Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Murchison Motorhome Park

Valid Reviews

129 Valid Reviews

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 132 reviews. There are 129 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 129 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 84
65%
9/10 24
19%
8/10 11
9%
7/10 5
4%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

93.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 93.33% and is based on 129 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

12 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 129 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
17%
9/10 4
33%
8/10 4
33%
7/10 1
8%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
8%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

83.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

97.51%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Wes 10/10 290 days 100%
Anne 10/10 318 days 99%
Cecile 10/10 318 days 99%
VamperCan 10/10 318 days 99%
TikitouringNZ 10/10 349 days 98%
Derek Gillard 10/10 349 days 98%
Quentin Vanantino 10/10 380 days 96%
Anaïs 10/10 441 days 93%
Monika 10/10 655 days 79%
Joanna 10/10 715 days 74%
Sue 10/10 715 days 74%
Jana 10/10 715 days 74%
Celeste 10/10 746 days 72%
Jimothyhike 10/10 837 days 63%
Dee Sage 10/10 837 days 63%
Daniel 10/10 1021 days 44%
Sue and Scott Collington 10/10 1021 days 44%
simon 10/10 1049 days 41%
Juju 6/10 1080 days 33%
Jo Hopkinson 10/10 1080 days 38%
PAULA WALLACE 9/10 1080 days 38%
Florian S. 4/10 1111 days 23%
Sophie 10/10 1111 days 36%
Deb 9/10 1111 days 35%
Daniel 10/10 1141 days 33%
Alec 10/10 1445 days 14%
Mike Whalen 10/10 1445 days 14%
Melissa 10/10 1476 days 12%
Catherine 10/10 1720 days 6%
Helen 6/10 1720 days 5%
Jane 10/10 1779 days 5%
Sass and Pete 10/10 1810 days 5%
Mitch 10/10 1810 days 5%
ZMad 10/10 1871 days 5%
Abi 8/10 1902 days 5%
Aaron 10/10 2024 days 5%
Marika Naylor 10/10 2024 days 5%
Lisa 10/10 2116 days 5%
Paul & Alison Saunders 10/10 2116 days 5%
Neil 10/10 2145 days 5%
Hatessandflys 10/10 2145 days 5%
Sue 10/10 2145 days 5%
Sue Hempstead 10/10 2145 days 5%
Niko Schachner 4/10 2175 days 3%
Mark 10/10 2176 days 4%
Achim 10/10 2176 days 4%
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ 10/10 2176 days 4%
Lukas 10/10 2207 days 4%
Tom McKernan 10/10 2236 days 4%
Gil 10/10 2237 days 4%
Katherine Ong 10/10 2268 days 4%
Pedro 9/10 2510 days 4%
Brian Palmer 10/10 2541 days 4%
Barry 10/10 2541 days 4%
Jill Grimwood 10/10 2541 days 4%
Macker 8/10 2602 days 4%
Guillaume 10/10 2663 days 3%
Karli18 9/10 2786 days 3%
Stephen Lindsay 10/10 2786 days 3%
Jenny 10/10 2786 days 3%
Johannes Kempf 9/10 2847 days 3%
Nat 10/10 2847 days 3%
The Weathersons 8/10 2860 days 2%
Malindi Esterhuizen 8/10 2888 days 3%
Emma Guthrie 8/10 2904 days 3%
Henry Hunter 10/10 2905 days 3%
Joanna du Toit 9/10 2936 days 3%
Edwin Bos 10/10 2947 days 3%
Nadene Chessells 10/10 2972 days 3%
Prudence Jane 10/10 2981 days 3%
Owen Dilling 10/10 2997 days 3%
Katherine Ong 10/10 2997 days 3%
Sue Armstrong 10/10 3117 days 3%
Anja Röhrich 9/10 3172 days 2%
Ann Teeters 10/10 3211 days 2%
Peter Armstrong 9/10 3239 days 2%
Alan Brown 9/10 3239 days 2%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 7/10 3254 days 2%
Amy Smith 9/10 3260 days 2%
Katie Ball 10/10 3273 days 2%
Richard and Anne Amphlett 10/10 3515 days 2%
Roland Syha 10/10 3541 days 2%
Michal Tomer 10/10 3552 days 2%
Max 7/10 3559 days 1%
Werner Langer 10/10 3576 days 2%
Barbara Dantas 10/10 3589 days 2%
Ines de la Griesbrei 9/10 3590 days 2%
Katy Knapp 10/10 3591 days 2%
Jane Louise Stokes 7/10 3591 days 1%
Steve Newton 10/10 3612 days 1%
Vibeke Pedersen 10/10 3620 days 1%
R Werder 10/10 3621 days 1%
Matthew Hallowell 10/10 3634 days 1%
Scott and Angela 10/10 3637 days 1%
David From Switzerland 10/10 3660 days 1%
Richard Kirby 9/10 3667 days 1%
Fiona Edwards 8/10 3667 days 1%
Alan White 10/10 3710 days 1%
Yann Le Gac 9/10 3867 days 1%
ct2034 10/10 3911 days 1%
Alistair Millward 9/10 3939 days 1%
Marten Nommensen 10/10 3970 days 1%
Christian Oihenart 10/10 4006 days 1%
Dieter & Lydia Schmees 10/10 4032 days 1%
Annie Butler 10/10 4093 days 1%
Tracy Armstrong 10/10 4093 days 1%
Tina Johnson 10/10 4186 days 0%
Sunny Sailing 8/10 4216 days 0%
Bob Morrison 9/10 4247 days 0%
Miro Amsalem 9/10 4308 days 0%
Monique Monique 9/10 4336 days 0%
Paul W 9/10 4336 days 0%
Michael Uebe 10/10 4339 days 0%
Helen King 9/10 4489 days 1%
Paul Taylor 9/10 4666 days 1%
Julian Roots 8/10 4673 days 1%
Tom and Jemima Rawlings 8/10 4754 days 1%
Anja and Katharina 10/10 4772 days 1%
Josef 9/10 5048 days 1%
Richard Spandonk 5/10 5055 days 0%
Arron 10/10 5067 days 1%
polzeath 7/10 5067 days 1%
richdrkt 9/10 5343 days 1%
Weez18 10/10 5373 days 1%
Helen and Graham 8/10 5388 days 1%
Mark 8/10 5411 days 1%
John 9/10 5416 days 1%
Family van Hessem 7/10 5817 days 0%
Alexis De Wilde 9/10 5869 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.05% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.99%
198 -4.01%
199 -4.03%
200 -4.05%
201 -4.08%
202 -4.10%
203 -4.12%

Balancing Adjustment

0.59% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

94%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.