G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cascade Creek Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
182 Valid Reviews
The Cascade Creek Campsite experience has a total of 182 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 182 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 10 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
79.40% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cascade Creek Campsite valid reviews is 79.40% and is based on 182 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
39 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 182 valid reviews, the experience has 39 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
79.23% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cascade Creek Campsite face-to-face reviews is 79.23% and is based on 39 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.66%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clement | 7/10 | 49 days | 94% |
| Mireille & Philippe | 9/10 | 80 days | 100% |
| cirefice bernard | 8/10 | 80 days | 99% |
| Sol | 9/10 | 80 days | 100% |
| Guybert | 7/10 | 110 days | 94% |
| Dom | 7/10 | 110 days | 94% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 110 days | 99% |
| Michaela | 8/10 | 141 days | 98% |
| Rory M | 8/10 | 141 days | 98% |
| Susan Boyton | 10/10 | 294 days | 96% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 324 days | 93% |
| Jacinta | 10/10 | 324 days | 95% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 355 days | 92% |
| McLean | 9/10 | 383 days | 92% |
| VamperCan | 10/10 | 383 days | 93% |
| Fredrik | 7/10 | 414 days | 85% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 414 days | 90% |
| Debyron | 9/10 | 445 days | 89% |
| Fritz | 9/10 | 475 days | 87% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 475 days | 88% |
| Glenda | 9/10 | 536 days | 84% |
| tasman travels | 10/10 | 628 days | 79% |
| Janneke | 5/10 | 689 days | 56% |
| YP | 7/10 | 689 days | 69% |
| Jesse Leake | 10/10 | 720 days | 71% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 749 days | 68% |
| Lu | 7/10 | 749 days | 64% |
| Jorian | 10/10 | 749 days | 69% |
| Amy | 7/10 | 811 days | 59% |
| Paloma Santos | 3/10 | 811 days | 34% |
| Philippe & Lena | 4/10 | 841 days | 40% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 9/10 | 841 days | 60% |
| Larissa | 6/10 | 841 days | 52% |
| Nina | 9/10 | 841 days | 60% |
| Cholly | 8/10 | 872 days | 56% |
| Hayley Ambrose | 3/10 | 902 days | 30% |
| Marie Perret | 8/10 | 902 days | 53% |
| Henry | 8/10 | 964 days | 47% |
| Jodie Muller | 9/10 | 1025 days | 42% |
| Amy Fortin-Barrette | 10/10 | 1025 days | 42% |
| Christy | 7/10 | 1025 days | 39% |
| Amy Catley | 6/10 | 1025 days | 36% |
| Helen E | 9/10 | 1055 days | 39% |
| Anthony V | 9/10 | 1086 days | 36% |
| Srinivas Prasad Bheemanadam | 9/10 | 1114 days | 34% |
| Lisa | 2/10 | 1114 days | 16% |
| Jaycee | 9/10 | 1145 days | 31% |
| Citlali & Mike | 10/10 | 1145 days | 32% |
| Sophie Rellensmann | 7/10 | 1145 days | 30% |
| Arie | 8/10 | 1145 days | 31% |
| Esther | 8/10 | 1145 days | 31% |
| Amanda Moreira | 7/10 | 1145 days | 30% |
| Romy De Bruin | 6/10 | 1206 days | 23% |
| Rebecca Woodbridge | 7/10 | 1206 days | 25% |
| Felix | 9/10 | 1206 days | 27% |
| Mil | 5/10 | 1206 days | 21% |
| Chantal D | 9/10 | 1298 days | 21% |
| The Gillies | 10/10 | 1816 days | 5% |
| Teesh K | 5/10 | 1936 days | 4% |
| Linda | 6/10 | 2210 days | 4% |
| Tanja & Sven | 8/10 | 2241 days | 4% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
| GM | 9/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
| Tilly Watermeyer | 9/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
| Timothy Davies | 9/10 | 2302 days | 4% |
| Karl Ohm | 7/10 | 2516 days | 3% |
| Maggie | 6/10 | 2516 days | 3% |
| Elin | 10/10 | 2547 days | 4% |
| Sally Sargeant-Hu | 9/10 | 2547 days | 4% |
| Georgia | 8/10 | 2547 days | 4% |
| Megan Belanger | 9/10 | 2575 days | 4% |
| Freya | 8/10 | 2575 days | 4% |
| Nicki Chow | 6/10 | 2575 days | 3% |
| Franz | 8/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Jeremy | 7/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Inna | 5/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Yh kim | 5/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2606 days | 4% |
| Ruddah | 5/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 5/10 | 2637 days | 3% |
| Mahi | 9/10 | 2637 days | 3% |
| Cora | 9/10 | 2637 days | 3% |
| Nadine | 8/10 | 2637 days | 3% |
| Mitchell | 9/10 | 2666 days | 3% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2698 days | 3% |
| Eranda | 10/10 | 2698 days | 3% |
| Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2698 days | 3% |
