Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Albert Town Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
155 Valid Reviews
The Albert Town Camping Ground experience has a total of 158 reviews. There are 155 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 155 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 32 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 46 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 21 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 14 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
77.16% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Albert Town Camping Ground valid reviews is 77.16% and is based on 155 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
24 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 155 valid reviews, the experience has 24 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 24 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.42% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Albert Town Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 80.42% and is based on 24 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
78.21%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 8/10 | 38 days | 99% |
| Sol | 9/10 | 100 days | 100% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 130 days | 99% |
| James Bendun | 7/10 | 161 days | 93% |
| jo | 7/10 | 314 days | 89% |
| laurie M haysom | 9/10 | 314 days | 95% |
| Jacinta | 7/10 | 344 days | 88% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 344 days | 93% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 344 days | 95% |
| Marguerite | 10/10 | 375 days | 93% |
| Laurie | 8/10 | 375 days | 92% |
| Harry | 6/10 | 403 days | 79% |
| Frances | 4/10 | 403 days | 60% |
| Oscar | 5/10 | 434 days | 69% |
| Dora | 10/10 | 434 days | 91% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 465 days | 89% |
| Sandy Penny | 1/10 | 465 days | 36% |
| golden menu | 9/10 | 495 days | 87% |
| Jen | 10/10 | 495 days | 87% |
| Bart | 8/10 | 495 days | 86% |
| Ellie | 10/10 | 526 days | 86% |
| Aaron | 5/10 | 526 days | 65% |
| Keith Fitzgerald | 8/10 | 526 days | 84% |
| Helene | 3/10 | 740 days | 38% |
| Christophe | 7/10 | 740 days | 65% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 740 days | 70% |
| Madge | 7/10 | 800 days | 60% |
| max | 10/10 | 800 days | 64% |
| Jo | 8/10 | 800 days | 63% |
| Maren | 8/10 | 831 days | 60% |
| Agnete | 10/10 | 831 days | 62% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 8/10 | 861 days | 57% |
| SK camper | 1/10 | 861 days | 24% |
| Cholly | 7/10 | 892 days | 52% |
| Dylan | 7/10 | 953 days | 46% |
| Etoile Rose | 8/10 | 1045 days | 40% |
| Niff | 8/10 | 1075 days | 37% |
| Vicky | 7/10 | 1106 days | 33% |
| Julia | 5/10 | 1165 days | 23% |
| Vish | 6/10 | 1165 days | 26% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 1165 days | 30% |
| Charlotte Houël | 8/10 | 1165 days | 30% |
| Maxime Dube | 5/10 | 1165 days | 23% |
| Arnon Meshoulam | 6/10 | 1196 days | 24% |
| Hanna | 1/10 | 1196 days | 11% |
| Becky | 6/10 | 1226 days | 22% |
| Caolan Harvey | 8/10 | 1226 days | 25% |
| Lewis | 6/10 | 1440 days | 12% |
| James | 8/10 | 1471 days | 12% |
| Suzanne | 9/10 | 1775 days | 5% |
| Sierra | 3/10 | 1805 days | 3% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 1895 days | 5% |
| Sophia | 9/10 | 1926 days | 5% |
| Dan | 6/10 | 1956 days | 4% |
| Lydia | 10/10 | 1956 days | 5% |
| Cam | 8/10 | 2017 days | 5% |
| Linda | 7/10 | 2201 days | 4% |
| Maria | 6/10 | 2201 days | 4% |
| Antonio | 10/10 | 2230 days | 4% |
| Drew | 6/10 | 2261 days | 4% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2261 days | 4% |
| Jason | 9/10 | 2261 days | 4% |
| Lauren Smith | 10/10 | 2353 days | 4% |
| Libby | 7/10 | 2353 days | 4% |
| Ashley | 4/10 | 2414 days | 3% |
| Alfie | 9/10 | 2414 days | 4% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 2445 days | 4% |
| ScoutnIndi | 8/10 | 2475 days | 4% |
| Rebecca | 8/10 | 2536 days | 4% |
| JirkaR | 8/10 | 2567 days | 4% |
| Pat Burns | 7/10 | 2567 days | 3% |
| Marty | 4/10 | 2595 days | 2% |
| Warrick | 2/10 | 2595 days | 2% |
