Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Pacific Horizon Motorhomes.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Pacific Horizon Motorhomes
Valid Reviews
243 Valid Reviews
The Pacific Horizon Motorhomes experience has a total of 253 reviews. There are 243 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 10 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 243 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 70 |
|
29% |
| 9/10 | 64 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 55 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 15 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 8 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.37% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pacific Horizon Motorhomes valid reviews is 83.37% and is based on 243 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
143 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 243 valid reviews, the experience has 143 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 143 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 12 |
|
8% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 48 |
|
34% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 15 |
|
10% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 7 |
|
5% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
77.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pacific Horizon Motorhomes face-to-face reviews is 77.13% and is based on 143 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
93.10%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Mason | 10/10 | 34 days | 99.82 | 100% | |
| Lydia | 9/10 | 34 days | 99.82 | 100% | |
| Tony Henderson-Newport | 9/10 | 34 days | 99.82 | 100% | |
| Lexi & Rod Kirk | 10/10 | 34 days | 99.82 | 100% | |
| Ian G | 10/10 | 64 days | 99.35 | 100% | |
| Morris | 10/10 | 64 days | 99.35 | 100% | |
| Stacy Lio | 10/10 | 64 days | 99.35 | 100% | |
| Anonymous (105552) | 8/10 | 155 days | 91.38 | 92% | |
| Keith Diver | 9/10 | 155 days | 96.19 | 96% | |
| Stefan Berger | 9/10 | 155 days | 96.19 | 96% | |
| Peter Leschev | 9/10 | 184 days | 94.64 | 95% | |
| Miles Protter | 8/10 | 184 days | 89.9 | 90% | |
| Martin Borjeskog | 10/10 | 185 days | 94.58 | 95% | |
| Christian | 9/10 | 185 days | 94.58 | 95% | |
| Alexandre Lacroix | 9/10 | 185 days | 94.58 | 95% | |
| Matthew Young | 9/10 | 185 days | 94.58 | 95% | |
| Ben Holmes | 10/10 | 185 days | 94.58 | 95% | |
| N.J. van den Berg | 10/10 | 185 days | 94.58 | 95% | |
| Mike Smith | 9/10 | 185 days | 94.58 | 95% | |
| Ron Meyerink | 10/10 | 215 days | 92.68 | 93% | |
| Gerd Weidenfeld | 10/10 | 216 days | 92.61 | 93% | |
| Geoff and Ginny Cunningham | 9/10 | 216 days | 92.61 | 93% | |
| Des Gilbert | 9/10 | 247 days | 90.33 | 90% | |
| Diane | 10/10 | 247 days | 90.33 | 90% | |
| Kirsch, Luxemburg | 10/10 | 247 days | 90.33 | 90% | |
| Anna Hunt | 9/10 | 247 days | 90.33 | 90% | |
| James and Emma Dickie | 10/10 | 247 days | 90.33 | 90% | |
| Jonatan Zarzif | 3/10 | 247 days | 69.56 | 70% | |
| Trevor Parkin | 9/10 | 276 days | 87.93 | 88% | |
| Edwin Walker | 8/10 | 308 days | 80.72 | 81% | |
| Serena Gray | 9/10 | 308 days | 84.97 | 85% | |
| PJ Caldito | 10/10 | 308 days | 84.97 | 85% | |
| Shane Howe | 10/10 | 338 days | 81.9 | 82% | |
| Jason | 10/10 | 338 days | 81.9 | 82% | |
| Teneille Harwood | 10/10 | 338 days | 81.9 | 82% | |
| Fabulous five | 10/10 | 369 days | 78.42 | 79% | |
| jac | 9/10 | 369 days | 78.42 | 79% | |
| Keith & Kay Finlayson | 10/10 | 369 days | 78.42 | 79% | |
| Jeannie Huang | 9/10 | 399 days | 74.77 | 75% | |
| Joao Madureira | 8/10 | 399 days | 71.03 | 71% | |
| Edith Peita | 10/10 | 400 days | 74.65 | 75% | |
| John Bourke | 10/10 | 400 days | 74.65 | 75% | |
| Maik | 10/10 | 430 days | 70.7 | 71% | |
| Helen | 10/10 | 430 days | 70.7 | 71% | |
| Kevin | 10/10 | 430 days | 70.7 | 71% | |
| Larry Mutu Reriti | 10/10 | 430 days | 70.7 | 71% | |
| Keryn | 10/10 | 430 days | 70.7 | 71% | |
| Greg Croft | 10/10 | 430 days | 70.7 | 71% | |
| Erin | 10/10 | 461 days | 66.32 | 66% | |
| schtahaups | 9/10 | 461 days | 66.32 | 66% | |
| CMe | 9/10 | 461 days | 66.32 | 66% | |
