Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Stray.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
195 Valid Reviews
The Stray experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 195 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 7 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 62 |
|
32% |
| 9/10 | 42 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 31 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.03% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Stray valid reviews is 83.03% and is based on 195 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
101 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 195 valid reviews, the experience has 101 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 101 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 10 |
|
10% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
15% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 28 |
|
28% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
74.65% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Stray face-to-face reviews is 74.65% and is based on 101 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.25%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atte | 6/10 | 2758 days | 100% |
| Tom C | 10/10 | 3548 days | 53% |
| Jodie | 10/10 | 3548 days | 53% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 3548 days | 53% |
| Christin Ossege | 10/10 | 3670 days | 43% |
| Theodore Trozinski | 9/10 | 3730 days | 38% |
| Phil Hartmann | 10/10 | 3883 days | 25% |
| dana forrest | 10/10 | 3975 days | 18% |
| Abbi Smith | 10/10 | 4036 days | 13% |
| Nicko Wong | 10/10 | 4067 days | 10% |
| Jodine | 10/10 | 4095 days | 8% |
| Samuel Berwick | 10/10 | 4095 days | 8% |
| Amy Jellings | 10/10 | 4187 days | 0% |
| Anna Elden | 9/10 | 4187 days | 0% |
| Andrea Leichtl | 10/10 | 4402 days | 27% |
| Johanna Molenaar | 7/10 | 4402 days | 24% |
| Claudia Bauch | 3/10 | 4431 days | 7% |
| Charlotte Wilson | 10/10 | 4432 days | 27% |
| Chris Luebbi | 8/10 | 4433 days | 26% |
| jason beinstein | 9/10 | 4460 days | 26% |
| discoveringaway | 9/10 | 4461 days | 26% |
| ieva m | 8/10 | 4492 days | 26% |
| Sonia | 10/10 | 4492 days | 27% |
| Zsolt | 10/10 | 4492 days | 27% |
| Victoria Wander | 10/10 | 4492 days | 27% |
| TtotheT13 | 9/10 | 4523 days | 26% |
| Kim O'Neill | 10/10 | 4553 days | 27% |
| Maia Kazaks | 8/10 | 4553 days | 26% |
| Colette Keely | 10/10 | 4584 days | 27% |
| Jen Hards | 10/10 | 4614 days | 27% |
| Thomas Jones | 10/10 | 4645 days | 27% |
| Raj Singh | 10/10 | 4645 days | 27% |
| Sohie | 9/10 | 4803 days | 26% |
| Robin Andersson | 9/10 | 4826 days | 26% |
| Megan Gallagher | 10/10 | 4857 days | 27% |
| Andy Brown | 10/10 | 4857 days | 27% |
| Vinnie K | 10/10 | 4918 days | 27% |
| Heather_Oz | 9/10 | 4979 days | 26% |
| luciasolda | 10/10 | 5041 days | 27% |
| jennyj | 10/10 | 5071 days | 27% |
| dwehrtmann | 9/10 | 5102 days | 26% |
| Evaislief | 10/10 | 5132 days | 27% |
| Malena | 10/10 | 5163 days | 27% |
| navilink | 10/10 | 5163 days | 27% |
| meganb04 | 10/10 | 5163 days | 27% |
| MaryG | 10/10 | 5163 days | 27% |
| JoPycroft | 10/10 | 5163 days | 27% |
| lovebyname | 9/10 | 5163 days | 26% |
