Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Sandboarding.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
43 Valid Reviews
The Sandboarding experience has a total of 45 reviews. There are 43 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 43 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Sandboarding valid reviews is 84.88% and is based on 43 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
35 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 43 valid reviews, the experience has 35 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 35 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Sandboarding face-to-face reviews is 82.86% and is based on 35 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Jennie Tollerton||10/10||110 days||100%|
|Shannon Malcolm||8/10||231 days||77%|
|Soeren Buchheister||9/10||457 days||67%|
|Ferdinand Hirsch||9/10||457 days||67%|
|Nina Rittmann||10/10||673 days||26%|
|Lisa Haedrich||8/10||695 days||29%|
|Heike Schreiber||9/10||695 days||29%|
|Kristina Breitwieser||8/10||699 days||29%|
|Jeanne Minor||9/10||709 days||27%|
|Michael Regensburger||9/10||717 days||26%|
|Clement Delrue||8/10||731 days||25%|
|Jonas Weidner||8/10||736 days||24%|
|Ben Schieber||6/10||738 days||24%|
|Max Mustermann||9/10||743 days||23%|
|Anna Bouteloup||9/10||751 days||22%|
|Pauline Chailand||8/10||751 days||22%|
|Martina Cervenkova||10/10||754 days||22%|
|Roland Fischer||7/10||756 days||22%|
|Daniel Roedel||10/10||757 days||18%|
|Johannes Marold||7/10||764 days||21%|
|Anat Yossef||9/10||764 days||21%|
|Raviv Regev||10/10||790 days||15%|
|Justin Kechanski||9/10||794 days||18%|
|Selma Krap||9/10||812 days||16%|
|Elisabeth Ringswandl||10/10||1073 days||3%|
|Thomas Haslbeck||10/10||1073 days||3%|
|Manuela Opprecht||8/10||1124 days||2%|
|Cornelia Witte||6/10||1461 days||2%|
|Marvin Koever||9/10||1464 days||2%|
|Audrey Ripoche||7/10||1791 days||2%|
|Herman Plasman||8/10||2286 days||1%|
|Jennifer Holloway||9/10||2520 days||1%|
|Carl and Angela Rapihana||8/10||3024 days||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Sandboarding does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.