| Martyn | 10/10 | 461 days | 66.32 | 66% | |
| John Flynn | 9/10 | 490 days | 61.95 | 62% | |
| charlie35slr | 10/10 | 491 days | 61.8 | 62% | |
| Ken | 2/10 | 521 days | 42.74 | 43% | |
| Bee | 3/10 | 522 days | 43.75 | 44% | |
| Catherine Johnson | 10/10 | 549 days | 52.24 | 52% | |
| Bk | 10/10 | 550 days | 52.07 | 52% | |
| John I. | 10/10 | 550 days | 52.07 | 52% | |
| Rogie | 9/10 | 550 days | 52.07 | 52% | |
| Krzysztof Jablonski | 10/10 | 550 days | 52.07 | 52% | |
| Berthold Wagner | 8/10 | 580 days | 44.68 | 45% | |
| Eric Arnal Fort | 10/10 | 580 days | 47.03 | 47% | |
| Andy Jamo | 10/10 | 581 days | 46.87 | 47% | |
| Agnès | 10/10 | 581 days | 46.87 | 47% | |
| Thomas Heri | 10/10 | 581 days | 46.87 | 47% | |
| Roger and Karen | 10/10 | 642 days | 37.52 | 38% | |
| renard | 9/10 | 642 days | 37.52 | 38% | |
| Berrie, the Netherlands | 10/10 | 642 days | 37.52 | 38% | |
| Warren S | 10/10 | 673 days | 33.22 | 33% | |
| Ronald Rampersad | 10/10 | 734 days | 25.65 | 26% | |
| Poynter Family | 9/10 | 734 days | 25.65 | 26% | |
| Wilson | 10/10 | 765 days | 22.26 | 22% | |
| Elsa | 10/10 | 765 days | 22.26 | 22% | |
| Pascal | 10/10 | 795 days | 19.26 | 19% | |
| Paul Haslam | 10/10 | 886 days | 11.92 | 12% | |
| Jennifer Makosky | 9/10 | 886 days | 11.92 | 12% | |
| Steve Pickard | 10/10 | 887 days | 11.86 | 12% | |
| Stuart C | 10/10 | 915 days | 10.13 | 10% | |
| Vicki Simmons | 10/10 | 945 days | 8.57 | 9% | |
| Steven Dunlop | 9/10 | 945 days | 8.57 | 9% | |
| Sarah Timms | 10/10 | 1037 days | 5.53 | 6% | |
| Emily Hibberd | 10/10 | 1067 days | 5.12 | 5% | |
| Sue Lander | 9/10 | 1067 days | 5.12 | 5% | |
| Kelvin Armstrong | 10/10 | 1129 days | 4.93 | 5% | |
| Tom Williamson | 9/10 | 1159 days | 4.87 | 5% | |
| Yves Deyris | 10/10 | 1220 days | 4.76 | 5% | |
| Fred RABIER BAGOEE | 9/10 | 1220 days | 4.76 | 5% | |
| Sylvie Paquette | 9/10 | 1251 days | 4.69 | 5% | |
| Axel and Patricia G | 10/10 | 1256 days |  |
4.68 | 5% |
| walter isselhard | 8/10 | 1616 days | 3.78 | 4% | |
| Darker | 9/10 | 1998 days | |
3.23 | 3% |
| L S | 10/10 | 2194 days | 2.85 | 3% | |
| aussiewoodies | 8/10 | 2682 days | 1.8 | 2% | |
| Sharyn Crosby | 10/10 | 2713 days | 1.83 | 2% | |
| Alekandra Ulm | 4/10 | 2785 days | |
1.34 | 1% |
| Sue Kieseker | 8/10 | 2788 days | |
1.6 | 2% |
| Karin Genyn | 8/10 | 2789 days | |
1.6 | 2% |
| Sharon Yates | 10/10 | 2791 days | |
1.68 | 2% |
| Moorman | 8/10 | 2794 days | |
1.59 | 2% |
| Marian | 7/10 | 2805 days | |
1.5 | 2% |
| Behrens | 4/10 | 2812 days | |
1.3 | 1% |
| FiStew | 10/10 | 2894 days | 1.48 | 1% | |
| Devil_n_Disquiz | 10/10 | 2925 days | 1.42 | 1% | |
| gezza2906 | 4/10 | 2956 days | 1.07 | 1% | |
| Tinne Cis | 8/10 | 3075 days | |
1.07 | 1% |
| B Sluis | 8/10 | 3087 days | |
1.05 | 1% |
| Bottoms | 7/10 | 3088 days | |
1.0 | 1% |
| Seiler | 6/10 | 3088 days | |
0.91 | 1% |
| Patrick Grant | 8/10 | 3088 days | |
1.04 | 1% |
| Moehl | 9/10 | 3090 days | |
1.1 | 1% |
| David Beaumont | 8/10 | 3090 days | |
1.04 | 1% |
| Beat Kindler | 7/10 | 3090 days | |
1.0 | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 3090 days | |
1.1 | 1% |
| Markus Heummer | 10/10 | 3091 days | |
1.09 | 1% |
| Gerrit & Martina | 8/10 | 3092 days | |
1.04 | 1% |
| Verne Heath | 7/10 | 3092 days | |
0.99 | 1% |
| Dave Simpson | 8/10 | 3092 days | |
1.04 | 1% |
| Steve Goodyear | 9/10 | 3099 days | |
1.08 | 1% |
| Colin Philpott | 8/10 | 3100 days | |
1.02 | 1% |
| Hans Erik Munch | 7/10 | 3105 days | |
0.97 | 1% |
| Thomas Behy | 5/10 | 3105 days | |
0.86 | 1% |
| Kroepfl | 9/10 | 3106 days | |
1.06 | 1% |
| Lesley | 5/10 | 3138 days | 0.81 | 1% | |
| Dagmar | 10/10 | 3170 days | |
0.94 | 1% |
| deJong | 6/10 | 3173 days | |
0.77 | 1% |
| Sillmann | 9/10 | 3175 days | |
0.93 | 1% |
| Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 3178 days | |
0.88 | 1% |
| Curry | 8/10 | 3181 days | |
0.87 | 1% |
| Willi & Elke Breier | 8/10 | 3186 days | |
0.86 | 1% |
| Powerfamily | 10/10 | 3322 days | 0.64 | 1% | |
| Jack Potman | 10/10 | 3401 days | |
0.49 | 0% |
| Andreas Blessing | 7/10 | 3424 days | |
0.4 | 0% |
| Desma Frampton | 2/10 | 3426 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Maike | 8/10 | 3432 days | |
