Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cascade Creek Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
183 Valid Reviews
The Cascade Creek Campsite experience has a total of 183 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 183 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 54 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 10 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
79.40% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cascade Creek Campsite valid reviews is 79.40% and is based on 183 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
39 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 183 valid reviews, the experience has 39 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
79.23% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cascade Creek Campsite face-to-face reviews is 79.23% and is based on 39 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.66%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 8/10 | 45 days | 100% |
| Clement | 7/10 | 76 days | 94% |
| Mireille & Philippe | 9/10 | 107 days | 100% |
| cirefice bernard | 8/10 | 107 days | 99% |
| Sol | 9/10 | 107 days | 100% |
| Guybert | 7/10 | 137 days | 94% |
| Dom | 7/10 | 137 days | 94% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 137 days | 99% |
| Michaela | 8/10 | 168 days | 98% |
| Rory M | 8/10 | 168 days | 98% |
| Susan Boyton | 10/10 | 320 days | 96% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 351 days | 93% |
| Jacinta | 10/10 | 351 days | 95% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 382 days | 91% |
| McLean | 9/10 | 410 days | 91% |
| VamperCan | 10/10 | 410 days | 92% |
| Fredrik | 7/10 | 441 days | 84% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 441 days | 89% |
| Debyron | 9/10 | 472 days | 88% |
| Fritz | 9/10 | 502 days | 86% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 502 days | 87% |
| Glenda | 9/10 | 562 days | 83% |
| tasman travels | 10/10 | 654 days | 77% |
| Janneke | 5/10 | 716 days | 55% |
| YP | 7/10 | 716 days | 67% |
| Jesse Leake | 10/10 | 747 days | 69% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 776 days | 66% |
| Lu | 7/10 | 776 days | 62% |
| Jorian | 10/10 | 776 days | 67% |
| Amy | 7/10 | 838 days | 57% |
| Paloma Santos | 3/10 | 838 days | 33% |
| Philippe & Lena | 4/10 | 868 days | 38% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 9/10 | 868 days | 57% |
| Larissa | 6/10 | 868 days | 50% |
| Nina | 9/10 | 868 days | 57% |
| Cholly | 8/10 | 899 days | 54% |
| Hayley Ambrose | 3/10 | 928 days | 28% |
| Marie Perret | 8/10 | 928 days | 51% |
| Henry | 8/10 | 990 days | 45% |
| Jodie Muller | 9/10 | 1051 days | 39% |
| Amy Fortin-Barrette | 10/10 | 1051 days | 40% |
| Christy | 7/10 | 1051 days | 37% |
| Amy Catley | 6/10 | 1051 days | 34% |
| Helen E | 9/10 | 1082 days | 37% |
| Anthony V | 9/10 | 1113 days | 34% |
| Srinivas Prasad Bheemanadam | 9/10 | 1141 days | 32% |
| Lisa | 2/10 | 1141 days | 15% |
| Jaycee | 9/10 | 1172 days | 29% |
| Citlali & Mike | 10/10 | 1172 days | 30% |
| Sophie Rellensmann | 7/10 | 1172 days | 28% |
| Arie | 8/10 | 1172 days | 29% |
| Esther | 8/10 | 1172 days | 29% |
| Amanda Moreira | 7/10 | 1172 days | 28% |
| Romy De Bruin | 6/10 | 1233 days | 22% |
| Rebecca Woodbridge | 7/10 | 1233 days | 24% |
| Felix | 9/10 | 1233 days | 25% |
| Mil | 5/10 | 1233 days | 19% |
| Chantal D | 9/10 | 1324 days | 19% |
| The Gillies | 10/10 | 1843 days | 5% |
| Teesh K | 5/10 | 1963 days | 4% |
| Linda | 6/10 | 2237 days | 4% |
| Tanja & Sven | 8/10 | 2268 days | 4% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2299 days | 4% |
| GM | 9/10 | 2299 days | 4% |
| Tilly Watermeyer | 9/10 | 2299 days | 4% |
| Timothy Davies | 9/10 | 2329 days | 4% |
| Karl Ohm | 7/10 | 2543 days | 3% |
| Maggie | 6/10 | 2543 days | 3% |
| Elin | 10/10 | 2574 days | 4% |
| Sally Sargeant-Hu | 9/10 | 2574 days | 4% |
| Georgia | 8/10 | 2574 days | 3% |
| Megan Belanger | 9/10 | 2602 days | 3% |
| Freya | 8/10 | 2602 days | 3% |
| Nicki Chow | 6/10 | 2602 days | 3% |
| Franz | 8/10 | 2633 days | 3% |
| Jeremy | 7/10 | 2633 days | 3% |
| Inna | 5/10 | 2633 days | 3% |
| Yh kim | 5/10 | 2633 days | 3% |
| Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2633 days | 3% |
| Ruddah | 5/10 | 2633 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 5/10 | 2664 days | 3% |
| Mahi | 9/10 | 2664 days | 3% |
| Cora | 9/10 | 2664 days | 3% |
| Nadine | 8/10 | 2664 days | 3% |
| Mitchell | 9/10 | 2693 days | 3% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2725 days | 3% |
| Eranda | 10/10 | 2725 days | 3% |
| Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2725 days | 3% |
| Jonas R. | 8/10 | 2725 days | 3% |
| J wells | 8/10 | 2754 days | 3% |
| Kiri Edwards | 8/10 | 2785 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 10/10 | 2908 days | 3% |
| Matt | 8/10 | 2908 days | 3% |
| Clobby | 7/10 | 2939 days | 3% |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 2939 days | 3% |
| Laura Clay | 9/10 | 2939 days | 3% |
| Hanneke van Dijk | 8/10 | 2972 days | 2% |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 8/10 | 2981 days | 2% |
| Fei Fei Lei | 8/10 | 2988 days | 2% |
| Oceane Imber | 10/10 | 2993 days | 3% |
| Anika Bedard | 6/10 | 2993 days | 2% |
| Rasmus Lundgaard Nielsen | 5/10 | 2995 days | 2% |
| Fiona Walker | 9/10 | 2998 days | 3% |
| Brigham Edgar | 9/10 | 3011 days | 3% |
| Gema Frontera | 8/10 | 3040 days | 3% |
| Julian Kihnle | 8/10 | 3057 days | 2% |
| Jenny Jaye | 8/10 | 3093 days | 2% |
| Oz Atiya | 10/10 | 3096 days | 3% |
| Sue Rogers | 10/10 | 3119 days | 2% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3172 days | 2% |
| Bruce Graham | 9/10 | 3246 days | 2% |
| Nathalie Gobin | 8/10 | 3266 days | 2% |
| Wendy Kildey | 10/10 | 3278 days | 2% |
| Shanna de Lang | 7/10 | 3280 days | 2% |
| Connie | 8/10 | 3282 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 9/10 | 3304 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3353 days | 2% |
| J Dobias | 3/10 | 3385 days | 1% |
| Madi | 9/10 | 3388 days | 2% |
| Frederick Yott | 9/10 | 3388 days | 2% |
| Megan Jurgensmeyer | 8/10 | 3397 days | 2% |
| Greg MacFire | 6/10 | 3400 days | 2% |
| Jill Grange | 7/10 | 3417 days | 1% |
| Melanie Giroux | 8/10 | 3467 days | 2% |
| Kathy Hart | 8/10 | 3607 days | 1% |
| Russell Opland | 8/10 | 3616 days | 1% |
| Andrik | 3/10 | 3634 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 10/10 | 3640 days | 1% |
| Heng Sing Teh | 9/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
| Jenny Adams | 7/10 | 3652 days | 1% |
| Sean Stevens | 8/10 | 3670 days | 1% |
| Marina | 10/10 | 3695 days | 1% |
| Rachel Macdonald | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
| Sam Brydon | 8/10 | 3728 days | 1% |
| Lucia | 8/10 | 3728 days | 1% |
| Judith Simpson | 5/10 | 3730 days | 1% |
| Neil | 8/10 | 3733 days | 1% |
| Jennifer Brown | 9/10 | 3789 days | 1% |
| Yann Le Gac | 7/10 | 3973 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 8/10 | 4033 days | 1% |
| Miguel | 7/10 | 4034 days | 1% |
| Wilma Senior | 8/10 | 4062 days | 1% |
| Stefanie Feldman | 9/10 | 4082 days | 1% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 8/10 | 4185 days | 0% |
| Douglas Yeates | 9/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Sarah Jane O'Reilly | 1/10 | 4396 days | 0% |
| Tomas Shairi | 1/10 | 4396 days | 0% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 9/10 | 4400 days | 1% |
| Austin Johns | 8/10 | 4402 days | 1% |
| Sarah Christman | 6/10 | 4402 days | 1% |
| Johanna Kofler | 9/10 | 4403 days | 1% |
| Steffen | 8/10 | 4416 days | 1% |
| Manuela Michelbach | 7/10 | 4417 days | 1% |
| Janis Gallois | 10/10 | 4423 days | 1% |
| Lionel | 6/10 | 4432 days | 1% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 9/10 | 4449 days | 1% |
| Daryl | 10/10 | 4454 days | 1% |
| Cornelia Stark | 9/10 | 4456 days | 1% |
| Michael Stark | 10/10 | 4456 days | 1% |
| Emeline Dupre | 8/10 | 4460 days | 1% |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 9/10 | 4551 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 9/10 | 4551 days | 1% |
| Tim Vennewold | 7/10 | 4752 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4760 days | 1% |
| patrick+ katerina | 10/10 | 4765 days | 1% |
| Jon Barratt | 7/10 | 4861 days | 1% |
| Harald | 9/10 | 5139 days | 1% |
| Paul Fairbrass | 9/10 | 5152 days | 1% |
| Loic | 8/10 | 5153 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 9/10 | 5159 days | 1% |
| Nathanael Boehm | 8/10 | 5221 days | 1% |
| Jensen Bresbenbeek | 7/10 | 5222 days | 1% |
| Steve | 8/10 | 5235 days | 1% |
| DJohnson | 9/10 | 5311 days | 1% |
| Becky Edney | 8/10 | 5470 days | 1% |
| Brian Jones | 10/10 | 5475 days | 1% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5483 days | 1% |
| T Lipscombe | 4/10 | 5488 days | 0% |
| Betten | 9/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 10/10 | 5497 days | 1% |
| Jann Clar | 9/10 | 5870 days | 1% |
| Yvonne German | 10/10 | 5906 days | 1% |
| Suzie Lechner | 10/10 | 6215 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cascade Creek Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.56% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.