Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Road Runner Rentals.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Road Runner Rentals
Valid Reviews
128 Valid Reviews
The Road Runner Rentals experience has a total of 144 reviews. There are 128 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 16 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 128 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 51 |
|
40% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 8 |
|
6% |
| 1/10 | 11 |
|
9% |
78.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Road Runner Rentals valid reviews is 78.05% and is based on 128 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
12 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 128 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
17% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
70.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Road Runner Rentals face-to-face reviews is 70.00% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
85.27%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yvonne | 9/10 | 289 days | 100% |
| Brian and Anne | 10/10 | 2115 days | 4% |
| Serwan | 1/10 | 2115 days | 2% |
| Eire1988 | 1/10 | 2175 days | 2% |
| clemens | 10/10 | 2175 days | 4% |
| Dominique | 10/10 | 2175 days | 4% |
| Christine Bourdette | 10/10 | 2205 days | 4% |
| Kyle Palframan | 10/10 | 2206 days | 4% |
| Olaf | 9/10 | 2206 days | 4% |
| Chris Herring | 10/10 | 2236 days | 4% |
| Monika | 10/10 | 2236 days | 4% |
| Koulikovski Jordan | 8/10 | 2236 days | 4% |
| Alana | 10/10 | 2450 days | 4% |
| Laura Jane | 10/10 | 2570 days | 4% |
| Clothilde Charron | 10/10 | 2601 days | 3% |
| Laura Dyne | 8/10 | 2845 days | 3% |
| Lucas keenan | 1/10 | 2846 days | 1% |
| Emmanuel HAulon | 7/10 | 2873 days | 3% |
| Victor Miccolis | 7/10 | 2873 days | 3% |
| yoannperrault@hotmail.com | 1/10 | 2874 days | 1% |
| Barbara Nakai | 9/10 | 2903 days | 3% |
| Ida Fran | 2/10 | 2904 days | 1% |
| Paul Reeves | 10/10 | 2904 days | 3% |
| Jacques Kemp | 7/10 | 2904 days | 3% |
| Laura Smith | 9/10 | 2905 days | 3% |
| Peter Bollen | 2/10 | 2936 days | 1% |
| nico dewaele | 7/10 | 2965 days | 3% |
| Damien Parker | 2/10 | 3179 days | 1% |
| Patricia Wright | 10/10 | 3179 days | 2% |
| Alberto Meseguer | 1/10 | 3179 days | 1% |
| Wayne Walker | 8/10 | 3210 days | 2% |
| Lucie Bultez | 2/10 | 3210 days | 1% |
| Patti Rossie | 2/10 | 3210 days | 1% |
| Stephanie Mills | 1/10 | 3210 days | 1% |
| Gilbert Keiser | 7/10 | 3216 days | 1% |
| Matti Picus | 7/10 | 3225 days | 1% |
| Han Li | 9/10 | 3227 days | 1% |
| Karen Regehr-Smith | 8/10 | 3238 days | 2% |
| Bo Zhou | 8/10 | 3238 days | 2% |
| Conrad Rossouw | 10/10 | 3238 days | 2% |
| Karen Mcnosh | 10/10 | 3269 days | 2% |
| ellen scully | 8/10 | 3269 days | 2% |
| Ellie Morrison | 2/10 | 3269 days | 1% |
| MARTA FLORES | 8/10 | 3269 days | 2% |
| Michael Kaus | 5/10 | 3270 days | 2% |
| Einar Wergeland-Jenssen | 2/10 | 3300 days | 1% |
| celine gries | 10/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
| Kayla | 6/10 | 3305 days | 1% |
| Anouk Goemans | 9/10 | 3305 days | 1% |
| Paul Gallagher | 10/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
| Bram Hoonhout | 10/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
| Gerard Lane | 1/10 | 3361 days | 1% |
| Phil Duggan | 1/10 | 3391 days | 1% |
| Susan Boyton | 10/10 | 3575 days | 1% |
| Normand Latour | 9/10 | 3575 days | 1% |
| Christine Singman Serio | 8/10 | 3604 days | 1% |
| herbert van wijngaarden | 9/10 | 3604 days | 1% |
| Bettina Castell | 2/10 | 3605 days | 1% |
| Patrick Tram Garrett | 10/10 | 3635 days | 1% |
| Judith K. | 9/10 | 3635 days | 1% |
| J | 10/10 | 3635 days | 1% |
| Chet Wah | 10/10 | 3636 days | 1% |
| Mauro Scali | 7/10 | 3636 days | 1% |
| matt west | 7/10 | 3636 days | 1% |
| oly steel | 6/10 | 3636 days | 1% |
| Chantal Beeli | 8/10 | 3666 days | 1% |
| Maya Adriani | 10/10 | 3666 days | 1% |
| Terry Lui | 8/10 | 3667 days | 1% |
| Scott Edward | 1/10 | 3696 days | 0% |
| Robin Duris | 10/10 | 3696 days | 1% |