0.41 | 0% |
| Kauzta | 7/10 | 3432 days | |
0.39 | 0% |
| Schroeder | 6/10 | 3432 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| J Meindersma | 7/10 | 3433 days | |
0.39 | 0% |
| Juergen Wolf | 8/10 | 3434 days | |
0.4 | 0% |
| Aimee Pollett | 9/10 | 3434 days | |
0.42 | 0% |
| Barbara Link | 8/10 | 3435 days | |
0.4 | 0% |
| E Brockbank | 6/10 | 3435 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| Gerstmann | 6/10 | 3438 days | |
0.34 | 0% |
| Ekhard Wittkugel | 10/10 | 3440 days | |
0.41 | 0% |
| Raith | 8/10 | 3443 days | |
0.38 | 0% |
| Omar Candon | 8/10 | 3445 days | |
0.38 | 0% |
| Gert Vogelaers | 8/10 | 3447 days | |
0.38 | 0% |
| Flueckiger | 6/10 | 3453 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Marleen Meyers | 6/10 | 3455 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Frank Schedler | 9/10 | 3455 days | |
0.38 | 0% |
| Katie Nicol | 7/10 | 3457 days | |
0.34 | 0% |
| Gerd Pagel | 2/10 | 3457 days | |
0.28 | 0% |
| mr Schumader | 9/10 | 3458 days | |
0.38 | 0% |
| Monja | 9/10 | 3460 days | |
0.37 | 0% |
| Teum and Orselien | 7/10 | 3460 days | |
0.34 | 0% |
| Marieke and Bert-Jan | 9/10 | 3460 days | |
0.37 | 0% |
| Johanna | 9/10 | 3461 days | |
0.37 | 0% |
| E M Klap | 8/10 | 3463 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 3463 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| Robert Cox | 4/10 | 3463 days | |
0.29 | 0% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 3463 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| Heike Toepelt | 9/10 | 3464 days | |
0.36 | 0% |
| Derek Archibald | 4/10 | 3465 days | |
0.29 | 0% |
| Loren van Oordt | 9/10 | 3467 days | |
0.36 | 0% |
| Gordon Daniels | 7/10 | 3467 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Ewald Waldner | 9/10 | 3468 days | |
0.36 | 0% |
| Meriel & Paul Best | 9/10 | 3468 days | |
0.36 | 0% |
| de Vries | 7/10 | 3470 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Jochen | 9/10 | 3470 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| Anne | 8/10 | 3472 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| D Saker | 9/10 | 3778 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Don Keith | 9/10 | 3796 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Westermann | 9/10 | 3800 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Pam Know | 8/10 | 3804 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Main | 9/10 | 3810 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mark and Natasha UK | 8/10 | 3811 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Gunda G | 4/10 | 3817 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Denecke Thorsten | 9/10 | 3818 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lehmann | 7/10 | 3819 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Walter | 6/10 | 3823 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mark | 8/10 | 3828 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Wilfred Sch | 8/10 | 3830 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| David Valentine | 8/10 | 3831 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Paul Ritchie | 8/10 | 3832 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Thea X | 7/10 | 3832 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Wim Van Gastel | 7/10 | 3835 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Coby Aalbrecht | 6/10 | 3836 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| nigelst | 7/10 | 3843 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Wolfgang G | 7/10 | 3843 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Goewe | 9/10 | 3851 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jennifer Templeton | 6/10 | 3854 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ralf Genthe | 6/10 | 3854 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Susi Schoetzler | 8/10 | 3857 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| marcusba | 10/10 | 3880 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| stephenst | 4/10 | 3883 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| weidep | 8/10 | 3883 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Monika