Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Sandboarding.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
45 Valid Reviews
The Sandboarding experience has a total of 47 reviews. There are 45 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Sandboarding valid reviews is 85.56% and is based on 45 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
35 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 45 valid reviews, the experience has 35 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 35 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Sandboarding face-to-face reviews is 82.86% and is based on 35 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Cindy Blignaut||10/10||1005 days||6.28||27%|
|Jennie Tollerton||10/10||1088 days||5.01||21%|
|Shannon Malcolm||8/10||1210 days||4.54||19%|
|Soeren Buchheister||9/10||1435 days||4.33||18%|
|Ferdinand Hirsch||9/10||1435 days||4.33||18%|
|Nina Rittmann||10/10||1651 days||3.91||17%|
|Lisa Haedrich||8/10||1673 days||3.68||16%|
|Heike Schreiber||9/10||1673 days||3.87||16%|
|Kristina Breitwieser||8/10||1677 days||3.67||16%|
|Jeanne Minor||9/10||1687 days||3.84||16%|
|Michael Regensburger||9/10||1695 days||3.83||16%|
|Clement Delrue||8/10||1709 days||3.61||15%|
|Jonas Weidner||8/10||1714 days||3.6||15%|
|Ben Schieber||6/10||1716 days||3.14||13%|
|Max Mustermann||9/10||1721 days||3.77||16%|
|Anna Bouteloup||9/10||1729 days||3.76||16%|
|Pauline Chailand||8/10||1729 days||3.57||15%|
|Martina Cervenkova||10/10||1732 days||3.75||16%|
|Roland Fischer||7/10||1734 days||3.41||14%|
|Daniel Roedel||10/10||1735 days||3.75||16%|
|Johannes Marold||7/10||1742 days||3.4||14%|
|Anat Yossef||9/10||1742 days||3.73||16%|
|Raviv Regev||10/10||1768 days||3.68||16%|
|Justin Kechanski||9/10||1772 days||3.68||16%|
|Selma Krap||9/10||1790 days||3.64||15%|
|Elisabeth Ringswandl||10/10||2051 days||3.13||13%|
|Thomas Haslbeck||10/10||2051 days||3.13||13%|
|Manuela Opprecht||8/10||2102 days||2.88||12%|
|Cornelia Witte||6/10||2439 days||1.97||8%|
|Marvin Koever||9/10||2442 days||2.36||10%|
|Audrey Ripoche||7/10||2769 days||1.57||7%|
|Herman Plasman||8/10||3264 days||0.72||3%|
|Jennifer Holloway||9/10||3498 days||0.3||1%|
|Carl and Angela Rapihana||8/10||4002 days||0.0||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Sandboarding does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.