Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Alpine Pacific Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
94 Valid Reviews
The Alpine Pacific Holiday Park experience has a total of 97 reviews. There are 94 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 94 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Alpine Pacific Holiday Park valid reviews is 81.06% and is based on 94 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 94 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Alpine Pacific Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 82.67% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Liz Wade||6/10||470 days||55%|
|Niko Schachner||10/10||501 days||61%|
|Bex & Jake||9/10||1112 days||5%|
|JAMES FRANCO||1/10||1142 days||3%|
|Bailey Dunne||10/10||1173 days||5%|
|Patricia Stitchbury||4/10||1200 days||4%|
|Keith Salway||9/10||1212 days||5%|
|Jan Schreuder||9/10||1214 days||5%|
|Kelly Zappia||3/10||1331 days||3%|
|Madelyn Fagerman||10/10||1494 days||4%|
|Maud Fredrikze||9/10||1574 days||4%|
|Aimee Theobald||10/10||1627 days||4%|
|Mallory Lopez||8/10||1906 days||3%|
|Gabor Kabacs||9/10||1914 days||3%|
|Sven Hasselberger||8/10||1944 days||3%|
|Lesa Price||8/10||2053 days||3%|
|Kate L||10/10||2146 days||3%|
|Nyla and Alan Ramsay||10/10||2268 days||2%|
|Isabel Seadon||3/10||2291 days||2%|
|Jurgen Moors||6/10||2313 days||2%|
|Stefanie Feldman||7/10||2316 days||2%|
|Bert Snel||7/10||2358 days||2%|
|David Cowling||9/10||2378 days||2%|
|John K||9/10||2388 days||2%|
|SUE COLEMAN||8/10||2388 days||2%|
|Gillian Scott||7/10||2632 days||2%|
|Andy Karl||8/10||2693 days||2%|
|catherine welsh||7/10||2693 days||1%|
|Paul Wood||9/10||2724 days||2%|
|Nigel & Annie Dale||9/10||2754 days||1%|
|Lis Bon||8/10||3058 days||1%|
|Sandra and Thomas||10/10||3077 days||1%|
|Urs Kloter||6/10||3080 days||1%|
|Esther Goh||9/10||3303 days||0%|
|Sander Heike||7/10||3336 days||0%|
|Inge & Erik||9/10||3374 days||0%|
|Nicholas Prakenhammar||8/10||3377 days||0%|
|Heewin Otten||8/10||3386 days||0%|
|Rocco Christian||9/10||3387 days||0%|
|Scott & Madeleine Bancroft||10/10||3475 days||0%|
|Res Kormann||10/10||3688 days||1%|
|Brian & Di||9/10||3712 days||1%|
|Beat & Connie||10/10||3724 days||1%|
|Jacob Nube||8/10||3726 days||1%|
|Erland Ostberg||3/10||3732 days||0%|
|Rolf Homeyer||5/10||3749 days||1%|
|Tony B||5/10||4076 days||1%|
|Helen T||9/10||4090 days||1%|
|Tony Geens||8/10||4096 days||1%|
|Natalie & Simon King||8/10||4098 days||1%|
|Emily Walters||9/10||4121 days||1%|
|Yvonne Ing||9/10||4122 days||1%|
|Marian Demients-deJongh||9/10||4136 days||1%|
|Hans Hoff||9/10||4193 days||1%|
|Gina Swindells||10/10||4196 days||1%|
|Katrin Wennin||10/10||4196 days||1%|
|Flavia Mionelli||10/10||4197 days||1%|
|Vicki Cashmore||10/10||4197 days||1%|
|Sara Reekmans||9/10||4208 days||1%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Alpine Pacific Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 93 days. However the Alpine Pacific Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Alpine Pacific Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 78 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.