Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Stray.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
195 Valid Reviews
The Stray experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 195 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 7 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 62 |
|
32% |
| 9/10 | 42 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 31 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.03% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Stray valid reviews is 83.03% and is based on 195 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
101 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 195 valid reviews, the experience has 101 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 101 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 10 |
|
10% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
15% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 28 |
|
28% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
74.65% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Stray face-to-face reviews is 74.65% and is based on 101 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.07%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atte | 6/10 | 2859 days | 100% |
| Tom C | 10/10 | 3650 days | 52% |
| Jodie | 10/10 | 3650 days | 52% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 3650 days | 52% |
| Christin Ossege | 10/10 | 3772 days | 42% |
| Theodore Trozinski | 9/10 | 3832 days | 37% |
| Phil Hartmann | 10/10 | 3985 days | 25% |
| dana forrest | 10/10 | 4077 days | 17% |
| Abbi Smith | 10/10 | 4138 days | 12% |
| Nicko Wong | 10/10 | 4169 days | 10% |
| Jodine | 10/10 | 4197 days | 8% |
| Samuel Berwick | 10/10 | 4197 days | 8% |
| Amy Jellings | 10/10 | 4289 days | 0% |
| Anna Elden | 9/10 | 4289 days | 0% |
| Andrea Leichtl | 10/10 | 4503 days | 34% |
| Johanna Molenaar | 7/10 | 4503 days | 32% |
| Claudia Bauch | 3/10 | 4532 days | 15% |
| Charlotte Wilson | 10/10 | 4534 days | 34% |
| Chris Luebbi | 8/10 | 4534 days | 34% |
| jason beinstein | 9/10 | 4562 days | 34% |
| discoveringaway | 9/10 | 4562 days | 34% |
| ieva m | 8/10 | 4593 days | 34% |
| Sonia | 10/10 | 4593 days | 34% |
| Zsolt | 10/10 | 4593 days | 34% |
| Victoria Wander | 10/10 | 4593 days | 34% |
| TtotheT13 | 9/10 | 4624 days | 34% |
| Kim O'Neill | 10/10 | 4654 days | 34% |
| Maia Kazaks | 8/10 | 4654 days | 34% |
| Colette Keely | 10/10 | 4685 days | 34% |
| Jen Hards | 10/10 | 4715 days | 34% |
| Thomas Jones | 10/10 | 4746 days | 34% |
| Raj Singh | 10/10 | 4746 days | 34% |
| Sohie | 9/10 | 4904 days | 34% |
| Robin Andersson | 9/10 | 4927 days | 34% |
| Megan Gallagher | 10/10 | 4958 days | 34% |
| Andy Brown | 10/10 | 4958 days | 34% |
| Vinnie K | 10/10 | 5019 days | 34% |
| Heather_Oz | 9/10 | 5080 days | 34% |
| luciasolda | 10/10 | 5142 days | 34% |
| jennyj | 10/10 | 5172 days | 34% |
| dwehrtmann | 9/10 | 5203 days | 34% |
| Evaislief | 10/10 | 5233 days | 34% |
| Malena | 10/10 | 5264 days | 34% |
| navilink | 10/10 | 5264 days | 34% |
| meganb04 | 10/10 | 5264 days | 34% |
| MaryG | 10/10 | 5264 days | 34% |
| JoPycroft | 10/10 | 5264 days | 34% |
| lovebyname | 9/10 | 5264 days | 34% |
