Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Alpine Pacific Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
88 Valid Reviews
The Alpine Pacific Holiday Park experience has a total of 90 reviews. There are 88 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 88 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Alpine Pacific Holiday Park valid reviews is 81.36% and is based on 88 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 88 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Alpine Pacific Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 82.67% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Bex & Jake||9/10||479 days||63.64||64%|
|JAMES FRANCO||1/10||509 days||43.03||43%|
|Bailey Dunne||10/10||540 days||53.79||54%|
|Patricia Stitchbury||4/10||567 days||38.85||39%|
|Keith Salway||9/10||579 days||47.19||47%|
|Jan Schreuder||9/10||581 days||46.87||47%|
|Kelly Zappia||3/10||698 days||23.08||23%|
|Madelyn Fagerman||10/10||861 days||13.68||13%|
|Maud Fredrikze||9/10||941 days||8.76||8%|
|Aimee Theobald||10/10||994 days||6.62||6%|
|Mallory Lopez||8/10||1273 days||4.49||4%|
|Gabor Kabacs||9/10||1281 days||4.72||4%|
|Sven Hasselberger||8/10||1311 days||4.44||4%|
|Lesa Price||8/10||1420 days||4.28||4%|
|Kate L||10/10||1513 days||4.36||4%|
|Nyla and Alan Ramsay||10/10||1635 days||4.18||4%|
|Isabel Seadon||3/10||1658 days||3.19||3%|
|Jurgen Moors||6/10||1680 days||3.41||3%|
|Stefanie Feldman||7/10||1683 days||3.74||3%|
|Bert Snel||7/10||1725 days||3.68||3%|
|David Cowling||9/10||1745 days||4.01||3%|
|John K||9/10||1755 days||4.0||3%|
|SUE COLEMAN||8/10||1755 days||3.8||3%|
|Gillian Scott||7/10||1999 days||3.3||3%|
|Andy Karl||8/10||2060 days||3.35||3%|
|catherine coombs||7/10||2060 days||3.21||3%|
|Paul Wood||9/10||2091 days||3.48||3%|
|Nigel & Annie Dale||9/10||2121 days||3.44||3%|
|Lis Bon||8/10||2425 days||2.83||2%|
|Sandra and Thomas||10/10||2444 days||2.95||2%|
|Urs Kloter||6/10||2447 days||2.44||2%|
|Esther Goh||9/10||2670 days||2.6||2%|
|Sander Heike||7/10||2703 days||2.32||2%|
|Inge & Erik||9/10||2741 days||2.49||2%|
|Nicholas Prakenhammar||8/10||2744 days||2.37||2%|
|Heewin Otten||8/10||2753 days||2.35||2%|
|Rocco Christian||9/10||2754 days||2.47||2%|
|Scott & Madeleine Bancroft||10/10||2842 days||2.34||2%|
|Res Kormann||10/10||3055 days||2.02||1%|
|Brian & Di||9/10||3079 days||1.98||1%|
|Beat & Connie||10/10||3091 days||1.96||1%|
|Jacob Nube||8/10||3093 days||1.86||1%|
|Erland Ostberg||3/10||3099 days||1.5||1%|
|Rolf Homeyer||5/10||3116 days||1.56||1%|
|Tony B||5/10||3443 days||1.16||1%|
|Helen T||9/10||3457 days||1.4||1%|
|Tony Geens||8/10||3463 days||1.33||1%|
|Natalie & Simon King||8/10||3465 days||1.32||1%|
|Emily Walters||9/10||3488 days||1.36||1%|
|Yvonne Ing||9/10||3489 days||1.36||1%|
|Marian Demients-deJongh||9/10||3503 days||1.33||1%|
|Hans Hoff||9/10||3560 days||1.25||1%|
|Gina Swindells||10/10||3563 days||1.24||1%|
|Katrin Wennin||10/10||3563 days||1.24||1%|
|Flavia Mionelli||10/10||3564 days||1.24||1%|
|Vicki Cashmore||10/10||3564 days||1.24||1%|
|Sara Reekmans||9/10||3575 days||1.23||1%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Alpine Pacific Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Alpine Pacific Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Alpine Pacific Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 74 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.