Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Pacific Horizon Motorhomes.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Pacific Horizon Motorhomes
Valid Reviews
244 Valid Reviews
The Pacific Horizon Motorhomes experience has a total of 254 reviews. There are 244 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 10 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 244 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 71 |
|
29% |
| 9/10 | 64 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 55 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 15 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 8 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pacific Horizon Motorhomes valid reviews is 83.44% and is based on 244 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
143 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 244 valid reviews, the experience has 143 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 143 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 12 |
|
8% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 48 |
|
34% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 15 |
|
10% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 7 |
|
5% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
77.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pacific Horizon Motorhomes face-to-face reviews is 77.13% and is based on 143 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
93.25%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Mason | 10/10 | 114 days | 97.94 | 100% | |
| Lydia | 9/10 | 114 days | 97.94 | 100% | |
| Tony Henderson-Newport | 9/10 | 114 days | 97.94 | 100% | |
| Lexi & Rod Kirk | 10/10 | 114 days | 97.94 | 100% | |
| Brooke Lillyston | 10/10 | 114 days | 97.94 | 100% | |
| Ian G | 10/10 | 144 days | 96.71 | 99% | |
| Morris | 10/10 | 144 days | 96.71 | 99% | |
| Stacy Lio | 10/10 | 144 days | 96.71 | 99% | |
| Anonymous (105552) | 8/10 | 236 days | 86.62 | 88% | |
| Keith Diver | 9/10 | 236 days | 91.17 | 93% | |
| Stefan Berger | 9/10 | 236 days | 91.17 | 93% | |
| Peter Leschev | 9/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 91% | |
| Miles Protter | 8/10 | 265 days | 84.43 | 86% | |
| Martin Borjeskog | 10/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 91% | |
| Christian | 9/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 91% | |
| Alexandre Lacroix | 9/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 91% | |
| Matthew Young | 9/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 91% | |
| Ben Holmes | 10/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 91% | |
| N.J. van den Berg | 10/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 91% | |
| Mike Smith | 9/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 91% | |
| Ron Meyerink | 10/10 | 296 days | 86.12 | 88% | |
| Gerd Weidenfeld | 10/10 | 296 days | 86.12 | 88% | |
| Geoff and Ginny Cunningham | 9/10 | 296 days | 86.12 | 88% | |
| Des Gilbert | 9/10 | 327 days | 83.06 | 85% | |
| Diane | 10/10 | 327 days | 83.06 | 85% | |
| Kirsch, Luxemburg | 10/10 | 327 days | 83.06 | 85% | |
| Anna Hunt | 9/10 | 327 days | 83.06 | 85% | |
| James and Emma Dickie | 10/10 | 327 days | 83.06 | 85% | |
| Jonatan Zarzif | 3/10 | 327 days | 63.95 | 65% | |
| Trevor Parkin | 9/10 | 357 days | 79.8 | 81% | |
| Edwin Walker | 8/10 | 388 days | 72.34 | 74% | |
| Serena Gray | 9/10 | 388 days | 76.14 | 78% | |
| PJ Caldito | 10/10 | 388 days | 76.14 | 78% | |
| Shane Howe | 10/10 | 418 days | 72.31 | 74% | |
| Jason | 10/10 | 418 days | 72.31 | 74% | |
| Teneille Harwood | 10/10 | 418 days | 72.31 | 74% | |
| Fabulous five | 10/10 | 449 days | 68.05 | 69% | |
| jac | 9/10 | 449 days | 68.05 | 69% | |
| Keith & Kay Finlayson | 10/10 | 449 days | 68.05 | 69% | |
| Jeannie Huang | 9/10 | 480 days | 63.49 | 65% | |
| Joao Madureira | 8/10 | 480 days | 60.32 | 62% | |
| Edith Peita | 10/10 | 480 days | 63.49 | 65% | |
| John Bourke | 10/10 | 480 days | 63.49 | 65% | |
| Maik | 10/10 | 510 days | 58.78 | 60% | |
| Helen | 10/10 | 510 days | 58.78 | 60% | |
| Kevin | 10/10 | 510 days | 58.78 | 60% | |
| Larry Mutu Reriti | 10/10 | 510 days | 58.78 | 60% | |
| Keryn | 10/10 | 510 days | 58.78 | 60% | |
| Greg Croft | 10/10 | 510 days | 58.78 | 60% | |
| Erin | 10/10 | 541 days | 53.62 | 55% | |
| schtahaups | 9/10 | 541 days | 53.62 | 55% | |
