G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Stray.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
195 Valid Reviews
The Stray experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 195 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 7 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 62 |
|
32% |
| 9/10 | 42 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 31 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.03% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Stray valid reviews is 83.03% and is based on 195 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
101 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 195 valid reviews, the experience has 101 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 101 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 10 |
|
10% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
15% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 28 |
|
28% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
74.65% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Stray face-to-face reviews is 74.65% and is based on 101 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.25%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atte | 6/10 | 2632 days | 100% |
| Tom C | 10/10 | 3423 days | 63% |
| Jodie | 10/10 | 3423 days | 63% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 3423 days | 63% |
| Christin Ossege | 10/10 | 3545 days | 55% |
| Theodore Trozinski | 9/10 | 3605 days | 51% |
| Phil Hartmann | 10/10 | 3758 days | 41% |
| dana forrest | 10/10 | 3850 days | 35% |
| Abbi Smith | 10/10 | 3911 days | 31% |
| Nicko Wong | 10/10 | 3942 days | 28% |
| Jodine | 10/10 | 3970 days | 27% |
| Samuel Berwick | 10/10 | 3970 days | 27% |
| Amy Jellings | 10/10 | 4062 days | 20% |
| Anna Elden | 9/10 | 4062 days | 20% |
| Andrea Leichtl | 10/10 | 4276 days | 6% |
| Johanna Molenaar | 7/10 | 4276 days | 6% |
| Claudia Bauch | 3/10 | 4305 days | 2% |
| Charlotte Wilson | 10/10 | 4307 days | 4% |
| Chris Luebbi | 8/10 | 4307 days | 4% |
| jason beinstein | 9/10 | 4335 days | 2% |
| discoveringaway | 9/10 | 4335 days | 2% |
| ieva m | 8/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Sonia | 10/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Zsolt | 10/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Victoria Wander | 10/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| TtotheT13 | 9/10 | 4397 days | 33% |
| Kim O'Neill | 10/10 | 4427 days | 33% |
| Maia Kazaks | 8/10 | 4427 days | 33% |
| Colette Keely | 10/10 | 4458 days | 33% |
| Jen Hards | 10/10 | 4488 days | 33% |
| Thomas Jones | 10/10 | 4519 days | 33% |
| Raj Singh | 10/10 | 4519 days | 33% |
| Sohie | 9/10 | 4677 days | 33% |
| Robin Andersson | 9/10 | 4700 days | 33% |
| Megan Gallagher | 10/10 | 4731 days | 33% |
| Andy Brown | 10/10 | 4731 days | 33% |
| Vinnie K | 10/10 | 4792 days | 33% |
| Heather_Oz | 9/10 | 4853 days | 33% |
| luciasolda | 10/10 | 4915 days | 33% |
| jennyj | 10/10 | 4945 days | 33% |
| dwehrtmann | 9/10 | 4976 days | 33% |
| Evaislief | 10/10 | 5006 days | 33% |
| Malena | 10/10 | 5037 days | 33% |
| navilink | 10/10 | 5037 days | 33% |
| meganb04 | 10/10 | 5037 days | 33% |
