Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Albert Town Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
154 Valid Reviews
The Albert Town Camping Ground experience has a total of 157 reviews. There are 154 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 154 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 32 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 45 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 21 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 14 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
77.14% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Albert Town Camping Ground valid reviews is 77.14% and is based on 154 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
24 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 154 valid reviews, the experience has 24 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 24 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.42% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Albert Town Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 80.42% and is based on 24 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
78.09%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sol | 9/10 | 79 days | 100% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 109 days | 99% |
| James Bendun | 7/10 | 140 days | 93% |
| jo | 7/10 | 293 days | 90% |
| laurie M haysom | 9/10 | 293 days | 95% |
| Jacinta | 7/10 | 323 days | 89% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 323 days | 93% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 323 days | 95% |
| Marguerite | 10/10 | 354 days | 94% |
| Laurie | 8/10 | 354 days | 92% |
| Harry | 6/10 | 382 days | 80% |
| Frances | 4/10 | 382 days | 61% |
| Oscar | 5/10 | 413 days | 70% |
| Dora | 10/10 | 413 days | 91% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 444 days | 90% |
| Sandy Penny | 1/10 | 444 days | 36% |
| golden menu | 9/10 | 474 days | 87% |
| Jen | 10/10 | 474 days | 88% |
| Bart | 8/10 | 474 days | 87% |
| Ellie | 10/10 | 505 days | 87% |
| Aaron | 5/10 | 505 days | 66% |
| Keith Fitzgerald | 8/10 | 505 days | 85% |
| Helene | 3/10 | 719 days | 39% |
| Christophe | 7/10 | 719 days | 67% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 719 days | 71% |
| Madge | 7/10 | 779 days | 62% |
| max | 10/10 | 779 days | 66% |
| Jo | 8/10 | 779 days | 65% |
| Maren | 8/10 | 810 days | 62% |
| Agnete | 10/10 | 810 days | 63% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 8/10 | 840 days | 59% |
| SK camper | 1/10 | 840 days | 25% |
| Cholly | 7/10 | 871 days | 53% |
| Dylan | 7/10 | 932 days | 48% |
| Etoile Rose | 8/10 | 1024 days | 41% |
| Niff | 8/10 | 1054 days | 39% |
| Vicky | 7/10 | 1085 days | 34% |
| Julia | 5/10 | 1144 days | 24% |
| Vish | 6/10 | 1144 days | 27% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 1144 days | 31% |
| Charlotte Houël | 8/10 | 1144 days | 31% |
| Maxime Dube | 5/10 | 1144 days | 24% |
| Arnon Meshoulam | 6/10 | 1175 days | 25% |
| Hanna | 1/10 | 1175 days | 12% |
| Becky | 6/10 | 1205 days | 23% |
| Caolan Harvey | 8/10 | 1205 days | 27% |
| Lewis | 6/10 | 1419 days | 13% |
| James | 8/10 | 1450 days | 13% |
| Suzanne | 9/10 | 1754 days | 5% |
| Sierra | 3/10 | 1784 days | 3% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 1874 days | 5% |
| Sophia | 9/10 | 1905 days | 5% |
| Dan | 6/10 | 1935 days | 4% |
| Lydia | 10/10 | 1935 days | 5% |
| Cam | 8/10 | 1996 days | 5% |
| Linda | 7/10 | 2180 days | 4% |
| Maria | 6/10 | 2180 days | 4% |
| Antonio | 10/10 | 2209 days | 4% |
| Drew | 6/10 | 2240 days | 4% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2240 days | 4% |
| Jason | 9/10 | 2240 days | 4% |
| Lauren Smith | 10/10 | 2332 days | 4% |
| Libby | 7/10 | 2332 days | 4% |
| Ashley | 4/10 | 2393 days | 3% |
| Alfie | 9/10 | 2393 days | 4% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 2424 days | 4% |
| ScoutnIndi | 8/10 | 2454 days | 4% |
| Rebecca | 8/10 | 2515 days | 4% |
| JirkaR | 8/10 | 2546 days | 4% |
| Pat Burns | 7/10 | 2546 days | 3% |
