Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kuirau Park walkway.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Kuirau Park walkway

Valid Reviews

54 Valid Reviews

The Kuirau Park walkway experience has a total of 55 reviews. There are 54 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
13%
9/10 14
26%
8/10 13
24%
7/10 16
30%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

80.56% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway valid reviews is 80.56% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

50 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 54 valid reviews, the experience has 50 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
14%
9/10 14
28%
8/10 11
22%
7/10 14
28%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

81.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway face-to-face reviews is 81.00% and is based on 50 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

80.39%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
C J B 8/10 2725 days 100%
Jeny Smolders 7/10 2944 days 82%
Micha Kuster 7/10 3262 days 63%
Holger Worner 8/10 3267 days 66%
Sebastian 8/10 3278 days 65%
Evelyn Rloeh 6/10 3284 days 56%
Jeanne 8/10 3308 days 63%
Bernd Muller 7/10 3496 days 49%
Camilla Geert 7/10 3527 days 47%
Gerbrand Smidt 10/10 3530 days 50%
Marka Okrutny 7/10 3531 days 47%
Sarah Dorsett 7/10 3538 days 46%
Andre 10/10 3539 days 50%
Selina You 8/10 3634 days 43%
Celia Nowak 9/10 3946 days 23%
Paul de Bruijn 7/10 4013 days 18%
Christina Perez 6/10 4253 days 3%
Konrad Ullmann 5/10 4284 days 1%
Laurene 9/10 4298 days 1%
Claudia 9/10 4315 days 0%
Katharina 9/10 4630 days 28%
Sarah Horn 10/10 4631 days 29%
Steen Rausmussen 10/10 4641 days 29%
Ralph and Leonie 8/10 4725 days 28%
Fam von Hattem 9/10 4745 days 28%
Huw Davies 6/10 4983 days 24%
Florion Scheffel 9/10 5013 days 28%
Danielle 10/10 5020 days 29%
M Neuman 7/10 5029 days 26%
Frank Waskikowski 10/10 5031 days 29%
Anika 7/10 5036 days 26%
Meagan Bradder 9/10 5082 days 28%
Steve Neilson 9/10 5106 days 28%
A Jones 9/10 5346 days 28%
Walker 7/10 5346 days 26%
Knapen 7/10 5354 days 26%
Margaret Lally 8/10 5356 days 28%
Birgette Lindved 9/10 5363 days 28%
Wheeler 8/10 5363 days 28%
Richard Bennink 9/10 5364 days 28%
Mr Stanley and Miss Christy 9/10 5364 days 28%
Marty Fey 9/10 5365 days 28%
Fam de Kruyf 7/10 5371 days 26%
Katharina Dierkes 8/10 5389 days 28%
Seifert 10/10 5394 days 29%
Michelle Booty 8/10 5401 days 28%
Andrew Hammond 7/10 5525 days 26%
Mette 7/10 5734 days 26%
Malcolm Glad 8/10 5752 days 28%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 8/10 5759 days 28%
A Southwood 9/10 5761 days 28%
Thomas 7/10 5836 days 26%
Ann Riley 8/10 5841 days 28%
Tracy & Peter Cassidy 7/10 5868 days 26%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kuirau Park walkway does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.89% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

83%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.