Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Campa South Rentals.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
159 Valid Reviews
The Campa South Rentals experience has a total of 162 reviews. There are 159 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 159 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Campa South Rentals valid reviews is 95.53% and is based on 159 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
14 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 159 valid reviews, the experience has 14 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 14 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Campa South Rentals face-to-face reviews is 82.86% and is based on 14 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Melody Marks||10/10||17 days||99.95||100%|
|Siegfried Behrendt||1/10||48 days||84.69||85%|
|Amy Fulham||10/10||48 days||99.63||100%|
|Marius Hundt||10/10||49 days||99.62||100%|
|Andrew & Mareike||10/10||49 days||99.62||100%|
|Brad McCulloch||10/10||49 days||99.62||100%|
|Melanie Raczek||10/10||49 days||99.62||100%|
|Rachael Dyson||8/10||78 days||99.04||99%|
|CAMILLE ROBAUDI||10/10||79 days||99.01||99%|
|Suzie and Ric||10/10||79 days||99.01||99%|
|Larissa D||10/10||79 days||99.01||99%|
|Claire Fitoussi||10/10||79 days||99.01||99%|
|Andreas and Andrea||10/10||79 days||99.01||99%|
|Rosalie Mathews||10/10||110 days||98.08||98%|
|Eduard van der Weert||9/10||110 days||98.08||98%|
|Karen Stephens||10/10||140 days||96.89||97%|
|Katarzyna Tulwin||10/10||292 days||86.49||86%|
|Renee Glenn||10/10||293 days||86.4||86%|
|Denise Adamic||9/10||323 days||83.47||83%|
|David Dam||10/10||323 days||83.47||83%|
|Douglas Burbidge||10/10||323 days||83.47||83%|
|Bronwyn Logan||10/10||351 days||80.48||80%|
|Jacqueline Reimers||10/10||351 days||80.48||80%|
|Dan Larson||7/10||351 days||80.48||80%|
|Peggy Larson||7/10||351 days||80.48||80%|
|Terri Kennedy||10/10||351 days||80.48||80%|
|Elizabeth Layhe||10/10||351 days||80.48||80%|
|Sophie & Nils||10/10||352 days||80.37||80%|
|Boon Sheng Teo||10/10||382 days||76.88||77%|
|Philippe ISOLA||9/10||382 days||76.88||77%|
|David Owen||10/10||382 days||76.88||77%|
|Sophie Sheather||10/10||413 days||72.97||73%|
|Michael Pitman||10/10||413 days||72.97||73%|
|Wayne Ong||10/10||413 days||72.97||73%|
|Cassandra Thomson||10/10||413 days||72.97||73%|
|Helen Rimmer||7/10||413 days||72.97||73%|
|diez fabrice||9/10||443 days||68.9||69%|
|Owen Kaluza||10/10||443 days||68.9||69%|
|fred atkins||10/10||443 days||68.9||69%|
|Nivard van Gerrevink||10/10||443 days||68.9||69%|
|Luke Meier||10/10||474 days||64.4||64%|
|John Dougherty||9/10||474 days||64.4||64%|
|Heidi Nicholl||10/10||627 days||39.71||39%|
|Chloe Gibbs||10/10||657 days||35.4||35%|
|Jasper de Groot||9/10||657 days||35.4||35%|
|Wacker Michel||10/10||688 days||31.25||30%|
|Rick Semo||9/10||688 days||31.25||30%|
|Ann Trebitz||10/10||716 days||27.76||27%|
|Janet Hopwood||10/10||716 days||27.76||27%|
|Felix Dally||9/10||716 days||27.76||27%|
|Chad Hobart||10/10||716 days||27.76||27%|
|Tom Mayer||9/10||717 days||27.64||27%|
|Peter Fand||10/10||747 days||24.19||23%|
|Sebastiaan & Chloé De Vries||10/10||747 days||24.19||23%|
|dani salamon||10/10||747 days||24.19||23%|
|Ian & Irene Jameison||10/10||747 days||24.19||23%|
|Bill Lafferty||10/10||747 days||24.19||23%|
|Philippe Colas||10/10||747 days||24.19||23%|
|Ellen Obenland||10/10||747 days||24.19||23%|
|Sara Kim||10/10||778 days||20.92||20%|
|Thomas Mulley||10/10||778 days||20.92||20%|
|Marcal Serrallonga||10/10||778 days||20.92||20%|
|Merel Blonk||10/10||808 days||18.05||17%|
|David Webster||9/10||808 days||18.05||17%|