| MaryG | 10/10 | 5037 days | 33% |
| JoPycroft | 10/10 | 5037 days | 33% |
| lovebyname | 9/10 | 5037 days | 33% |
| Sonia Sennane | 7/10 | 5038 days | 31% |
| Tamara McVey | 7/10 | 5049 days | 31% |
| Rachel | 7/10 | 5051 days | 31% |
| Danielle & Jobbe | 8/10 | 5051 days | 33% |
| Andy Bridgman | 8/10 | 5051 days | 33% |
| Fiona Finke | 6/10 | 5057 days | 29% |
| Miron & Hendrik | 8/10 | 5061 days | 33% |
| marielou | 10/10 | 5066 days | 33% |
| iainmcgin | 10/10 | 5066 days | 33% |
| redkeels | 10/10 | 5066 days | 33% |
| lulu | 6/10 | 5097 days | 29% |
| Boogie | 5/10 | 5128 days | 25% |
| isha | 9/10 | 5128 days | 33% |
| pepper | 9/10 | 5158 days | 33% |
| Kez | 10/10 | 5189 days | 33% |
| Brilly01 | 8/10 | 5189 days | 33% |
| yens123 | 9/10 | 5189 days | 33% |
| louiset | 9/10 | 5189 days | 33% |
| siek09 | 9/10 | 5219 days | 33% |
| rosey | 10/10 | 5250 days | 33% |
| Cadz | 10/10 | 5250 days | 33% |
| natalietrueman84 | 10/10 | 5281 days | 33% |
| Josie | 10/10 | 5281 days | 33% |
| Scott_and_Stephanie | 9/10 | 5372 days | 33% |
| Samantha | 10/10 | 5372 days | 33% |
| Tracey Airiscough | 9/10 | 5394 days | 33% |
| Vanessa Hanzen | 4/10 | 5395 days | 21% |
| Lauren McKeone | 7/10 | 5401 days | 31% |
| Faye Cox | 7/10 | 5401 days | 31% |
| pudddddin | 9/10 | 5403 days | 33% |
| alicevarren | 9/10 | 5403 days | 33% |
| irisheyes | 7/10 | 5403 days | 31% |
| Steff | 7/10 | 5423 days | 31% |
| Forestal Youri | 7/10 | 5423 days | 31% |
| Amanda Craig | 8/10 | 5425 days | 33% |
| Olle Beide | 8/10 | 5431 days | 33% |
| JonathanMills | 8/10 | 5431 days | 33% |
| lisa | 9/10 | 5462 days | 33% |
| phydough | 6/10 | 5493 days | 29% |
| zippy | 10/10 | 5584 days | 33% |
| TerriH | 10/10 | 5615 days | 33% |
| ciara | 10/10 | 5646 days | 33% |
| mel1407 | 10/10 | 5646 days | 33% |
| Claram | 9/10 | 5676 days | 33% |
| joycevanb | 7/10 | 5707 days | 31% |
| JohnG | 10/10 | 5707 days | 33% |
| nicolejr413 | 9/10 | 5737 days | 33% |
| Antoine Migault | 8/10 | 5758 days | 33% |
| Christine T | 7/10 | 5762 days | 31% |
| Kay Beaumont | 8/10 | 5770 days | 33% |
| Johan | 7/10 | 5770 days | 31% |
| S Millet | 9/10 | 5774 days | 33% |
| Jens van Evp | 9/10 | 5792 days | 33% |
| Max Van der Zalm | 9/10 | 5792 days | 33% |
| Emily Walters | 7/10 | 5794 days | 31% |
| Brett Oz | 9/10 | 5827 days | 33% |
| greenbex | 9/10 | 5827 days | 33% |
| simonbo | 3/10 | 5842 days | 18% |
| katesc | 9/10 | 5847 days | 33% |
| martint | 6/10 | 5851 days | 29% |
| richelle | 7/10 | 5851 days | 31% |
| rosalindm | 8/10 | 5852 days | 33% |
| katepat | 8/10 | 5858 days | 33% |
| Beau | 5/10 | 5858 days | 25% |
| Debbie Rathbone | 10/10 | 5865 days | 33% |
| Ricarda | 3/10 | 5868 days | 18% |
| Malinka Nuefeld | 4/10 | 5868 days | 21% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5868 days | 33% |
| Thomas Willi | 8/10 | 5868 days | 33% |
| Jess Pasos | 9/10 | 5877 days | 33% |
| stettim | 10/10 | 5919 days | 33% |
| Philipp | 9/10 | 5919 days | 33% |
| Holly Mrowiec | 10/10 | 5949 days | 33% |
| Sophie Keate | 10/10 | 5986 days | 33% |
| Sam Lightfoot | 10/10 | 5986 days | 33% |
| Jenny Lee | 7/10 | 6008 days | 31% |
| Cat Payne | 9/10 | 6015 days | 33% |
| Catherine Smiles | 10/10 | 6016 days | 33% |
