Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

59 Valid Reviews

The Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park experience has a total of 59 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 16
27%
9/10 16
27%
8/10 13
22%
7/10 5
8%
6/10 4
7%
5/10 2
3%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 0
0%

82.54% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park valid reviews is 82.54% and is based on 59 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

20 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 59 valid reviews, the experience has 20 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 20 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
35%
9/10 6
30%
8/10 4
20%
7/10 1
5%
6/10 2
10%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

87.50% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 87.50% and is based on 20 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.74%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Amber M 10/10 252 days 100%
Marine 10/10 497 days 89%
Campground Reviews 8/10 1136 days 32%
Achim 9/10 2352 days 4%
Michael 10/10 2352 days 4%
Johnny H 9/10 2414 days 4%
John Cooper 8/10 2444 days 4%
Kiwiguy 10/10 2505 days 4%
Margie 10/10 2628 days 3%
Scooper 7/10 2628 days 3%
Brian 8/10 2689 days 3%
Backpacking couple 5/10 2748 days 2%
Thomas Syesha 9/10 3118 days 2%
Stephanie Starbuck 8/10 3122 days 2%
Herma 2/10 3468 days 1%
Hock Soon Ong 9/10 3599 days 1%
Frans Van Schie 9/10 3677 days 1%
Kim weng Tok 9/10 3722 days 1%
Alice Craig 8/10 3732 days 1%
Andreea Scott 10/10 3740 days 1%
Tanja Laube 7/10 3771 days 1%
Paul O'Neill 9/10 3781 days 1%
Sven Hasselberger 9/10 3825 days 1%
Max Brunner 4/10 3834 days 0%
Jamie 8/10 3883 days 1%
Chester Martin 7/10 3981 days 0%
Grace Fleck 9/10 4075 days 0%
Matt Betts 6/10 4094 days 0%
Constantin D 5/10 4182 days 0%
Carolin Siegert 10/10 4492 days 1%
Jenny Hall 6/10 4635 days 1%
David Restell 8/10 4788 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 8/10 4819 days 1%
Michael Nolan 10/10 4880 days 1%
K & F 4/10 4880 days 0%
Julien Bocherens 8/10 4956 days 1%
Lydia Holleman 9/10 4961 days 1%
Jim and JoAnn Harllee 10/10 4976 days 1%
Petra 8/10 4981 days 1%
Megan Child 9/10 4987 days 1%
roring40 10/10 5031 days 1%
Michael Touzer 9/10 5240 days 1%
Lee Lloyd 6/10 5255 days 0%
polzeath 9/10 5274 days 1%
Chris & Susanna 6/10 5337 days 0%
antrobdozer 10/10 5854 days 1%
jenniferuk 8/10 5915 days 1%
Mike Robinson 9/10 5969 days 1%
Henrik Plichta 9/10 5985 days 1%
Aaron 10/10 5986 days 1%
Mark 8/10 5995 days 1%
Kane Chain 10/10 6021 days 1%
thomash 10/10 6060 days 1%
jennyb 9/10 6064 days 1%
Andreas Sterki 10/10 6074 days 1%
canadianislandgirl 8/10 6096 days 1%
BryonyS 10/10 6298 days 1%
Brian Boyle 7/10 6341 days 1%
Kruiver 7/10 6351 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-2.00% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 125 days. However the Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -1.97%
198 -1.98%
199 -1.99%
200 -2.00%
201 -2.01%
202 -2.02%
203 -2.03%

Balancing Adjustment

0.78% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

92%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.