Wenzel | 9/10 | 3907 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jean Paul Mesnage | 6/10 | 3909 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Uerilie Stolareh | 8/10 | 3912 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Karen Fisher | 10/10 | 3925 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tracy & Peter Cassidy | 7/10 | 3938 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| PamB | 8/10 | 4131 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| RubyJ | 8/10 | 4135 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Frank | 9/10 | 4160 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| HeideS | 10/10 | 4162 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 4176 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| ChristineM | 8/10 | 4176 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| FrankFlemming | 7/10 | 4177 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| MrHebbard | 9/10 | 4177 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Elrik frau | 9/10 | 4177 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Helle | 9/10 | 4182 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Trevor | 8/10 | 4186 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tim | 9/10 | 4187 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Annemarie | 8/10 | 4193 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| plumbaum | 8/10 | 4207 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Bernd | 7/10 | 4207 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| groenewold | 7/10 | 4207 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Liane | 10/10 | 4211 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Burkhalter | 6/10 | 4214 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Keith | 9/10 | 4214 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Bernd | 8/10 | 4216 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 4216 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| David | 8/10 | 4255 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Marc | 8/10 | 4260 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kaminsky | 9/10 | 4260 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| olland | 8/10 | 4263 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Terry | 9/10 | 4333 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Chris | 7/10 | 4520 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Stuart Bartram | 8/10 | 4526 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hoetnagels | 8/10 | 4526 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Anja Kunert | 8/10 | 4540 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kenneth and Mette | 8/10 | 4543 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Myrtille de Vries | 6/10 | 4547 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| struck | 10/10 | 4632 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Pat Brewster | 9/10 | 4745 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Stef | 7/10 | 4853 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Schranger | 10/10 | 4880 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Karla | 4/10 | 4902 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Andy | 9/10 | 4908 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tom | 8/10 | 4908 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jacobien | 8/10 | 4913 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Alexandra | 5/10 | 4913 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Stefan | 6/10 | 4917 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Pacific Horizon Motorhomes experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.13% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 121 days. However the Pacific Horizon Motorhomes experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Pacific Horizon Motorhomes experience has been adjusted for 12 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 9 | -0.10% |
| 10 | -0.11% |
| 11 | -0.12% |
| 12 | -0.13% |
| 13 | -0.14% |
| 14 | -0.15% |
| 15 | -0.16% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
93%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.