Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Dunedin Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
132 Valid Reviews
The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has a total of 136 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 14 |
|
11% |
9/10 | 21 |
|
16% |
8/10 | 47 |
|
36% |
7/10 | 20 |
|
15% |
6/10 | 12 |
|
9% |
5/10 | 6 |
|
5% |
4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
74.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Dunedin Holiday Park valid reviews is 74.17% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
38 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 38 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
9/10 | 8 |
|
21% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
34% |
7/10 | 6 |
|
16% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
73.68% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Dunedin Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 73.68% and is based on 38 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
78.27%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Cafe | 10/10 | 25 days | 100% |
Brett | 9/10 | 56 days | 99% |
Debyron | 8/10 | 56 days | 98% |
Lu | 8/10 | 331 days | 92% |
Janneke | 9/10 | 331 days | 93% |
Diana Heffner | 1/10 | 452 days | 36% |
Nicky | 7/10 | 483 days | 81% |
Shykiwi | 7/10 | 635 days | 72% |
Amy Fortin-Barrette | 9/10 | 635 days | 76% |
Lukas Meier | 2/10 | 697 days | 33% |
Laz. | 8/10 | 697 days | 71% |
Paul McLaughlin | 8/10 | 725 days | 69% |
RR | 6/10 | 787 days | 56% |
Colin | 9/10 | 848 days | 58% |
Carol | 9/10 | 1000 days | 43% |
Rosie | 7/10 | 1242 days | 23% |
Ogilvie family of 5 | 8/10 | 1486 days | 11% |
Monkeyalan | 7/10 | 1607 days | 7% |
Carla | 8/10 | 1821 days | 5% |
Tanja & Sven | 6/10 | 1852 days | 4% |
Nigel Crane | 10/10 | 1883 days | 5% |
Corin Krainer | 5/10 | 1883 days | 4% |
Fran | 6/10 | 1883 days | 4% |
Stevie | 5/10 | 2127 days | 3% |
Cassie | 9/10 | 2338 days | 4% |
Kiri Edwards | 7/10 | 2400 days | 4% |
Sue | 6/10 | 2400 days | 3% |
sally m | 10/10 | 2430 days | 4% |
Bailey Dunne | 8/10 | 2523 days | 4% |
Benn | 8/10 | 2523 days | 4% |
Angela MacPherson | 8/10 | 2542 days | 4% |
Shira LA | 8/10 | 2551 days | 4% |
Mark Lindeman | 3/10 | 2551 days | 2% |
Jack James | 8/10 | 2609 days | 3% |
Rodney Morris | 7/10 | 2643 days | 3% |
Laeticia Coelho | 10/10 | 2649 days | 3% |
Samantha Brewin | 7/10 | 2654 days | 3% |
Suzanne Halfpenny | 6/10 | 2672 days | 3% |
Charlie Dodds | 8/10 | 2697 days | 3% |
Jo Dawson | 8/10 | 2781 days | 3% |
Per Rantze | 1/10 | 2794 days | 1% |
Chris Nugent | 10/10 | 2817 days | 3% |
Josh Withell | 4/10 | 2872 days | 2% |
Iris Maatman | 10/10 | 2878 days | 3% |
Paul Smith | 8/10 | 2882 days | 3% |
Frank Hofmann | 10/10 | 2882 days | 3% |
Josephine Ayvadian | 10/10 | 2888 days | 3% |
Walter Neff | 7/10 | 2915 days | 3% |
Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 2946 days | 3% |
Lenka Pruherova | 8/10 | 2958 days | 3% |
Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 2966 days | 3% |
Alex Dorrington | 10/10 | 2972 days | 3% |
estelle D | 6/10 | 2977 days | 2% |
Sheryl Hicks | 8/10 | 3020 days | 3% |
Helen Keck | 10/10 | 3104 days | 2% |
Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3123 days | 2% |
Sarah Hammond | 9/10 | 3141 days | 2% |
Tony | 8/10 | 3222 days | 2% |
Ray Tombs | 8/10 | 3239 days | 2% |
Roland Tauchner | 3/10 | 3258 days | 1% |
Peter Fink | 9/10 | 3263 days | 2% |
David From Switzerland | 7/10 | 3327 days | 2% |
