Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Campa South Rentals.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Campa South Rentals

Valid Reviews

180 Valid Reviews

The Campa South Rentals experience has a total of 184 reviews. There are 180 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 180 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 133
74%
9/10 28
16%
8/10 11
6%
7/10 7
4%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

95.56% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Campa South Rentals valid reviews is 95.56% and is based on 180 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

14 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 180 valid reviews, the experience has 14 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 14 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 1
7%
9/10 4
29%
8/10 7
50%
7/10 2
14%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

82.86% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Campa South Rentals face-to-face reviews is 82.86% and is based on 14 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

95.26%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Face-to-Face Weight Relative Weight
Kenny Reeves 10/10 22 days 99.92 100%
Terry Rousseau 10/10 52 days 99.57 100%
Oskar Rönneman 10/10 52 days 99.57 100%
Liesbeth Groot 9/10 83 days 98.91 99%
Miranda Grace 7/10 83 days 98.91 99%
Jill Hore 9/10 83 days 98.91 99%
Ian & Cheryl 10/10 83 days 98.91 99%
Daisy 9/10 83 days 98.91 99%
Joan Handasyde 10/10 111 days 98.05 98%
Michal 10/10 111 days 98.05 98%
Rosemary M 10/10 111 days 98.05 98%
Melody Marks 10/10 142 days 96.8 97%
John Duncan 10/10 142 days 96.8 97%
Gabby Nash 10/10 142 days 96.8 97%
Lisa Gossweiler 10/10 142 days 96.8 97%
Marco 10/10 142 days 96.8 97%
Jornt van Dijk 10/10 142 days 96.8 97%
Michaela Oetzel 10/10 142 days 96.8 97%
Roy 10/10 142 days 96.8 97%
Sven Wilkens 10/10 142 days 96.8 97%
Siegfried Behrendt 1/10 173 days 80.97 81%
Amy Fulham 10/10 173 days 95.26 95%
Marius Hundt 10/10 173 days 95.26 95%
Veronika 10/10 173 days 95.26 95%
Andrew & Mareike 10/10 173 days 95.26 95%
Sacal 10/10 173 days 95.26 95%
Brad McCulloch 10/10 173 days 95.26 95%
Melanie Raczek 10/10 173 days 95.26 95%
helbel 7/10 173 days 95.26 95%
Rachael Dyson 8/10 203 days 93.47 93%
CAMILLE ROBAUDI 10/10 203 days 93.47 93%
Suzie and Ric 10/10 203 days 93.47 93%
Larissa D 10/10 203 days 93.47 93%
Claire Fitoussi 10/10 203 days 93.47 93%
Andreas and Andrea 10/10 203 days 93.47 93%
Mario Radl 10/10 203 days 93.47 93%
paula 10/10 234 days 91.32 91%
Rosalie Mathews 10/10 234 days 91.32 91%
Eduard van der Weert 9/10 234 days 91.32 91%
Karen Stephens 10/10 264 days 88.96 89%
Katarzyna Tulwin 10/10 417 days 72.45 72%
Renee Glenn 10/10 417 days 72.45 72%
Denise Adamic 9/10 448 days 68.2 68%
David Dam 10/10 448 days 68.2 68%
