Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Lakeview Holiday Park & Motels.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
249 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Lakeview Holiday Park & Motels experience has a total of 255 reviews. There are 249 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 249 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 98 |
|
39% |
| 9/10 | 79 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 39 |
|
16% |
| 7/10 | 21 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.59% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Lakeview Holiday Park & Motels valid reviews is 88.59% and is based on 249 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
79 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 249 valid reviews, the experience has 79 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 79 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 22 |
|
28% |
| 9/10 | 28 |
|
35% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.34% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Lakeview Holiday Park & Motels face-to-face reviews is 87.34% and is based on 79 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.27%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| William Kent | 10/10 | 61 days | 100% |
| Wesley Clark | 6/10 | 61 days | 86% |
| Wanderlust Camper | 7/10 | 92 days | 93% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 92 days | 100% |
| Herbert Vorholt | 10/10 | 120 days | 99% |
| Dave Jordan | 10/10 | 120 days | 99% |
| Marit | 2/10 | 151 days | 45% |
| Karina Kloppenburg | 9/10 | 151 days | 98% |
| Robert Maslen | 7/10 | 151 days | 92% |
| Mireille & Philippe | 9/10 | 182 days | 97% |
| L Hart | 10/10 | 212 days | 98% |
| Paul T Beisser III | 10/10 | 212 days | 98% |
| Elizabet | 10/10 | 426 days | 90% |
| Marine | 10/10 | 457 days | 88% |
| Anne | 7/10 | 516 days | 79% |
| Southern man | 10/10 | 547 days | 83% |
| Debyron | 9/10 | 547 days | 82% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 638 days | 77% |
| Zoe Grimshaw | 9/10 | 638 days | 76% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 638 days | 75% |
| Sal | 7/10 | 882 days | 52% |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 1004 days | 43% |
| Marie Perret | 10/10 | 1004 days | 43% |
| Dylan | 8/10 | 1035 days | 40% |
| Charlie | 9/10 | 1035 days | 40% |
| MB | 10/10 | 1127 days | 33% |
| Jodie Muller | 9/10 | 1127 days | 32% |
| Taylor Russell | 7/10 | 1127 days | 30% |
| FitzHanss | 5/10 | 1157 days | 23% |
| Ryli West | 7/10 | 1157 days | 28% |
| Whitney | 6/10 | 1157 days | 26% |
| Matt Olejniczak | 9/10 | 1188 days | 28% |
| Gary | 10/10 | 1216 days | 26% |
| Jaycee | 9/10 | 1247 days | 24% |
| Arie | 9/10 | 1247 days | 24% |
| Pierre Marty | 9/10 | 1278 days | 22% |
| RR | 10/10 | 1278 days | 22% |
| Karen Parker | 9/10 | 1339 days | 18% |
| Lara | 10/10 | 1339 days | 18% |
| Yuvin | 10/10 | 1369 days | 17% |
| Chantal D | 9/10 | 1400 days | 15% |
| Hannah and Matthew | 10/10 | 1400 days | 15% |
| Catherine | 10/10 | 1673 days | 6% |
