Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Pohara Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
69 Valid Reviews
The Pohara Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 70 reviews. There are 69 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 69 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pohara Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 80.14% and is based on 69 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 69 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pohara Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 76.09% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Mike Fricker||10/10||115 days||97.9||98%|
|Paul and Paula||10/10||419 days||72.18||72%|
|Lindy Scrivin||9/10||692 days||30.74||30%|
|Alan Brown||8/10||722 days||27.05||26%|
|Lynn Pateron||10/10||935 days||9.06||7%|
|Ray Tombs||10/10||1018 days||5.94||4%|
|Amy Bayliss||9/10||1113 days||4.98||3%|
|Jean marc Daubenfeld||9/10||1113 days||4.98||3%|
|Valerie Wee||5/10||1150 days||4.92||3%|
|Hol. M.||9/10||1515 days||4.42||3%|
|Anja Weppler||3/10||1757 days||4.54||3%|
|Luca Scheuemeier||9/10||1802 days||4.84||3%|
|gareth williams||8/10||2306 days||3.34||2%|
|Camille and Lucie||3/10||2511 days||3.4||2%|
|Brian Livesey||9/10||2525 days||3.65||2%|
|Fabian Germar||10/10||2525 days||3.65||2%|
|Ian Bailey||7/10||2529 days||3.64||2%|
|Sylvia & Garrit||1/10||2534 days||3.18||1%|
|Gabriele Wendt||10/10||2534 days||3.63||2%|
|Stephanie Wirthlin||2/10||2543 days||3.26||1%|
|Volker Neumeyer||5/10||2544 days||3.62||2%|
|Patricia Motzheim||10/10||2548 days||3.61||2%|
|Iain Campbell||9/10||2864 days||3.09||1%|
|Koen Vanlede||9/10||2872 days||3.08||1%|
|Beat & Connie||8/10||2880 days||3.07||1%|
|Patrick Schaad||6/10||2880 days||3.07||1%|
|Anita Tonks||9/10||2885 days||3.06||1%|
|David Emerick||10/10||2889 days||3.05||1%|
|Josef & Christine Evers||8/10||2895 days||3.04||1%|
|Annie Pennington||10/10||2901 days||3.03||1%|
|Andy Martin||9/10||2903 days||3.03||1%|
|Roger Lows||8/10||2905 days||3.02||1%|
|Gerry Nichols||9/10||2909 days||3.02||1%|
|Meriel & Paul Best||10/10||2910 days||3.02||1%|
|inda Hall||7/10||2911 days||3.01||1%|
|Bruce & Bonnie Childs||9/10||2913 days||3.01||1%|
|Stephan Imartina||9/10||3186 days||2.56||1%|
|Muller Weissert||8/10||3258 days||2.44||1%|
|Ron Price||9/10||3259 days||2.44||1%|
|Rob Alston||8/10||3279 days||2.01||0%|
|Colin Morbey||6/10||3293 days||2.39||1%|
|jan and john||9/10||3295 days||2.38||1%|
|Johan Vaartjes||9/10||3295 days||2.38||1%|
|gary mitchell||10/10||3341 days||1.92||0%|
|Sandra M||7/10||3343 days||2.3||0%|
|Vicki Cashmore||9/10||3353 days||2.29||0%|
|Paul & Lois Somerville||9/10||3353 days||2.29||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Pohara Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Pohara Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.
The Pohara Beach TOP 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 30 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.