| Jonas R. | 8/10 | 2698 days | 3% |
| J wells | 8/10 | 2728 days | 3% |
| Kiri Edwards | 8/10 | 2759 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 10/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
| Matt | 8/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
| Clobby | 7/10 | 2912 days | 3% |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 2912 days | 3% |
| Laura Clay | 9/10 | 2912 days | 3% |
| Hanneke van Dijk | 8/10 | 2945 days | 2% |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 8/10 | 2954 days | 2% |
| Fei Fei Lei | 8/10 | 2961 days | 2% |
| Oceane Imber | 10/10 | 2966 days | 3% |
| Anika Bedard | 6/10 | 2966 days | 2% |
| Rasmus Lundgaard Nielsen | 5/10 | 2968 days | 2% |
| Fiona Walker | 9/10 | 2971 days | 3% |
| Brigham Edgar | 9/10 | 2984 days | 3% |
| Gema Frontera | 8/10 | 3013 days | 3% |
| Julian Kihnle | 8/10 | 3030 days | 2% |
| Jenny Jaye | 8/10 | 3066 days | 3% |
| Oz Atiya | 10/10 | 3070 days | 3% |
| Sue Rogers | 10/10 | 3092 days | 3% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3146 days | 2% |
| Bruce Graham | 9/10 | 3220 days | 2% |
| Nathalie Gobin | 8/10 | 3240 days | 2% |
| Wendy Kildey | 10/10 | 3251 days | 2% |
| Shanna de Lang | 7/10 | 3253 days | 2% |
| Connie | 8/10 | 3255 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 9/10 | 3277 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3326 days | 2% |
| J Dobias | 3/10 | 3358 days | 1% |
| Madi | 9/10 | 3361 days | 2% |
| Frederick Yott | 9/10 | 3361 days | 2% |
| Megan Jurgensmeyer | 8/10 | 3370 days | 2% |
| Greg MacFire | 6/10 | 3373 days | 2% |
| Jill Grange | 7/10 | 3390 days | 1% |
| Melanie Giroux | 8/10 | 3441 days | 2% |
| Kathy Hart | 8/10 | 3580 days | 2% |
| Russell Opland | 8/10 | 3590 days | 2% |
| Andrik | 3/10 | 3608 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 10/10 | 3613 days | 2% |
| Heng Sing Teh | 9/10 | 3616 days | 1% |
| Jenny Adams | 7/10 | 3625 days | 1% |
| Sean Stevens | 8/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
| Marina | 10/10 | 3668 days | 1% |
| Rachel Macdonald | 10/10 | 3691 days | 1% |
| Sam Brydon | 8/10 | 3701 days | 1% |
| Lucia | 8/10 | 3701 days | 1% |
| Judith Simpson | 5/10 | 3703 days | 1% |
| Neil | 8/10 | 3706 days | 1% |
| Jennifer Brown | 9/10 | 3762 days | 1% |
| Yann Le Gac | 7/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 8/10 | 4006 days | 1% |
| Miguel | 7/10 | 4007 days | 1% |
| Wilma Senior | 8/10 | 4035 days | 1% |
| Stefanie Feldman | 9/10 | 4055 days | 1% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 8/10 | 4158 days | 0% |
| Douglas Yeates | 9/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
| Sarah Jane O'Reilly | 1/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
| Tomas Shairi | 1/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 9/10 | 4373 days | 0% |
| Austin Johns | 8/10 | 4375 days | 0% |
| Sarah Christman | 6/10 | 4375 days | 0% |
| Johanna Kofler | 9/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
| Steffen | 8/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
| Manuela Michelbach | 7/10 | 4390 days | 1% |
| Janis Gallois | 10/10 | 4396 days | 1% |
| Lionel | 6/10 | 4405 days | 1% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 9/10 | 4422 days | 1% |
| Daryl | 10/10 | 4427 days | 1% |
| Cornelia Stark | 9/10 | 4429 days | 1% |
| Michael Stark | 10/10 | 4429 days | 1% |
| Emeline Dupre | 8/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 9/10 | 4524 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 9/10 | 4524 days | 1% |
| Tim Vennewold | 7/10 | 4725 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4733 days | 1% |
| patrick+ katerina | 10/10 | 4738 days | 1% |
| Jon Barratt | 7/10 | 4834 days | 1% |
| Harald | 9/10 | 5112 days | 1% |
| Paul Fairbrass | 9/10 | 5125 days | 1% |
| Loic | 8/10 | 5126 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 9/10 | 5132 days | 1% |
| Nathanael Boehm | 8/10 | 5194 days | 1% |
| Jensen Bresbenbeek | 7/10 | 5195 days | 1% |
| Steve | 8/10 | 5208 days | 1% |
| DJohnson | 9/10 | 5285 days | 1% |
| Becky Edney | 8/10 | 5443 days | 1% |
| Brian Jones | 10/10 | 5448 days | 1% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5456 days | 1% |
| T Lipscombe | 4/10 | 5461 days | 0% |
| Betten | 9/10 | 5468 days | 1% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 10/10 | 5470 days | 1% |
| Jann Clar | 9/10 | 5843 days | 1% |
| Yvonne German | 10/10 | 5879 days | 1% |
| Suzie Lechner | 10/10 | 6188 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cascade Creek Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.57% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.