G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kuirau Park walkway.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Kuirau Park walkway

Valid Reviews

54 Valid Reviews

The Kuirau Park walkway experience has a total of 55 reviews. There are 54 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
13%
9/10 14
26%
8/10 13
24%
7/10 16
30%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

80.56% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway valid reviews is 80.56% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

50 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 54 valid reviews, the experience has 50 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
14%
9/10 14
28%
8/10 11
22%
7/10 14
28%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

81.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway face-to-face reviews is 81.00% and is based on 50 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

80.43%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
C J B 8/10 2962 days 100%
Jeny Smolders 7/10 3181 days 78%
Micha Kuster 7/10 3499 days 55%
Holger Worner 8/10 3504 days 58%
Sebastian 8/10 3515 days 57%
Evelyn Rloeh 6/10 3521 days 49%
Jeanne 8/10 3545 days 55%
Bernd Muller 7/10 3733 days 38%
Camilla Geert 7/10 3764 days 36%
Gerbrand Smidt 10/10 3767 days 39%
Marka Okrutny 7/10 3768 days 35%
Sarah Dorsett 7/10 3775 days 35%
Andre 10/10 3776 days 38%
Selina You 8/10 3871 days 30%
Celia Nowak 9/10 4183 days 6%
Paul de Bruijn 7/10 4250 days 0%
Christina Perez 6/10 4490 days 25%
Konrad Ullmann 5/10 4521 days 21%
Laurene 9/10 4535 days 30%
Claudia 9/10 4552 days 30%
Katharina 9/10 4867 days 30%
Sarah Horn 10/10 4868 days 31%
Steen Rausmussen 10/10 4878 days 31%
Ralph and Leonie 8/10 4962 days 30%
Fam von Hattem 9/10 4982 days 30%
Huw Davies 6/10 5220 days 25%
Florion Scheffel 9/10 5250 days 30%
Danielle 10/10 5257 days 31%
M Neuman 7/10 5266 days 28%
Frank Waskikowski 10/10 5268 days 31%
Anika 7/10 5273 days 28%
Meagan Bradder 9/10 5319 days 30%
Steve Neilson 9/10 5343 days 30%
A Jones 9/10 5583 days 30%
Walker 7/10 5583 days 28%
Knapen 7/10 5591 days 28%
Margaret Lally 8/10 5593 days 30%
Birgette Lindved 9/10 5600 days 30%
Wheeler 8/10 5600 days 30%
Richard Bennink 9/10 5601 days 30%
Mr Stanley and Miss Christy 9/10 5601 days 30%
Marty Fey 9/10 5602 days 30%
Fam de Kruyf 7/10 5608 days 28%
Katharina Dierkes 8/10 5626 days 30%
Seifert 10/10 5631 days 31%
Michelle Booty 8/10 5638 days 30%
Andrew Hammond 7/10 5762 days 28%
Mette 7/10 5971 days 28%
Malcolm Glad 8/10 5989 days 30%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 8/10 5996 days 30%
A Southwood 9/10 5998 days 30%
Thomas 7/10 6073 days 28%
Ann Riley 8/10 6078 days 30%
Tracy & Peter Cassidy 7/10 6105 days 28%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kuirau Park walkway does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.88% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

83%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.