Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kuirau Park walkway.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
54 Valid Reviews
The Kuirau Park walkway experience has a total of 54 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway valid reviews is 80.56% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
50 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 54 valid reviews, the experience has 50 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kuirau Park walkway face-to-face reviews is 81.00% and is based on 50 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|C J B||8/10||480 days||60.32||100%|
|Jeny Smolders||7/10||699 days||27.16||44%|
|Micha Kuster||7/10||1017 days||5.43||8%|
|Holger Worner||8/10||1022 days||5.55||8%|
|Evelyn Rloeh||6/10||1039 days||4.56||7%|
|Bernd Muller||7/10||1251 days||4.31||6%|
|Camilla Geert||7/10||1282 days||4.26||6%|
|Gerbrand Smidt||10/10||1285 days||4.67||7%|
|Marka Okrutny||7/10||1286 days||4.25||6%|
|Sarah Dorsett||7/10||1293 days||4.24||6%|
|Selina You||8/10||1389 days||4.27||6%|
|Celia Nowak||9/10||1701 days||3.96||6%|
|Paul de Bruijn||7/10||1768 days||3.5||5%|
|Christina Perez||6/10||2008 days||2.85||4%|
|Konrad Ullmann||5/10||2039 days||2.74||4%|
|Sarah Horn||10/10||2386 days||2.79||4%|
|Steen Rausmussen||10/10||2396 days||2.77||4%|
|Ralph and Leonie||8/10||2480 days||2.5||3%|
|Fam von Hattem||9/10||2500 days||2.59||3%|
|Huw Davies||6/10||2738 days||1.81||2%|
|Florion Scheffel||9/10||2768 days||2.14||3%|
|M Neuman||7/10||2784 days||1.92||2%|
|Frank Waskikowski||10/10||2786 days||2.1||3%|
|Meagan Bradder||9/10||2837 days||2.02||2%|
|Steve Neilson||9/10||2861 days||1.98||2%|
|A Jones||9/10||3101 days||1.57||2%|
|Margaret Lally||8/10||3111 days||1.47||1%|
|Birgette Lindved||9/10||3118 days||1.54||2%|
|Richard Bennink||9/10||3119 days||1.53||2%|
|Mr Stanley and Miss Christy||9/10||3119 days||1.53||2%|
|Marty Fey||9/10||3120 days||1.53||2%|
|Fam de Kruyf||7/10||3126 days||1.39||1%|
|Katharina Dierkes||8/10||3144 days||1.42||1%|
|Michelle Booty||8/10||3156 days||1.4||1%|
|Andrew Hammond||7/10||3280 days||1.15||1%|
|Malcolm Glad||8/10||3507 days||0.83||0%|
|Martÿn Steenvoorden||8/10||3514 days||0.81||0%|
|A Southwood||9/10||3516 days||0.85||0%|
|Ann Riley||8/10||3596 days||0.68||0%|
|Tracy & Peter Cassidy||7/10||3623 days||0.61||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kuirau Park walkway does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.