| Trina | 10/10 | 1857 days | 5% |
| Tracy W | 10/10 | 1857 days | 5% |
| Ramona | 10/10 | 1918 days | 4% |
| Rory | 10/10 | 1946 days | 4% |
| Michelle | 10/10 | 2008 days | 4% |
| ZMad | 10/10 | 2008 days | 4% |
| Josia | 10/10 | 2008 days | 4% |
| Hamish | 10/10 | 2069 days | 4% |
| David | 10/10 | 2191 days | 4% |
| Maria | 9/10 | 2283 days | 4% |
| Sandra Forstner | 10/10 | 2312 days | 4% |
| Clauds | 9/10 | 2312 days | 4% |
| Melanie | 10/10 | 2342 days | 4% |
| Erica | 9/10 | 2343 days | 4% |
| Fran | 9/10 | 2374 days | 4% |
| Kellen Richter | 9/10 | 2404 days | 3% |
| Susanne | 9/10 | 2404 days | 3% |
| Chris Taesali | 8/10 | 2404 days | 3% |
| Timothy Davies | 10/10 | 2404 days | 4% |
| Elaine | 8/10 | 2465 days | 3% |
| Erin | 7/10 | 2527 days | 3% |
| Matilda | 10/10 | 2527 days | 3% |
| Dominique Q | 10/10 | 2617 days | 3% |
| Taylor | 7/10 | 2618 days | 3% |
| Jmurray | 10/10 | 2649 days | 3% |
| Pat Burns | 8/10 | 2649 days | 3% |
| Peter Lillie | 9/10 | 2649 days | 3% |
| Ruddah | 10/10 | 2708 days | 3% |
| Heather Abbott | 8/10 | 2708 days | 3% |
| JT | 6/10 | 2708 days | 2% |
| An | 7/10 | 2739 days | 3% |
| Matt | 6/10 | 2769 days | 2% |
| James & Kerry | 10/10 | 2769 days | 3% |
| Grizzly Girl | 8/10 | 2800 days | 3% |
| Angela | 9/10 | 2800 days | 3% |
| Rachel | 10/10 | 2830 days | 3% |
| Dory | 9/10 | 2922 days | 2% |
| Candy | 8/10 | 2983 days | 2% |
| Matt | 9/10 | 2983 days | 2% |
| Christina | 9/10 | 2983 days | 2% |
| Nicky Edwards | 8/10 | 3027 days | 2% |
| Yasmin Sabir | 10/10 | 3028 days | 2% |
| UK 50-something couple | 9/10 | 3042 days | 2% |
| Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 3072 days | 2% |
| Victor Hernandez | 3/10 | 3098 days | 1% |
| Laura Meelynn | 10/10 | 3103 days | 2% |
| Nora Tobies | 9/10 | 3109 days | 2% |
| Stacey Cheong | 9/10 | 3138 days | 2% |
| Samantha Brewin | 10/10 | 3145 days | 2% |
| Sandra Jeffers | 7/10 | 3150 days | 2% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 9/10 | 3153 days | 2% |
| Detlef Buxmann | 10/10 | 3173 days | 2% |
| Vanessa Stubbs | 9/10 | 3191 days | 2% |
| R R | 10/10 | 3194 days | 2% |
| CARMERS | 10/10 | 3195 days | 2% |
| Aman Yusuf | 10/10 | 3202 days | 2% |
| Nat and Chad | 10/10 | 3211 days | 2% |
| Chloe McKee | 10/10 | 3235 days | 2% |
| Alex Umbers | 9/10 | 3263 days | 2% |
| Joanne Haslam | 10/10 | 3298 days | 2% |
| Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 3317 days | 2% |
| Linda Jones | 10/10 | 3339 days | 2% |
| Louise Russell | 9/10 | 3347 days | 2% |
| Jerry Bart | 10/10 | 3352 days | 2% |
| Grainne Phelan | 9/10 | 3359 days | 2% |
| Paul Morris | 9/10 | 3365 days | 2% |
| Joe Fram | 10/10 | 3367 days | 2% |
| Cathy Mead | 8/10 | 3371 days | 2% |
| Paul Smith | 8/10 | 3378 days | 2% |
| Jason Perks | 9/10 | 3385 days | 2% |
| Erich Brueggermann | 9/10 | 3402 days | 2% |
| Lee Burdett | 10/10 | 3423 days | 2% |
| Roeland Driessen | 10/10 | 3437 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 3437 days | 1% |
| Greg Dylewski | 10/10 | 3445 days | 1% |