Richard Kirby | 7/10 | 3328 days | 2% |
Valerie Wee | 7/10 | 3352 days | 2% |
Pang Albert | 7/10 | 3438 days | 2% |
Fabien Metro | 9/10 | 3475 days | 2% |
Nicole | 9/10 | 3533 days | 2% |
Barry Goodwin | 5/10 | 3615 days | 1% |
Larry Dashiell | 10/10 | 3618 days | 1% |
John Drake | 6/10 | 3624 days | 1% |
Bjorn Privat | 5/10 | 3700 days | 1% |
Lucy Grund | 9/10 | 3710 days | 1% |
Gianpiero Rodari | 8/10 | 3738 days | 1% |
Bert Snel | 8/10 | 3738 days | 1% |
Andrea | 8/10 | 3769 days | 1% |
Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3891 days | 1% |
Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 3953 days | 1% |
Marek Heiurich | 3/10 | 3962 days | 0% |
Stefan Glock | 9/10 | 3967 days | 1% |
Brita Topp | 8/10 | 3984 days | 1% |
Becky Davis | 8/10 | 4011 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 7/10 | 4012 days | 1% |
Carina Borho | 8/10 | 4018 days | 1% |
Markus Spitzmueller | 9/10 | 4019 days | 1% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 8/10 | 4033 days | 1% |
Andy Karl | 8/10 | 4043 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 5/10 | 4050 days | 0% |
A Farquhar | 6/10 | 4104 days | 0% |
Henrik Joshua | 8/10 | 4135 days | 0% |
Kerri | 8/10 | 4164 days | 0% |
Florian | 8/10 | 4318 days | 0% |
Verena | 9/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
Anja S | 9/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
Moni Sangoi | 6/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
Lis Bon | 9/10 | 4408 days | 1% |
Martin | 8/10 | 4408 days | 1% |
Hanneke P | 7/10 | 4408 days | 1% |
Martyn Kool | 4/10 | 4425 days | 0% |
Marieke | 4/10 | 4425 days | 0% |
M Natterser | 8/10 | 4427 days | 1% |
Katharina Pape | 9/10 | 4437 days | 1% |
Kimothy | 8/10 | 4683 days | 1% |
Hilbert vanEssen | 7/10 | 4711 days | 1% |
Beeny | 6/10 | 4724 days | 1% |
Peter Aertssen | 7/10 | 4729 days | 1% |
John Heal | 8/10 | 4819 days | 1% |
Heather & Jenny | 7/10 | 4820 days | 1% |
neilqecosse | 9/10 | 4895 days | 1% |
damaca | 1/10 | 4895 days | 0% |
redmatthew16 | 9/10 | 4987 days | 1% |
Ed Piotrowski | 8/10 | 5057 days | 1% |
Graham Greentree | 8/10 | 5057 days | 1% |
G Cucel | 10/10 | 5063 days | 1% |
Siggi Wick | 6/10 | 5071 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 8/10 | 5071 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 7/10 | 5074 days | 1% |
LandJ | 3/10 | 5080 days | 1% |
Lenore Dejong | 10/10 | 5082 days | 1% |
Mr & Mrs Mackie | 5/10 | 5090 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 8/10 | 5096 days | 1% |
Ellen Thompson | 3/10 | 5103 days | 0% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5139 days | 1% |
nelliekaye | 8/10 | 5260 days | 1% |
Paula Martinez | 8/10 | 5448 days | 1% |
Dieter Groscurth | 7/10 | 5455 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 8/10 | 5490 days | 1% |
asselman | 8/10 | 5520 days | 1% |
hellami | 8/10 | 5565 days | 1% |
Ritag | 9/10 | 5650 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 7/10 | 5812 days | 1% |
Dirk | 8/10 | 5822 days | 1% |
John | 6/10 | 5828 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.33% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 48 days. However the Dunedin Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Dunedin Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 16 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
13 | -0.27% |
14 | -0.29% |
15 | -0.31% |
16 | -0.33% |
17 | -0.35% |
18 | -0.37% |
19 | -0.39% |
… | … |
3.60% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.