Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Murchison Motorhome Park

Valid Reviews

130 Valid Reviews

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 130 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 130 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 85
65%
9/10 24
18%
8/10 11
8%
7/10 5
4%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

93.38% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 93.38% and is based on 130 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

12 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 130 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
17%
9/10 4
33%
8/10 4
33%
7/10 1
8%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
8%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

83.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

97.76%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Martin 10/10 18 days 100%
Wes 10/10 355 days 93%
Anne 10/10 383 days 92%
Cecile 10/10 383 days 92%
VamperCan 10/10 383 days 92%
TikitouringNZ 10/10 414 days 90%
Derek Gillard 10/10 414 days 90%
Quentin Vanantino 10/10 445 days 89%
Anaïs 10/10 506 days 85%
Monika 10/10 720 days 70%
Joanna 10/10 780 days 65%
Sue 10/10 780 days 65%
Jana 10/10 780 days 65%
Celeste 10/10 811 days 62%
Jimothyhike 10/10 902 days 54%
Dee Sage 10/10 902 days 54%
Daniel 10/10 1086 days 36%
Sue and Scott Collington 10/10 1086 days 36%
simon 10/10 1114 days 34%
Juju 6/10 1145 days 27%
Jo Hopkinson 10/10 1145 days 31%
PAULA WALLACE 9/10 1145 days 31%
Florian S. 4/10 1176 days 19%
Sophie 10/10 1176 days 29%
Deb 9/10 1176 days 29%
Daniel 10/10 1206 days 27%
Alec 10/10 1510 days 11%
Mike Whalen 10/10 1510 days 11%
Melissa 10/10 1541 days 10%
Catherine 10/10 1785 days 5%
Helen 6/10 1785 days 4%
Jane 10/10 1844 days 5%
Sass and Pete 10/10 1875 days 5%
Mitch 10/10 1875 days 5%
ZMad 10/10 1936 days 5%
Abi 8/10 1967 days 5%
Aaron 10/10 2089 days 4%
Marika Naylor 10/10 2089 days 4%
Lisa 10/10 2181 days 4%
Paul & Alison Saunders 10/10 2181 days 4%
Neil 10/10 2210 days 4%
Hatessandflys 10/10 2210 days 4%
Sue 10/10 2210 days 4%
Sue Hempstead 10/10 2210 days 4%
Niko Schachner 4/10 2240 days 3%
Mark 10/10 2241 days 4%
Achim 10/10 2241 days 4%
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ 10/10 2241 days 4%
Lukas 10/10 2272 days 4%
Tom McKernan 10/10 2301 days 4%
Gil 10/10 2302 days 4%
Katherine Ong 10/10 2333 days 4%
Pedro 9/10 2575 days 3%
Brian Palmer 10/10 2606 days 3%
Barry 10/10 2606 days 3%
Jill Grimwood 10/10 2606 days 3%
Macker 8/10 2667 days 3%
Guillaume 10/10 2728 days 3%
Karli18 9/10 2851 days 3%
Stephen Lindsay 10/10 2851 days 3%
Jenny 10/10 2851 days 3%
Johannes Kempf 9/10 2912 days 3%
Nat 10/10 2912 days 3%
The Weathersons 8/10 2925 days 2%
Malindi Esterhuizen 8/10 2953 days 3%
Emma Guthrie 8/10 2969 days 3%
Henry Hunter 10/10 2970 days 3%
Joanna du Toit 9/10 3001 days 3%
Edwin Bos 10/10 3012 days 3%
Nadene Chessells 10/10 3037 days 3%
Prudence Jane 10/10 3046 days 3%
Owen Dilling 10/10 3062 days 3%
Katherine Ong 10/10 3062 days 3%
Sue Armstrong 10/10 3182 days 2%
Anja Röhrich 9/10 3237 days 2%
Ann Teeters 10/10 3276 days 2%
Peter Armstrong 9/10 3304 days 2%
Alan Brown 9/10 3304 days 2%
Matthias Wohlgemuth 7/10 3319 days 2%
Amy Smith 9/10 3325 days 2%
Katie Ball 10/10 3338 days 2%
Richard and Anne Amphlett 10/10 3580 days 2%
Roland Syha 10/10 3606 days 2%
Michal Tomer 10/10 3617 days 1%
Max 7/10 3624 days 1%
Werner Langer 10/10 3641 days 1%
Barbara Dantas 10/10 3654 days 1%
Ines de la Griesbrei 9/10 3655 days 1%
Katy Knapp 10/10 3656 days 1%
Jane Louise Stokes 7/10 3656 days 1%
Steve Newton 10/10 3677 days 1%
Vibeke Pedersen 10/10 3685 days 1%
R Werder 10/10 3686 days 1%
Matthew Hallowell 10/10 3699 days 1%
Scott and Angela 10/10 3702 days 1%
David From Switzerland 10/10 3725 days 1%
Richard Kirby 9/10 3732 days 1%
Fiona Edwards 8/10 3732 days 1%
Alan White 10/10 3775 days 1%
Yann Le Gac 9/10 3932 days 1%
ct2034 10/10 3976 days 1%
Alistair Millward 9/10 4004 days 1%
Marten Nommensen 10/10 4035 days 1%
Christian Oihenart 10/10 4071 days 1%
Dieter & Lydia Schmees 10/10 4097 days 1%
Annie Butler 10/10 4158 days 0%
Tracy Armstrong 10/10 4158 days 0%
Tina Johnson 10/10 4251 days 0%
Sunny Sailing 8/10 4281 days 0%
Bob Morrison 9/10 4312 days 0%
Miro Amsalem 9/10 4373 days 0%
Monique Monique 9/10 4401 days 1%
Paul W 9/10 4401 days 1%
Michael Uebe 10/10 4404 days 1%
Helen King 9/10 4554 days 1%
Paul Taylor 9/10 4731 days 1%
Julian Roots 8/10 4738 days 1%
Tom and Jemima Rawlings 8/10 4819 days 1%
Anja and Katharina 10/10 4837 days 1%
Josef 9/10 5113 days 1%
Richard Spandonk 5/10 5120 days 0%
Arron 10/10 5132 days 1%
polzeath 7/10 5132 days 1%
richdrkt 9/10 5408 days 1%
Weez18 10/10 5438 days 1%
Helen and Graham 8/10 5453 days 1%
Mark 8/10 5476 days 1%
John 9/10 5481 days 1%
Family van Hessem 7/10 5882 days 1%
Alexis De Wilde 9/10 5934 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.15% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 53 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 7 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
4 -0.08%
5 -0.10%
6 -0.12%
7 -0.15%
8 -0.17%
9 -0.19%
10 -0.21%

Balancing Adjustment

0.20% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

96%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.