Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cascade Creek Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
182 Valid Reviews
The Cascade Creek Campsite experience has a total of 182 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 182 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 10 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
79.40% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cascade Creek Campsite valid reviews is 79.40% and is based on 182 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
39 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 182 valid reviews, the experience has 39 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
79.23% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cascade Creek Campsite face-to-face reviews is 79.23% and is based on 39 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.65%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clement | 7/10 | 47 days | 94% |
| Mireille & Philippe | 9/10 | 78 days | 100% |
| cirefice bernard | 8/10 | 78 days | 99% |
| Sol | 9/10 | 78 days | 100% |
| Guybert | 7/10 | 108 days | 94% |
| Dom | 7/10 | 108 days | 94% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 108 days | 99% |
| Michaela | 8/10 | 139 days | 98% |
| Rory M | 8/10 | 139 days | 98% |
| Susan Boyton | 10/10 | 292 days | 96% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 322 days | 93% |
| Jacinta | 10/10 | 322 days | 95% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 353 days | 92% |
| McLean | 9/10 | 381 days | 92% |
| VamperCan | 10/10 | 381 days | 93% |
| Fredrik | 7/10 | 412 days | 85% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 412 days | 90% |
| Debyron | 9/10 | 443 days | 89% |
| Fritz | 9/10 | 473 days | 88% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 473 days | 88% |
| Glenda | 9/10 | 534 days | 84% |
| tasman travels | 10/10 | 626 days | 79% |
| Janneke | 5/10 | 687 days | 56% |
| YP | 7/10 | 687 days | 69% |
| Jesse Leake | 10/10 | 718 days | 72% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 747 days | 68% |
| Lu | 7/10 | 747 days | 64% |
| Jorian | 10/10 | 747 days | 69% |
| Amy | 7/10 | 809 days | 59% |
| Paloma Santos | 3/10 | 809 days | 35% |
| Philippe & Lena | 4/10 | 839 days | 40% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 9/10 | 839 days | 60% |
| Larissa | 6/10 | 839 days | 52% |
| Nina | 9/10 | 839 days | 60% |
| Cholly | 8/10 | 870 days | 56% |
| Hayley Ambrose | 3/10 | 900 days | 30% |
| Marie Perret | 8/10 | 900 days | 53% |
| Henry | 8/10 | 962 days | 47% |
| Jodie Muller | 9/10 | 1023 days | 42% |
| Amy Fortin-Barrette | 10/10 | 1023 days | 42% |
| Christy | 7/10 | 1023 days | 39% |
| Amy Catley | 6/10 | 1023 days | 36% |
| Helen E | 9/10 | 1053 days | 39% |
| Anthony V | 9/10 | 1084 days | 36% |
| Srinivas Prasad Bheemanadam | 9/10 | 1112 days | 34% |
| Lisa | 2/10 | 1112 days | 16% |
| Jaycee | 9/10 | 1143 days | 32% |
| Citlali & Mike | 10/10 | 1143 days | 32% |
| Sophie Rellensmann | 7/10 | 1143 days | 30% |
| Arie | 8/10 | 1143 days | 31% |
| Esther | 8/10 | 1143 days | 31% |
| Amanda Moreira | 7/10 | 1143 days | 30% |
| Romy De Bruin | 6/10 | 1204 days | 24% |
| Rebecca Woodbridge | 7/10 | 1204 days | 25% |
| Felix | 9/10 | 1204 days | 27% |
| Mil | 5/10 | 1204 days | 21% |
| Chantal D | 9/10 | 1296 days | 21% |
| The Gillies | 10/10 | 1814 days | 5% |
| Teesh K | 5/10 | 1934 days | 4% |
| Linda | 6/10 | 2208 days | 4% |
| Tanja & Sven | 8/10 | 2239 days | 4% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2270 days | 4% |
| GM | 9/10 | 2270 days | 4% |
| Tilly Watermeyer | 9/10 | 2270 days | 4% |
| Timothy Davies | 9/10 | 2300 days | 4% |
| Karl Ohm | 7/10 | 2514 days | 3% |
| Maggie | 6/10 | 2514 days | 3% |
| Elin | 10/10 | 2545 days | 4% |
| Sally Sargeant-Hu | 9/10 | 2545 days | 4% |
| Georgia | 8/10 | 2545 days | 4% |
| Megan Belanger | 9/10 | 2573 days | 4% |
| Freya | 8/10 | 2573 days | 4% |
| Nicki Chow | 6/10 | 2573 days | 3% |
| Franz | 8/10 | 2604 days | 3% |
| Jeremy | 7/10 | 2604 days | 3% |
| Inna | 5/10 | 2604 days | 3% |
| Yh kim | 5/10 | 2604 days | 3% |
| Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2604 days | 4% |
| Ruddah | 5/10 | 2604 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 5/10 | 2635 days | 3% |
| Mahi | 9/10 | 2635 days | 3% |
| Cora | 9/10 | 2635 days | 3% |
| Nadine | 8/10 | 2635 days | 3% |
| Mitchell | 9/10 | 2665 days | 3% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2696 days | 3% |
| Eranda | 10/10 | 2696 days | 3% |
| Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2696 days | 3% |
