Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Banz Tours and Rentals Ltd.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Banz Tours and Rentals Ltd
Valid Reviews
54 Valid Reviews
The Banz Tours and Rentals Ltd experience has a total of 54 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 44 |
|
81% |
| 9/10 | 3 |
|
6% |
| 8/10 | 5 |
|
9% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
96.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Banz Tours and Rentals Ltd valid reviews is 96.11% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
10 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 54 valid reviews, the experience has 10 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 10 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
40% |
| 9/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
40% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
10% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Banz Tours and Rentals Ltd face-to-face reviews is 84.00% and is based on 10 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
97.99%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birte Eckey | 10/10 | 338 days | 100% |
| Mats Thulin | 10/10 | 673 days | 79% |
| Stefan | 10/10 | 765 days | 71% |
| Crystal Brierly | 8/10 | 1161 days | 32% |
| Rico | 10/10 | 2134 days | 5% |
| Ulrich and Brigitte | 10/10 | 2165 days | 5% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 2196 days | 5% |
| Linda and Max | 10/10 | 2226 days | 4% |
| Benjamin Cooper | 9/10 | 2226 days | 4% |
| Renate | 9/10 | 2226 days | 4% |
| Richard Cormie | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| Karin Schedlbauer | 10/10 | 2440 days | 4% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
| Stefan & Freddy | 10/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
| Ann-Katrin Klüß | 10/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
| Tom Broeckaert | 10/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
| Thomas Zahn | 10/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
| Konstantin Nergert | 10/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
| michael brisson | 10/10 | 2499 days | 4% |
| Giovanna Pavanato | 10/10 | 2499 days | 4% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 2499 days | 4% |
| Rob F | 10/10 | 2530 days | 4% |
| Heidelinde, Fiona and Paul | 10/10 | 2561 days | 4% |
| Roland Licha | 10/10 | 2561 days | 4% |
| cyril gregoire | 10/10 | 2591 days | 4% |
| Monika Koch and Pietro Pettena | 10/10 | 2591 days | 4% |
| William Nolan | 10/10 | 2591 days | 4% |
| Humphrey | 10/10 | 2622 days | 4% |
| Fabian Rich | 10/10 | 2987 days | 3% |
| David g. from British Columbia, Canada | 10/10 | 2987 days | 3% |
| Daniela van den Heuvel | 10/10 | 3170 days | 2% |
| Günter Happel | 10/10 | 3595 days | 2% |
| Irina Eichwald | 10/10 | 3626 days | 2% |
| Alasdair Handley | 10/10 | 3932 days | 1% |
| Nico Nico | 10/10 | 3960 days | 1% |
| Andy Maguire | 10/10 | 4052 days | 1% |
| Guilhem Lenoire | 10/10 | 4266 days | 0% |
| Helma Druyken | 8/10 | 4295 days | 0% |
| Julian Bauer | 10/10 | 4297 days | 0% |
| Joann | 10/10 | 4325 days | 0% |
| Debora Grusler | 10/10 | 4326 days | 0% |
| Stefan Bucher | 9/10 | 4356 days | 0% |
| Christof Simon | 10/10 | 4356 days | 0% |
| Steffen | 10/10 | 4631 days | 1% |
| Heiko Gantenberg | 10/10 | 4721 days | 1% |
| Bucher | 7/10 | 4737 days | 1% |
| Hans Duerst | 10/10 | 5033 days | 1% |
| Monika & Roger | 8/10 | 5069 days | 1% |
| Sinloft | 10/10 | 5362 days | 1% |
| Todd Pang | 10/10 | 5377 days | 1% |
| Christian Pflegi | 10/10 | 5381 days | 1% |
| Madlen & Inna | 8/10 | 5420 days | 1% |
| Stephanie Steiner | 5/10 | 5852 days | 0% |
| Solveig Mosinski | 8/10 | 5860 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Banz Tours and Rentals Ltd experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-7.07% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 42 days. The Banz Tours and Rentals Ltd experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
| Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| 0 | -3.00% |
| 1 | -2.63% |
| 2 | -1.50% |
| 3 | -0.38% |
| 4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Banz Tours and Rentals Ltd experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.88% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Onboarding Rating
This rating is about customer service and camper availability. It measures aspects of the customer journey that are often missing from online ratings. It includes performances based on: pre-booking communication, product availability and responsiveness to customer enquiries.
All metrics come from actual customer interactions.
Details are calculated daily from statistics over several years and merged with the score derived from customer reviews - to then form the final ranking score.
Final Ranking Score
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.