Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Horahora Domain.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
80 Valid Reviews
The Horahora Domain experience has a total of 80 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 80 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 25 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.25% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Horahora Domain valid reviews is 86.25% and is based on 80 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
4 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 80 valid reviews, the experience has 4 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 4 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 2 |
|
50% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
50% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Horahora Domain face-to-face reviews is 85.00% and is based on 4 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
85.68%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsty | 8/10 | 111 days | 100% |
| Nicky | 7/10 | 111 days | 95% |
| Laura Knox | 9/10 | 264 days | 98% |
| Marine | 8/10 | 356 days | 93% |
| Josh Harrop | 7/10 | 356 days | 89% |
| Kathy from Australia | 10/10 | 415 days | 93% |
| Hans | 7/10 | 446 days | 85% |
| Chloe | 7/10 | 476 days | 83% |
| Walvins | 9/10 | 507 days | 87% |
| Newcamper | 8/10 | 507 days | 86% |
| Toni | 9/10 | 507 days | 87% |
| Sj | 9/10 | 507 days | 87% |
| EI | 9/10 | 507 days | 87% |
| RedSparr0w | 10/10 | 568 days | 84% |
| cclou | 8/10 | 660 days | 76% |
| PimC | 8/10 | 781 days | 66% |
| Ann | 9/10 | 781 days | 66% |
| Nadja | 10/10 | 781 days | 67% |
| tortuga | 8/10 | 812 days | 63% |
| Joaco periplo | 9/10 | 812 days | 63% |
| Mandy | 10/10 | 812 days | 64% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 812 days | 63% |
| HIMANSHU CHAUDHARY | 9/10 | 965 days | 48% |
| Max | 9/10 | 1026 days | 42% |
| James | 9/10 | 1026 days | 42% |
| Chloe | 8/10 | 1056 days | 39% |
| Mikaela | 8/10 | 1087 days | 36% |
| Stefany | 10/10 | 1177 days | 30% |
| Jo and Neipa | 9/10 | 1177 days | 29% |
| GRANMA | 8/10 | 1207 days | 27% |
| Archie O. | 10/10 | 1238 days | 25% |
| Tamya Da Silva | 8/10 | 1238 days | 25% |
| Cara Johnston | 9/10 | 1268 days | 23% |
| Richard | 8/10 | 1299 days | 21% |
| Leyna H. | 9/10 | 1391 days | 16% |
| Ashleigh | 10/10 | 1817 days | 5% |
| Rollmaesta | 10/10 | 1845 days | 5% |
| Hamsome | 10/10 | 1907 days | 5% |
| Keith robertson | 8/10 | 1937 days | 5% |
| Karen | 10/10 | 1998 days | 5% |
| DaniZ | 10/10 | 2303 days | 4% |
| Martin Hansen | 7/10 | 2334 days | 4% |
| Mike Sc | 9/10 | 2334 days | 4% |
| Dennis Rijbroek | 9/10 | 2364 days | 4% |
| Julian | 8/10 | 2395 days | 4% |
| Charlotte | 8/10 | 2426 days | 4% |
| Debs | 7/10 | 2426 days | 4% |
| David Hart | 8/10 | 2548 days | 4% |
| Clare & Gerry | 9/10 | 2548 days | 4% |
| Aparna | 9/10 | 2576 days | 4% |
| Matthias | 8/10 | 2576 days | 3% |
| Dirk Taubner | 10/10 | 2638 days | 3% |
| Andy Bond | 9/10 | 2641 days | 3% |
| Edward Lowe | 9/10 | 2699 days | 3% |
| The Weathersons | 8/10 | 2926 days | 2% |
| Tiara Flewelling | 9/10 | 2969 days | 3% |
| Leanne Taylor-Smith | 6/10 | 2991 days | 2% |
| Shawn Hoelsch | 10/10 | 2995 days | 3% |
| Vander Plancke Julien | 8/10 | 3025 days | 3% |
| Victoria Smith | 10/10 | 3123 days | 2% |
| Anita Wilkie | 10/10 | 3336 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 3336 days | 2% |
| Neil Warnock | 9/10 | 3367 days | 2% |
| Heidi Maurice | 9/10 | 3380 days | 2% |
| Daryl and Chris | 10/10 | 3402 days | 2% |
| Alan Eason | 5/10 | 3417 days | 1% |
| Stuart Morgan | 10/10 | 3433 days | 2% |
| Frans Van Schie | 8/10 | 3445 days | 2% |
| Robert Hanbidge | 10/10 | 3445 days | 2% |
| Kimmo Kiiski | 8/10 | 3591 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3611 days | 1% |
| Bridget Brebner | 8/10 | 3678 days | 1% |
| Alison Cary | 9/10 | 3763 days | 1% |
| Andrew Jones | 7/10 | 4008 days | 1% |
| Ed Hill | 8/10 | 4056 days | 1% |
| Manuela | 9/10 | 4095 days | 0% |
| Justin globalgauthiers.blogspot.com | 7/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Christina Perez | 9/10 | 4349 days | 0% |
| Konrad Ullmann | 8/10 | 4380 days | 1% |
| N smith | 8/10 | 4647 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Horahora Domain does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.69% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.