Douglas Burbidge 10/10 448 days 68.2 68%
Bronwyn Logan 10/10 476 days 64.1 64%
Jacqueline Reimers 10/10 476 days 64.1 64%
Dan Larson 7/10 476 days 64.1 64%
Peggy Larson 7/10 476 days 64.1 64%
Terri Kennedy 10/10 476 days 64.1 64%
Elizabeth Layhe 10/10 476 days 64.1 64%
Sophie & Nils 10/10 476 days 64.1 64%
Boon Sheng Teo 10/10 507 days 59.27 59%
Philippe ISOLA 9/10 507 days 59.27 59%
David Owen 10/10 507 days 59.27 59%
Xavier Ambroggio 10/10 507 days 59.27 59%
Sophie Sheather 10/10 538 days 54.13 54%
Michael Pitman 10/10 538 days 54.13 54%
Wayne Ong 10/10 538 days 54.13 54%
Cassandra Thomson 10/10 538 days 54.13 54%
Helen Rimmer 7/10 538 days 54.13 54%
diez fabrice 9/10 568 days 49.01 49%
Owen Kaluza 10/10 568 days 49.01 49%
fred atkins 10/10 568 days 49.01 49%
Nivard van Gerrevink 10/10 568 days 49.01 49%
Luke Meier 10/10 599 days 43.98 43%
John Dougherty 9/10 599 days 43.98 43%
Heidi Nicholl 10/10 752 days 23.64 23%
Chloe Gibbs 10/10 782 days 20.52 20%
Jasper de Groot 9/10 782 days 20.52 20%
Wacker Michel 10/10 813 days 17.6 17%
Rick Semo 9/10 813 days 17.6 17%
Timo 10/10 813 days 17.6 17%
Grant 8/10 828 days true 19.56 19%
Ann Trebitz 10/10 841 days 15.22 14%
Janet Hopwood 10/10 841 days 15.22 14%
Felix Dally 9/10 841 days 15.22 14%
Chad Hobart 10/10 841 days 15.22 14%
Tom Mayer 9/10 841 days 15.22 14%
Peter Fand 10/10 872 days 12.88 12%
Sebastiaan & Chloé De Vries 10/10 872 days 12.88 12%
dani salamon 10/10 872 days 12.88 12%
Ian & Irene Jameison 10/10 872 days 12.88 12%
Bill Lafferty 10/10 872 days 12.88 12%
Philippe Colas 10/10 872 days 12.88 12%
Ellen Obenland 10/10 872 days 12.88 12%
DC_NZ 10/10 903 days 10.84 10%
Sara Kim 10/10 903 days 10.84 10%
Thomas Mulley 10/10 903 days 10.84 10%
Marcal Serrallonga 10/10 903 days 10.84 10%
Francis0123456 10/10 933 days 9.16 8%
Merel Blonk 10/10 933 days 9.16 8%
David Webster 9/10 933 days 9.16 8%
Freddy 9/10 933 days 9.16 8%
Rick S 10/10 1147 days 4.93 4%
Katharina Eylens 10/10 1147 days 4.93 4%
Mark Adriance 9/10 1178 days 4.89 4%
Jan Hulleman 9/10 1178 days 4.89 4%
Robert Schellekens 10/10 1178 days 4.89 4%
Luca Staudt 9/10 1178 days true 5.86 5%
Annalies Beard 10/10 1188 days true 5.85 5%
Benjamin Hall 10/10 1207 days 4.85 4%
Madeline Rae 10/10 1238 days 4.8 4%
Janet Newton 10/10 1238 days 4.8 4%
Ewa Starzomska 9/10 1238 days 4.8 4%
David Donnelly 10/10 1238 days 4.8 4%
Kelly Peacock 10/10 1238 days 4.8 4%
Johan Van Buren 9/10 1238 days 4.8 4%
Eleanor Pundyk 10/10 1238 days 4.8 4%
Lorenzo Raco 10/10 1269 days 4.76 4%
Tess G. 10/10 1269 days 4.76 4%
Simone Buerkli 10/10 1269 days 4.76 4%
Tuomas Nikoskinen 10/10 1269 days 4.76 4%
Line Lefevre Nielsen 10/10 1269 days 4.76 4%
Newzealand2015 10/10 1299 days 4.72 4%
Juergen 10/10 1299 days 4.72 4%
karen Eade 10/10 1299 days 4.72 4%
Hidde Verschuur 10/10 1299 days 4.72 4%
Warren Reece 10/10 1299 days 4.72 4%