| Petr Jesko | 10/10 | 3474 days | 1% |
| Kathryn Meadows | 7/10 | 3499 days | 1% |
| Margo Wiltens | 10/10 | 3522 days | 1% |
| Ana Ciocchini | 10/10 | 3546 days | 1% |
| Rosanne van Dooren | 9/10 | 3550 days | 1% |
| Lyn Pobke | 10/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 8/10 | 3685 days | 1% |
| Diane Klasen | 9/10 | 3690 days | 1% |
| Erin Polcyn Sailer | 9/10 | 3693 days | 1% |
| Heng Sing Teh | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 3730 days | 1% |
| Gloria Berlari | 10/10 | 3748 days | 1% |
| Corina Sima | 10/10 | 3751 days | 1% |
| Chris Kay | 9/10 | 3761 days | 1% |
| Udo Morello | 10/10 | 3763 days | 1% |
| Volker Stroenisch | 10/10 | 3772 days | 1% |
| Laura Daly | 10/10 | 3793 days | 1% |
| Nicole CAirns | 10/10 | 3796 days | 1% |
| James Whitehead | 7/10 | 3806 days | 1% |
| Steve Warren | 10/10 | 3894 days | 1% |
| Cassandra Schreier | 10/10 | 3921 days | 1% |
| Pam Russell | 10/10 | 3927 days | 1% |
| Harriet Bramley | 8/10 | 3929 days | 1% |
| Chris Read | 4/10 | 4054 days | 0% |
| Steffen Paul | 5/10 | 4059 days | 0% |
| Linda Eather | 9/10 | 4070 days | 0% |
| Rachel S | 10/10 | 4078 days | 0% |
| Kurz Werner | 8/10 | 4078 days | 0% |
| Ken | 8/10 | 4100 days | 0% |
| Andrew Cruickshank | 8/10 | 4109 days | 0% |
| Mike Merrick | 9/10 | 4117 days | 0% |
| Averil Brown | 9/10 | 4135 days | 0% |
| Robert Warner | 10/10 | 4137 days | 0% |
| Elles Janssen | 8/10 | 4168 days | 0% |
| Patrick Dezarnaulds | 10/10 | 4178 days | 0% |
| Pia Sander | 9/10 | 4199 days | 0% |
| Gillian Scott | 9/10 | 4473 days | 1% |
| Malcolm & Susan | 9/10 | 4474 days | 1% |
| Brita Topp | 9/10 | 4475 days | 1% |
| Eva-Maria Krueger | 8/10 | 4475 days | 1% |
| Denise Ewbank | 9/10 | 4490 days | 1% |
| Steffen | 7/10 | 4491 days | 0% |
| Lopez Anandine | 9/10 | 4492 days | 1% |
| Sybille Willenbrock | 10/10 | 4497 days | 1% |
| Luca Maria Willensrock | 9/10 | 4497 days | 1% |
| Michael Uebe | 10/10 | 4506 days | 1% |
| Andrea Hiemer | 9/10 | 4510 days | 1% |
| S B | 10/10 | 4516 days | 1% |
| M K | 10/10 | 4516 days | 1% |
| Martin Thibaut | 10/10 | 4526 days | 1% |
| John Davis | 9/10 | 4533 days | 1% |
| Erin Decker | 10/10 | 4565 days | 1% |
| A Farquhar | 10/10 | 4595 days | 1% |
| Ron Stenhouse | 8/10 | 4809 days | 1% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 9/10 | 4827 days | 1% |
| patrick+ katerina | 9/10 | 4840 days | 1% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 8/10 | 4848 days | 1% |
| Veronica and Jordi | 4/10 | 4859 days | 0% |
| doepie277 | 7/10 | 4899 days | 1% |
| Margaret and Derek McNeil | 9/10 | 4915 days | 1% |
| Anja and Katharina | 10/10 | 4939 days | 1% |
| David | 8/10 | 4960 days | 1% |
| Lindsay Berquist | 10/10 | 5144 days | 1% |
| Stephanie Peter | 10/10 | 5192 days | 1% |
| Jill Homewood | 9/10 | 5198 days | 1% |
| Tinne Cis | 8/10 | 5202 days | 1% |
| Les Barnes | 10/10 | 5214 days | 1% |
| Aridne Giraud | 8/10 | 5217 days | 1% |
| Manuela Weber | 9/10 | 5219 days | 1% |
| Peter Aertssen | 7/10 | 5220 days | 0% |
| Horst Langstein | 9/10 | 5227 days | 1% |
