Ranking Score Explained

Hello there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping

Valid Reviews

69 Valid Reviews

The Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping experience has a total of 73 reviews. There are 69 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 69 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 35
51%
9/10 20
29%
8/10 12
17%
7/10 1
1%
6/10 1
1%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.61% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping valid reviews is 92.61% and is based on 69 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

4 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 69 valid reviews, the experience has 4 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 4 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
50%
9/10 0
0%
8/10 2
50%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

90.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping face-to-face reviews is 90.00% and is based on 4 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

91.18%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
cearon 9/10 101 days 100%
MB 7/10 405 days 68%
Patrícia 9/10 496 days 62%
Ashleigh 10/10 527 days 56%
Thomas 10/10 586 days 46%
Finlay 10/10 678 days 32%
Stefan Hohmann 8/10 892 days 10%
Liz Wade 8/10 921 days 9%
Kim 8/10 921 days 9%
James Murphy 10/10 952 days 7%
Dil 10/10 952 days 7%
harre medemblik 8/10 1013 days 5%
Dennis Rijbroek 10/10 1074 days 4%
Mik Jennings 9/10 1074 days 4%
Anselm 9/10 1105 days 4%
Adrian and Tanya 10/10 1136 days 4%
Kate 9/10 1197 days 4%
Tash & Laura 9/10 1286 days 4%
Fabienne&Dustin 10/10 1286 days 4%
Alis 10/10 1286 days 4%
Emma 10/10 1286 days 4%
Nik 9/10 1286 days 4%
seph 9/10 1317 days 4%
Jan Z. 10/10 1317 days 4%
Gerrit 10/10 1317 days 4%
M Elsten 10/10 1317 days 4%
Jason 10/10 1348 days 4%
Agathe 10/10 1378 days 4%
Ali 9/10 1409 days 4%
Xiaoming Guo 10/10 1409 days 4%
Grizzly Girl 10/10 1409 days 4%
Gio 10/10 1470 days 3%
Stefano Clerici 10/10 1501 days 3%
C J B 10/10 1531 days 3%
L + J 10/10 1562 days 3%
Florian 10/10 1592 days 3%
Boguslaw MAKIELLO 10/10 1606 days 1%
M A Pelton 9/10 1648 days 3%
UK 50-something couple 8/10 1651 days 3%
Alyson Reid 9/10 1665 days 3%
Ewan Evans 9/10 1715 days 3%
Lucy Watson 10/10 1742 days 3%
Mairead Bushe 10/10 1747 days 3%
Artemis 9/10 1960 days 2%
Naira Prudencio 10/10 1986 days 2%
Mailhos Cécile 10/10 1991 days 2%
Caryn Grosvenor 10/10 2010 days 2%
Catherine Kay 8/10 2031 days 2%
Svetlana L 10/10 2041 days 2%
Rebecca Lindsey 9/10 2047 days 2%
Neil Warnock 10/10 2078 days 2%
Shelly Stanchuk 9/10 2108 days 2%
Becky and James 10/10 2141 days 2%
Mikael Torres 9/10 2201 days 2%
Pamela Hoffman 8/10 2294 days 2%
Daniel Fuell 10/10 2301 days 2%
John-Jozef Proczka 9/10 2382 days 2%
Loic Journet 8/10 2389 days 1%
Janneke Hekhuis 8/10 2393 days 1%
Max Brunner 9/10 2436 days 1%
Ruth P 8/10 2444 days 1%
Nurul Nadia Naziron 9/10 2509 days 1%
Lotte Spors 10/10 2597 days 1%
Chiara Magelli 10/10 2610 days 1%
Philip Mattes 9/10 2682 days 1%
Claude Nobs 6/10 2778 days 0%
Simon Mehlmann 10/10 3061 days 0%
Camille Gagnant 8/10 3133 days 0%
Amanda Neall 8/10 4172 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-1.04% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 118 days. However the Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Juno Hall Backpackers and Camping experience has been adjusted for 94 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
91 -1.01%
92 -1.02%
93 -1.03%
94 -1.04%
95 -1.05%
96 -1.06%
97 -1.08%

Final Ranking Score

90%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.