| Sonia Sennane | 7/10 | 5164 days | 24% |
| Tamara McVey | 7/10 | 5175 days | 24% |
| Rachel | 7/10 | 5177 days | 24% |
| Danielle & Jobbe | 8/10 | 5177 days | 26% |
| Andy Bridgman | 8/10 | 5177 days | 26% |
| Fiona Finke | 6/10 | 5183 days | 21% |
| Miron & Hendrik | 8/10 | 5187 days | 26% |
| marielou | 10/10 | 5192 days | 27% |
| iainmcgin | 10/10 | 5192 days | 27% |
| redkeels | 10/10 | 5192 days | 27% |
| lulu | 6/10 | 5223 days | 21% |
| Boogie | 5/10 | 5254 days | 16% |
| isha | 9/10 | 5254 days | 26% |
| pepper | 9/10 | 5284 days | 26% |
| Kez | 10/10 | 5315 days | 27% |
| Brilly01 | 8/10 | 5315 days | 26% |
| yens123 | 9/10 | 5315 days | 26% |
| louiset | 9/10 | 5315 days | 26% |
| siek09 | 9/10 | 5345 days | 26% |
| rosey | 10/10 | 5376 days | 27% |
| Cadz | 10/10 | 5376 days | 27% |
| natalietrueman84 | 10/10 | 5407 days | 27% |
| Josie | 10/10 | 5407 days | 27% |
| Scott_and_Stephanie | 9/10 | 5498 days | 26% |
| Samantha | 10/10 | 5498 days | 27% |
| Tracey Airiscough | 9/10 | 5520 days | 26% |
| Vanessa Hanzen | 4/10 | 5521 days | 12% |
| Lauren McKeone | 7/10 | 5527 days | 24% |
| Faye Cox | 7/10 | 5527 days | 24% |
| pudddddin | 9/10 | 5529 days | 26% |
| alicevarren | 9/10 | 5529 days | 26% |
| irisheyes | 7/10 | 5529 days | 24% |
| Steff | 7/10 | 5549 days | 24% |
| Forestal Youri | 7/10 | 5549 days | 24% |
| Amanda Craig | 8/10 | 5551 days | 26% |
| Olle Beide | 8/10 | 5557 days | 26% |
| JonathanMills | 8/10 | 5557 days | 26% |
| lisa | 9/10 | 5588 days | 26% |
| phydough | 6/10 | 5619 days | 21% |
| zippy | 10/10 | 5710 days | 27% |
| TerriH | 10/10 | 5741 days | 27% |
| ciara | 10/10 | 5772 days | 27% |
| mel1407 | 10/10 | 5772 days | 27% |
| Claram | 9/10 | 5802 days | 26% |
| joycevanb | 7/10 | 5833 days | 24% |
| JohnG | 10/10 | 5833 days | 27% |
| nicolejr413 | 9/10 | 5863 days | 26% |
| Antoine Migault | 8/10 | 5884 days | 26% |
| Christine T | 7/10 | 5888 days | 24% |
| Kay Beaumont | 8/10 | 5896 days | 26% |
| Johan | 7/10 | 5896 days | 24% |
| S Millet | 9/10 | 5900 days | 26% |
| Jens van Evp | 9/10 | 5918 days | 26% |
| Max Van der Zalm | 9/10 | 5918 days | 26% |
| Emily Walters | 7/10 | 5920 days | 24% |
| Brett Oz | 9/10 | 5953 days | 26% |
| greenbex | 9/10 | 5953 days | 26% |
| simonbo | 3/10 | 5968 days | 7% |
| katesc | 9/10 | 5973 days | 26% |
| martint | 6/10 | 5977 days | 21% |
| richelle | 7/10 | 5977 days | 24% |
| rosalindm | 8/10 | 5978 days | 26% |
| katepat | 8/10 | 5984 days | 26% |
| Beau | 5/10 | 5984 days | 16% |
| Debbie Rathbone | 10/10 | 5991 days | 27% |
| Ricarda | 3/10 | 5994 days | 7% |
| Malinka Nuefeld | 4/10 | 5994 days | 12% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5994 days | 26% |
| Thomas Willi | 8/10 | 5994 days | 26% |
| Jess Pasos | 9/10 | 6003 days | 26% |
| stettim | 10/10 | 6045 days | 27% |
| Philipp | 9/10 | 6045 days | 26% |
| Holly Mrowiec | 10/10 | 6075 days | 27% |
| Sophie Keate | 10/10 | 6112 days | 27% |
| Sam Lightfoot | 10/10 | 6112 days | 27% |
| Jenny Lee | 7/10 | 6134 days | 24% |
| Cat Payne | 9/10 | 6141 days | 26% |
| Catherine Smiles | 10/10 | 6142 days | 27% |
| Nikki Turner | 9/10 | 6149 days | 26% |
| TaraD | 10/10 | 6226 days | 27% |