|Rick S||10/10||1022 days||5.84||5%|
|Katharina Eylens||10/10||1022 days||5.84||5%|
|Mark Adriance||9/10||1053 days||5.28||4%|
|Jan Hulleman||9/10||1053 days||5.28||4%|
|Robert Schellekens||10/10||1054 days||5.27||4%|
|Luca Staudt||9/10||1054 days||6.32||5%|
|Annalies Beard||10/10||1064 days||6.18||5%|
|Benjamin Hall||10/10||1082 days||5.03||4%|
|Madeline Rae||10/10||1113 days||4.98||4%|
|Janet Newton||10/10||1113 days||4.98||4%|
|Ewa Starzomska||9/10||1113 days||4.98||4%|
|David Donnelly||10/10||1114 days||4.97||4%|
|Kelly Peacock||10/10||1114 days||4.97||4%|
|Johan Van Buren||9/10||1114 days||4.97||4%|
|Eleanor Pundyk||10/10||1114 days||4.97||4%|
|Lorenzo Raco||10/10||1144 days||4.93||4%|
|Tess G.||10/10||1144 days||4.93||4%|
|Simone Buerkli||10/10||1145 days||4.93||4%|
|Tuomas Nikoskinen||10/10||1145 days||4.93||4%|
|Line Lefevre Nielsen||10/10||1145 days||4.93||4%|
|karen Eade||10/10||1175 days||4.89||4%|
|Hidde Verschuur||10/10||1175 days||4.89||4%|
|Warren Reece||10/10||1175 days||4.89||4%|
|Vincent Gunn||10/10||1235 days||4.81||4%|
|Bill Dorman||10/10||1388 days||4.6||4%|
|Gabriel Schönung||10/10||1388 days||4.6||4%|
|Sarah Osborne||10/10||1419 days||4.56||3%|
|Danielle Pohn||10/10||1419 days||4.56||3%|
|Denise Donaldson||10/10||1419 days||4.56||3%|
|Jaap Velthuis||10/10||1447 days||4.52||3%|
|John Cobley||10/10||1447 days||4.52||3%|
|Graham Jenkins||10/10||1447 days||4.52||3%|
|Christoph Lagger||10/10||1478 days||4.48||3%|
|AUDREY BIGAND||10/10||1478 days||4.48||3%|
|Richard Kop||9/10||1478 days||4.48||3%|
|Romke Wijma||8/10||1478 days||4.48||3%|
|Fiona Buglass||10/10||1478 days||4.48||3%|
|Elisa Vireca||10/10||1478 days||4.48||3%|
|Christophe Scieszka||10/10||1478 days||4.48||3%|
|Pamela Hintie||10/10||1478 days||4.48||3%|
|Tracy Kovacs||10/10||1478 days||4.48||3%|
|Sophie James||8/10||1496 days||5.34||4%|
|Zuzka Prokopova||10/10||1509 days||4.43||3%|
|Jason Leet||10/10||1539 days||4.39||3%|
|Amy Gately||10/10||1785 days||4.05||3%|
|Simon Dixon||10/10||1785 days||4.05||3%|
|Bryan Fisher||10/10||1785 days||4.05||3%|
|Joy S||9/10||1785 days||4.05||3%|
|Florian Lisa||10/10||1785 days||4.05||3%|
|Tim Soukop||10/10||1785 days||4.05||3%|
|James Johnstone||10/10||1785 days||4.05||3%|
|Sebastian Gartner||10/10||1813 days||4.02||3%|
|Michaela Boysen||10/10||1844 days||3.97||3%|
|Helga van der Linden||9/10||1844 days||3.97||3%|
|brian herberte||9/10||1844 days||3.97||3%|
|Anna Garlicka||10/10||1844 days||3.97||3%|
|JUAN VALCARCEL||9/10||1844 days||3.97||3%|
|Mo Bottger||10/10||1844 days||3.97||3%|
|Stuart Curran||10/10||1905 days||3.89||3%|
|Daniel Kaiser||10/10||1936 days||3.85||3%|
|Enna Keet||7/10||2162 days||4.25||3%|
|Chris Peterson||10/10||2178 days||3.52||2%|
|Christoph Erb||10/10||2178 days||3.52||2%|
|Lars Petersen||10/10||2178 days||3.52||2%|
|Charly Kempf||10/10||2209 days||3.47||2%|
|Piet de Jong||8/10||2209 days||3.47||2%|
|Natalie Abendroth||10/10||2209 days||3.47||2%|
|Kali Lohman||9/10||2256 days||4.09||3%|
|cs cs||10/10||2270 days||3.39||2%|
|Juergen Lake Constance||10/10||2270 days||3.39||2%|
|E C Frans||8/10||2879 days||3.07||2%|
|Jol Balder||8/10||2897 days||3.04||2%|
|Tanja Haring||8/10||3259 days||2.44||1%|
|Robert Trostle||9/10||3274 days||2.42||1%|
|Maxim van Schijndel||7/10||3348 days||2.3||1%|
|Greg and Sue||8/10||3971 days||1.27||0%|
|Gabriel Faber||8/10||4055 days||1.13||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Campa South Rentals experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Campa South Rentals experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.
The Campa South Rentals experience has been adjusted for 2 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.