Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for South Brighton Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
South Brighton Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
75 Valid Reviews
The South Brighton Holiday Park experience has a total of 81 reviews. There are 75 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 75 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
20% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
78.27% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the South Brighton Holiday Park valid reviews is 78.27% and is based on 75 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
10 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 75 valid reviews, the experience has 10 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 10 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
20% |
| 9/10 | 1 |
|
10% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
20% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
10% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
10% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
78.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the South Brighton Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 78.00% and is based on 10 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
84.10%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| June scott | 10/10 | 393 days | 100% |
| Fabian | 8/10 | 667 days | 80% |
| Kay | 8/10 | 911 days | 57% |
| Klaudia Fekete | 9/10 | 942 days | 54% |
| Pauline | 8/10 | 971 days | 50% |
| Lu | 1/10 | 1002 days | 19% |
| Annessa Eason | 10/10 | 1033 days | 45% |
| June Cormack | 9/10 | 1094 days | 38% |
| Lizelle Bennett | 9/10 | 1124 days | 36% |
| Marie Perret | 9/10 | 1124 days | 36% |
| Amy Catley | 10/10 | 1247 days | 26% |
| Lynsey Keaton | 8/10 | 1308 days | 22% |
| Suzanne p | 10/10 | 1308 days | 22% |
| Danny Mac | 6/10 | 1336 days | 18% |
| Trui Waalwijk | 3/10 | 1367 days | 10% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 1367 days | 19% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 1367 days | 18% |
| Julia | 8/10 | 1398 days | 16% |
| Peter | 1/10 | 1428 days | 6% |
| Rambo23 | 9/10 | 1428 days | 15% |
| Alex Tikonoff | 4/10 | 1428 days | 10% |
| Ramona | 9/10 | 2066 days | 5% |
| Ada | 8/10 | 2097 days | 5% |
| Morgan | 8/10 | 2189 days | 4% |
| Keith & Kay Finlayson | 6/10 | 2616 days | 3% |
| Janna Schneppenheim | 10/10 | 2769 days | 3% |
| Bob C | 9/10 | 2797 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 10/10 | 2859 days | 3% |
| Hanna | 9/10 | 2859 days | 3% |
| Andrew | 3/10 | 2889 days | 2% |
| Nifty | 8/10 | 2889 days | 3% |
| Joe | 8/10 | 2920 days | 3% |
| Cassie | 7/10 | 2950 days | 3% |
| Boa | 9/10 | 2981 days | 3% |
| Stephen Lindsay | 8/10 | 3073 days | 3% |
| Paul and Paula | 8/10 | 3214 days | 2% |
| Sanne Heil | 8/10 | 3223 days | 2% |
| Nora Tobies | 7/10 | 3229 days | 2% |
| Michael Talbot | 5/10 | 3259 days | 2% |
| Silvia Rissi | 10/10 | 3266 days | 2% |
| Howard Morris | 6/10 | 3287 days | 2% |
| Vanessa Stubbs | 6/10 | 3311 days | 2% |
| Tracey Tyson | 10/10 | 3433 days | 2% |
| Kate and Dom | 8/10 | 3508 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 7/10 | 3558 days | 2% |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 3591 days | 2% |
| Peter Passlack | 9/10 | 3627 days | 1% |
| Julia Mayerhoefer | 8/10 | 3834 days | 1% |
| Lisa Conradie | 7/10 | 3893 days | 1% |
| leo lionheart | 10/10 | 4169 days | 0% |
| Rossco | 3/10 | 4199 days | 0% |
| Jean-Claude Escutary | 9/10 | 4231 days | 0% |
| Mark Angell | 8/10 | 4303 days | 0% |
| Bert Snel | 9/10 | 4320 days | 0% |
| Kane F | 10/10 | 4411 days | 1% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4595 days | 1% |
| Jeanne Knights | 9/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
| Andy Karl | 9/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
| catherine welsh | 7/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
| Helen Buxton | 9/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
| Alan Blackburn | 6/10 | 4685 days | 1% |
| Kiwix3 | 9/10 | 4776 days | 1% |
| Mycall | 9/10 | 4929 days | 1% |
| Trissy MP | 5/10 | 4960 days | 1% |
| Chantal Mortel | 8/10 | 4965 days | 1% |
| CanadaGirl23 | 10/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
| Andrew K | 8/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
| Lyn Deavin | 7/10 | 5337 days | 1% |
| Seraphim Karin | 10/10 | 5351 days | 1% |
| damaca | 8/10 | 5507 days | 1% |
| Sofie Dubillot | 10/10 | 5694 days | 1% |
| Marcus Kippner | 5/10 | 6047 days | 0% |
| Emily Walters | 7/10 | 6082 days | 1% |
| Laura Walters | 8/10 | 6083 days | 1% |
| andriesk | 6/10 | 6272 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The South Brighton Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.23% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 68 days. However the South Brighton Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The South Brighton Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.18% |
| 198 | -3.20% |
| 199 | -3.21% |
| 200 | -3.23% |
| 201 | -3.25% |
| 202 | -3.26% |
| 203 | -3.28% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
2.77% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.