| Nikki Turner | 9/10 | 6023 days | 33% |
| TaraD | 10/10 | 6100 days | 33% |
| BiancaA | 9/10 | 6100 days | 33% |
| hibbler | 10/10 | 6102 days | 33% |
| ferdinande | 7/10 | 6104 days | 31% |
| mariea | 8/10 | 6114 days | 33% |
| JennekeK | 6/10 | 6114 days | 29% |
| Ross | 5/10 | 6116 days | 25% |
| MarielR | 7/10 | 6120 days | 31% |
| NikW | 8/10 | 6120 days | 33% |
| Anna Skeer | 9/10 | 6143 days | 33% |
| EmmaB1 | 8/10 | 6148 days | 33% |
| BethanD | 9/10 | 6149 days | 33% |
| renanf | 8/10 | 6153 days | 33% |
| Laura Muser | 9/10 | 6161 days | 33% |
| Alan Gallagher | 7/10 | 6161 days | 31% |
| Ellen Perrin | 9/10 | 6161 days | 33% |
| Julia | 7/10 | 6164 days | 31% |
| Philipp | 10/10 | 6167 days | 33% |
| Marieke | 3/10 | 6168 days | 18% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 6171 days | 33% |
| Ann-Kathren | 7/10 | 6175 days | 31% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6207 days | 33% |
| Claudia Schmidt | 9/10 | 6219 days | 33% |
| sylvia | 8/10 | 6224 days | 33% |
| Amy Newton | 10/10 | 6227 days | 33% |
| debsnz | 10/10 | 6240 days | 33% |
| Nicole | 3/10 | 6249 days | 18% |
| Spike | 7/10 | 6309 days | 31% |
| Sam Prior | 8/10 | 6318 days | 33% |
| Marco | 7/10 | 6342 days | 31% |
| Meike Biel | 8/10 | 6452 days | 33% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 6452 days | 33% |
| Mark | 7/10 | 6472 days | 31% |
| Julie | 5/10 | 6482 days | 25% |
| Marlo | 7/10 | 6489 days | 31% |
| Simon Mills | 8/10 | 6499 days | 33% |
| Sayaka | 4/10 | 6514 days | 21% |
| Camille | 10/10 | 6515 days | 33% |
| Anders | 9/10 | 6515 days | 33% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 6538 days | 33% |
| Ian | 7/10 | 6542 days | 31% |
| Carole Roccia | 6/10 | 6543 days | 29% |
| Thierry Berdah | 8/10 | 6545 days | 33% |
| Helena | 8/10 | 6545 days | 33% |
| Peter Katafey | 6/10 | 6545 days | 29% |
| Lindsey Woosnam | 5/10 | 6545 days | 25% |
| Katherine | 7/10 | 6548 days | 31% |
| Fred | 6/10 | 6549 days | 29% |
| Rob | 5/10 | 6549 days | 25% |
| Gav | 10/10 | 6549 days | 33% |
| Tom Anson | 8/10 | 6550 days | 33% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6577 days | 33% |
| Jim | 8/10 | 6586 days | 33% |
| Willemien | 7/10 | 6594 days | 31% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 6820 days | 33% |
| David | 5/10 | 6823 days | 25% |
| Stefan | 7/10 | 6823 days | 31% |
| Gwen | 8/10 | 6826 days | 33% |
| Hanneke | 8/10 | 6830 days | 33% |
| Matt | 7/10 | 6830 days | 31% |
| Alex | 8/10 | 6830 days | 33% |
| Johnny | 8/10 | 6830 days | 33% |
| Aaron | 9/10 | 6830 days | 33% |
| Hilary | 10/10 | 6839 days | 33% |
| Nina | 8/10 | 6874 days | 33% |
| Italy | 9/10 | 6874 days | 33% |
| Helle | 7/10 | 6874 days | 31% |
| KikiNelissen | 7/10 | 6880 days | 31% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Stray experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.06% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Stray experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Stray experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.00% |
| 198 | -4.02% |
| 199 | -4.04% |
| 200 | -4.06% |
| 201 | -4.08% |
| 202 | -4.10% |
| 203 | -4.12% |
| … | … |
2.95% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.