| Haitao Huang | 10/10 | 3696 days | 1% |
| Colin Jones | 9/10 | 3696 days | 1% |
| Miquel Fabro | 9/10 | 3697 days | 1% |
| Ashlie Willett | 10/10 | 3728 days | 1% |
| Felix Riether | 9/10 | 3728 days | 1% |
| matt smith | 10/10 | 3849 days | 1% |
| Felix Graf | 10/10 | 3880 days | 1% |
| Linden E | 10/10 | 3910 days | 1% |
| Niki Pearce | 8/10 | 3910 days | 1% |
| Don Wiljamaa | 9/10 | 3941 days | 1% |
| Terhi Rajala | 1/10 | 3941 days | 0% |
| stephen boston | 10/10 | 3941 days | 1% |
| Freek Dix | 10/10 | 3941 days | 1% |
| Lydia Lennox | 10/10 | 3941 days | 1% |
| Christopher Hobbs | 9/10 | 3941 days | 1% |
| oded braverman | 8/10 | 3941 days | 1% |
| Joost Donkers | 8/10 | 3942 days | 1% |
| leslie page | 10/10 | 3969 days | 1% |
| Emily Minty | 10/10 | 3969 days | 1% |
| Denis Fitzsimons | 8/10 | 3969 days | 1% |
| Liz and Alan Weathers | 7/10 | 3979 days | 0% |
| Ian Smith | 1/10 | 4000 days | 0% |
| Michal Valovic | 9/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Anna Kammann | 10/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Katharina Rebstock | 8/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Jean Shears | 8/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Charles Xu | 9/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Mohamed Shahabdeen | 10/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| will jennings | 10/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| yann zebiche | 10/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Albert Mari | 9/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Ally Cook | 7/10 | 4027 days | 0% |
| Tammie Fraser | 10/10 | 4061 days | 0% |
| Karen Jiang | 9/10 | 4061 days | 0% |
| Abby Wallwork | 10/10 | 4092 days | 0% |
| Hannah Purser | 10/10 | 4153 days | 0% |
| Nicole | 10/10 | 4153 days | 0% |
| Catherine Bew | 10/10 | 4245 days | 0% |
| Kelly Murray | 10/10 | 4276 days | 0% |
| christoph martensson | 9/10 | 4397 days | 1% |
| keith murray | 10/10 | 4427 days | 1% |
| Renee | 8/10 | 4487 days | 1% |
| Bradly Beukes | 10/10 | 4549 days | 1% |
| tracy | 9/10 | 4610 days | 1% |
| Schumi Döpfer | 10/10 | 4641 days | 1% |
| Janina Hoffmann | 5/10 | 4667 days | 0% |
| Ally | 9/10 | 4672 days | 1% |
| 53V0 | 10/10 | 4975 days | 1% |
| stellmaris | 10/10 | 4975 days | 1% |
| petevir | 10/10 | 5006 days | 1% |
| Simon Rawlinson | 9/10 | 5018 days | 0% |
| Rocco Christian | 3/10 | 5060 days | 0% |
| Jessica Lane | 9/10 | 5063 days | 0% |
| RomaChoolun | 9/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
| Kolja Chromow | 10/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
| lee05 | 9/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
| Leon Burgess | 10/10 | 5462 days | 1% |
| Jon | 6/10 | 6208 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Road Runner Rentals experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-5.54% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 42 days. The Road Runner Rentals experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
| Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| 0 | -3.00% |
| 1 | -2.63% |
| 2 | -1.50% |
| 3 | -0.38% |
| 4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Road Runner Rentals experience has been adjusted for 125 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 122 | -2.48% |
| 123 | -2.50% |
| 124 | -2.52% |
| 125 | -2.54% |
| 126 | -2.56% |
| 127 | -2.58% |
| 128 | -2.60% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
3.07% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Onboarding Rating
This rating is about customer service and camper availability. It measures aspects of the customer journey that are often missing from online ratings. It includes performances based on: pre-booking communication, product availability and responsiveness to customer enquiries.
All metrics come from actual customer interactions.
Details are calculated daily from statistics over several years and merged with the score derived from customer reviews - to then form the final ranking score.
Final Ranking Score
77%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.