Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Alpine Pacific Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
91 Valid Reviews
The Alpine Pacific Holiday Park experience has a total of 94 reviews. There are 91 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 91 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Alpine Pacific Holiday Park valid reviews is 81.43% and is based on 91 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 91 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Alpine Pacific Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 82.67% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Liz Wade||6/10||65 days||82.44||84%|
|Niko Schachner||10/10||96 days||98.54||100%|
|Bex & Jake||9/10||706 days||28.98||29%|
|JAMES FRANCO||1/10||736 days||18.56||19%|
|Bailey Dunne||10/10||767 days||22.05||22%|
|Patricia Stitchbury||4/10||794 days||15.29||16%|
|Keith Salway||9/10||806 days||18.23||19%|
|Jan Schreuder||9/10||808 days||18.05||18%|
|Kelly Zappia||3/10||925 days||7.38||7%|
|Madelyn Fagerman||10/10||1088 days||5.01||5%|
|Maud Fredrikze||9/10||1168 days||4.86||5%|
|Aimee Theobald||10/10||1222 days||4.75||5%|
|Mallory Lopez||8/10||1500 days||4.0||4%|
|Gabor Kabacs||9/10||1508 days||4.19||4%|
|Sven Hasselberger||8/10||1538 days||3.93||4%|
|Lesa Price||8/10||1647 days||3.72||4%|
|Kate L||10/10||1741 days||3.74||4%|
|Nyla and Alan Ramsay||10/10||1862 days||3.5||4%|
|Isabel Seadon||3/10||1885 days||2.66||3%|
|Jurgen Moors||6/10||1907 days||2.83||3%|
|Stefanie Feldman||7/10||1910 days||3.1||3%|
|Bert Snel||7/10||1953 days||3.02||3%|
|David Cowling||9/10||1972 days||3.28||3%|
|John K||9/10||1983 days||3.26||3%|
|SUE COLEMAN||8/10||1983 days||3.1||3%|
|Gillian Scott||7/10||2226 days||2.54||3%|
|Andy Karl||8/10||2287 days||2.53||3%|
|catherine coombs||7/10||2287 days||2.43||2%|
|Paul Wood||9/10||2318 days||2.61||3%|
|Nigel & Annie Dale||9/10||2348 days||2.55||3%|
|Lis Bon||8/10||2652 days||1.86||2%|
|Sandra and Thomas||10/10||2671 days||1.92||2%|
|Urs Kloter||6/10||2674 days||1.59||2%|
|Esther Goh||9/10||2897 days||1.47||1%|
|Sander Heike||7/10||2930 days||1.28||1%|
|Inge & Erik||9/10||2968 days||1.33||1%|
|Nicholas Prakenhammar||8/10||2971 days||1.26||1%|
|Heewin Otten||8/10||2980 days||1.25||1%|
|Rocco Christian||9/10||2981 days||1.31||1%|
|Scott & Madeleine Bancroft||10/10||3069 days||1.14||1%|
|Res Kormann||10/10||3282 days||0.72||1%|
|Brian & Di||9/10||3306 days||0.67||1%|
|Beat & Connie||10/10||3318 days||0.65||1%|
|Jacob Nube||8/10||3320 days||0.61||1%|
|Erland Ostberg||3/10||3326 days||0.49||0%|
|Rolf Homeyer||5/10||3343 days||0.49||0%|
|Tony B||5/10||3670 days||0.0||0%|
|Helen T||9/10||3684 days||0.0||0%|
|Tony Geens||8/10||3690 days||0.0||0%|
|Natalie & Simon King||8/10||3692 days||0.0||0%|
|Emily Walters||9/10||3715 days||0.0||0%|
|Yvonne Ing||9/10||3716 days||0.0||0%|
|Marian Demients-deJongh||9/10||3730 days||0.0||0%|
|Hans Hoff||9/10||3787 days||0.0||0%|
|Gina Swindells||10/10||3790 days||0.0||0%|
|Katrin Wennin||10/10||3790 days||0.0||0%|
|Flavia Mionelli||10/10||3791 days||0.0||0%|
|Vicki Cashmore||10/10||3791 days||0.0||0%|
|Sara Reekmans||9/10||3802 days||0.0||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Alpine Pacific Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Alpine Pacific Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Alpine Pacific Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 28 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.