Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Albert Town Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
154 Valid Reviews
The Albert Town Camping Ground experience has a total of 157 reviews. There are 154 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 154 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 32 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 45 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 21 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 14 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
77.14% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Albert Town Camping Ground valid reviews is 77.14% and is based on 154 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
24 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 154 valid reviews, the experience has 24 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 24 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.42% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Albert Town Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 80.42% and is based on 24 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
77.97%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sol | 9/10 | 40 days | 100% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 70 days | 99% |
| James Bendun | 7/10 | 101 days | 94% |
| jo | 7/10 | 254 days | 91% |
| laurie M haysom | 9/10 | 254 days | 96% |
| Jacinta | 7/10 | 284 days | 90% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 284 days | 95% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 284 days | 96% |
| Marguerite | 10/10 | 315 days | 95% |
| Laurie | 8/10 | 315 days | 93% |
| Harry | 6/10 | 343 days | 81% |
| Frances | 4/10 | 343 days | 62% |
| Oscar | 5/10 | 374 days | 71% |
| Dora | 10/10 | 374 days | 93% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 405 days | 92% |
| Sandy Penny | 1/10 | 405 days | 37% |
| golden menu | 9/10 | 435 days | 89% |
| Jen | 10/10 | 435 days | 90% |
| Bart | 8/10 | 435 days | 88% |
| Ellie | 10/10 | 466 days | 89% |
| Aaron | 5/10 | 466 days | 68% |
| Keith Fitzgerald | 8/10 | 466 days | 87% |
| Helene | 3/10 | 680 days | 40% |
| Christophe | 7/10 | 680 days | 69% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 680 days | 74% |
| Madge | 7/10 | 740 days | 65% |
| max | 10/10 | 740 days | 69% |
| Jo | 8/10 | 740 days | 68% |
| Maren | 8/10 | 771 days | 65% |
| Agnete | 10/10 | 771 days | 67% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 8/10 | 801 days | 63% |
| SK camper | 1/10 | 801 days | 26% |
| Cholly | 7/10 | 832 days | 57% |
| Dylan | 7/10 | 893 days | 51% |
| Etoile Rose | 8/10 | 985 days | 45% |
| Niff | 8/10 | 1015 days | 42% |
| Vicky | 7/10 | 1046 days | 37% |
| Julia | 5/10 | 1105 days | 27% |
| Vish | 6/10 | 1105 days | 30% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 1105 days | 34% |
| Charlotte Houël | 8/10 | 1105 days | 34% |
| Maxime Dube | 5/10 | 1105 days | 27% |
| Arnon Meshoulam | 6/10 | 1136 days | 28% |
| Hanna | 1/10 | 1136 days | 13% |
| Becky | 6/10 | 1166 days | 26% |
| Caolan Harvey | 8/10 | 1166 days | 29% |
| Lewis | 6/10 | 1380 days | 14% |
| James | 8/10 | 1411 days | 15% |
| Suzanne | 9/10 | 1715 days | 6% |
| Sierra | 3/10 | 1745 days | 3% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 1835 days | 5% |
| Sophia | 9/10 | 1866 days | 5% |
| Dan | 6/10 | 1896 days | 4% |
| Lydia | 10/10 | 1896 days | 5% |
| Cam | 8/10 | 1957 days | 5% |
| Linda | 7/10 | 2141 days | 4% |
| Maria | 6/10 | 2141 days | 4% |
| Antonio | 10/10 | 2170 days | 4% |
| Drew | 6/10 | 2201 days | 4% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2201 days | 4% |
| Jason | 9/10 | 2201 days | 4% |
| Lauren Smith | 10/10 | 2293 days | 4% |
| Libby | 7/10 | 2293 days | 4% |
| Ashley | 4/10 | 2354 days | 3% |
| Alfie | 9/10 | 2354 days | 4% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 2385 days | 4% |
| ScoutnIndi | 8/10 | 2415 days | 4% |
| Rebecca | 8/10 | 2476 days | 4% |
| JirkaR | 8/10 | 2507 days | 4% |
| Pat Burns | 7/10 | 2507 days | 3% |
| Marty | 4/10 | 2535 days | 2% |
