Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Murchison Motorhome Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
99 Valid Reviews
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has a total of 102 reviews. There are 99 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 99 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 59 |
|
60% |
9/10 | 22 |
|
22% |
8/10 | 11 |
|
11% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.93% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park valid reviews is 92.93% and is based on 99 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
12 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 99 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
17% |
9/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 4 |
|
33% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Murchison Motorhome Park face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
96.40%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jane | 10/10 | 35 days | 100% |
Sass and Pete | 10/10 | 66 days | 100% |
Mitch | 10/10 | 66 days | 100% |
ZMad | 10/10 | 127 days | 98% |
Abi | 8/10 | 158 days | 91% |
Aaron | 10/10 | 280 days | 88% |
Marika Naylor | 10/10 | 280 days | 88% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 372 days | 78% |
Paul & Alison Saunders | 10/10 | 372 days | 78% |
Neil | 10/10 | 401 days | 75% |
Hatessandflys | 10/10 | 401 days | 75% |
Sue | 10/10 | 401 days | 75% |
Sue Hempstead | 10/10 | 401 days | 75% |
Niko Schachner | 4/10 | 432 days | 56% |
Mark | 10/10 | 432 days | 71% |
Achim | 10/10 | 432 days | 71% |
Faircloughs, Auckland, NZ | 10/10 | 432 days | 71% |
Lukas | 10/10 | 463 days | 66% |
Tom McKernan | 10/10 | 493 days | 62% |
Gil | 10/10 | 493 days | 62% |
Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 524 days | 57% |
Pedro | 9/10 | 766 days | 22% |
Brian Palmer | 10/10 | 797 days | 19% |
Barry | 10/10 | 797 days | 19% |
Jill Grimwood | 10/10 | 797 days | 19% |
Macker | 8/10 | 858 days | 13% |
Guillaume | 10/10 | 919 days | 10% |
Karli18 | 9/10 | 1042 days | 5% |
Stephen Lindsay | 10/10 | 1042 days | 5% |
Jenny | 10/10 | 1042 days | 5% |
Johannes Kempf | 9/10 | 1103 days | 5% |
Nat | 10/10 | 1103 days | 5% |
The Weathersons | 8/10 | 1116 days | 3% |
Malindi Esterhuizen | 8/10 | 1144 days | 5% |
Emma Guthrie | 8/10 | 1160 days | 5% |
Henry Hunter | 10/10 | 1161 days | 5% |
Joanna du Toit | 9/10 | 1193 days | 5% |
Edwin Bos | 10/10 | 1203 days | 5% |
Nadene Chessells | 10/10 | 1228 days | 5% |
Prudence Jane | 10/10 | 1237 days | 5% |
Owen Dilling | 10/10 | 1254 days | 5% |
Katherine Ong | 10/10 | 1254 days | 5% |
Sue Armstrong | 10/10 | 1373 days | 4% |
Anja Röhrich | 9/10 | 1428 days | 4% |
Ann Teeters | 10/10 | 1468 days | 4% |
Peter Armstrong | 9/10 | 1496 days | 4% |
Alan Brown | 9/10 | 1496 days | 4% |
Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 1510 days | 4% |
Amy Smith | 9/10 | 1516 days | 4% |
Katie Ball | 10/10 | 1529 days | 4% |
Richard and Anne Amphlett | 10/10 | 1772 days | 4% |
Roland Syha | 10/10 | 1797 days | 4% |
Michal Tomer | 10/10 | 1808 days | 4% |
Max | 7/10 | 1815 days | 3% |
Werner Langer | 10/10 | 1833 days | 4% |
Barbara Dantas | 10/10 | 1845 days | 4% |
Ines de la Griesbrei | 9/10 | 1846 days | 4% |
Katy Knapp | 10/10 | 1847 days | 4% |
Jane Louise Stokes | 7/10 | 1847 days | 3% |
Steve Newton | 10/10 | 1868 days | 3% |
Vibeke Pedersen | 10/10 | 1876 days | 3% |
R Werder | 10/10 | 1877 days | 3% |
Matthew Hallowell | 10/10 | 1890 days | 3% |
Scott and Angela | 10/10 | 1893 days | 3% |
David From Switzerland | 10/10 | 1916 days | 3% |
Richard Kirby | 9/10 | 1924 days | 3% |
Fiona Edwards | 8/10 | 1924 days | 3% |
Alan White | 10/10 | 1966 days | 3% |
Yann Le Gac | 9/10 | 2123 days | 3% |
ct2034 | 10/10 | 2168 days | 3% |
Alistair Millward | 9/10 | 2195 days | 3% |
Marten Nommensen | 10/10 | 2227 days | 3% |
Christian Oihenart | 10/10 | 2262 days | 3% |
Dieter & Lydia Schmees | 10/10 | 2289 days | 3% |
Annie Butler | 10/10 | 2350 days | 3% |
Tracy Armstrong | 10/10 | 2350 days | 3% |
Tina Johnson | 10/10 | 2442 days | 2% |
Sunny Sailing | 8/10 | 2472 days | 2% |
Bob Morrison | 9/10 | 2503 days | 2% |
Miro Amsalem | 9/10 | 2564 days | 2% |
Monique Monique | 9/10 | 2592 days | 2% |
Paul W | 9/10 | 2592 days | 2% |
Michael Uebe | 10/10 | 2595 days | 1% |
Helen King | 9/10 | 2745 days | 2% |
Paul Taylor | 9/10 | 2922 days | 1% |
Julian Roots | 8/10 | 2929 days | 1% |
Tom and Jemima Rawlings | 8/10 | 3010 days | 1% |
Anja and Katharina | 10/10 | 3028 days | 1% |
Josef | 9/10 | 3304 days | 0% |
Richard Spandonk | 5/10 | 3311 days | 0% |
Arron | 10/10 | 3323 days | 1% |
polzeath | 7/10 | 3323 days | 1% |
richdrkt | 9/10 | 3599 days | 0% |
Weez18 | 10/10 | 3629 days | 0% |
Helen and Graham | 8/10 | 3644 days | 0% |
Mark | 8/10 | 3667 days | 1% |
John | 9/10 | 3672 days | 1% |
Family van Hessem | 7/10 | 4073 days | 1% |
Alexis De Wilde | 9/10 | 4125 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.22% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 56 days. However the Murchison Motorhome Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Murchison Motorhome Park experience has been adjusted for 11 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
8 | -0.16% |
9 | -0.18% |
10 | -0.20% |
11 | -0.22% |
12 | -0.24% |
13 | -0.26% |
14 | -0.28% |
… | … |
96%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.