Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Apex Rental Cars.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
209 Valid Reviews
The Apex Rental Cars experience has a total of 233 reviews. There are 209 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 24 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 209 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
16% |
| 8/10 | 40 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 17 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 8 |
|
4% |
| 2/10 | 10 |
|
5% |
| 1/10 | 36 |
|
17% |
66.89% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Apex Rental Cars valid reviews is 66.89% and is based on 209 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
94 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 209 valid reviews, the experience has 94 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 94 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 34 |
|
36% |
| 7/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Apex Rental Cars face-to-face reviews is 82.45% and is based on 94 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
75.81%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rene | 10/10 | 150 days | 100% |
| CB | 10/10 | 211 days | 99% |
| Ondrej | 1/10 | 821 days | 25% |
| Will | 1/10 | 850 days | 24% |
| Derek UK | 10/10 | 850 days | 59% |
| Barry | 3/10 | 912 days | 29% |
| Klm | 3/10 | 942 days | 27% |
| Steve | 10/10 | 973 days | 47% |
| Martyn | 10/10 | 973 days | 47% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1003 days | 44% |
| Melissa | 1/10 | 1034 days | 17% |
| Nyah | 1/10 | 1187 days | 11% |
| David M | 3/10 | 1187 days | 15% |
| Karla, Sydney | 10/10 | 1368 days | 17% |
| Neville | 1/10 | 1552 days | 4% |
| A Tango | 10/10 | 1580 days | 8% |
| Nicholas Chin | 1/10 | 1703 days | 2% |
| Trista McLean | 10/10 | 1917 days | 5% |
| Steve | 9/10 | 1976 days | 5% |
| Kane | 1/10 | 2007 days | 2% |
| Melanie Brown | 8/10 | 2098 days | 4% |
| World Traveller | 1/10 | 2129 days | 2% |
| Dave Berry | 10/10 | 2129 days | 4% |
| RJ | 1/10 | 2129 days | 2% |
| R Woolley | 10/10 | 2282 days | 4% |
| Claire Wood | 10/10 | 2311 days | 4% |
| ALEKSANDROV Igor Avramovski | 1/10 | 2342 days | 1% |
| Luiz | 2/10 | 2342 days | 2% |
| Jorge | 1/10 | 2373 days | 1% |
| Adam Beevers | 3/10 | 2373 days | 2% |
| Megan | 1/10 | 2373 days | 1% |
| Marc | 3/10 | 2403 days | 2% |
| Howie | 9/10 | 2403 days | 4% |
| Jacques | 1/10 | 2403 days | 1% |
| Janet | 10/10 | 2434 days | 4% |
| Shelby and Matt | 10/10 | 2434 days | 4% |
| Taki Green | 1/10 | 2464 days | 1% |
| Mel | 1/10 | 2464 days | 1% |
| David | 5/10 | 2464 days | 3% |
| JS | 1/10 | 2587 days | 1% |
| Yoke | 1/10 | 2617 days | 1% |
| Kirstie Gallant | 7/10 | 2617 days | 3% |
| Yvonne M Hackenberg | 10/10 | 2617 days | 3% |
| Miss T | 1/10 | 2617 days | 1% |
| Me | 1/10 | 2617 days | 1% |
| Mike Purchas | 2/10 | 2648 days | 1% |
