Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Murchison Motorhome Park
Valid Reviews
92 Valid Reviews
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 95 reviews. There are 92 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 92 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 53 |
|
58% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
11% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.61% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 92.61% and is based on 92 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
12 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 92 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
17% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
95.68%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa | 10/10 | 35 days | 99.81 | 100% | |
| Paul & Alison Saunders | 10/10 | 35 days | 99.81 | 100% | |
| Neil | 10/10 | 64 days | 99.35 | 100% | |
| Hatessandflys | 10/10 | 64 days | 99.35 | 100% | |
| Sue | 10/10 | 64 days | 99.35 | 100% | |
| Sue Hempstead | 10/10 | 64 days | 99.35 | 100% | |
| Niko Schachner | 4/10 | 94 days | 77.89 | 78% | |
| Mark | 10/10 | 95 days | 98.57 | 99% | |
| Achim | 10/10 | 95 days | 98.57 | 99% | |
| Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ | 10/10 | 95 days | 98.57 | 99% | |
| Lukas | 10/10 | 126 days | 97.48 | 98% | |
| Tom McKernan | 10/10 | 155 days | 96.19 | 96% | |
| Gil | 10/10 | 156 days | 96.14 | 96% | |
| Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 187 days | 94.46 | 95% | |
| Pedro | 9/10 | 429 days | 70.84 | 71% | |
| Brian Palmer | 10/10 | 460 days | 66.47 | 67% | |
| Barry | 10/10 | 460 days | 66.47 | 67% | |
| Jill Grimwood | 10/10 | 460 days | 66.47 | 67% | |
| Macker | 8/10 | 521 days | 54.14 | 54% | |
| Guillaume | 10/10 | 582 days | 46.7 | 47% | |
| Karli18 | 9/10 | 705 days | 29.1 | 29% | |
| Stephen Lindsay | 10/10 | 705 days | 29.1 | 29% | |
| Jenny | 10/10 | 705 days | 29.1 | 29% | |
| Johannes Kempf | 9/10 | 766 days | 22.15 | 22% | |
| Nat | 10/10 | 766 days | 22.15 | 22% | |
| The Weathersons | 8/10 | 779 days |  |
19.78 | 20% |
| Malindi Esterhuizen | 8/10 | 807 days | 17.24 | 17% | |
| Emma Guthrie | 8/10 | 823 days | 15.89 | 16% | |
| Henry Hunter | 10/10 | 824 days | 16.64 | 17% | |
| Joanna du Toit | 9/10 | 855 days | 14.13 | 14% | |
| Edwin Bos | 10/10 | 866 days | 13.31 | 13% | |
| Nadene Chessells | 10/10 | 891 days | 11.59 | 12% | |
| Prudence Jane | 10/10 | 900 days | 11.03 | 11% | |
| Owen Dilling | 10/10 | 916 days | 10.08 | 10% | |
| Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 916 days | 10.08 | 10% | |
| Sue Armstrong | 10/10 | 1036 days | 5.55 | 6% | |
| Anja Röhrich | 9/10 | 1091 days | 5.0 | 5% | |
| Ann Teeters | 10/10 | 1130 days | 4.93 | 5% | |
| Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 1158 days | 4.88 | 5% | |
| Alan Brown | 9/10 | 1158 days | 4.88 | 5% | |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 1173 days | 4.41 | 4% | |
| Amy Smith | 9/10 | 1179 days | 4.84 | 5% | |
| Katie Ball | 10/10 | 1192 days | 4.81 | 5% | |
| Richard and Anne Amphlett | 10/10 | 1434 days | 4.34 | 4% | |
| Roland Syha | 10/10 | 1460 days | 4.29 | 4% | |
| Michal Tomer | 10/10 | 1471 days | 4.26 | 4% | |
| Max | 7/10 | 1478 days | 3.87 | 4% | |
| Werner Langer | 10/10 | 1495 days | 4.22 | 4% | |
| Barbara Dantas | 10/10 | 1508 days | 4.19 | 4% | |
| Ines de la Griesbrei | 9/10 | 1509 days | 4.19 | 4% | |
| Katy Knapp | 10/10 | 1510 days | 4.19 | 4% | |
| Jane Louise Stokes | 7/10 | 1510 days | 3.81 | 4% | |
| Steve Newton | 10/10 | 1531 days | 4.15 | 4% | |
| Vibeke Pedersen | 10/10 | 1539 days | 4.13 | 4% | |
| R Werder | 10/10 | 1540 days | 4.13 | 4% | |
| Matthew Hallowell | 10/10 | 1553 days | 4.1 | 4% | |
| Scott and Angela | 10/10 | 1556 days | 4.1 | 4% | |
| David From Switzerland | 10/10 | 1579 days | 4.05 | 4% | |
| Richard Kirby | 9/10 | 1586 days | 4.04 | 4% | |
| Fiona Edwards | 8/10 | 1586 days | 3.84 | 4% | |
| Alan White | 10/10 | 1629 days | 3.95 | 4% | |
| Yann Le Gac | 9/10 | 1786 days | 3.65 | 4% | |
| ct2034 | 10/10 | 1830 days | 3.56 | 4% | |
| Alistair Millward | 9/10 | 1858 days | 3.51 | 4% | |
| Marten Nommensen | 10/10 | 1889 days | 3.45 | 3% | |
| Christian Oihenart | 10/10 | 1925 days | 3.38 | 3% | |
| Dieter & Lydia Schmees | 10/10 | 1951 days | 3.32 | 3% | |
| Annie Butler | 10/10 | 2012 days | 3.21 | 3% | |
| Tracy Armstrong | 10/10 | 2012 days | 3.21 | 3% | |
| Tina Johnson | 10/10 | 2105 days | 3.02 | 3% | |
| Sunny Sailing | 8/10 | 2135 days | 2.82 | 3% | |
| Bob Morrison | 9/10 | 2166 days | 2.9 | 3% | |
| Miro Amsalem | 9/10 | 2227 days | 2.78 | 3% | |
| Monique Monique | 9/10 | 2255 days | 2.73 | 3% | |
| Paul W | 9/10 | 2255 days | 2.73 | 3% | |
| Michael Uebe | 10/10 | 2258 days | |
2.72 | 3% |
| Helen King | 9/10 | 2408 days | 2.43 | 2% | |
| Paul Taylor | 9/10 | 2585 days | |
2.08 | 2% |
| Julian Roots | 8/10 | 2592 days | 1.97 | 2% | |
| Tom and Jemima Rawlings | 8/10 | 2673 days | |
1.82 | 2% |
| Anja and Katharina | 10/10 | 2691 days | |
1.88 | 2% |
| Josef | 9/10 | 2967 days | |
1.34 | 1% |
| Richard Spandonk | 5/10 | 2974 days | |
1.07 | 1% |
| Arron | 10/10 | 2986 days | 1.3 | 1% | |
| polzeath | 7/10 | 2986 days | 1.18 | 1% | |
| richdrkt | 9/10 | 3262 days | 0.76 | 1% | |
| Weez18 | 10/10 | 3292 days | 0.7 | 1% | |
| Helen and Graham | 8/10 | 3307 days | |
0.64 | 1% |
| Mark | 8/10 | 3330 days | |
0.59 | 1% |
| John | 9/10 | 3335 days | |
0.62 | 1% |
| Family van Hessem | 7/10 | 3736 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Alexis De Wilde | 9/10 | 3788 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.30% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 15 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 12 | -0.24% |
| 13 | -0.26% |
| 14 | -0.28% |
| 15 | -0.30% |
| 16 | -0.32% |
| 17 | -0.34% |
| 18 | -0.36% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
95%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.