| CMe | 9/10 | 541 days | 53.62 | 55% | |
| Martyn | 10/10 | 541 days | 53.62 | 55% | |
| John Flynn | 9/10 | 571 days | 48.51 | 50% | |
| charlie35slr | 10/10 | 571 days | 48.51 | 50% | |
| Ken | 2/10 | 602 days | 32.64 | 33% | |
| Bee | 3/10 | 602 days | 33.51 | 34% | |
| Catherine Johnson | 10/10 | 630 days | 39.26 | 40% | |
| Bk | 10/10 | 630 days | 39.26 | 40% | |
| John I. | 10/10 | 630 days | 39.26 | 40% | |
| Rogie | 9/10 | 630 days | 39.26 | 40% | |
| Krzysztof Jablonski | 10/10 | 630 days | 39.26 | 40% | |
| Berthold Wagner | 8/10 | 661 days | 33.1 | 34% | |
| Eric Arnal Fort | 10/10 | 661 days | 34.85 | 36% | |
| Andy Jamo | 10/10 | 661 days | 34.85 | 36% | |
| Agnès | 10/10 | 661 days | 34.85 | 36% | |
| Thomas Heri | 10/10 | 661 days | 34.85 | 36% | |
| Roger and Karen | 10/10 | 722 days | 27.05 | 28% | |
| renard | 9/10 | 722 days | 27.05 | 28% | |
| Berrie, the Netherlands | 10/10 | 722 days | 27.05 | 28% | |
| Warren S | 10/10 | 753 days | 23.53 | 24% | |
| Ronald Rampersad | 10/10 | 814 days | 17.51 | 18% | |
| Poynter Family | 9/10 | 814 days | 17.51 | 18% | |
| Wilson | 10/10 | 845 days | 14.9 | 15% | |
| Elsa | 10/10 | 845 days | 14.9 | 15% | |
| Pascal | 10/10 | 875 days | 12.67 | 13% | |
| Paul Haslam | 10/10 | 967 days | 7.6 | 8% | |
| Jennifer Makosky | 9/10 | 967 days | 7.6 | 8% | |
| Steve Pickard | 10/10 | 967 days | 7.6 | 8% | |
| Stuart C | 10/10 | 995 days | 6.58 | 7% | |
| Vicki Simmons | 10/10 | 1026 days | 5.75 | 6% | |
| Steven Dunlop | 9/10 | 1026 days | 5.75 | 6% | |
| Sarah Timms | 10/10 | 1118 days | 4.95 | 5% | |
| Emily Hibberd | 10/10 | 1148 days | 4.9 | 5% | |
| Sue Lander | 9/10 | 1148 days | 4.9 | 5% | |
| Kelvin Armstrong | 10/10 | 1210 days | 4.77 | 5% | |
| Tom Williamson | 9/10 | 1240 days | 4.72 | 5% | |
| Yves Deyris | 10/10 | 1301 days | 4.6 | 5% | |
| Fred RABIER BAGOEE | 9/10 | 1301 days | 4.6 | 5% | |
| Sylvie Paquette | 9/10 | 1332 days | 4.54 | 5% | |
| Axel and Patricia G | 10/10 | 1336 days |  |
4.53 | 5% |
| walter isselhard | 8/10 | 1697 days | 3.63 | 4% | |
| Darker | 9/10 | 2078 days | |
3.08 | 3% |
| L S | 10/10 | 2275 days | 2.69 | 3% | |
| aussiewoodies | 8/10 | 2762 days | 1.65 | 2% | |
| Sharyn Crosby | 10/10 | 2793 days | 1.68 | 2% | |
| Alekandra Ulm | 4/10 | 2865 days | |
1.21 | 1% |
| Sue Kieseker | 8/10 | 2868 days | |
1.45 | 1% |
| Karin Genyn | 8/10 | 2869 days | |
1.45 | 1% |
| Sharon Yates | 10/10 | 2871 days | |
1.52 | 2% |
| Moorman | 8/10 | 2874 days | |
1.44 | 1% |
| Marian | 7/10 | 2885 days | |
1.36 | 1% |
| Behrens | 4/10 | 2892 days | |
1.17 | 1% |
| FiStew | 10/10 | 2974 days | 1.32 | 1% | |
| Devil_n_Disquiz | 10/10 | 3005 days | 1.26 | 1% | |
| gezza2906 | 4/10 | 3036 days | 0.95 | 1% | |
| Tinne Cis | 8/10 | 3155 days | |
0.92 | 1% |
| B Sluis | 8/10 | 3167 days | |
0.9 | 1% |
| Bottoms | 7/10 | 3168 days | |
0.86 | 1% |
| Seiler | 6/10 | 3168 days | |
0.78 | 1% |
| Patrick Grant | 8/10 | 3168 days | |
0.9 | 1% |
| Moehl | 9/10 | 3170 days | |
0.94 | 1% |
| David Beaumont | 8/10 | 3170 days | |
0.89 | 1% |
| Beat Kindler | 7/10 | 3170 days | |
0.85 | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 3170 days | |
0.94 | 1% |
| Markus Heummer | 10/10 | 3171 days | |
0.94 | 1% |
| Gerrit & Martina | 8/10 | 3172 days | |
0.89 | 1% |
| Verne Heath | 7/10 | 3172 days | |
0.85 | 1% |
| Dave Simpson | 8/10 | 3172 days | |
0.89 | 1% |
| Steve Goodyear | 9/10 | 3179 days | |
0.92 | 1% |
| Colin Philpott | 8/10 | 3180 days | |
0.87 | 1% |
| Hans Erik Munch | 7/10 | 3185 days | |
0.83 | 1% |
| Thomas Behy | 5/10 | 3185 days | |
0.74 | 1% |
| Kroepfl | 9/10 | 3186 days | |
0.91 | 1% |
| Lesley | 5/10 | 3218 days | 0.68 | 1% | |
| Dagmar | 10/10 | 3250 days | |
0.78 | 1% |
| deJong | 6/10 | 3253 days | |
0.64 | 1% |
| Sillmann | 9/10 | 3255 days | |
0.77 | 1% |
| Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 3258 days | |
0.73 | 1% |
| Curry | 8/10 | 3261 days | |
0.72 | 1% |
| Willi & Elke Breier | 8/10 | 3266 days | |
0.71 | 1% |
| Powerfamily | 10/10 | 3402 days | 0.49 | 0% | |
| Jack Potman | 10/10 | 3481 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Andreas Blessing | 7/10 | 3504 days | |
0.26 | 0% |
| Desma Frampton | 2/10 | 3506 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| Maike | 8/10 | 3512 days | |
0.26 | 0% |
