Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
121 Valid Reviews
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 124 reviews. There are 121 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 121 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 76 |
|
63% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
20% |
8/10 | 11 |
|
9% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.89% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 92.89% and is based on 121 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
12 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 121 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
17% |
9/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
95.09%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Monika | 10/10 | 217 days | 100% |
Joanna | 10/10 | 277 days | 98% |
Sue | 10/10 | 277 days | 98% |
Jana | 10/10 | 277 days | 98% |
Celeste | 10/10 | 308 days | 97% |
Jimothyhike | 10/10 | 399 days | 93% |
Dee Sage | 10/10 | 399 days | 93% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 583 days | 83% |
Sue and Scott Collington | 10/10 | 583 days | 83% |
simon | 10/10 | 611 days | 81% |
Juju | 6/10 | 642 days | 68% |
Jo Hopkinson | 10/10 | 642 days | 79% |
PAULA WALLACE | 9/10 | 642 days | 78% |
Florian S. | 4/10 | 673 days | 50% |
Sophie | 10/10 | 673 days | 76% |
Deb | 9/10 | 673 days | 75% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 703 days | 74% |
Alec | 10/10 | 1007 days | 44% |
Mike Whalen | 10/10 | 1007 days | 44% |
Melissa | 10/10 | 1038 days | 41% |
Catherine | 10/10 | 1282 days | 22% |
Helen | 6/10 | 1282 days | 19% |
Jane | 10/10 | 1341 days | 19% |
Sass and Pete | 10/10 | 1372 days | 17% |
Mitch | 10/10 | 1372 days | 17% |
ZMad | 10/10 | 1433 days | 14% |
Abi | 8/10 | 1464 days | 12% |
Aaron | 10/10 | 1586 days | 8% |
Marika Naylor | 10/10 | 1586 days | 8% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 1678 days | 6% |
Paul & Alison Saunders | 10/10 | 1678 days | 6% |
Neil | 10/10 | 1707 days | 6% |
Hatessandflys | 10/10 | 1707 days | 6% |
Sue | 10/10 | 1707 days | 6% |
Sue Hempstead | 10/10 | 1707 days | 6% |
Niko Schachner | 4/10 | 1738 days | 4% |
Mark | 10/10 | 1738 days | 5% |
Achim | 10/10 | 1738 days | 5% |
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ | 10/10 | 1738 days | 5% |
Lukas | 10/10 | 1769 days | 5% |
Tom McKernan | 10/10 | 1799 days | 5% |
Gil | 10/10 | 1799 days | 5% |
Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 1830 days | 5% |
Pedro | 9/10 | 2072 days | 5% |
Brian Palmer | 10/10 | 2103 days | 4% |
Barry | 10/10 | 2103 days | 4% |
Jill Grimwood | 10/10 | 2103 days | 4% |
Macker | 8/10 | 2164 days | 4% |
Guillaume | 10/10 | 2225 days | 4% |
Karli18 | 9/10 | 2348 days | 4% |
Stephen Lindsay | 10/10 | 2348 days | 4% |
Jenny | 10/10 | 2348 days | 4% |
Johannes Kempf | 9/10 | 2409 days | 4% |
Nat | 10/10 | 2409 days | 4% |
The Weathersons | 8/10 | 2422 days | 2% |
Malindi Esterhuizen | 8/10 | 2450 days | 4% |
Emma Guthrie | 8/10 | 2466 days | 4% |
Henry Hunter | 10/10 | 2467 days | 4% |
Joanna du Toit | 9/10 | 2499 days | 4% |
Edwin Bos | 10/10 | 2509 days | 4% |
Nadene Chessells | 10/10 | 2534 days | 4% |
Prudence Jane | 10/10 | 2543 days | 4% |
Owen Dilling | 10/10 | 2560 days | 4% |
Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 2560 days | 4% |
Sue Armstrong | 10/10 | 2679 days | 3% |
Anja Röhrich | 9/10 | 2734 days | 3% |
Ann Teeters | 10/10 | 2774 days | 3% |
Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 2802 days | 3% |
Alan Brown | 9/10 | 2802 days | 3% |
Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 2816 days | 3% |
Amy Smith | 9/10 | 2822 days | 3% |
Katie Ball | 10/10 | 2835 days | 3% |
Richard and Anne Amphlett | 10/10 | 3078 days | 3% |
Roland Syha | 10/10 | 3103 days | 2% |
Michal Tomer | 10/10 | 3114 days | 2% |
Max | 7/10 | 3121 days | 2% |
Werner Langer | 10/10 | 3139 days | 2% |
Barbara Dantas | 10/10 | 3151 days | 2% |
Ines de la Griesbrei | 9/10 | 3152 days | 2% |
Katy Knapp | 10/10 | 3153 days | 2% |
Jane Louise Stokes | 7/10 | 3153 days | 2% |
Steve Newton | 10/10 | 3174 days | 2% |
Vibeke Pedersen | 10/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
R Werder | 10/10 | 3183 days | 2% |
Matthew Hallowell | 10/10 | 3196 days | 2% |
Scott and Angela | 10/10 | 3199 days | 2% |
David From Switzerland | 10/10 | 3222 days | 2% |
Richard Kirby | 9/10 | 3230 days | 2% |
Fiona Edwards | 8/10 | 3230 days | 2% |
Alan White | 10/10 | 3272 days | 2% |
Yann Le Gac | 9/10 | 3429 days | 2% |
ct2034 | 10/10 | 3474 days | 2% |
Alistair Millward | 9/10 | 3501 days | 2% |
Marten Nommensen | 10/10 | 3533 days | 2% |
Christian Oihenart | 10/10 | 3568 days | 2% |
Dieter & Lydia Schmees | 10/10 | 3595 days | 1% |
Annie Butler | 10/10 | 3656 days | 1% |
Tracy Armstrong | 10/10 | 3656 days | 1% |
Tina Johnson | 10/10 | 3748 days | 1% |
Sunny Sailing | 8/10 | 3778 days | 1% |
Bob Morrison | 9/10 | 3809 days | 1% |
Miro Amsalem | 9/10 | 3870 days | 1% |
Monique Monique | 9/10 | 3898 days | 1% |
Paul W | 9/10 | 3898 days | 1% |
Michael Uebe | 10/10 | 3901 days | 0% |
Helen King | 9/10 | 4051 days | 1% |
Paul Taylor | 9/10 | 4228 days | 0% |
Julian Roots | 8/10 | 4235 days | 0% |
Tom and Jemima Rawlings | 8/10 | 4316 days | 0% |
Anja and Katharina | 10/10 | 4334 days | 0% |
Josef | 9/10 | 4610 days | 1% |
Richard Spandonk | 5/10 | 4617 days | 0% |
Arron | 10/10 | 4629 days | 1% |
polzeath | 7/10 | 4629 days | 1% |
richdrkt | 9/10 | 4905 days | 1% |
Weez18 | 10/10 | 4935 days | 1% |
Helen and Graham | 8/10 | 4950 days | 1% |
Mark | 8/10 | 4973 days | 1% |
John | 9/10 | 4978 days | 1% |
Family van Hessem | 7/10 | 5379 days | 0% |
Alexis De Wilde | 9/10 | 5431 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.26% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 65 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 194 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
191 | -3.21% |
192 | -3.23% |
193 | -3.24% |
194 | -3.26% |
195 | -3.28% |
196 | -3.29% |
197 | -3.31% |
… | … |
0.77% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.