Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Milford Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Milford Track
Valid Reviews
70 Valid Reviews
The Milford Track experience has a total of 72 reviews. There are 70 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
89.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Milford Track valid reviews is 89.00% and is based on 70 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
66 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 70 valid reviews, the experience has 66 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 66 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
39% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
88.64% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Milford Track face-to-face reviews is 88.64% and is based on 66 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.69%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben H | 10/10 | 693 days | 30.61 | 100% | |
| Julian Kihnle | 10/10 | 811 days |  |
17.78 | 58% |
| Tom | 10/10 | 1058 days | |
5.22 | 17% |
| Carly Biedul | 8/10 | 1095 days | |
4.75 | 16% |
| Rhydian Templer | 10/10 | 1127 days | |
4.94 | 16% |
| Sian Templer | 9/10 | 1127 days | |
4.94 | 16% |
| Jade Templer | 10/10 | 1127 days | |
4.94 | 16% |
| Jolien | 9/10 | 1137 days | |
4.92 | 16% |
| Rebecca Holmes | 9/10 | 1138 days | |
4.92 | 16% |
| Marc Sanivan | 7/10 | 1139 days | |
4.47 | 15% |
| Nick Lancy | 9/10 | 1422 days | |
4.36 | 14% |
| Stephanie Pope | 9/10 | 1439 days | |
4.33 | 14% |
| Mia Gaynor | 10/10 | 1445 days | |
4.32 | 14% |
| Alexis Leneveu | 8/10 | 1855 days | 3.34 | 11% | |
| Fanny DeBon | 8/10 | 1877 days | |
3.3 | 11% |
| Antoine Vernay | 6/10 | 1884 days | |
2.87 | 9% |
| Hadar | 1/10 | 2158 days | |
2.13 | 7% |
| Juliane | 8/10 | 2166 days | |
2.76 | 9% |
| Lopez Anandine | 9/10 | 2171 days | |
2.89 | 9% |
| Thomas Zilio | 9/10 | 2171 days | |
2.89 | 9% |
| Gilad Itzkovitz | 6/10 | 2202 days | |
2.35 | 8% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 2213 days | 2.81 | 9% | |
| Evyatar Karni | 10/10 | 2216 days | |
2.81 | 9% |
| Pete Wilson | 4/10 | 2505 days | |
1.77 | 6% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 2523 days | |
2.21 | 7% |
| Armand Poulain | 8/10 | 2525 days | |
2.09 | 7% |
| Colin and Raewyn Newton | 8/10 | 2533 days | |
2.08 | 7% |
| Tobias Sowade | 8/10 | 2547 days | |
2.05 | 7% |
| Jessica Tilly | 8/10 | 2859 days | |
1.47 | 5% |
| Alan Brady | 10/10 | 2881 days | |
1.5 | 5% |
| Tinne Cis | 10/10 | 2881 days | |
1.5 | 5% |
| Fabian Germar | 9/10 | 2889 days | |
1.49 | 5% |
| Robert & Bridget Holden | 10/10 | 2893 days | |
1.48 | 5% |
| S & J McDonald | 8/10 | 2894 days | |
1.41 | 5% |
| John & Ray Calder | 8/10 | 2896 days | |
1.4 | 5% |
| Katrawa | 9/10 | 2906 days | |
1.46 | 5% |
| Anna Bret | 9/10 | 2984 days | |
1.3 | 4% |
| Jaime Castells | 10/10 | 2984 days | |
1.3 | 4% |
| Alita Smith | 9/10 | 3222 days | |
0.84 | 3% |
| David Brown | 10/10 | 3223 days | |
0.84 | 3% |
| R Tearle | 9/10 | 3228 days | |
0.83 | 3% |
| Jorge Martinez Gacio | 9/10 | 3230 days | |
0.82 | 3% |
| Phil Smith | 10/10 | 3234 days | |
0.81 | 3% |
| Marquardt and Bernd | 10/10 | 3236 days | |
0.81 | 3% |
| David and Karen | 9/10 | 3242 days | |
0.8 | 3% |
| Richard Broughton | 10/10 | 3244 days | |
0.79 | 3% |
| Susan Herd | 9/10 | 3245 days | |
0.79 | 3% |
| Jol Balder | 8/10 | 3266 days | |
0.71 | 2% |
| Amanda Craig | 10/10 | 3272 days | |
0.74 | 2% |
| Dr Dorthe Bossow | 10/10 | 3274 days | |
0.74 | 2% |
| JudyandAndre | 10/10 | 3309 days | 0.67 | 2% | |
| Monica Askew | 10/10 | 3532 days | |
0.23 | 1% |
| Darrell & Michelle Lamb | 9/10 | 3532 days | |
0.23 | 1% |
| Kevin & Chris | 10/10 | 3548 days | |
0.2 | 1% |
| Ian Tainsh | 10/10 | 3597 days | |
0.1 | 0% |
| Einar | 9/10 | 3603 days | |
0.09 | 0% |
| Angela | 7/10 | 3616 days | |
0.06 | 0% |
| Wielink | 9/10 | 3623 days | |
0.05 | 0% |
| Lynette Sal | 10/10 | 3659 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Bill Nash | 9/10 | 3709 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lindsay Brown | 10/10 | 3715 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sena | 8/10 | 3715 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| X Vogel | 10/10 | 3715 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Peter and Dianne McKinnon | 10/10 | 3728 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| SophieC | 9/10 | 3944 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Wight | 10/10 | 3947 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Viktoria Stoffel | 9/10 | 3956 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Joel | 9/10 | 3969 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Dianne | 8/10 | 4058 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Rebekka | 10/10 | 4076 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Milford Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.