| Gal | 1/10 | 2648 days | 1% |
| M Reeder | 2/10 | 2676 days | 1% |
| Nikki | 10/10 | 2707 days | 3% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 2707 days | 3% |
| Reena Scobie | 1/10 | 2707 days | 1% |
| Bill Brennan | 9/10 | 2707 days | 3% |
| Jeff & Sharon | 2/10 | 2707 days | 1% |
| Craig | 5/10 | 2707 days | 2% |
| Mel B | 1/10 | 2707 days | 1% |
| David | 1/10 | 2707 days | 1% |
| JR WU | 2/10 | 2738 days | 1% |
| Kirstie Lilly | 10/10 | 2768 days | 3% |
| Arlene | 8/10 | 2829 days | 3% |
| Penny Mackay | 10/10 | 2829 days | 3% |
| Laura | 3/10 | 2891 days | 1% |
| Bharat | 10/10 | 2952 days | 3% |
| Gandalf | 4/10 | 2982 days | 2% |
| siti fatimah adnan | 10/10 | 3013 days | 3% |
| Katie | 1/10 | 3013 days | 1% |
| Giovanni | 5/10 | 3013 days | 2% |
| Aileen Davies | 2/10 | 3013 days | 1% |
| Nicola | 1/10 | 3013 days | 1% |
| Dane | 1/10 | 3013 days | 1% |
| David williams | 3/10 | 3013 days | 1% |
| Yan Xiao | 3/10 | 3013 days | 1% |
| Peter Dawkins | 10/10 | 3041 days | 3% |
| David | 2/10 | 3041 days | 1% |
| David Elliott | 10/10 | 3072 days | 2% |
| You Joon Kim | 1/10 | 3072 days | 1% |
| Chris Monk | 8/10 | 3103 days | 2% |
| Helen Burgess | 2/10 | 3133 days | 1% |
| Carol Smith | 1/10 | 3133 days | 1% |
| Richard Hunter | 1/10 | 3133 days | 1% |
| peter hendry | 1/10 | 3164 days | 1% |
| Katharina Koch | 8/10 | 3390 days | 2% |
| Luna Tarius | 1/10 | 3406 days | 1% |
| Carly Biedul | 10/10 | 3415 days | 2% |
| Guillaume Deleuze | 6/10 | 3431 days | 1% |
| Brad Dean | 2/10 | 3437 days | 1% |
| dave car | 1/10 | 3437 days | 1% |
| Rhydian Templer | 8/10 | 3447 days | 2% |
| Amy | 9/10 | 3450 days | 2% |
| Nina Kaspar | 6/10 | 3468 days | 1% |
| Silvia Hermosillo | 1/10 | 3468 days | 1% |
| Tony Algie | 8/10 | 3468 days | 2% |
| diane wong | 8/10 | 3498 days | 2% |
| Maryanne Wardlaw | 2/10 | 3559 days | 1% |
| Hans Dersch | 1/10 | 3621 days | 0% |
| Kuldeep Nandurkar | 9/10 | 3682 days | 1% |
| Emily Noyd | 10/10 | 3731 days | 1% |
| Christofer Cronholm | 6/10 | 3772 days | 1% |
| Taylor Fabricius | 9/10 | 3775 days | 1% |
| Cecile | 7/10 | 3799 days | 1% |
| Geoff Plunkett | 10/10 | 3803 days | 1% |
| Pawa | 7/10 | 3834 days | 1% |
| James Norcliffe | 10/10 | 3895 days | 1% |
| Andrew Barnden | 10/10 | 3925 days | 1% |
| Sheila Wee | 10/10 | 4078 days | 0% |
| Joana | 8/10 | 4125 days | 0% |
| Lea Karl | 8/10 | 4186 days | 0% |
| Travelgirl | 1/10 | 4199 days | 0% |
| Vanessa | 8/10 | 4471 days | 1% |
| Natalie Boehm | 8/10 | 4490 days | 1% |
| Bradford Young | 1/10 | 4564 days | 0% |
| regi kiwi | 10/10 | 4564 days | 1% |
| Jeremy Eng | 9/10 | 4839 days | 1% |
| Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4843 days | 1% |
| Anna Neuenfeldt | 10/10 | 4845 days | 1% |
| Maja Bogdanowicz | 10/10 | 4846 days | 1% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5200 days | 1% |
| Wright | 7/10 | 5208 days | 1% |
| Denise & Maciej Holzer | 8/10 | 5208 days | 1% |
