Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Havelock Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Havelock Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
57 Valid Reviews
The Havelock Holiday Park experience has a total of 60 reviews. There are 57 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 57 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 10 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 13 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
32% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
77.54% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Havelock Holiday Park valid reviews is 77.54% and is based on 57 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
24 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 57 valid reviews, the experience has 24 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 24 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 9/10 | 3 |
|
13% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
46% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
73.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Havelock Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 73.33% and is based on 24 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
82.60%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gregg Becker | 8/10 | 41 days | 99% |
| Massimo | 3/10 | 41 days | 55% |
| Thilo Baumann | 10/10 | 103 days | 100% |
| Vern Christensen | 8/10 | 347 days | 92% |
| Graham | 9/10 | 437 days | 89% |
| Marie Perret | 10/10 | 895 days | 55% |
| Blu Ice | 9/10 | 1229 days | 25% |
| Susan | 8/10 | 1474 days | 12% |
| Chris Barham | 9/10 | 1502 days | 11% |
| Criss | 9/10 | 1625 days | 7% |
| Laz. | 7/10 | 1839 days | 5% |
| Daretobe | 8/10 | 1959 days | 5% |
| Welsh Camper | 3/10 | 2233 days | 2% |
| Tracy | 9/10 | 2509 days | 4% |
| Kyra | 9/10 | 2660 days | 3% |
| John L | 9/10 | 2690 days | 3% |
| Ian&yevon | 2/10 | 2904 days | 1% |
| Chris and Maike | 10/10 | 2904 days | 3% |
| John Spittlehouse | 9/10 | 2943 days | 3% |
| UK 50-something couple | 8/10 | 2963 days | 3% |
| Paul and Paula | 7/10 | 3025 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3043 days | 3% |
| Gary Prescot | 6/10 | 3088 days | 2% |
| CARMERS | 9/10 | 3116 days | 2% |
| Anja Röhrich | 10/10 | 3257 days | 2% |
| Jerry Bart | 8/10 | 3273 days | 2% |
| Paul Smith | 7/10 | 3306 days | 2% |
| Adam Wartman | 9/10 | 3651 days | 1% |
| Valerie Calligrafi | 10/10 | 3707 days | 1% |
| Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 4335 days | 0% |
| Collacott | 4/10 | 4775 days | 1% |
| Ann Sinclair | 10/10 | 4779 days | 1% |
| Maura Dillon | 10/10 | 4820 days | 1% |
| Letitia Wenn | 7/10 | 4868 days | 1% |
| Owen Dunning | 8/10 | 5130 days | 1% |
| Seraphim Karin | 6/10 | 5152 days | 1% |
| polzeath | 5/10 | 5155 days | 1% |
| Sillmann | 9/10 | 5223 days | 1% |
| John Reilly | 8/10 | 5443 days | 1% |
| Schweisshelm | 8/10 | 5486 days | 1% |
| Walter Peters | 8/10 | 5504 days | 1% |
| Trevor Gibbins | 7/10 | 5508 days | 1% |
| Saglibene | 4/10 | 5510 days | 1% |
| Seifert | 10/10 | 5512 days | 1% |
| Wal & Lynne | 6/10 | 5786 days | 1% |
| Chris & Rob | 8/10 | 5789 days | 1% |
| Betty le Brech | 9/10 | 5839 days | 1% |
| Russell & Barbara Gilmour | 9/10 | 5843 days | 1% |
| Tanya Fitzgibbon | 8/10 | 5858 days | 1% |
| Haitsma | 5/10 | 5865 days | 1% |
| Pete H | 2/10 | 5866 days | 0% |
| Martin | 8/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
| Maarten | 8/10 | 5894 days | 1% |
| Thomas | 8/10 | 5954 days | 1% |
| Ruth Kinder | 8/10 | 6008 days | 1% |
| JuliaG1 | 8/10 | 6224 days | 1% |
| John | 8/10 | 6318 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Havelock Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.28% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Havelock Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Havelock Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 14 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 11 | -0.22% |
| 12 | -0.24% |
| 13 | -0.26% |
| 14 | -0.28% |
| 15 | -0.30% |
| 16 | -0.32% |
| 17 | -0.34% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
2.40% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.