Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

59 Valid Reviews

The Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park experience has a total of 59 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 16
27%
9/10 16
27%
8/10 13
22%
7/10 5
8%
6/10 4
7%
5/10 2
3%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 0
0%

82.54% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park valid reviews is 82.54% and is based on 59 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

20 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 59 valid reviews, the experience has 20 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 20 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
35%
9/10 6
30%
8/10 4
20%
7/10 1
5%
6/10 2
10%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

87.50% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 87.50% and is based on 20 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.96%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Amber M 10/10 312 days 100%
Marine 10/10 557 days 87%
Campground Reviews 8/10 1196 days 28%
Achim 9/10 2412 days 4%
Michael 10/10 2412 days 4%
Johnny H 9/10 2474 days 4%
John Cooper 8/10 2504 days 4%
Kiwiguy 10/10 2565 days 4%
Margie 10/10 2688 days 3%
Scooper 7/10 2688 days 3%
Brian 8/10 2749 days 3%
Backpacking couple 5/10 2808 days 2%
Thomas Syesha 9/10 3178 days 2%
Stephanie Starbuck 8/10 3182 days 2%
Herma 2/10 3528 days 1%
Hock Soon Ong 9/10 3659 days 1%
Frans Van Schie 9/10 3737 days 1%
Kim weng Tok 9/10 3782 days 1%
Alice Craig 8/10 3792 days 1%
Andreea Scott 10/10 3800 days 1%
Tanja Laube 7/10 3831 days 1%
Paul O'Neill 9/10 3841 days 1%
Sven Hasselberger 9/10 3885 days 1%
Max Brunner 4/10 3894 days 0%
Jamie 8/10 3943 days 1%
Chester Martin 7/10 4041 days 0%
Grace Fleck 9/10 4135 days 0%
Matt Betts 6/10 4154 days 0%
Constantin D 5/10 4242 days 0%
Carolin Siegert 10/10 4552 days 1%
Jenny Hall 6/10 4695 days 1%
David Restell 8/10 4848 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 8/10 4879 days 1%
Michael Nolan 10/10 4940 days 1%
K & F 4/10 4940 days 0%
Julien Bocherens 8/10 5016 days 1%
Lydia Holleman 9/10 5021 days 1%
Jim and JoAnn Harllee 10/10 5036 days 1%
Petra 8/10 5041 days 1%
Megan Child 9/10 5047 days 1%
roring40 10/10 5091 days 1%
Michael Touzer 9/10 5300 days 1%
Lee Lloyd 6/10 5315 days 1%
polzeath 9/10 5334 days 1%
Chris & Susanna 6/10 5397 days 1%
antrobdozer 10/10 5914 days 1%
jenniferuk 8/10 5975 days 1%
Mike Robinson 9/10 6029 days 1%
Henrik Plichta 9/10 6045 days 1%
Aaron 10/10 6046 days 1%
Mark 8/10 6055 days 1%
Kane Chain 10/10 6081 days 1%
thomash 10/10 6120 days 1%
jennyb 9/10 6124 days 1%
Andreas Sterki 10/10 6134 days 1%
canadianislandgirl 8/10 6156 days 1%
BryonyS 10/10 6358 days 1%
Brian Boyle 7/10 6401 days 1%
Kruiver 7/10 6411 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-2.78% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 85 days. However the Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Mount / Mt Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -2.74%
198 -2.76%
199 -2.77%
200 -2.78%
201 -2.80%
202 -2.81%
203 -2.83%

Balancing Adjustment

0.85% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

92%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.