| BiancaA | 9/10 | 6226 days | 26% |
| hibbler | 10/10 | 6228 days | 27% |
| ferdinande | 7/10 | 6229 days | 24% |
| mariea | 8/10 | 6240 days | 26% |
| JennekeK | 6/10 | 6240 days | 21% |
| Ross | 5/10 | 6242 days | 16% |
| MarielR | 7/10 | 6246 days | 24% |
| NikW | 8/10 | 6246 days | 26% |
| Anna Skeer | 9/10 | 6269 days | 26% |
| EmmaB1 | 8/10 | 6274 days | 26% |
| BethanD | 9/10 | 6275 days | 26% |
| renanf | 8/10 | 6279 days | 26% |
| Laura Muser | 9/10 | 6286 days | 26% |
| Alan Gallagher | 7/10 | 6287 days | 24% |
| Ellen Perrin | 9/10 | 6287 days | 26% |
| Julia | 7/10 | 6290 days | 24% |
| Philipp | 10/10 | 6292 days | 27% |
| Marieke | 3/10 | 6294 days | 7% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 6297 days | 27% |
| Ann-Kathren | 7/10 | 6300 days | 24% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6333 days | 26% |
| Claudia Schmidt | 9/10 | 6344 days | 26% |
| sylvia | 8/10 | 6349 days | 26% |
| Amy Newton | 10/10 | 6352 days | 27% |
| debsnz | 10/10 | 6365 days | 27% |
| Nicole | 3/10 | 6374 days | 7% |
| Spike | 7/10 | 6434 days | 24% |
| Sam Prior | 8/10 | 6443 days | 26% |
| Marco | 7/10 | 6467 days | 24% |
| Meike Biel | 8/10 | 6578 days | 26% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 6578 days | 26% |
| Mark | 7/10 | 6598 days | 24% |
| Julie | 5/10 | 6608 days | 16% |
| Marlo | 7/10 | 6615 days | 24% |
| Simon Mills | 8/10 | 6625 days | 26% |
| Sayaka | 4/10 | 6640 days | 12% |
| Camille | 10/10 | 6641 days | 27% |
| Anders | 9/10 | 6641 days | 26% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 6664 days | 26% |
| Ian | 7/10 | 6668 days | 24% |
| Carole Roccia | 6/10 | 6669 days | 21% |
| Thierry Berdah | 8/10 | 6671 days | 26% |
| Helena | 8/10 | 6671 days | 26% |
| Peter Katafey | 6/10 | 6671 days | 21% |
| Lindsey Woosnam | 5/10 | 6671 days | 16% |
| Katherine | 7/10 | 6674 days | 24% |
| Fred | 6/10 | 6675 days | 21% |
| Rob | 5/10 | 6675 days | 16% |
| Gav | 10/10 | 6675 days | 27% |
| Tom Anson | 8/10 | 6676 days | 26% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6703 days | 27% |
| Jim | 8/10 | 6712 days | 26% |
| Willemien | 7/10 | 6720 days | 24% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 6946 days | 26% |
| David | 5/10 | 6949 days | 16% |
| Stefan | 7/10 | 6949 days | 24% |
| Gwen | 8/10 | 6952 days | 26% |
| Hanneke | 8/10 | 6956 days | 26% |
| Matt | 7/10 | 6956 days | 24% |
| Alex | 8/10 | 6956 days | 26% |
| Johnny | 8/10 | 6956 days | 26% |
| Aaron | 9/10 | 6956 days | 26% |
| Hilary | 10/10 | 6965 days | 27% |
| Nina | 8/10 | 7000 days | 26% |
| Italy | 9/10 | 7000 days | 26% |
| Helle | 7/10 | 7000 days | 24% |
| KikiNelissen | 7/10 | 7006 days | 24% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Stray experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.36% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 69 days. However the Stray experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Stray experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.31% |
| 198 | -3.32% |
| 199 | -3.34% |
| 200 | -3.36% |
| 201 | -3.37% |
| 202 | -3.39% |
| 203 | -3.41% |
| … | … |
2.76% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.