G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kiwi Experience.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Kiwi Experience
Valid Reviews
98 Valid Reviews
The Kiwi Experience experience has a total of 101 reviews. There are 98 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 98 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 17 |
|
17% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
18% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
75.71% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kiwi Experience valid reviews is 75.71% and is based on 98 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
85 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 98 valid reviews, the experience has 85 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 85 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
11% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
27% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 4 |
|
5% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
74.71% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kiwi Experience face-to-face reviews is 74.71% and is based on 85 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
72.14%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Xuereb | 4/10 | 1166 days | 100% |
| Raymond Pua | 10/10 | 2747 days | 15% |
| Douglas Fernside | 10/10 | 3081 days | 11% |
| gnkwvefvjpewyiiu | 7/10 | 3754 days | 4% |
| Matt | 4/10 | 3843 days | 1% |
| Brett Comley | 3/10 | 3965 days | 0% |
| isaac verkaik | 9/10 | 3996 days | 2% |
| Lucy Sumner | 10/10 | 4027 days | 1% |
| Ewa Bednarczyk | 10/10 | 4057 days | 1% |
| Richard Houghton | 10/10 | 4088 days | 1% |
| Helena Wilton | 10/10 | 4118 days | 1% |
| Moacir Batista de Campos Neto | 10/10 | 4392 days | 3% |
| Victor Herranz | 9/10 | 4545 days | 3% |
| Nimh Oudhof | 7/10 | 4546 days | 3% |
| Miron & Hendrik | 4/10 | 5268 days | 1% |
| Hanz | 9/10 | 5999 days | 3% |
| Jay Kenway | 7/10 | 6003 days | 3% |
| NikW | 6/10 | 6327 days | 2% |
| DerrynL | 4/10 | 6329 days | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 6333 days | 3% |
| Hayley | 9/10 | 6333 days | 3% |
| Abigail | 9/10 | 6333 days | 3% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 6346 days | 3% |
| BenM1 | 7/10 | 6351 days | 3% |
| HelenP | 8/10 | 6352 days | 3% |
| AbigailB | 5/10 | 6354 days | 2% |
| Philippa | 7/10 | 6360 days | 3% |
| Rob | 9/10 | 6360 days | 3% |
| Andrew | 7/10 | 6360 days | 3% |
| Kirsty | 8/10 | 6360 days | 3% |
| David | 6/10 | 6360 days | 2% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 6360 days | 3% |
| Karen | 10/10 | 6374 days | 3% |
| Sophie | 9/10 | 6382 days | 3% |
| Kat | 7/10 | 6414 days | 3% |
| Jess | 10/10 | 6435 days | 3% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 6440 days | 3% |
| Marie | 7/10 | 6444 days | 3% |
| Richard | 7/10 | 6489 days | 3% |
| David | 9/10 | 6529 days | 3% |
| Katie Wise | 9/10 | 6542 days | 3% |
| maria d | 10/10 | 6552 days | 3% |
| Nikki Gray | 6/10 | 6559 days | 2% |
| Gemma Harling | 6/10 | 6584 days | 2% |
| Charlie Bond | 7/10 | 6591 days | 3% |
| Ovin | 8/10 | 6685 days | 3% |
| John Ryan | 6/10 | 6686 days | 2% |
| Yayami Kimura | 4/10 | 6692 days | 1% |
| Demo | 5/10 | 6693 days | 2% |
| Mariah | 7/10 | 6693 days | 3% |
| Derek | 7/10 | 6695 days | 3% |
| Nick | 8/10 | 6695 days | 3% |
| Ben Ackland | 7/10 | 6696 days | 3% |
| Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 6696 days | 3% |
| Stephen | 7/10 | 6700 days | 3% |
| Shannon | 8/10 | 6701 days | 3% |
| Tess Tammer | 8/10 | 6701 days | 3% |
| Nick | 8/10 | 6723 days | 3% |
| Hayley | 5/10 | 6749 days | 2% |
| Aske Helbor | 2/10 | 6752 days | 0% |
| ranker_734 | 1/10 | 6752 days | 0% |
| Tom Anson | 8/10 | 6757 days | 3% |
| Mel | 4/10 | 6761 days | 1% |
| Abbey | 7/10 | 6793 days | 3% |
| Kirsty Ranger | 9/10 | 6869 days | 3% |
| Roger Stewart | 8/10 | 6869 days | 3% |
| Matt | 9/10 | 7027 days | 3% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 7032 days | 3% |
| Paul | 7/10 | 7032 days | 3% |
| Flinders | 7/10 | 7033 days | 3% |
| Tomomi | 7/10 | 7037 days | 3% |
| Birte | 8/10 | 7045 days | 3% |
| Lorraine | 7/10 | 7045 days | 3% |
| Jen | 7/10 | 7045 days | 3% |
| Valerie | 7/10 | 7046 days | 3% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 7046 days | 3% |
| Sean | 9/10 | 7049 days | 3% |
| Marcus | 8/10 | 7049 days | 3% |
| Katie | 7/10 | 7049 days | 3% |
| AndrewEwen | 9/10 | 7064 days | 3% |
| Martina | 9/10 | 7064 days | 3% |
| Andrew | 8/10 | 7065 days | 3% |
| GillianW | 10/10 | 7065 days | 3% |
| ErikVanDam | 9/10 | 7065 days | 3% |
| MarcHarris | 10/10 | 7065 days | 3% |
| Malon | 7/10 | 7065 days | 3% |
| Helena | 8/10 | 7065 days | 3% |
| Twan | 6/10 | 7085 days | 2% |
| FredAndersson | 10/10 | 7085 days | 3% |
| KerrieHymers | 9/10 | 7086 days | 3% |
| JamesAtkinson | 6/10 | 7086 days | 2% |
| Cat | 10/10 | 7087 days | 3% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 7087 days | 3% |
| Lyndsey | 9/10 | 7087 days | 3% |
| Majken | 7/10 | 7098 days | 3% |
| ranker_410 | 8/10 | 7098 days | 3% |
| MartinJago | 3/10 | 7098 days | 1% |
| Kylie | 8/10 | 7100 days | 3% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Kiwi Experience experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-2.00% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 125 days. However the Kiwi Experience experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Kiwi Experience experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -1.97% |
| 198 | -1.98% |
| 199 | -1.99% |
| 200 | -2.00% |
| 201 | -2.01% |
| 202 | -2.02% |
| 203 | -2.03% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
6.92% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
77%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.