Vincent Gunn 10/10 1360 days 4.64 4%
Bill Dorman 10/10 1513 days 4.43 4%
Gabriel Schönung 10/10 1513 days 4.43 4%
Sarah Osborne 10/10 1544 days 4.38 3%
Danielle Pohn 10/10 1544 days 4.38 3%
Denise Donaldson 10/10 1544 days 4.38 3%
Jaap Velthuis 10/10 1572 days 4.35 3%
John Cobley 10/10 1572 days 4.35 3%
Graham Jenkins 10/10 1572 days 4.35 3%
Christoph Lagger 10/10 1603 days 4.3 3%
AUDREY BIGAND 10/10 1603 days 4.3 3%
Richard Kop 9/10 1603 days 4.3 3%
Romke Wijma 8/10 1603 days 4.3 3%
Fiona Buglass 10/10 1603 days 4.3 3%
Elisa Vireca 10/10 1603 days 4.3 3%
Christophe Scieszka 10/10 1603 days 4.3 3%
Pamela Hintie 10/10 1603 days 4.3 3%
Tracy Kovacs 10/10 1603 days 4.3 3%
Sophie James 8/10 1620 days true 5.14 4%
Zuzka Prokopova 10/10 1634 days 4.26 3%
Billy1951 8/10 1634 days 4.26 3%
Jason Leet 10/10 1664 days 4.22 3%
Markus 10/10 1878 days 3.93 3%
Amy Gately 10/10 1909 days 3.88 3%
Simon Dixon 10/10 1909 days 3.88 3%
Bryan Fisher 10/10 1909 days 3.88 3%
Joy S 9/10 1909 days 3.88 3%
Florian Lisa 10/10 1909 days 3.88 3%
Tim Soukop 10/10 1909 days 3.88 3%
James Johnstone 10/10 1909 days 3.88 3%
Sebastian Gartner 10/10 1937 days 3.85 3%
Michaela Boysen 10/10 1968 days 3.8 3%
Helga van der Linden 9/10 1968 days 3.8 3%
brian herberte 9/10 1968 days 3.8 3%
Anna Garlicka 10/10 1968 days 3.8 3%
JUAN VALCARCEL 9/10 1968 days 3.8 3%
Anje 10/10 1968 days 3.8 3%
Mo Bottger 10/10 1968 days 3.8 3%
Bakkerfamily 9/10 1999 days 3.76 3%
Stuart Curran 10/10 2029 days 3.72 3%
Daniel Kaiser 10/10 2060 days 3.68 3%
Enna Keet 7/10 2286 days true 4.04 3%
Chris Peterson 10/10 2302 days 3.35 2%
Christoph Erb 10/10 2302 days 3.35 2%
Lars Petersen 10/10 2302 days 3.35 2%
DonHendricks 10/10 2302 days 3.35 2%
Charly Kempf 10/10 2333 days 3.3 2%
Piet de Jong 8/10 2333 days 3.3 2%
Natalie Abendroth 10/10 2333 days 3.3 2%
Bernard 10/10 2364 days 3.26 2%
Kali Lohman 9/10 2380 days true 3.89 3%
cs cs 10/10 2394 days 3.22 2%
Juergen Lake Constance 10/10 2394 days 3.22 2%
E C Frans 8/10 3003 days true 2.86 2%
Jol Balder 8/10 3021 days true 2.83 2%
Tanja Haring 8/10 3383 days true 2.24 1%
Robert Trostle 9/10 3398 days true 2.21 1%
Maxim van Schijndel 7/10 3472 days true 2.09 1%
Chris 9/10 3769 days true 1.6 1%
Greg and Sue 8/10 4095 days true 1.07 0%
Gabriel Faber 8/10 4179 days true 0.93 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Campa South Rentals experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.28% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Campa South Rentals experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.

The Campa South Rentals experience has been adjusted for 14 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
11 -0.22%
12 -0.24%
13 -0.26%
14 -0.28%
15 -0.30%
16 -0.32%
17 -0.34%

Final Ranking Score

95%

The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.

Love Christchurch