| dierikx | 10/10 | 5265 days | 1% |
| lydzb | 10/10 | 5296 days | 1% |
| Martherus | 8/10 | 5303 days | 1% |
| Rus | 9/10 | 5326 days | 1% |
| DJohnson | 9/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| damaca | 10/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| Graham Greentree | 10/10 | 5548 days | 1% |
| Leroy Dimitri | 10/10 | 5553 days | 1% |
| Jolien Kruizinga | 9/10 | 5555 days | 1% |
| John Tinus | 8/10 | 5555 days | 1% |
| Tom Bushell | 7/10 | 5555 days | 0% |
| Nathalie | 10/10 | 5555 days | 1% |
| Sandra Milch | 10/10 | 5555 days | 1% |
| Graham Wilson | 9/10 | 5555 days | 1% |
| Laurie Smith | 9/10 | 5562 days | 1% |
| Juerg & Denise Zuesli | 7/10 | 5564 days | 0% |
| Courtney Wood | 8/10 | 5569 days | 1% |
| Elise van Haastert | 9/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
| Geert Van Tittelboom | 8/10 | 5575 days | 1% |
| Matthys Kikke | 8/10 | 5575 days | 1% |
| Bucher Weruer | 10/10 | 5575 days | 1% |
| Alexander & Stephanie | 8/10 | 5576 days | 1% |
| Lauren Pestell | 10/10 | 5578 days | 1% |
| John Price | 9/10 | 5589 days | 1% |
| Derek Archibald | 9/10 | 5592 days | 1% |
| Ellen Thompson | 10/10 | 5594 days | 1% |
| Robin Schomburg | 10/10 | 5596 days | 1% |
| flyfishingbum | 3/10 | 5599 days | 0% |
| dollimyxture | 8/10 | 5630 days | 1% |
| Monica Askew | 9/10 | 5853 days | 1% |
| davidm239 | 8/10 | 5875 days | 1% |
| Jess | 8/10 | 5910 days | 1% |
| Martina Pankova | 10/10 | 5911 days | 1% |
| Corine van Been | 7/10 | 5918 days | 0% |
| Einar | 9/10 | 5924 days | 1% |
| Don & Alice | 9/10 | 5940 days | 1% |
| John Cox | 8/10 | 5942 days | 1% |
| Remko Ebbens | 9/10 | 5949 days | 1% |
| T. Timmers | 9/10 | 5950 days | 1% |
| Jamie | 9/10 | 5956 days | 1% |
| Glenn Williamson | 8/10 | 5957 days | 1% |
| Keith Wilde | 8/10 | 5959 days | 1% |
| Hanz | 9/10 | 5960 days | 1% |
| marcoswi | 10/10 | 5970 days | 1% |
| Jonathan Angela | 7/10 | 5978 days | 0% |
| Chris Bulman | 9/10 | 6037 days | 1% |
| nancyburns | 9/10 | 6056 days | 1% |
| Francesca | 9/10 | 6071 days | 1% |
| DirkGermany | 10/10 | 6265 days | 1% |
| Ger | 10/10 | 6268 days | 1% |
| Philipp | 7/10 | 6270 days | 0% |
| johnst | 10/10 | 6270 days | 1% |
| Rissmann | 8/10 | 6286 days | 1% |
| MarcoJ | 9/10 | 6290 days | 1% |
| CSander | 8/10 | 6302 days | 1% |
| RobC1 | 7/10 | 6305 days | 0% |
| JoT | 9/10 | 6305 days | 1% |
| RobH | 8/10 | 6306 days | 1% |
| Frank | 9/10 | 6313 days | 1% |
| winter_uk | 6/10 | 6313 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Lakeview Holiday Park & Motels experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.53% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 106 days. However the Te Anau Lakeview Holiday Park & Motels experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Lakeview Holiday Park & Motels experience has been adjusted for 43 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 40 | -0.49% |
| 41 | -0.50% |
| 42 | -0.51% |
| 43 | -0.53% |
| 44 | -0.54% |
| 45 | -0.55% |
| 46 | -0.56% |
| … | … |
1.33% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.