G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Otto/MacDonalds Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Otto/MacDonalds Campsite
Valid Reviews
89 Valid Reviews
The Otto/MacDonalds Campsite experience has a total of 92 reviews. There are 89 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 89 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
17% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 26 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
82.02% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Otto/MacDonalds Campsite valid reviews is 82.02% and is based on 89 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
25 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 89 valid reviews, the experience has 25 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 25 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 5 |
|
20% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 5 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
77.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Otto/MacDonalds Campsite face-to-face reviews is 77.20% and is based on 25 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
90.17%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jakub | 8/10 | 110 days | 100% |
| jo | 9/10 | 294 days | 97% |
| Susan Boyton | 10/10 | 294 days | 98% |
| Marguerite | 10/10 | 355 days | 95% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 383 days | 93% |
| Adam B | 9/10 | 811 days | 64% |
| Mathilde K | 9/10 | 1055 days | 39% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 1055 days | 39% |
| ElizabethE | 10/10 | 1145 days | 32% |
| Julia | 9/10 | 1176 days | 30% |
| Lewis | 8/10 | 1420 days | 14% |
| Lizzie | 10/10 | 1451 days | 13% |
| Alec | 8/10 | 1510 days | 11% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 1602 days | 8% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 1875 days | 5% |
| John | 10/10 | 1997 days | 5% |
| Linda | 9/10 | 2181 days | 4% |
| Timothy Davies | 10/10 | 2302 days | 4% |
| ScoutnIndi | 9/10 | 2455 days | 4% |
| Dean Coran | 7/10 | 2547 days | 3% |
| Liz | 8/10 | 2547 days | 4% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 7/10 | 2547 days | 3% |
| Francois & Caroline | 8/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2667 days | 3% |
| Indy | 9/10 | 2667 days | 3% |
| Rebecca Rodeghiero | 10/10 | 2667 days | 3% |
| Schubi | 9/10 | 2728 days | 3% |
| Sezz bella | 8/10 | 2851 days | 3% |
| Stephen Lindsay | 9/10 | 2851 days | 3% |
| Matt | 9/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
| Juliane | 7/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
| The Farrs | 7/10 | 2912 days | 3% |
| Fei Fei Lei | 9/10 | 2961 days | 2% |
| Oceane Imber | 10/10 | 2966 days | 3% |
| Linda Lua | 7/10 | 2968 days | 3% |
| Ronald Daigneault | 8/10 | 2995 days | 2% |
| Jarod | 6/10 | 3031 days | 2% |
| Michael Talbot | 8/10 | 3037 days | 3% |
| Jozef Pinkerton | 8/10 | 3083 days | 3% |
| Victoria Smith | 8/10 | 3117 days | 2% |
| Sally Caboche | 7/10 | 3245 days | 2% |
| Marc Lambert | 6/10 | 3252 days | 2% |
| Carol Brislane | 9/10 | 3276 days | 2% |
| Xander | 8/10 | 3306 days | 2% |
| CMG | 7/10 | 3335 days | 2% |
| Myles Petersen | 7/10 | 3338 days | 2% |
| Ruiyi Yin | 9/10 | 3373 days | 2% |
| Alf Caruana | 8/10 | 3394 days | 2% |
| Martina Hadolt | 6/10 | 3423 days | 2% |
| Catherine Johnston | 8/10 | 3469 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 9/10 | 3598 days | 2% |
| Pascale Lemieux | 9/10 | 3616 days | 1% |
| Howard Kestrel | 6/10 | 3623 days | 1% |
| Jenny Adams | 8/10 | 3628 days | 1% |
| Helena Bond | 8/10 | 3647 days | 1% |
| Rachel Macdonald | 10/10 | 3696 days | 1% |
| Juliana Ott | 8/10 | 3736 days | 1% |
| Bob Fontaine | 8/10 | 3812 days | 1% |
| Yann Le Gac | 8/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
| Soizic Vandermeersch | 9/10 | 3969 days | 1% |
| Bernard Duinkerken | 8/10 | 3977 days | 1% |
| Stephanie Poppe | 9/10 | 3982 days | 1% |
| Adam Wight | 7/10 | 4010 days | 1% |
| Jess Rose | 9/10 | 4035 days | 1% |
| Manuela | 8/10 | 4094 days | 0% |
| Pauline Gibson | 7/10 | 4096 days | 0% |
| Alexandre Moleiro | 8/10 | 4097 days | 1% |
| Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 8/10 | 4251 days | 0% |
| Tom Guthknecht | 6/10 | 4336 days | 0% |
| isabel Zander | 10/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
| Calvin Becker | 10/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
| Annika Marz | 8/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
| Malcolm & Susan | 9/10 | 4372 days | 0% |
| Alexander Zimmer | 9/10 | 4378 days | 0% |
| Francisco Pablo Miguel | 7/10 | 4398 days | 1% |
| Inga Memmen | 10/10 | 4399 days | 1% |
| Paige Galbraith | 10/10 | 4440 days | 1% |
| Deon Bossenger | 9/10 | 4707 days | 1% |
| ramy | 9/10 | 4707 days | 1% |
| Jacquemard | 4/10 | 4833 days | 0% |
| Sabrina Germany | 9/10 | 5098 days | 1% |
| Bill Mclennan | 7/10 | 5451 days | 1% |
| Martin Vitiello | 6/10 | 5459 days | 1% |
| Jerry & Floon | 8/10 | 5467 days | 1% |
| Cesar | 4/10 | 5474 days | 0% |
| David Valentine | 1/10 | 5856 days | 0% |
| BryonyS | 9/10 | 6158 days | 1% |
| RogerW | 9/10 | 6158 days | 1% |
| Vivien Williams | 10/10 | 6186 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Otto/MacDonalds Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.98% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.