| Kauzta | 7/10 | 3512 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| Schroeder | 6/10 | 3512 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| J Meindersma | 7/10 | 3513 days | |
0.24 | 0% |
| Juergen Wolf | 8/10 | 3514 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| Aimee Pollett | 9/10 | 3514 days | |
0.27 | 0% |
| Barbara Link | 8/10 | 3515 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| E Brockbank | 6/10 | 3515 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| Gerstmann | 6/10 | 3518 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| Ekhard Wittkugel | 10/10 | 3520 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| Raith | 8/10 | 3523 days | |
0.24 | 0% |
| Omar Candon | 8/10 | 3525 days | |
0.23 | 0% |
| Gert Vogelaers | 8/10 | 3527 days | |
0.23 | 0% |
| Flueckiger | 6/10 | 3533 days | |
0.19 | 0% |
| Marleen Meyers | 6/10 | 3535 days | |
0.19 | 0% |
| Frank Schedler | 9/10 | 3535 days | |
0.23 | 0% |
| Katie Nicol | 7/10 | 3537 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| Gerd Pagel | 2/10 | 3537 days | |
0.17 | 0% |
| mr Schumader | 9/10 | 3538 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| Monja | 9/10 | 3540 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| Teum and Orselien | 7/10 | 3540 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| Marieke and Bert-Jan | 9/10 | 3540 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| Johanna | 9/10 | 3541 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| E M Klap | 8/10 | 3543 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 3543 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| Robert Cox | 4/10 | 3543 days | |
0.17 | 0% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 3543 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| Heike Toepelt | 9/10 | 3544 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| Derek Archibald | 4/10 | 3545 days | |
0.16 | 0% |
| Loren van Oordt | 9/10 | 3547 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| Gordon Daniels | 7/10 | 3547 days | |
0.18 | 0% |
| Ewald Waldner | 9/10 | 3548 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| Meriel & Paul Best | 9/10 | 3548 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| de Vries | 7/10 | 3550 days | |
0.18 | 0% |
| Jochen | 9/10 | 3550 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| Anne | 8/10 | 3552 days | |
0.18 | 0% |
| D Saker | 9/10 | 3858 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Don Keith | 9/10 | 3876 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Westermann | 9/10 | 3880 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Pam Know | 8/10 | 3884 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Main | 9/10 | 3890 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mark and Natasha UK | 8/10 | 3891 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Gunda G | 4/10 | 3897 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Denecke Thorsten | 9/10 | 3898 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lehmann | 7/10 | 3899 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Walter | 6/10 | 3903 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mark | 8/10 | 3908 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Wilfred Sch | 8/10 | 3910 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| David Valentine | 8/10 | 3911 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Paul Ritchie | 8/10 | 3912 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Thea X | 7/10 | 3912 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Wim Van Gastel | 7/10 | 3915 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Coby Aalbrecht | 6/10 | 3916 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| nigelst | 7/10 | 3923 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Wolfgang G | 7/10 | 3923 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Goewe | 9/10 | 3931 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jennifer Templeton | 6/10 | 3934 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ralf Genthe | 6/10 | 3934 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Susi Schoetzler | 8/10 | 3937 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| marcusba | 10/10 | 3960 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| stephenst | 4/10 | 3963 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| weidep | 8/10 | 3963 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Monika