Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for North South Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

North South Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

59 Valid Reviews

The North South Holiday Park experience has a total of 60 reviews. There are 59 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
12%
9/10 9
15%
8/10 14
24%
7/10 14
24%
6/10 5
8%
5/10 6
10%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 2
3%
1/10 0
0%

73.39% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the North South Holiday Park valid reviews is 73.39% and is based on 59 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

6 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 59 valid reviews, the experience has 6 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 6 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 0
0%
9/10 0
0%
8/10 5
83%
7/10 1
17%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

78.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the North South Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 78.33% and is based on 6 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

63.20%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Susan Melgaard Rasmussen 6/10 281 days 96%
Marco from Netherlands 6/10 312 days 95%
cirefice bernard 4/10 343 days 71%
Richard Howell 7/10 373 days 100%
Hannah 6/10 708 days 72%
DC 5/10 1012 days 38%
Nicky 8/10 1135 days 37%
Kath 5/10 1318 days 17%
Russell 10/10 1377 days 19%
Anna Tatje 7/10 1408 days 16%
Karthik 7/10 2048 days 5%
Julianne McKie 9/10 2596 days 4%
Andrew Hammond 7/10 2626 days 4%
Renee 7/10 2779 days 3%
Wouter 7/10 2900 days 3%
Mike Fricker 8/10 2930 days 3%
Maccherone 8/10 2961 days 3%
Tati Moron 8/10 3148 days 2%
S Weslake 5/10 3175 days 2%
Christian Oerlemans 4/10 3180 days 2%
laurence airey 9/10 3264 days 2%
Mellisa Marcellus 9/10 3273 days 2%
Phil and Mel Rowson 10/10 3293 days 2%
Gary Prescot 5/10 3328 days 2%
Craig Wilcock 9/10 3510 days 2%
Rode Stella 10/10 3556 days 2%
Nicola Barlow 8/10 3625 days 2%
S Webb 10/10 3632 days 2%
Darren Bolton 10/10 3649 days 2%
Ivan Wee 6/10 3650 days 1%
Sheryl Hicks 9/10 3672 days 2%
Monika 8/10 3674 days 1%
Helen Keck 8/10 3757 days 1%
Peter Barker 10/10 3885 days 1%
Katharina Herzog 2/10 3892 days 0%
Goldfinger 2/10 3904 days 0%
Bianca Biehl 7/10 3941 days 1%
Venita Damm 9/10 3962 days 1%
Alex Macdonald 7/10 3964 days 1%
Helen B 6/10 3988 days 1%
Ann Bogelund 5/10 4037 days 1%
Jessie Karsif 9/10 4169 days 0%
Yvonne Wu 7/10 4209 days 0%
Matt Betts 7/10 4215 days 0%
Tomáš Bžatek 5/10 4245 days 0%
Julia 8/10 4270 days 0%
Jan Rüegg 7/10 4360 days 0%
Carina Borho 8/10 4670 days 1%
Markus Spitzmueller 7/10 4671 days 1%
Mette, Bo, Viktor & Olivia Seligmann 7/10 4970 days 1%
Mycall 9/10 4970 days 1%
Doug Digstravel 8/10 5060 days 1%
Lis Bon 8/10 5060 days 1%
phudgb 7/10 5121 days 1%
Chris 10/10 5152 days 1%
dierikx 9/10 5395 days 1%
hendrik king 8/10 5426 days 1%
Bette Eh 8/10 5721 days 1%
Mrs Russon 8/10 6122 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The North South Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.95% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 47 days. However the North South Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The North South Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
… …
197 -3.89%
198 -3.91%
199 -3.93%
200 -3.95%
201 -3.97%
202 -3.99%
203 -4.01%
… …

Balancing Adjustment

14.60% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

74%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.