| Warrick | 2/10 | 2535 days | 2% |
| Jeremy | 7/10 | 2566 days | 3% |
| Zoe | 7/10 | 2566 days | 3% |
| Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2566 days | 4% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2597 days | 3% |
| Henk Sjon | 7/10 | 2597 days | 3% |
| Mitchell | 10/10 | 2626 days | 3% |
| Robin Norris | 10/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Sebaten | 9/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2658 days | 3% |
| Jonas R. | 7/10 | 2658 days | 3% |
| Andres | 9/10 | 2719 days | 3% |
| Laura Clay | 10/10 | 2872 days | 3% |
| Louis Goring-Morris | 5/10 | 2898 days | 1% |
| Meijerelske | 8/10 | 2937 days | 3% |
| Nadene Wheatley | 5/10 | 2988 days | 2% |
| Laura Delaney | 9/10 | 3009 days | 3% |
| Jenny Jaye | 8/10 | 3026 days | 3% |
| Calo Taranto | 7/10 | 3067 days | 2% |
| Alex Umbers | 8/10 | 3121 days | 2% |
| Judy Aspinall | 8/10 | 3191 days | 2% |
| Julie Yu | 10/10 | 3221 days | 2% |
| Emily Livesey | 8/10 | 3226 days | 2% |
| Jos Tolboom | 8/10 | 3291 days | 2% |
| Agnes Khyn | 9/10 | 3292 days | 2% |
| Madi | 8/10 | 3321 days | 1% |
| Shaylene Noble | 10/10 | 3392 days | 2% |
| Jessica Stokes | 9/10 | 3471 days | 2% |
| Lauren Roitman | 8/10 | 3540 days | 2% |
| Kathy Hart | 7/10 | 3540 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 8/10 | 3543 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 8/10 | 3558 days | 2% |
| Anna Carins | 8/10 | 3567 days | 2% |
| Max | 8/10 | 3580 days | 1% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 8/10 | 3595 days | 1% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 8/10 | 3611 days | 1% |
| Berenike Wissinger | 10/10 | 3612 days | 1% |
| Stephan Friedrich | 7/10 | 3616 days | 1% |
| Lauren | 2/10 | 3630 days | 1% |
| Juste B | 9/10 | 3656 days | 1% |
| Jo Batt | 9/10 | 3697 days | 1% |
| Caro G | 9/10 | 3728 days | 1% |
| Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3736 days | 1% |
| Chantal Heemink | 9/10 | 3739 days | 1% |
| Mitchell Henderson | 7/10 | 3813 days | 1% |
| Wyklicky | 7/10 | 3941 days | 1% |
| Jess Rose | 9/10 | 3995 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Sanne | 8/10 | 4011 days | 1% |
| Maggie Tobar | 8/10 | 4012 days | 1% |
| Claude Nobs | 10/10 | 4015 days | 1% |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 4045 days | 1% |
| Cora and Franzi | 6/10 | 4049 days | 0% |
| Manuela | 8/10 | 4054 days | 0% |
| Sidney Stokkers | 6/10 | 4087 days | 0% |
| Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 6/10 | 4211 days | 0% |
| Anna Grafenstein | 9/10 | 4298 days | 0% |
| Karolina Gren | 9/10 | 4302 days | 0% |
| Katarina | 10/10 | 4304 days | 0% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4304 days | 0% |
| Simeon W | 6/10 | 4315 days | 0% |
| Svenja Trubenbach | 10/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
| Frederieke | 10/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
| Julian | 8/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
| Carolin Kettler | 9/10 | 4347 days | 0% |
| Marinette | 9/10 | 4348 days | 0% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 4348 days | 0% |
| Natalie Boehm | 9/10 | 4349 days | 0% |
| Jean Batiste Le meur | 4/10 | 4381 days | 0% |
| Shay Sofer | 8/10 | 4382 days | 1% |
| Doran Swartz | 8/10 | 4382 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 9/10 | 4392 days | 1% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 4395 days | 1% |
| Hannah | 9/10 | 4423 days | 1% |
| Julian Kemp | 9/10 | 4453 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 9/10 | 4484 days | 1% |
| kimbeveridge | 9/10 | 4667 days | 1% |
| Luise Fuchs | 10/10 | 4688 days | 1% |
| Judith & John Bishop | 8/10 | 5032 days | 1% |
| hammone | 9/10 | 5154 days | 1% |
| John Hensman | 6/10 | 5433 days | 1% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 6/10 | 5436 days | 1% |
| Rissa W | 8/10 | 5457 days | 1% |
| Lukas Blaauw | 9/10 | 5781 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Albert Town Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.60% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.