| Jeremy | 7/10 | 2626 days | 3% |
| Zoe | 7/10 | 2626 days | 3% |
| Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2626 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
| Henk Sjon | 7/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
| Mitchell | 10/10 | 2687 days | 3% |
| Robin Norris | 10/10 | 2687 days | 3% |
| Sebaten | 9/10 | 2687 days | 3% |
| Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
| Jonas R. | 7/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
| Andres | 9/10 | 2779 days | 3% |
| Laura Clay | 10/10 | 2932 days | 3% |
| Louis Goring-Morris | 5/10 | 2958 days | 1% |
| Meijerelske | 8/10 | 2997 days | 3% |
| Nadene Wheatley | 5/10 | 3048 days | 2% |
| Laura Delaney | 9/10 | 3069 days | 3% |
| Jenny Jaye | 8/10 | 3086 days | 3% |
| Calo Taranto | 7/10 | 3127 days | 2% |
| Alex Umbers | 8/10 | 3181 days | 2% |
| Judy Aspinall | 8/10 | 3251 days | 2% |
| Julie Yu | 10/10 | 3281 days | 2% |
| Emily Livesey | 8/10 | 3286 days | 2% |
| Jos Tolboom | 8/10 | 3351 days | 2% |
| Agnes Khyn | 9/10 | 3352 days | 2% |
| Madi | 8/10 | 3381 days | 1% |
| Shaylene Noble | 10/10 | 3452 days | 2% |
| Jessica Stokes | 9/10 | 3531 days | 2% |
| Lauren Roitman | 8/10 | 3600 days | 2% |
| Kathy Hart | 7/10 | 3601 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 8/10 | 3603 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 8/10 | 3618 days | 1% |
| Anna Carins | 8/10 | 3627 days | 1% |
| Max | 8/10 | 3640 days | 1% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 8/10 | 3655 days | 1% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 8/10 | 3671 days | 1% |
| Berenike Wissinger | 10/10 | 3672 days | 1% |
| Stephan Friedrich | 7/10 | 3676 days | 1% |
| Lauren | 2/10 | 3690 days | 1% |
| Juste B | 9/10 | 3716 days | 1% |
| Jo Batt | 9/10 | 3757 days | 1% |
| Caro G | 9/10 | 3788 days | 1% |
| Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3796 days | 1% |
| Chantal Heemink | 9/10 | 3799 days | 1% |
| Mitchell Henderson | 7/10 | 3873 days | 1% |
| Wyklicky | 7/10 | 4001 days | 1% |
| Jess Rose | 9/10 | 4056 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Sanne | 8/10 | 4071 days | 1% |
| Maggie Tobar | 8/10 | 4072 days | 1% |
| Claude Nobs | 10/10 | 4075 days | 1% |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 4105 days | 1% |
| Cora and Franzi | 6/10 | 4109 days | 0% |
| Manuela | 8/10 | 4114 days | 0% |
| Sidney Stokkers | 6/10 | 4148 days | 0% |
| Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 6/10 | 4271 days | 0% |
| Anna Grafenstein | 9/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
| Karolina Gren | 9/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
| Katarina | 10/10 | 4364 days | 0% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4364 days | 0% |
| Simeon W | 6/10 | 4375 days | 0% |
| Svenja Trubenbach | 10/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
| Frederieke | 10/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
| Julian | 8/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
| Carolin Kettler | 9/10 | 4407 days | 1% |
| Marinette | 9/10 | 4408 days | 1% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 4408 days | 1% |
| Natalie Boehm | 9/10 | 4409 days | 1% |
| Jean Batiste Le meur | 4/10 | 4441 days | 0% |
| Shay Sofer | 8/10 | 4442 days | 1% |
| Doran Swartz | 8/10 | 4442 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 9/10 | 4452 days | 1% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 4455 days | 1% |
| Hannah | 9/10 | 4483 days | 1% |
| Julian Kemp | 9/10 | 4513 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 9/10 | 4544 days | 1% |
| kimbeveridge | 9/10 | 4727 days | 1% |
| Luise Fuchs | 10/10 | 4748 days | 1% |
| Judith & John Bishop | 8/10 | 5092 days | 1% |
| hammone | 9/10 | 5214 days | 1% |
| John Hensman | 6/10 | 5493 days | 1% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 6/10 | 5496 days | 1% |
| Rissa W | 8/10 | 5517 days | 1% |
| Lukas Blaauw | 9/10 | 5841 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Albert Town Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.53% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.