Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kuirau Park walkway.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Kuirau Park walkway

Valid Reviews

54 Valid Reviews

The Kuirau Park walkway experience has a total of 55 reviews. There are 54 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
13%
9/10 14
26%
8/10 13
24%
7/10 16
30%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

80.56% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway valid reviews is 80.56% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

50 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 54 valid reviews, the experience has 50 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
14%
9/10 14
28%
8/10 11
22%
7/10 14
28%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

81.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway face-to-face reviews is 81.00% and is based on 50 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

80.45%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
C J B 8/10 2758 days 100%
Jeny Smolders 7/10 2977 days 82%
Micha Kuster 7/10 3295 days 63%
Holger Worner 8/10 3300 days 66%
Sebastian 8/10 3311 days 65%
Evelyn Rloeh 6/10 3317 days 57%
Jeanne 8/10 3341 days 63%
Bernd Muller 7/10 3529 days 49%
Camilla Geert 7/10 3560 days 47%
Gerbrand Smidt 10/10 3563 days 50%
Marka Okrutny 7/10 3564 days 47%
Sarah Dorsett 7/10 3571 days 46%
Andre 10/10 3572 days 50%
Selina You 8/10 3667 days 43%
Celia Nowak 9/10 3979 days 23%
Paul de Bruijn 7/10 4046 days 18%
Christina Perez 6/10 4286 days 3%
Konrad Ullmann 5/10 4317 days 1%
Laurene 9/10 4331 days 1%
Claudia 9/10 4348 days 0%
Katharina 9/10 4663 days 30%
Sarah Horn 10/10 4664 days 31%
Steen Rausmussen 10/10 4674 days 31%
Ralph and Leonie 8/10 4758 days 30%
Fam von Hattem 9/10 4778 days 30%
Huw Davies 6/10 5016 days 26%
Florion Scheffel 9/10 5046 days 30%
Danielle 10/10 5053 days 31%
M Neuman 7/10 5062 days 28%
Frank Waskikowski 10/10 5064 days 31%
Anika 7/10 5069 days 28%
Meagan Bradder 9/10 5115 days 30%
Steve Neilson 9/10 5139 days 30%
A Jones 9/10 5379 days 30%
Walker 7/10 5379 days 28%
Knapen 7/10 5387 days 28%
Margaret Lally 8/10 5389 days 30%
Birgette Lindved 9/10 5396 days 30%
Wheeler 8/10 5396 days 30%
Richard Bennink 9/10 5397 days 30%
Mr Stanley and Miss Christy 9/10 5397 days 30%
Marty Fey 9/10 5398 days 30%
Fam de Kruyf 7/10 5404 days 28%
Katharina Dierkes 8/10 5422 days 30%
Seifert 10/10 5427 days 31%
Michelle Booty 8/10 5434 days 30%
Andrew Hammond 7/10 5558 days 28%
Mette 7/10 5767 days 28%
Malcolm Glad 8/10 5785 days 30%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 8/10 5792 days 30%
A Southwood 9/10 5794 days 30%
Thomas 7/10 5869 days 28%
Ann Riley 8/10 5874 days 30%
Tracy & Peter Cassidy 7/10 5901 days 28%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kuirau Park walkway does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.88% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

83%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.