G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Stray.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
195 Valid Reviews
The Stray experience has a total of 202 reviews. There are 195 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 7 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 195 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 62 |
|
32% |
| 9/10 | 42 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 31 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.03% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Stray valid reviews is 83.03% and is based on 195 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
101 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 195 valid reviews, the experience has 101 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 101 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 10 |
|
10% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
15% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 28 |
|
28% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
74.65% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Stray face-to-face reviews is 74.65% and is based on 101 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.43%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atte | 6/10 | 2659 days | 100% |
| Tom C | 10/10 | 3449 days | 62% |
| Jodie | 10/10 | 3449 days | 62% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 3449 days | 62% |
| Christin Ossege | 10/10 | 3571 days | 54% |
| Theodore Trozinski | 9/10 | 3631 days | 49% |
| Phil Hartmann | 10/10 | 3784 days | 39% |
| dana forrest | 10/10 | 3876 days | 33% |
| Abbi Smith | 10/10 | 3937 days | 29% |
| Nicko Wong | 10/10 | 3968 days | 27% |
| Jodine | 10/10 | 3996 days | 25% |
| Samuel Berwick | 10/10 | 3996 days | 25% |
| Amy Jellings | 10/10 | 4088 days | 19% |
| Anna Elden | 9/10 | 4088 days | 19% |
| Andrea Leichtl | 10/10 | 4303 days | 4% |
| Johanna Molenaar | 7/10 | 4303 days | 4% |
| Claudia Bauch | 3/10 | 4332 days | 1% |
| Charlotte Wilson | 10/10 | 4333 days | 2% |
| Chris Luebbi | 8/10 | 4334 days | 2% |
| jason beinstein | 9/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| discoveringaway | 9/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
| ieva m | 8/10 | 4393 days | 33% |
| Sonia | 10/10 | 4393 days | 34% |
| Zsolt | 10/10 | 4393 days | 34% |
| Victoria Wander | 10/10 | 4393 days | 34% |
| TtotheT13 | 9/10 | 4424 days | 33% |
| Kim O'Neill | 10/10 | 4454 days | 34% |
| Maia Kazaks | 8/10 | 4454 days | 33% |
| Colette Keely | 10/10 | 4485 days | 34% |
| Jen Hards | 10/10 | 4515 days | 34% |
| Thomas Jones | 10/10 | 4546 days | 34% |
| Raj Singh | 10/10 | 4546 days | 34% |
| Sohie | 9/10 | 4704 days | 33% |
| Robin Andersson | 9/10 | 4727 days | 33% |
| Megan Gallagher | 10/10 | 4758 days | 34% |
| Andy Brown | 10/10 | 4758 days | 34% |
| Vinnie K | 10/10 | 4819 days | 34% |
| Heather_Oz | 9/10 | 4880 days | 33% |
| luciasolda | 10/10 | 4942 days | 34% |
| jennyj | 10/10 | 4972 days | 34% |
| dwehrtmann | 9/10 | 5003 days | 33% |
| Evaislief | 10/10 | 5033 days | 34% |
| Malena | 10/10 | 5064 days | 34% |
| navilink | 10/10 | 5064 days | 34% |
| meganb04 | 10/10 | 5064 days | 34% |
