075 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Sanne | 8/10 | 4091 days | 1% |
| Maggie Tobar | 8/10 | 4092 days | 1% |
| Claude Nobs | 10/10 | 4095 days | 1% |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 4125 days | 0% |
| Cora and Franzi | 6/10 | 4129 days | 0% |
| Manuela | 8/10 | 4134 days | 0% |
| Sidney Stokkers | 6/10 | 4167 days | 0% |
| Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 6/10 | 4291 days | 0% |
| Anna Grafenstein | 9/10 | 4378 days | 0% |
| Karolina Gren | 9/10 | 4382 days | 1% |
| Katarina | 10/10 | 4384 days | 1% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4384 days | 1% |
| Simeon W | 6/10 | 4395 days | 1% |
| Svenja Trubenbach | 10/10 | 4397 days | 1% |
| Frederieke | 10/10 | 4397 days | 1% |
| Julian | 8/10 | 4397 days | 1% |
| Carolin Kettler | 9/10 | 4427 days | 1% |
| Marinette | 9/10 | 4428 days | 1% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 4428 days | 1% |
| Natalie Boehm | 9/10 | 4429 days | 1% |
| Jean Batiste Le meur | 4/10 | 4461 days | 0% |
| Shay Sofer | 8/10 | 4462 days | 1% |
| Doran Swartz | 8/10 | 4462 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 9/10 | 4472 days | 1% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 4475 days | 1% |
| Hannah | 9/10 | 4503 days | 1% |
| Julian Kemp | 9/10 | 4533 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 9/10 | 4564 days | 1% |
| kimbeveridge | 9/10 | 4747 days | 1% |
| Luise Fuchs | 10/10 | 4768 days | 1% |
| Judith & John Bishop | 8/10 | 5112 days | 1% |
| hammone | 9/10 | 5234 days | 1% |
| John Hensman | 6/10 | 5513 days | 1% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 6/10 | 5516 days | 1% |
| Rissa W | 8/10 | 5537 days | 1% |
| Lukas Blaauw | 9/10 | 5861 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Albert Town Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.50% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.