G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Naked Bus.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
95 Valid Reviews
The Naked Bus experience has a total of 101 reviews. There are 95 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 95 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 24 |
|
25% |
60.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Naked Bus valid reviews is 60.11% and is based on 95 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
58 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 95 valid reviews, the experience has 58 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 58 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
10% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
19% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.48% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Naked Bus face-to-face reviews is 79.48% and is based on 58 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
70.71%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angela Hills Boughey | 10/10 | 2363 days | 100% |
| craig hardy | 1/10 | 3092 days | 25% |
| Viv stefadouros | 9/10 | 3246 days | 55% |
| Suzanne | 1/10 | 3276 days | 22% |
| kiruthika vijayakumar | 1/10 | 3276 days | 22% |
| Ellie Pask | 1/10 | 3337 days | 20% |
| Justine Langero | 10/10 | 3460 days | 45% |
| SR SR | 1/10 | 3580 days | 15% |
| Tom Anders | 9/10 | 3669 days | 34% |
| Estelle Coquard | 7/10 | 3674 days | 32% |
| Kathrin Redl | 6/10 | 3689 days | 29% |
| Emily Noyd | 8/10 | 3691 days | 33% |
| Maxim Motheus | 8/10 | 3727 days | 31% |
| Emil Black Christian | 9/10 | 3727 days | 32% |
| Charn Tiebtienrat | 1/10 | 3762 days | 12% |
| peter salfrais | 1/10 | 3762 days | 12% |
| Pierre Villaume-Odile | 7/10 | 3785 days | 27% |
| unhappycustomer | 3/10 | 3854 days | 14% |
| Brendan Carton | 1/10 | 3855 days | 10% |
| Funk | 7/10 | 3976 days | 18% |
| Calvin Shi | 1/10 | 4068 days | 6% |
| pat rao | 1/10 | 4096 days | 5% |
| Justin Little | 1/10 | 4127 days | 4% |
| Focalvisions | 7/10 | 4127 days | 11% |
| Mischelle Mills | 1/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
| ilove totravel | 5/10 | 4403 days | 19% |
| Anna Sternberg | 8/10 | 4435 days | 24% |
| Jan Kerkhoff | 9/10 | 4438 days | 25% |
| Daniel Garcia Dezgado | 8/10 | 4443 days | 24% |
| Maria = Moller Hansen | 9/10 | 4445 days | 25% |
| Gassat | 9/10 | 4456 days | 25% |
| Felix | 4/10 | 4482 days | 16% |
| Corban Hill | 1/10 | 4493 days | 10% |
| Cyndyl Richards | 1/10 | 4585 days | 10% |
| John Stroup | 1/10 | 4585 days | 10% |
| paulweig | 8/10 | 4768 days | 24% |
| Epi Gates | 6/10 | 4768 days | 21% |
| Andé Moreira | 1/10 | 4799 days | 10% |
| Stella Thoben | 7/10 | 4801 days | 23% |
| Anna Niesl | 7/10 | 4805 days | 23% |
| Kristina Wells | 1/10 | 4858 days | 10% |
| alastair maceachern | 1/10 | 4858 days | 10% |
| hirini2371 | 1/10 | 4919 days | 10% |
| Lisa Ruhfus | 10/10 | 5173 days | 25% |
| Danpaley | 1/10 | 5224 days | 10% |
| Ashley Mckenney | 8/10 | 5238 days | 24% |
| Isabella Abele | 7/10 | 5255 days | 23% |
| smileyducky | 1/10 | 5346 days | 10% |
| Lennart Lundberg | 7/10 | 5501 days | 23% |
| Claudia Jackson and Geoffroy van Roelenbosch | 7/10 | 5513 days | 23% |
| Chrissy Crebas | 6/10 | 5515 days | 21% |
| Beth and Daisy | 8/10 | 5518 days | 24% |
| Tim Wright | 8/10 | 5556 days | 24% |
| Emma Wilkinson | 8/10 | 5557 days | 24% |
| Katny | 8/10 | 5558 days | 24% |
| SandyS | 8/10 | 5589 days | 24% |
| Katy | 8/10 | 5828 days | 24% |
| Christine T | 8/10 | 5889 days | 24% |
| Marcio Moretti | 9/10 | 5905 days | 25% |
| ohSNAP | 3/10 | 5923 days | 13% |
| Hokang Kim | 3/10 | 5985 days | 13% |
| Lindsay Brown | 5/10 | 5995 days | 19% |
| confederatesoldier | 1/10 | 6015 days | 10% |
| Annabel | 1/10 | 6046 days | 10% |
| miniappleses | 8/10 | 6046 days | 24% |
| Ozhan | 8/10 | 6269 days | 24% |
| Deahne | 8/10 | 6279 days | 24% |
| Yuko | 9/10 | 6279 days | 25% |
| Craig | 10/10 | 6286 days | 25% |
| Constance | 7/10 | 6295 days | 23% |
| Kristen | 8/10 | 6302 days | 24% |
| frank | 5/10 | 6303 days | 19% |
| Grace | 9/10 | 6333 days | 25% |
| Claudia Schmidt | 9/10 | 6345 days | 25% |
| Helga | 6/10 | 6403 days | 21% |
| Sophie | 10/10 | 6426 days | 25% |
| Carmen | 10/10 | 6481 days | 25% |
| Wolfgang | 7/10 | 6501 days | 23% |
| Anke | 8/10 | 6579 days | 24% |
| Hernando | 9/10 | 6605 days | 25% |
| Klaus | 7/10 | 6609 days | 23% |
| Corinne | 8/10 | 6613 days | 24% |
| Yumi | 7/10 | 6622 days | 23% |
| Lena | 8/10 | 6622 days | 24% |
| Vicky Elliott | 9/10 | 6640 days | 25% |
| Sophia | 10/10 | 6642 days | 25% |
| Reina Lohaye | 9/10 | 6644 days | 25% |
| Iain | 9/10 | 6676 days | 25% |
| Gav | 6/10 | 6676 days | 21% |
| Anneli | 6/10 | 6677 days | 21% |
| Davinia | 9/10 | 6704 days | 25% |
| Rob Boston | 1/10 | 6777 days | 10% |
| Will | 9/10 | 6945 days | 25% |
| clairekidd | 9/10 | 6958 days | 25% |
| Silke | 9/10 | 6966 days | 25% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Naked Bus experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.34% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 70 days. However the Naked Bus experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Naked Bus experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.29% |
| 198 | -3.30% |
| 199 | -3.32% |
| 200 | -3.34% |
| 201 | -3.35% |
| 202 | -3.37% |
| 203 | -3.39% |
| … | … |
8.59% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
76%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.