| Sonia Sennane | 7/10 | 5265 days | 32% |
| Tamara McVey | 7/10 | 5276 days | 32% |
| Rachel | 7/10 | 5278 days | 32% |
| Danielle & Jobbe | 8/10 | 5278 days | 34% |
| Andy Bridgman | 8/10 | 5278 days | 34% |
| Fiona Finke | 6/10 | 5284 days | 29% |
| Miron & Hendrik | 8/10 | 5288 days | 34% |
| marielou | 10/10 | 5293 days | 34% |
| iainmcgin | 10/10 | 5293 days | 34% |
| redkeels | 10/10 | 5293 days | 34% |
| lulu | 6/10 | 5324 days | 29% |
| Boogie | 5/10 | 5355 days | 25% |
| isha | 9/10 | 5355 days | 34% |
| pepper | 9/10 | 5385 days | 34% |
| Kez | 10/10 | 5416 days | 34% |
| Brilly01 | 8/10 | 5416 days | 34% |
| yens123 | 9/10 | 5416 days | 34% |
| louiset | 9/10 | 5416 days | 34% |
| siek09 | 9/10 | 5446 days | 34% |
| rosey | 10/10 | 5477 days | 34% |
| Cadz | 10/10 | 5477 days | 34% |
| natalietrueman84 | 10/10 | 5508 days | 34% |
| Josie | 10/10 | 5508 days | 34% |
| Scott_and_Stephanie | 9/10 | 5599 days | 34% |
| Samantha | 10/10 | 5599 days | 34% |
| Tracey Airiscough | 9/10 | 5621 days | 34% |
| Vanessa Hanzen | 4/10 | 5622 days | 20% |
| Lauren McKeone | 7/10 | 5628 days | 32% |
| Faye Cox | 7/10 | 5628 days | 32% |
| pudddddin | 9/10 | 5630 days | 34% |
| alicevarren | 9/10 | 5630 days | 34% |
| irisheyes | 7/10 | 5630 days | 32% |
| Steff | 7/10 | 5650 days | 32% |
| Forestal Youri | 7/10 | 5650 days | 32% |
| Amanda Craig | 8/10 | 5652 days | 34% |
| Olle Beide | 8/10 | 5658 days | 34% |
| JonathanMills | 8/10 | 5658 days | 34% |
| lisa | 9/10 | 5689 days | 34% |
| phydough | 6/10 | 5720 days | 29% |
| zippy | 10/10 | 5811 days | 34% |
| TerriH | 10/10 | 5842 days | 34% |
| ciara | 10/10 | 5873 days | 34% |
| mel1407 | 10/10 | 5873 days | 34% |
| Claram | 9/10 | 5903 days | 34% |
| joycevanb | 7/10 | 5934 days | 32% |
| JohnG | 10/10 | 5934 days | 34% |
| nicolejr413 | 9/10 | 5964 days | 34% |
| Antoine Migault | 8/10 | 5985 days | 34% |
| Christine T | 7/10 | 5989 days | 32% |
| Kay Beaumont | 8/10 | 5997 days | 34% |
| Johan | 7/10 | 5997 days | 32% |
| S Millet | 9/10 | 6001 days | 34% |
| Jens van Evp | 9/10 | 6019 days | 34% |
| Max Van der Zalm | 9/10 | 6019 days | 34% |
| Emily Walters | 7/10 | 6021 days | 32% |
| Brett Oz | 9/10 | 6054 days | 34% |
| greenbex | 9/10 | 6054 days | 34% |
| simonbo | 3/10 | 6069 days | 15% |
| katesc | 9/10 | 6074 days | 34% |
| martint | 6/10 | 6078 days | 29% |
| richelle | 7/10 | 6078 days | 32% |
| rosalindm | 8/10 | 6079 days | 34% |
| katepat | 8/10 | 6085 days | 34% |
| Beau | 5/10 | 6085 days | 25% |
| Debbie Rathbone | 10/10 | 6092 days | 34% |
| Ricarda | 3/10 | 6095 days | 15% |
| Malinka Nuefeld | 4/10 | 6095 days | 20% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 6095 days | 34% |
| Thomas Willi | 8/10 | 6095 days | 34% |
| Jess Pasos | 9/10 | 6104 days | 34% |
| stettim | 10/10 | 6146 days | 34% |
| Philipp | 9/10 | 6146 days | 34% |
| Holly Mrowiec | 10/10 | 6176 days | 34% |
| Sophie Keate | 10/10 | 6213 days | 34% |
| Sam Lightfoot | 10/10 | 6213 days | 34% |
| Jenny Lee | 7/10 | 6235 days | 32% |
| Cat Payne | 9/10 | 6242 days | 34% |
| Catherine Smiles | 10/10 | 6243 days | 34% |
| Nikki Turner | 9/10 | 6250 days | 34% |
| TaraD | 10/10 | 6327 days | 34% |