Wenzel | 9/10 | 3987 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jean Paul Mesnage | 6/10 | 3989 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Uerilie Stolareh | 8/10 | 3992 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Karen Fisher | 10/10 | 4005 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tracy & Peter Cassidy | 7/10 | 4018 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| PamB | 8/10 | 4211 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| RubyJ | 8/10 | 4215 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Frank | 9/10 | 4241 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| HeideS | 10/10 | 4242 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 4256 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| ChristineM | 8/10 | 4256 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| FrankFlemming | 7/10 | 4257 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| MrHebbard | 9/10 | 4257 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Elrik frau | 9/10 | 4257 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Helle | 9/10 | 4263 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Trevor | 8/10 | 4267 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tim | 9/10 | 4267 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Annemarie | 8/10 | 4274 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| plumbaum | 8/10 | 4288 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Bernd | 7/10 | 4288 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| groenewold | 7/10 | 4288 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Liane | 10/10 | 4292 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Burkhalter | 6/10 | 4295 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Keith | 9/10 | 4295 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Bernd | 8/10 | 4297 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Rosa | 9/10 | 4297 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| David | 8/10 | 4336 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Marc | 8/10 | 4341 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kaminsky | 9/10 | 4341 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| olland | 8/10 | 4344 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Terry | 9/10 | 4414 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Chris | 7/10 | 4600 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Stuart Bartram | 8/10 | 4606 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hoetnagels | 8/10 | 4606 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Anja Kunert | 8/10 | 4620 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kenneth and Mette | 8/10 | 4623 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Myrtille de Vries | 6/10 | 4627 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| struck | 10/10 | 4712 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Pat Brewster | 9/10 | 4825 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Stef | 7/10 | 4933 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Schranger | 10/10 | 4960 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Karla | 4/10 | 4982 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Andy | 9/10 | 4988 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tom | 8/10 | 4988 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jacobien | 8/10 | 4993 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Alexandra | 5/10 | 4993 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Stefan | 6/10 | 4997 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Pacific Horizon Motorhomes experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.31% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 54 days. The Pacific Horizon Motorhomes experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
| Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| 0 | -3.00% |
| 1 | -2.83% |
| 2 | -2.33% |
| 3 | -1.50% |
| 4 | -0.67% |
| 5 | -0.17% |
| 6 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Pacific Horizon Motorhomes experience has been adjusted for 70 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 67 | -1.25% |
| 68 | -1.27% |
| 69 | -1.29% |
| 70 | -1.31% |
| 71 | -1.32% |
| 72 | -1.34% |
| 73 | -1.36% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
89%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.