| Marty | 4/10 | 2574 days | 2% |
| Warrick | 2/10 | 2574 days | 2% |
| Jeremy | 7/10 | 2605 days | 3% |
| Zoe | 7/10 | 2605 days | 3% |
| Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2605 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2636 days | 3% |
| Henk Sjon | 7/10 | 2636 days | 3% |
| Mitchell | 10/10 | 2666 days | 3% |
| Robin Norris | 10/10 | 2666 days | 3% |
| Sebaten | 9/10 | 2666 days | 3% |
| Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2697 days | 3% |
| Jonas R. | 7/10 | 2697 days | 3% |
| Andres | 9/10 | 2758 days | 3% |
| Laura Clay | 10/10 | 2911 days | 3% |
| Louis Goring-Morris | 5/10 | 2937 days | 1% |
| Meijerelske | 8/10 | 2976 days | 3% |
| Nadene Wheatley | 5/10 | 3027 days | 2% |
| Laura Delaney | 9/10 | 3048 days | 3% |
| Jenny Jaye | 8/10 | 3065 days | 3% |
| Calo Taranto | 7/10 | 3106 days | 2% |
| Alex Umbers | 8/10 | 3160 days | 2% |
| Judy Aspinall | 8/10 | 3230 days | 2% |
| Julie Yu | 10/10 | 3260 days | 2% |
| Emily Livesey | 8/10 | 3265 days | 2% |
| Jos Tolboom | 8/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
| Agnes Khyn | 9/10 | 3331 days | 2% |
| Madi | 8/10 | 3360 days | 1% |
| Shaylene Noble | 10/10 | 3431 days | 2% |
| Jessica Stokes | 9/10 | 3510 days | 2% |
| Lauren Roitman | 8/10 | 3579 days | 2% |
| Kathy Hart | 7/10 | 3580 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 8/10 | 3582 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 8/10 | 3597 days | 1% |
| Anna Carins | 8/10 | 3606 days | 1% |
| Max | 8/10 | 3619 days | 1% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 8/10 | 3634 days | 1% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 8/10 | 3650 days | 1% |
| Berenike Wissinger | 10/10 | 3651 days | 1% |
| Stephan Friedrich | 7/10 | 3655 days | 1% |
| Lauren | 2/10 | 3669 days | 1% |
| Juste B | 9/10 | 3695 days | 1% |
| Jo Batt | 9/10 | 3736 days | 1% |
| Caro G | 9/10 | 3767 days | 1% |
| Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3775 days | 1% |
| Chantal Heemink | 9/10 | 3778 days | 1% |
| Mitchell Henderson | 7/10 | 3852 days | 1% |
| Wyklicky | 7/10 | 3980 days | 1% |
| Jess Rose | 9/10 | 4035 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Sanne | 8/10 | 4050 days | 1% |
| Maggie Tobar | 8/10 | 4051 days | 1% |
| Claude Nobs | 10/10 | 4054 days | 1% |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 4084 days | 1% |
| Cora and Franzi | 6/10 | 4088 days | 0% |
| Manuela | 8/10 | 4093 days | 0% |
| Sidney Stokkers | 6/10 | 4127 days | 0% |
| Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 6/10 | 4250 days | 0% |
| Anna Grafenstein | 9/10 | 4337 days | 0% |
| Karolina Gren | 9/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
| Katarina | 10/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Simeon W | 6/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| Svenja Trubenbach | 10/10 | 4356 days | 0% |
| Frederieke | 10/10 | 4356 days | 0% |
| Julian | 8/10 | 4356 days | 0% |
| Carolin Kettler | 9/10 | 4386 days | 1% |
| Marinette | 9/10 | 4387 days | 1% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 4387 days | 1% |
| Natalie Boehm | 9/10 | 4388 days | 1% |
| Jean Batiste Le meur | 4/10 | 4420 days | 0% |
| Shay Sofer | 8/10 | 4421 days | 1% |
| Doran Swartz | 8/10 | 4421 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 9/10 | 4431 days | 1% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 4434 days | 1% |
| Hannah | 9/10 | 4462 days | 1% |
| Julian Kemp | 9/10 | 4492 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 9/10 | 4523 days | 1% |
| kimbeveridge | 9/10 | 4706 days | 1% |
| Luise Fuchs | 10/10 | 4727 days | 1% |
| Judith & John Bishop | 8/10 | 5071 days | 1% |
| hammone | 9/10 | 5193 days | 1% |
| John Hensman | 6/10 | 5472 days | 1% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 6/10 | 5475 days | 1% |
| Rissa W | 8/10 | 5496 days | 1% |
| Lukas Blaauw | 9/10 | 5820 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Albert Town Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.56% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.