| BiancaA | 9/10 | 6327 days | 34% |
| hibbler | 10/10 | 6329 days | 34% |
| ferdinande | 7/10 | 6330 days | 32% |
| mariea | 8/10 | 6341 days | 34% |
| JennekeK | 6/10 | 6341 days | 29% |
| Ross | 5/10 | 6343 days | 25% |
| MarielR | 7/10 | 6347 days | 32% |
| NikW | 8/10 | 6347 days | 34% |
| Anna Skeer | 9/10 | 6370 days | 34% |
| EmmaB1 | 8/10 | 6375 days | 34% |
| BethanD | 9/10 | 6376 days | 34% |
| renanf | 8/10 | 6380 days | 34% |
| Laura Muser | 9/10 | 6388 days | 34% |
| Alan Gallagher | 7/10 | 6388 days | 32% |
| Ellen Perrin | 9/10 | 6388 days | 34% |
| Julia | 7/10 | 6391 days | 32% |
| Philipp | 10/10 | 6394 days | 34% |
| Marieke | 3/10 | 6395 days | 15% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 6398 days | 34% |
| Ann-Kathren | 7/10 | 6401 days | 32% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6434 days | 34% |
| Claudia Schmidt | 9/10 | 6446 days | 34% |
| sylvia | 8/10 | 6451 days | 34% |
| Amy Newton | 10/10 | 6454 days | 34% |
| debsnz | 10/10 | 6467 days | 34% |
| Nicole | 3/10 | 6476 days | 15% |
| Spike | 7/10 | 6536 days | 32% |
| Sam Prior | 8/10 | 6544 days | 34% |
| Marco | 7/10 | 6569 days | 32% |
| Meike Biel | 8/10 | 6679 days | 34% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 6679 days | 34% |
| Mark | 7/10 | 6699 days | 32% |
| Julie | 5/10 | 6709 days | 25% |
| Marlo | 7/10 | 6716 days | 32% |
| Simon Mills | 8/10 | 6726 days | 34% |
| Sayaka | 4/10 | 6741 days | 20% |
| Camille | 10/10 | 6742 days | 34% |
| Anders | 9/10 | 6742 days | 34% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 6765 days | 34% |
| Ian | 7/10 | 6769 days | 32% |
| Carole Roccia | 6/10 | 6770 days | 29% |
| Thierry Berdah | 8/10 | 6772 days | 34% |
| Helena | 8/10 | 6772 days | 34% |
| Peter Katafey | 6/10 | 6772 days | 29% |
| Lindsey Woosnam | 5/10 | 6772 days | 25% |
| Katherine | 7/10 | 6775 days | 32% |
| Fred | 6/10 | 6776 days | 29% |
| Rob | 5/10 | 6776 days | 25% |
| Gav | 10/10 | 6776 days | 34% |
| Tom Anson | 8/10 | 6777 days | 34% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6804 days | 34% |
| Jim | 8/10 | 6813 days | 34% |
| Willemien | 7/10 | 6821 days | 32% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 7047 days | 34% |
| David | 5/10 | 7050 days | 25% |
| Stefan | 7/10 | 7050 days | 32% |
| Gwen | 8/10 | 7053 days | 34% |
| Hanneke | 8/10 | 7057 days | 34% |
| Matt | 7/10 | 7057 days | 32% |
| Alex | 8/10 | 7057 days | 34% |
| Johnny | 8/10 | 7057 days | 34% |
| Aaron | 9/10 | 7057 days | 34% |
| Hilary | 10/10 | 7066 days | 34% |
| Nina | 8/10 | 7101 days | 34% |
| Italy | 9/10 | 7101 days | 34% |
| Helle | 7/10 | 7101 days | 32% |
| KikiNelissen | 7/10 | 7107 days | 32% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Stray experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.08% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 123 days. However the Stray experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Stray experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.05% |
| 198 | -2.06% |
| 199 | -2.07% |
| 200 | -2.08% |
| 201 | -2.09% |
| 202 | -2.11% |
| 203 | -2.12% |
| … | … |
2.49% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.