Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kuirau Park walkway.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Kuirau Park walkway

Valid Reviews

54 Valid Reviews

The Kuirau Park walkway experience has a total of 55 reviews. There are 54 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
13%
9/10 14
26%
8/10 13
24%
7/10 16
30%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

80.56% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway valid reviews is 80.56% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

50 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 54 valid reviews, the experience has 50 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
14%
9/10 14
28%
8/10 11
22%
7/10 14
28%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

81.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway face-to-face reviews is 81.00% and is based on 50 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

80.52%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
C J B 8/10 2821 days 100%
Jeny Smolders 7/10 3040 days 81%
Micha Kuster 7/10 3358 days 62%
Holger Worner 8/10 3363 days 65%
Sebastian 8/10 3374 days 64%
Evelyn Rloeh 6/10 3380 days 56%
Jeanne 8/10 3404 days 62%
Bernd Muller 7/10 3592 days 47%
Camilla Geert 7/10 3623 days 45%
Gerbrand Smidt 10/10 3626 days 48%
Marka Okrutny 7/10 3627 days 45%
Sarah Dorsett 7/10 3634 days 44%
Andre 10/10 3635 days 48%
Selina You 8/10 3730 days 41%
Celia Nowak 9/10 4042 days 21%
Paul de Bruijn 7/10 4109 days 15%
Christina Perez 6/10 4349 days 0%
Konrad Ullmann 5/10 4380 days 24%
Laurene 9/10 4394 days 32%
Claudia 9/10 4411 days 32%
Katharina 9/10 4726 days 32%
Sarah Horn 10/10 4727 days 32%
Steen Rausmussen 10/10 4737 days 32%
Ralph and Leonie 8/10 4821 days 32%
Fam von Hattem 9/10 4841 days 32%
Huw Davies 6/10 5079 days 28%
Florion Scheffel 9/10 5109 days 32%
Danielle 10/10 5116 days 32%
M Neuman 7/10 5125 days 30%
Frank Waskikowski 10/10 5127 days 32%
Anika 7/10 5132 days 30%
Meagan Bradder 9/10 5178 days 32%
Steve Neilson 9/10 5202 days 32%
A Jones 9/10 5442 days 32%
Walker 7/10 5442 days 30%
Knapen 7/10 5450 days 30%
Margaret Lally 8/10 5452 days 32%
Birgette Lindved 9/10 5459 days 32%
Wheeler 8/10 5459 days 32%
Richard Bennink 9/10 5460 days 32%
Mr Stanley and Miss Christy 9/10 5460 days 32%
Marty Fey 9/10 5461 days 32%
Fam de Kruyf 7/10 5467 days 30%
Katharina Dierkes 8/10 5485 days 32%
Seifert 10/10 5490 days 32%
Michelle Booty 8/10 5497 days 32%
Andrew Hammond 7/10 5621 days 30%
Mette 7/10 5830 days 30%
Malcolm Glad 8/10 5848 days 32%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 8/10 5855 days 32%
A Southwood 9/10 5857 days 32%
Thomas 7/10 5932 days 30%
Ann Riley 8/10 5937 days 32%
Tracy & Peter Cassidy 7/10 5964 days 30%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kuirau Park walkway does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.86% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

84%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.