Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Piha Domain Motor Camp.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Piha Domain Motor Camp

Valid Reviews

80 Valid Reviews

The Piha Domain Motor Camp experience has a total of 85 reviews. There are 80 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 80 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 18
23%
9/10 15
19%
8/10 20
25%
7/10 11
14%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 2
3%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 2
3%
1/10 9
11%

74.13% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Piha Domain Motor Camp valid reviews is 74.13% and is based on 80 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

14 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 80 valid reviews, the experience has 14 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 14 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
14%
9/10 6
43%
8/10 4
29%
7/10 1
7%
6/10 1
7%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

85.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Piha Domain Motor Camp face-to-face reviews is 85.00% and is based on 14 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

89.83%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Rod Pik 10/10 59 days 100%
Danice Carlson 10/10 90 days 100%
Julie 10/10 121 days 99%
Ailsa McIntosh 10/10 151 days 99%
Jake 10/10 182 days 98%
McLean 9/10 396 days 90%
Sarah 10/10 486 days 87%
Luka 8/10 576 days 80%
Stefan Lee 10/10 607 days 79%
Guest 7/10 761 days 62%
Virginie 8/10 790 days 63%
Marie 8/10 1155 days 30%
Caleb 1/10 1186 days 11%
Wendy 1/10 1186 days 11%
Stephen 1/10 1278 days 9%
Jimbo 10/10 1369 days 17%
Michaela 10/10 2222 days 4%
Charles M 8/10 2282 days 4%
Eric 10/10 2343 days 4%
Martin Hansen 8/10 2374 days 4%
Max 9/10 2465 days 3%
Julie 1/10 2495 days 1%
Wal 1/10 2557 days 1%
Maree 1/10 2557 days 1%
Rueben 1/10 2588 days 1%
Christopher 1/10 2616 days 1%
Willem 8/10 2616 days 3%
Courtney 8/10 2616 days 3%
Francois & Caroline 8/10 2647 days 3%
Kevin 1/10 2647 days 1%
Elke fuenfstueck 5/10 2678 days 2%
Dave 6/10 2768 days 2%
Nat 7/10 2953 days 2%
Claus 2/10 2953 days 1%
Inigo Baranano 9/10 3010 days 2%
Millka Pietikainen 10/10 3023 days 2%
Marc Willemsen 10/10 3035 days 2%
Jo Dawson 7/10 3219 days 2%
Julia Weiss 9/10 3280 days 2%
Paul Smith 8/10 3355 days 2%
John Curries 9/10 3571 days 1%
Pamela Hoffman 8/10 3623 days 1%
Rebecca Kearns 9/10 3650 days 1%
Volker Stroenisch 7/10 3662 days 1%
Tanja Laube 7/10 3670 days 1%
Janneke Hekhuis 7/10 3723 days 1%
Craig Scott 8/10 3734 days 1%
Brandy Brooks 8/10 3747 days 1%
M Bakker 9/10 3749 days 1%
Julia Summa 7/10 3749 days 1%
Hana Rachfalik 9/10 3761 days 1%
Michael 8/10 3794 days 1%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3910 days 0%
Ardene Ver Hoef 2/10 3972 days 0%
Connor Skelly 10/10 4012 days 0%
Rodrigo De Sebastian 10/10 4017 days 0%
Emma Keegan 5/10 4017 days 0%
Andrew Jones 9/10 4048 days 0%
Katerina Hlavsova 10/10 4068 days 0%
Ines 8/10 4080 days 0%
Kim Frey 7/10 4082 days 0%
Lisa Tomlinson 10/10 4108 days 0%
Laurene 10/10 4434 days 0%
Guillaume 9/10 4438 days 0%
Nataliya Hare 7/10 4594 days 1%
Erik Muchembled 9/10 4783 days 0%
Hanneke P 7/10 4838 days 1%
Will and Taylor 8/10 4838 days 1%
David Restell 8/10 4838 days 1%
Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell 9/10 4851 days 0%
Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell 9/10 4851 days 0%
Hans 7/10 4859 days 0%
Cennart ud Brock 9/10 4868 days 0%
Liz Marquart Scholtz 8/10 4880 days 0%
Lucie Rutherfurd 8/10 5171 days 0%
Tim Clark 8/10 5172 days 0%
Lukas Bauer 9/10 5496 days 0%
Johannes Klein 8/10 5502 days 0%
Cara Dungay 6/10 5526 days 0%
AliB 10/10 6017 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Piha Domain Motor Camp experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.56% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Piha Domain Motor Camp experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Piha Domain Motor Camp experience has been adjusted for 30 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
27 -0.50%
28 -0.52%
29 -0.54%
30 -0.56%
31 -0.58%
32 -0.60%
33 -0.62%

Balancing Adjustment

1.10% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

90%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.