Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kuirau Park walkway.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Kuirau Park walkway

Valid Reviews

54 Valid Reviews

The Kuirau Park walkway experience has a total of 55 reviews. There are 54 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
13%
9/10 14
26%
8/10 13
24%
7/10 16
30%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

80.56% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway valid reviews is 80.56% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

50 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 54 valid reviews, the experience has 50 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
14%
9/10 14
28%
8/10 11
22%
7/10 14
28%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

81.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway face-to-face reviews is 81.00% and is based on 50 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

80.54%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
C J B 8/10 3042 days 100%
Jeny Smolders 7/10 3262 days 79%
Micha Kuster 7/10 3580 days 55%
Holger Worner 8/10 3585 days 58%
Sebastian 8/10 3596 days 57%
Evelyn Rloeh 6/10 3602 days 49%
Jeanne 8/10 3626 days 55%
Bernd Muller 7/10 3813 days 38%
Camilla Geert 7/10 3845 days 36%
Gerbrand Smidt 10/10 3848 days 38%
Marka Okrutny 7/10 3849 days 35%
Sarah Dorsett 7/10 3856 days 35%
Andre 10/10 3857 days 38%
Selina You 8/10 3952 days 30%
Celia Nowak 9/10 4264 days 5%
Paul de Bruijn 7/10 4331 days 0%
Christina Perez 6/10 4571 days 31%
Konrad Ullmann 5/10 4602 days 27%
Laurene 9/10 4616 days 36%
Claudia 9/10 4633 days 36%
Katharina 9/10 4948 days 36%
Sarah Horn 10/10 4949 days 37%
Steen Rausmussen 10/10 4959 days 37%
Ralph and Leonie 8/10 5043 days 36%
Fam von Hattem 9/10 5063 days 36%
Huw Davies 6/10 5301 days 31%
Florion Scheffel 9/10 5331 days 36%
Danielle 10/10 5338 days 37%
M Neuman 7/10 5347 days 34%
Frank Waskikowski 10/10 5349 days 37%
Anika 7/10 5354 days 34%
Meagan Bradder 9/10 5400 days 36%
Steve Neilson 9/10 5424 days 36%
A Jones 9/10 5664 days 36%
Walker 7/10 5664 days 34%
Knapen 7/10 5672 days 34%
Margaret Lally 8/10 5674 days 36%
Birgette Lindved 9/10 5681 days 36%
Wheeler 8/10 5681 days 36%
Richard Bennink 9/10 5682 days 36%
Mr Stanley and Miss Christy 9/10 5682 days 36%
Marty Fey 9/10 5683 days 36%
Fam de Kruyf 7/10 5689 days 34%
Katharina Dierkes 8/10 5707 days 36%
Seifert 10/10 5712 days 37%
Michelle Booty 8/10 5719 days 36%
Andrew Hammond 7/10 5843 days 34%
Mette 7/10 6052 days 34%
Malcolm Glad 8/10 6070 days 36%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 8/10 6077 days 36%
A Southwood 9/10 6079 days 36%
Thomas 7/10 6154 days 34%
Ann Riley 8/10 6159 days 36%
Tracy & Peter Cassidy 7/10 6186 days 34%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kuirau Park walkway does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.85% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

83%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.