G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Russell-Orongo Bay Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Russell-Orongo Bay Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
66 Valid Reviews
The Russell-Orongo Bay Holiday Park experience has a total of 67 reviews. There are 66 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 66 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 30 |
|
45% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
15% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
85.30% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Russell-Orongo Bay Holiday Park valid reviews is 85.30% and is based on 66 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
5 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 66 valid reviews, the experience has 5 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 5 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 2 |
|
40% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
40% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
20% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Russell-Orongo Bay Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 80.00% and is based on 5 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
71.12%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stephan Leibiger | 2/10 | 251 days | 52% |
| Steph McConnochie | 10/10 | 524 days | 100% |
| Answa | 1/10 | 1072 days | 18% |
| Josie | 4/10 | 1163 days | 23% |
| Kerry | 3/10 | 1620 days | 5% |
| Kim | 10/10 | 1740 days | 6% |
| Stephanie Hei | 10/10 | 2228 days | 5% |
| Jennifer | 2/10 | 2471 days | 2% |
| Carys | 10/10 | 2563 days | 4% |
| Josie | 9/10 | 2747 days | 4% |
| Sam | 10/10 | 2747 days | 4% |
| Franz | 4/10 | 2867 days | 2% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 2928 days | 3% |
| Markus | 10/10 | 2928 days | 3% |
| Dirk | 8/10 | 2928 days | 3% |
| Meg | 10/10 | 3081 days | 3% |
| Emma Guthrie | 8/10 | 3173 days | 3% |
| Martina Horn | 10/10 | 3205 days | 3% |
| Leonie Scholten | 8/10 | 3373 days | 2% |
| Andy Bond | 10/10 | 3560 days | 2% |
| Julia Krysiak | 9/10 | 3597 days | 2% |
| Mike Hopkins | 10/10 | 3597 days | 2% |
| marion | 10/10 | 3628 days | 2% |
| Hannah Noble | 10/10 | 3719 days | 1% |
| Nick Mossman | 7/10 | 3763 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 9/10 | 3943 days | 1% |
| Run2016 | 8/10 | 3963 days | 1% |
| Hana Rachfalik | 10/10 | 3983 days | 1% |
| Anne Hirsch | 8/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 4041 days | 1% |
| Anne-G. G | 9/10 | 4238 days | 0% |
| Addy Willcock | 10/10 | 4269 days | 0% |
| Inga Hinnerichsen | 10/10 | 4297 days | 0% |
| Julie Jennings | 8/10 | 4319 days | 0% |
| Loz Moody | 9/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Trevor Sharman | 9/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Tim Cook | 10/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| anna anastasia | 9/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Laurie | 8/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Michael Ohnemus | 10/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Ally Cook | 6/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| Hannah Woodhouse | 10/10 | 4359 days | 0% |
| Angela Vandy | 10/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
| Richard Slee | 10/10 | 4481 days | 1% |
| Gerrit Groeneveld | 1/10 | 4531 days | 0% |
| Sue Maher | 9/10 | 4573 days | 1% |
| Wolfgang and Christine | 9/10 | 4621 days | 1% |
| john anderson | 9/10 | 4634 days | 1% |
| Chaloner Chute | 10/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
| Jan Craig | 10/10 | 4693 days | 1% |
| Caroline Jackson | 10/10 | 4693 days | 1% |
| Lindley Clements | 9/10 | 4693 days | 1% |
| Peter Obermaier | 10/10 | 4754 days | 1% |
| mark burley | 10/10 | 4754 days | 1% |
| K P | 9/10 | 4785 days | 1% |
| Dale Mercier | 10/10 | 4785 days | 1% |
| Rosie Leota | 10/10 | 4785 days | 1% |
| Tracie Thornborough | 10/10 | 4815 days | 1% |
| Kt0909 | 9/10 | 4907 days | 1% |
| alan_lynda | 8/10 | 4999 days | 1% |
| K & F | 9/10 | 4999 days | 1% |
| Nelly & Lisa | 8/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| graemec | 9/10 | 5393 days | 1% |
| Siobhan Lorgena | 9/10 | 6092 days | 1% |
| Seacookie | 10/10 | 6123 days | 1% |
| Alies van der plank | 8/10 | 6140 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Russell-Orongo Bay Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.93% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 47 days. However the Russell-Orongo Bay Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Russell-Orongo Bay Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.87% |
| 198 | -3.89% |
| 199 | -3.91% |
| 200 | -3.93% |
| 201 | -3.95% |
| 202 | -3.97% |
| 203 | -3.99% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
8.71% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
76%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.