Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Murchison Motorhome Park

Valid Reviews

130 Valid Reviews

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 130 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 130 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 85
65%
9/10 24
18%
8/10 11
8%
7/10 5
4%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

93.38% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 93.38% and is based on 130 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

12 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 130 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
17%
9/10 4
33%
8/10 4
33%
7/10 1
8%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
8%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

83.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

97.79%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Martin 10/10 38 days 100%
Wes 10/10 375 days 92%
Anne 10/10 403 days 91%
Cecile 10/10 403 days 91%
VamperCan 10/10 403 days 91%
TikitouringNZ 10/10 434 days 89%
Derek Gillard 10/10 434 days 89%
Quentin Vanantino 10/10 465 days 88%
Anaïs 10/10 526 days 84%
Monika 10/10 740 days 69%
Joanna 10/10 800 days 64%
Sue 10/10 800 days 64%
Jana 10/10 800 days 64%
Celeste 10/10 831 days 61%
Jimothyhike 10/10 922 days 52%
Dee Sage 10/10 922 days 52%
Daniel 10/10 1106 days 34%
Sue and Scott Collington 10/10 1106 days 34%
simon 10/10 1134 days 32%
Juju 6/10 1165 days 26%
Jo Hopkinson 10/10 1165 days 30%
PAULA WALLACE 9/10 1165 days 30%
Florian S. 4/10 1196 days 18%
Sophie 10/10 1196 days 28%
Deb 9/10 1196 days 27%
Daniel 10/10 1226 days 25%
Alec 10/10 1530 days 10%
Mike Whalen 10/10 1530 days 10%
Melissa 10/10 1561 days 9%
Catherine 10/10 1805 days 5%
Helen 6/10 1805 days 4%
Jane 10/10 1864 days 5%
Sass and Pete 10/10 1895 days 5%
Mitch 10/10 1895 days 5%
ZMad 10/10 1956 days 5%
Abi 8/10 1987 days 5%
Aaron 10/10 2109 days 4%
Marika Naylor 10/10 2109 days 4%
Lisa 10/10 2201 days 4%
Paul & Alison Saunders 10/10 2201 days 4%
Neil 10/10 2230 days 4%
Hatessandflys 10/10 2230 days 4%
Sue 10/10 2230 days 4%
Sue Hempstead 10/10 2230 days 4%
Niko Schachner 4/10 2260 days 3%
Mark 10/10 2261 days 4%
Achim 10/10 2261 days 4%
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ 10/10 2261 days 4%
Lukas 10/10 2292 days 4%
Tom McKernan 10/10 2321 days 4%
Gil 10/10 2322 days 4%
Katherine Ong 10/10 2353 days 4%
Pedro 9/10 2595 days 3%
Brian Palmer 10/10 2626 days 3%
Barry 10/10 2626 days 3%
Jill Grimwood 10/10 2626 days 3%
Macker 8/10 2687 days 3%
Guillaume 10/10 2748 days 3%
Karli18 9/10 2871 days 3%
Stephen Lindsay 10/10 2871 days 3%
Jenny 10/10 2871 days 3%
Johannes Kempf 9/10 2932 days 3%
Nat 10/10 2932 days 3%
The Weathersons 8/10 2945 days 2%
Malindi Esterhuizen 8/10 2973 days 3%
Emma Guthrie 8/10 2989 days 3%
Henry Hunter 10/10 2990 days 3%
Joanna du Toit 9/10 3021 days 3%
Edwin Bos 10/10 3032 days 3%
Nadene Chessells 10/10 3057 days 3%
Prudence Jane 10/10 3066 days 2%
Owen Dilling 10/10 3082 days 2%
Katherine Ong 10/10 3082 days 2%
Sue Armstrong 10/10 3202 days 2%
Anja Röhrich 9/10 3257 days 2%
Ann Teeters 10/10 3296 days 2%
Peter Armstrong 9/10 3324 days 2%
Alan Brown 9/10 3324 days 2%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 7/10 3339 days 2%
Amy Smith 9/10 3345 days 2%
Katie Ball 10/10 3358 days 2%
Richard and Anne Amphlett 10/10 3600 days 1%
Roland Syha 10/10 3626 days 1%
Michal Tomer 10/10 3637 days 1%
Max 7/10 3644 days 1%
Werner Langer 10/10 3661 days 1%
Barbara Dantas 10/10 3674 days 1%
Ines de la Griesbrei 9/10 3675 days 1%
Katy Knapp 10/10 3676 days 1%
Jane Louise Stokes 7/10 3676 days 1%
Steve Newton 10/10 3697 days 1%
Vibeke Pedersen 10/10 3705 days 1%
R Werder 10/10 3706 days 1%
Matthew Hallowell 10/10 3719 days 1%
Scott and Angela 10/10 3722 days 1%
David From Switzerland 10/10 3745 days 1%
Richard Kirby 9/10 3752 days 1%
Fiona Edwards 8/10 3752 days 1%
Alan White 10/10 3795 days 1%
Yann Le Gac 9/10 3952 days 1%
ct2034 10/10 3996 days 1%
Alistair Millward 9/10 4024 days 1%
Marten Nommensen 10/10 4055 days 1%
Christian Oihenart 10/10 4091 days 0%
Dieter & Lydia Schmees 10/10 4117 days 0%
Annie Butler 10/10 4178 days 0%
Tracy Armstrong 10/10 4178 days 0%
Tina Johnson 10/10 4271 days 0%
Sunny Sailing 8/10 4301 days 0%
Bob Morrison 9/10 4332 days 0%
Miro Amsalem 9/10 4393 days 1%
Monique Monique 9/10 4421 days 1%
Paul W 9/10 4421 days 1%
Michael Uebe 10/10 4424 days 1%
Helen King 9/10 4574 days 1%
Paul Taylor 9/10 4751 days 1%
Julian Roots 8/10 4758 days 1%
Tom and Jemima Rawlings 8/10 4839 days 0%
Anja and Katharina 10/10 4857 days 1%
Josef 9/10 5133 days 1%
Richard Spandonk 5/10 5140 days 0%
Arron 10/10 5152 days 1%
polzeath 7/10 5152 days 1%
richdrkt 9/10 5428 days 1%
Weez18 10/10 5458 days 1%
Helen and Graham 8/10 5473 days 0%
Mark 8/10 5496 days 0%
John 9/10 5501 days 1%
Family van Hessem 7/10 5902 days 0%
Alexis De Wilde 9/10 5954 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.54% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 27 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
24 -0.48%
25 -0.50%
26 -0.52%
27 -0.54%
28 -0.56%
29 -0.58%
30 -0.60%

Balancing Adjustment

0.23% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

98%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.