Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Waitomo Caveworld.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
74 Valid Reviews
The Waitomo Caveworld experience has a total of 74 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 74 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
20% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 8 |
|
11% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waitomo Caveworld valid reviews is 81.35% and is based on 74 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
68 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 74 valid reviews, the experience has 68 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 68 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
22% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
10% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.50% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waitomo Caveworld face-to-face reviews is 82.50% and is based on 68 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
82.44%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cassandra Geyer | 9/10 | 3653 days | 100% |
| Mijke Boesten | 8/10 | 3708 days | 87% |
| Anders Hauke | 8/10 | 3709 days | 87% |
| Lengxi | 8/10 | 3709 days | 87% |
| Arvid Hellquist | 9/10 | 4081 days | 13% |
| Steven Lotrian | 9/10 | 4428 days | 56% |
| Alex Artigues | 10/10 | 4476 days | 57% |
| Serge Garcin | 10/10 | 4476 days | 57% |
| Tourist101 | 2/10 | 4930 days | 0% |
| kayburns | 9/10 | 4991 days | 56% |
| Alison Rosser | 7/10 | 5167 days | 50% |
| Helen & Laurence | 8/10 | 5242 days | 55% |
| Kris Gijbels | 8/10 | 5488 days | 55% |
| Mike | 6/10 | 5526 days | 43% |
| Stefan Morris | 8/10 | 5529 days | 55% |
| Jessie Currie | 7/10 | 5529 days | 50% |
| Barry | 9/10 | 5531 days | 56% |
| Melanie Armbruster | 6/10 | 5534 days | 43% |
| Stefanie Halbrock | 5/10 | 5534 days | 32% |
| Jim Thomsen | 8/10 | 5535 days | 55% |
| Kate Thomsen | 8/10 | 5535 days | 55% |
| Denecke Thorsten | 7/10 | 5884 days | 50% |
| M and H Lunn | 8/10 | 5884 days | 55% |
| Henrik Plichta | 9/10 | 5884 days | 56% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 5885 days | 57% |
| San Ahuia | 5/10 | 5894 days | 32% |
| Amer | 10/10 | 5900 days | 57% |
| Coby Aalbrecht | 7/10 | 5902 days | 50% |
| Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 5973 days | 55% |
| X Otte | 7/10 | 5973 days | 50% |
| Hansjoerg Ehrmann | 9/10 | 5976 days | 56% |
| Sophie Keate | 8/10 | 6093 days | 55% |
| Catherine Smiles | 10/10 | 6123 days | 57% |
| Martina | 6/10 | 6209 days | 43% |
| IanM | 8/10 | 6209 days | 55% |
| MarielR | 9/10 | 6227 days | 56% |
| Joel | 9/10 | 6229 days | 56% |
| Brigette Guikens | 10/10 | 6230 days | 57% |
| Keith | 7/10 | 6233 days | 50% |
| JuliaG1 | 8/10 | 6242 days | 55% |
| DavidMurray | 8/10 | 6243 days | 55% |
| RosC | 6/10 | 6244 days | 43% |
| AndrewF78 | 9/10 | 6245 days | 56% |
| EmmaB1 | 9/10 | 6255 days | 56% |
| ClaudiaK | 10/10 | 6258 days | 57% |
| ArnarF | 9/10 | 6268 days | 56% |
| SonjaS | 10/10 | 6268 days | 57% |
| Burkhalter | 9/10 | 6280 days | 56% |
| Rene | 7/10 | 6281 days | 50% |
| Paula | 8/10 | 6334 days | 55% |
| Teresa | 10/10 | 6340 days | 57% |
| Kay | 10/10 | 6388 days | 57% |
| Jimmy | 9/10 | 6406 days | 56% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6406 days | 57% |
| sabine | 10/10 | 6406 days | 57% |
| Elisabeth | 10/10 | 6415 days | 57% |
| Terneal King | 7/10 | 6447 days | 50% |
| Helen | 6/10 | 6457 days | 43% |
| Nicnac | 8/10 | 6574 days | 55% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 6579 days | 57% |
| Joanne M | 7/10 | 6585 days | 50% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 6586 days | 57% |
| Leila | 9/10 | 6589 days | 56% |
| Adam Richards | 8/10 | 6589 days | 55% |
| Lena1 | 9/10 | 6609 days | 56% |
| Stephanie | 9/10 | 6621 days | 56% |
| Hanna | 6/10 | 6622 days | 43% |
| Maree | 8/10 | 6622 days | 55% |
| Orlaith | 9/10 | 6622 days | 56% |
| Lisa | 8/10 | 6622 days | 55% |
| Stephanie Jones | 6/10 | 6649 days | 43% |
| Paula Smith | 7/10 | 6652 days | 50% |
| Bridgy | 8/10 | 6899 days | 55% |
| JanKovar | 6/10 | 6927 days | 43% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Waitomo Caveworld experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.74% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Waitomo Caveworld experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Waitomo Caveworld experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.68% |
| 198 | -3.70% |
| 199 | -3.72% |
| 200 | -3.74% |
| 201 | -3.76% |
| 202 | -3.77% |
| 203 | -3.79% |
| … | … |
3.38% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.