| Jonas R. | 8/10 | 2696 days | 3% |
| J wells | 8/10 | 2726 days | 3% |
| Kiri Edwards | 8/10 | 2757 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 10/10 | 2879 days | 3% |
| Matt | 8/10 | 2879 days | 3% |
| Clobby | 7/10 | 2910 days | 3% |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 2910 days | 3% |
| Laura Clay | 9/10 | 2910 days | 3% |
| Hanneke van Dijk | 8/10 | 2943 days | 2% |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 8/10 | 2952 days | 2% |
| Fei Fei Lei | 8/10 | 2959 days | 2% |
| Oceane Imber | 10/10 | 2964 days | 3% |
| Anika Bedard | 6/10 | 2964 days | 2% |
| Rasmus Lundgaard Nielsen | 5/10 | 2966 days | 2% |
| Fiona Walker | 9/10 | 2969 days | 3% |
| Brigham Edgar | 9/10 | 2982 days | 3% |
| Gema Frontera | 8/10 | 3011 days | 3% |
| Julian Kihnle | 8/10 | 3028 days | 2% |
| Jenny Jaye | 8/10 | 3064 days | 3% |
| Oz Atiya | 10/10 | 3068 days | 3% |
| Sue Rogers | 10/10 | 3091 days | 3% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3144 days | 2% |
| Bruce Graham | 9/10 | 3218 days | 2% |
| Nathalie Gobin | 8/10 | 3238 days | 2% |
| Wendy Kildey | 10/10 | 3249 days | 2% |
| Shanna de Lang | 7/10 | 3251 days | 2% |
| Connie | 8/10 | 3253 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 9/10 | 3275 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3324 days | 2% |
| J Dobias | 3/10 | 3356 days | 1% |
| Madi | 9/10 | 3359 days | 2% |
| Frederick Yott | 9/10 | 3359 days | 2% |
| Megan Jurgensmeyer | 8/10 | 3368 days | 2% |
| Greg MacFire | 6/10 | 3371 days | 2% |
| Jill Grange | 7/10 | 3388 days | 1% |
| Melanie Giroux | 8/10 | 3439 days | 2% |
| Kathy Hart | 8/10 | 3579 days | 2% |
| Russell Opland | 8/10 | 3588 days | 2% |
| Andrik | 3/10 | 3606 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 10/10 | 3611 days | 2% |
| Heng Sing Teh | 9/10 | 3614 days | 1% |
| Jenny Adams | 7/10 | 3623 days | 1% |
| Sean Stevens | 8/10 | 3641 days | 1% |
| Marina | 10/10 | 3666 days | 1% |
| Rachel Macdonald | 10/10 | 3689 days | 1% |
| Sam Brydon | 8/10 | 3700 days | 1% |
| Lucia | 8/10 | 3700 days | 1% |
| Judith Simpson | 5/10 | 3701 days | 1% |
| Neil | 8/10 | 3704 days | 1% |
| Jennifer Brown | 9/10 | 3761 days | 1% |
| Yann Le Gac | 7/10 | 3945 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 8/10 | 4004 days | 1% |
| Miguel | 7/10 | 4006 days | 1% |
| Wilma Senior | 8/10 | 4034 days | 1% |
| Stefanie Feldman | 9/10 | 4053 days | 1% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 8/10 | 4157 days | 0% |
| Douglas Yeates | 9/10 | 4337 days | 0% |
| Sarah Jane O'Reilly | 1/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
| Tomas Shairi | 1/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 9/10 | 4371 days | 0% |
| Austin Johns | 8/10 | 4373 days | 0% |
| Sarah Christman | 6/10 | 4373 days | 0% |
| Johanna Kofler | 9/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Steffen | 8/10 | 4387 days | 1% |
| Manuela Michelbach | 7/10 | 4388 days | 1% |
| Janis Gallois | 10/10 | 4394 days | 1% |
| Lionel | 6/10 | 4403 days | 1% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 9/10 | 4420 days | 1% |
| Daryl | 10/10 | 4425 days | 1% |
| Cornelia Stark | 9/10 | 4427 days | 1% |
| Michael Stark | 10/10 | 4427 days | 1% |
| Emeline Dupre | 8/10 | 4431 days | 1% |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 9/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 9/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
| Tim Vennewold | 7/10 | 4723 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4731 days | 1% |
| patrick+ katerina | 10/10 | 4736 days | 1% |
| Jon Barratt | 7/10 | 4832 days | 1% |
| Harald | 9/10 | 5110 days | 1% |
| Paul Fairbrass | 9/10 | 5123 days | 1% |
| Loic | 8/10 | 5124 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 9/10 | 5130 days | 1% |
| Nathanael Boehm | 8/10 | 5192 days | 1% |
| Jensen Bresbenbeek | 7/10 | 5193 days | 1% |
| Steve | 8/10 | 5206 days | 1% |
| DJohnson | 9/10 | 5283 days | 1% |
| Becky Edney | 8/10 | 5441 days | 1% |
| Brian Jones | 10/10 | 5446 days | 1% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5454 days | 1% |
| T Lipscombe | 4/10 | 5459 days | 0% |
| Betten | 9/10 | 5466 days | 1% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 10/10 | 5468 days | 1% |
| Jann Clar | 9/10 | 5841 days | 1% |
| Yvonne German | 10/10 | 5877 days | 1% |
| Suzie Lechner | 10/10 | 6186 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cascade Creek Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.57% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.