G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kuirau Park walkway.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Kuirau Park walkway
Valid Reviews
54 Valid Reviews
The Kuirau Park walkway experience has a total of 54 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
13% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 16 |
|
30% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.56% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway valid reviews is 80.56% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
50 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 54 valid reviews, the experience has 50 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
14% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 14 |
|
28% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway face-to-face reviews is 81.00% and is based on 50 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
80.04%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| C J B | 8/10 | 2515 days | 100% |
| Jeny Smolders | 7/10 | 2734 days | 81% |
| Micha Kuster | 7/10 | 3052 days | 63% |
| Holger Worner | 8/10 | 3057 days | 67% |
| Sebastian | 8/10 | 3068 days | 66% |
| Evelyn Rloeh | 6/10 | 3074 days | 56% |
| Jeanne | 8/10 | 3098 days | 64% |
| Bernd Muller | 7/10 | 3286 days | 49% |
| Camilla Geert | 7/10 | 3317 days | 47% |
| Gerbrand Smidt | 10/10 | 3320 days | 52% |
| Marka Okrutny | 7/10 | 3321 days | 47% |
| Sarah Dorsett | 7/10 | 3328 days | 47% |
| Andre | 10/10 | 3329 days | 51% |
| Selina You | 8/10 | 3424 days | 44% |
| Celia Nowak | 9/10 | 3736 days | 25% |
| Paul de Bruijn | 7/10 | 3803 days | 19% |
| Christina Perez | 6/10 | 4043 days | 4% |
| Konrad Ullmann | 5/10 | 4074 days | 0% |
| Laurene | 9/10 | 4088 days | 4% |
| Claudia | 9/10 | 4105 days | 2% |
| Katharina | 9/10 | 4420 days | 17% |
| Sarah Horn | 10/10 | 4421 days | 17% |
| Steen Rausmussen | 10/10 | 4431 days | 17% |
| Ralph and Leonie | 8/10 | 4515 days | 17% |
| Fam von Hattem | 9/10 | 4535 days | 17% |
| Huw Davies | 6/10 | 4773 days | 13% |
| Florion Scheffel | 9/10 | 4803 days | 17% |
| Danielle | 10/10 | 4810 days | 17% |
| M Neuman | 7/10 | 4819 days | 15% |
| Frank Waskikowski | 10/10 | 4821 days | 17% |
| Anika | 7/10 | 4826 days | 15% |
| Meagan Bradder | 9/10 | 4872 days | 17% |
| Steve Neilson | 9/10 | 4896 days | 17% |
| A Jones | 9/10 | 5136 days | 17% |
| Walker | 7/10 | 5136 days | 15% |
| Knapen | 7/10 | 5144 days | 15% |
| Margaret Lally | 8/10 | 5146 days | 17% |
| Birgette Lindved | 9/10 | 5153 days | 17% |
| Wheeler | 8/10 | 5153 days | 17% |
| Richard Bennink | 9/10 | 5154 days | 17% |
| Mr Stanley and Miss Christy | 9/10 | 5154 days | 17% |
| Marty Fey | 9/10 | 5155 days | 17% |
| Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 5161 days | 15% |
| Katharina Dierkes | 8/10 | 5179 days | 17% |
| Seifert | 10/10 | 5184 days | 17% |
| Michelle Booty | 8/10 | 5191 days | 17% |
| Andrew Hammond | 7/10 | 5315 days | 15% |
| Mette | 7/10 | 5524 days | 15% |
| Malcolm Glad | 8/10 | 5542 days | 17% |
| Martÿn Steenvoorden | 8/10 | 5549 days | 17% |
| A Southwood | 9/10 | 5551 days | 17% |
| Thomas | 7/10 | 5626 days | 15% |
| Ann Riley | 8/10 | 5631 days | 17% |
| Tracy & Peter Cassidy | 7/10 | 5658 days | 15% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kuirau Park walkway does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.99% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.