Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake
Valid Reviews
53 Valid Reviews
The Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake experience has a total of 53 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.30% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake valid reviews is 88.30% and is based on 53 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 53 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 13 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake face-to-face reviews is 88.00% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
89.29%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Violette Z | 10/10 | 2251 days | 100% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 2282 days | 99% |
| Huan Quintero | 9/10 | 2678 days | 79% |
| Carl von Horstig | 8/10 | 3087 days | 60% |
| Dana | 8/10 | 3321 days | 49% |
| Rob and Nicole | 8/10 | 3340 days | 48% |
| Harold Booy | 10/10 | 3349 days | 48% |
| Gena Bond | 8/10 | 3354 days | 47% |
| Leif Marienlund | 9/10 | 3361 days | 47% |
| Anouk Goemans | 9/10 | 3412 days | 45% |
| Danny | 9/10 | 3419 days | 45% |
| Jakob Lovdahl | 6/10 | 3423 days | 39% |
| Marine Audoire | 10/10 | 3650 days | 34% |
| Manu T | 10/10 | 3651 days | 34% |
| Mathilde | 9/10 | 3664 days | 33% |
| Phlippe | 9/10 | 3664 days | 33% |
| Floriane Desnoyer | 10/10 | 3665 days | 34% |
| Jeff Barth | 8/10 | 3665 days | 33% |
| Kim | 9/10 | 3693 days | 32% |
| Hannah Stiles | 10/10 | 3737 days | 30% |
| Diego Pablos | 8/10 | 3762 days | 28% |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 8/10 | 3804 days | 26% |
| Jam Boggomann | 8/10 | 4135 days | 11% |
| Bartlomiej Berger | 10/10 | 4144 days | 11% |
| Anna Grafenstein | 8/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
| jefft | 8/10 | 4384 days | 23% |
| Benoit Irissou | 9/10 | 4414 days | 24% |
| Crousse | 8/10 | 4414 days | 23% |
| Sapir Lifshitz | 10/10 | 4463 days | 24% |
| Maya Barad | 10/10 | 4463 days | 24% |
| Marc Schnelanburger | 9/10 | 4466 days | 24% |
| Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4480 days | 24% |
| Clive West | 9/10 | 4534 days | 24% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 10/10 | 4754 days | 24% |
| Pieke | 10/10 | 4779 days | 24% |
| Loesje | 8/10 | 4838 days | 23% |
| Marieke | 6/10 | 4855 days | 21% |
| Knorr Bracher | 9/10 | 4873 days | 24% |
| Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4885 days | 24% |
| Ton Franke | 9/10 | 4885 days | 24% |
| Margreet Hanemaaijer | 8/10 | 5130 days | 23% |
| Elaine | 10/10 | 5154 days | 24% |
| Ursi Meier | 10/10 | 5167 days | 24% |
| Frank & Ruth | 10/10 | 5494 days | 24% |
| female40 | 10/10 | 5495 days | 24% |
| Stoop | 8/10 | 5496 days | 23% |
| Steve & Pearl Baker | 10/10 | 5500 days | 24% |
| Nicolas | 9/10 | 5511 days | 24% |
| Stefanie E | 10/10 | 5972 days | 24% |
| Sarah Smith | 7/10 | 5991 days | 22% |
| HovingL | 6/10 | 6221 days | 21% |
| Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 8/10 | 6229 days | 23% |
| KathrinS | 8/10 | 6229 days | 23% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.10% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.