| MaryG | 10/10 | 5064 days | 34% |
| JoPycroft | 10/10 | 5064 days | 34% |
| lovebyname | 9/10 | 5064 days | 33% |
| Sonia Sennane | 7/10 | 5065 days | 31% |
| Tamara McVey | 7/10 | 5076 days | 31% |
| Rachel | 7/10 | 5078 days | 31% |
| Danielle & Jobbe | 8/10 | 5078 days | 33% |
| Andy Bridgman | 8/10 | 5078 days | 33% |
| Fiona Finke | 6/10 | 5084 days | 29% |
| Miron & Hendrik | 8/10 | 5088 days | 33% |
| marielou | 10/10 | 5093 days | 34% |
| iainmcgin | 10/10 | 5093 days | 34% |
| redkeels | 10/10 | 5093 days | 34% |
| lulu | 6/10 | 5124 days | 29% |
| Boogie | 5/10 | 5155 days | 25% |
| isha | 9/10 | 5155 days | 33% |
| pepper | 9/10 | 5185 days | 33% |
| Kez | 10/10 | 5216 days | 34% |
| Brilly01 | 8/10 | 5216 days | 33% |
| yens123 | 9/10 | 5216 days | 33% |
| louiset | 9/10 | 5216 days | 33% |
| siek09 | 9/10 | 5246 days | 33% |
| rosey | 10/10 | 5277 days | 34% |
| Cadz | 10/10 | 5277 days | 34% |
| natalietrueman84 | 10/10 | 5308 days | 34% |
| Josie | 10/10 | 5308 days | 34% |
| Scott_and_Stephanie | 9/10 | 5399 days | 33% |
| Samantha | 10/10 | 5399 days | 34% |
| Tracey Airiscough | 9/10 | 5421 days | 33% |
| Vanessa Hanzen | 4/10 | 5422 days | 22% |
| Lauren McKeone | 7/10 | 5428 days | 31% |
| Faye Cox | 7/10 | 5428 days | 31% |
| pudddddin | 9/10 | 5430 days | 33% |
| alicevarren | 9/10 | 5430 days | 33% |
| irisheyes | 7/10 | 5430 days | 31% |
| Steff | 7/10 | 5450 days | 31% |
| Forestal Youri | 7/10 | 5450 days | 31% |
| Amanda Craig | 8/10 | 5452 days | 33% |
| Olle Beide | 8/10 | 5458 days | 33% |
| JonathanMills | 8/10 | 5458 days | 33% |
| lisa | 9/10 | 5489 days | 33% |
| phydough | 6/10 | 5520 days | 29% |
| zippy | 10/10 | 5611 days | 34% |
| TerriH | 10/10 | 5642 days | 34% |
| ciara | 10/10 | 5673 days | 34% |
| mel1407 | 10/10 | 5673 days | 34% |
| Claram | 9/10 | 5703 days | 33% |
| joycevanb | 7/10 | 5734 days | 31% |
| JohnG | 10/10 | 5734 days | 34% |
| nicolejr413 | 9/10 | 5764 days | 33% |
| Antoine Migault | 8/10 | 5785 days | 33% |
| Christine T | 7/10 | 5789 days | 31% |
| Kay Beaumont | 8/10 | 5797 days | 33% |
| Johan | 7/10 | 5797 days | 31% |
| S Millet | 9/10 | 5801 days | 33% |
| Jens van Evp | 9/10 | 5819 days | 33% |
| Max Van der Zalm | 9/10 | 5819 days | 33% |
| Emily Walters | 7/10 | 5821 days | 31% |
| Brett Oz | 9/10 | 5854 days | 33% |
| greenbex | 9/10 | 5854 days | 33% |
| simonbo | 3/10 | 5869 days | 18% |
| katesc | 9/10 | 5874 days | 33% |
| martint | 6/10 | 5878 days | 29% |
| richelle | 7/10 | 5878 days | 31% |
| rosalindm | 8/10 | 5879 days | 33% |
| katepat | 8/10 | 5885 days | 33% |
| Beau | 5/10 | 5885 days | 25% |
| Debbie Rathbone | 10/10 | 5892 days | 34% |
| Ricarda | 3/10 | 5895 days | 18% |
| Malinka Nuefeld | 4/10 | 5895 days | 22% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5895 days | 33% |
| Thomas Willi | 8/10 | 5895 days | 33% |
| Jess Pasos | 9/10 | 5904 days | 33% |
| stettim | 10/10 | 5946 days | 34% |
| Philipp | 9/10 | 5946 days | 33% |
| Holly Mrowiec | 10/10 | 5976 days | 34% |
| Sophie Keate | 10/10 | 6013 days | 34% |
| Sam Lightfoot | 10/10 | 6013 days | 34% |
| Jenny Lee | 7/10 | 6035 days | 31% |
| Cat Payne | 9/10 | 6042 days | 33% |
| Catherine Smiles | 10/10 | 6043 days | 34% |
| Nikki Turner | 9/10 | 6050 days | 33% |
| TaraD | 10/10 | 6127 days | 34% |
| BiancaA | 9/10 | 6127 days | 33% |
| hibbler | 10/10 | 6129 days | 34% |
| ferdinande | 7/10 | 6130 days | 31% |
| mariea | 8/10 | 6140 days | 33% |
| JennekeK | 6/10 | 6141 days | 29% |
| Ross | 5/10 | 6143 days | 25% |
| MarielR | 7/10 | 6147 days | 31% |
| NikW | 8/10 | 6147 days | 33% |
| Anna Skeer | 9/10 | 6170 days | 33% |
| EmmaB1 | 8/10 | 6175 days | 33% |
| BethanD | 9/10 | 6176 days | 33% |
| renanf | 8/10 | 6180 days | 33% |
| Laura Muser | 9/10 | 6187 days | 33% |
| Alan Gallagher | 7/10 | 6188 days | 31% |
| Ellen Perrin | 9/10 | 6188 days | 33% |
| Julia | 7/10 | 6191 days | 31% |
| Philipp | 10/10 | 6193 days | 34% |
| Marieke | 3/10 | 6195 days | 18% |
| Katie | 10/10 | 6198 days | 34% |
| Ann-Kathren | 7/10 | 6201 days | 31% |
| Sonja | 8/10 | 6233 days | 33% |
| Claudia Schmidt | 9/10 | 6245 days | 33% |
| sylvia | 8/10 | 6250 days | 33% |
| Amy Newton | 10/10 | 6253 days | 34% |
| debsnz | 10/10 | 6266 days | 34% |
| Nicole | 3/10 | 6275 days | 18% |
| Spike | 7/10 | 6335 days | 31% |
| Sam Prior | 8/10 | 6344 days | 33% |
| Marco | 7/10 | 6368 days | 31% |
| Meike Biel | 8/10 | 6479 days | 33% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 6479 days | 33% |
| Mark | 7/10 | 6499 days | 31% |
| Julie | 5/10 | 6509 days | 25% |
| Marlo | 7/10 | 6516 days | 31% |
| Simon Mills | 8/10 | 6526 days | 33% |
| Sayaka | 4/10 | 6541 days | 22% |
| Camille | 10/10 | 6542 days | 34% |
| Anders | 9/10 | 6542 days | 33% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 6565 days | 33% |
| Ian | 7/10 | 6569 days | 31% |
| Carole Roccia | 6/10 | 6570 days | 29% |
| Thierry Berdah | 8/10 | 6572 days | 33% |
| Helena | 8/10 | 6572 days | 33% |
| Peter Katafey | 6/10 | 6572 days | 29% |
| Lindsey Woosnam | 5/10 | 6572 days | 25% |
| Katherine | 7/10 | 6575 days | 31% |
| Fred | 6/10 | 6576 days | 29% |
| Rob | 5/10 | 6576 days | 25% |
| Gav | 10/10 | 6576 days | 34% |
| Tom Anson | 8/10 | 6577 days | 33% |
| Paul Cowie | 10/10 | 6604 days | 34% |
| Jim | 8/10 | 6613 days | 33% |
| Willemien | 7/10 | 6621 days | 31% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 6847 days | 33% |
| David | 5/10 | 6850 days | 25% |
| Stefan | 7/10 | 6850 days | 31% |
| Gwen | 8/10 | 6853 days | 33% |
| Hanneke | 8/10 | 6857 days | 33% |
| Matt | 7/10 | 6857 days | 31% |
| Alex | 8/10 | 6857 days | 33% |
| Johnny | 8/10 | 6857 days | 33% |
| Aaron | 9/10 | 6857 days | 33% |
| Hilary | 10/10 | 6866 days | 34% |
| Nina | 8/10 | 6901 days | 33% |
| Italy | 9/10 | 6901 days | 33% |
| Helle | 7/10 | 6901 days | 31% |
| KikiNelissen | 7/10 | 6907 days | 31% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Stray experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.06% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Stray experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Stray experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.00% |
| 198 | -4.02% |
| 199 | -4.04% |
| 200 | -4.06% |
| 201 | -4.08% |
| 202 | -4.10% |
| 203 | -4.12% |
| … | … |
2.90% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.