| Deana Peters | 9/10 | 5216 days | 1% |
| Jeroen Bartos | 8/10 | 5217 days | 1% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 8/10 | 5218 days | 1% |
| Aled | 9/10 | 5222 days | 1% |
| Ute Rogawski | 6/10 | 5225 days | 1% |
| Asha | 7/10 | 5264 days | 1% |
| Rene Rypkema | 8/10 | 5278 days | 1% |
| Judith | 8/10 | 5284 days | 1% |
| ZubZubZub | 10/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| Mascot | 9/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| joE | 10/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| Sherbertdip | 8/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
| tj10128 | 10/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
| Nicky Bell | 9/10 | 5515 days | 1% |
| Gerryq Winters | 9/10 | 5541 days | 1% |
| A Jones | 6/10 | 5542 days | 1% |
| Katarina Bokor | 8/10 | 5547 days | 1% |
| Sue Carren | 8/10 | 5547 days | 1% |
| Karen Stephens | 7/10 | 5547 days | 1% |
| M Bigras | 8/10 | 5552 days | 1% |
| Binder | 7/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
| Jo Meekley | 8/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
| Guy Cohen | 8/10 | 5556 days | 1% |
| Ven | 8/10 | 5556 days | 1% |
| Wouter Moui | 7/10 | 5562 days | 1% |
| Jerven and Kim | 7/10 | 5563 days | 1% |
| Tanya & Florian | 9/10 | 5564 days | 1% |
| Niklas Ronnino | 8/10 | 5568 days | 1% |
| Gael Romain | 8/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
| Diana Clipsham | 6/10 | 5589 days | 1% |
| Roger Lows | 9/10 | 5589 days | 1% |
| Lynn Leitch | 9/10 | 5591 days | 1% |
| Stephen Leitch | 9/10 | 5591 days | 1% |
| Claus Olsen | 10/10 | 5593 days | 1% |
| hellsknipe356 | 10/10 | 5721 days | 1% |
| chumfft | 10/10 | 5813 days | 1% |
| Elisabeth | 10/10 | 5898 days | 1% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 5904 days | 1% |
| Hana Vokata | 8/10 | 5909 days | 1% |
| Ralph | 8/10 | 5932 days | 1% |
| Senel | 10/10 | 5942 days | 1% |
| Cheryl Gorman | 10/10 | 5948 days | 1% |
| Stefan | 8/10 | 5957 days | 1% |
| Eva | 6/10 | 5961 days | 1% |
| Alain Deslandres | 7/10 | 5976 days | 1% |
| Ross & Catherine Litherland | 8/10 | 5976 days | 1% |
| graemeh1 | 7/10 | 6009 days | 1% |
| martinab | 8/10 | 6009 days | 1% |
| taupoguy | 10/10 | 6025 days | 1% |
| carolineder | 8/10 | 6025 days | 1% |
| Robert Hausser | 9/10 | 6029 days | 1% |
| Thomas Rust | 9/10 | 6029 days | 1% |
| X Otte | 8/10 | 6033 days | 1% |
| kymberlyw | 9/10 | 6270 days | 1% |
| stephen | 9/10 | 6270 days | 1% |
| StijmH | 8/10 | 6286 days | 1% |
| StijnH | 8/10 | 6286 days | 1% |
| Rene | 9/10 | 6293 days | 1% |
| BrzezinskaM | 10/10 | 6294 days | 1% |
| AndreB | 9/10 | 6294 days | 1% |
| Dalibor | 9/10 | 6303 days | 1% |
| Pavel | 8/10 | 6306 days | 1% |
| LeaM | 9/10 | 6339 days | 1% |
| AndreM | 9/10 | 6339 days | 1% |
| JohannesE | 7/10 | 6339 days | 1% |
| Eugen | 9/10 | 6342 days | 1% |
| Maike | 9/10 | 6342 days | 1% |
| Mary | 7/10 | 6342 days | 1% |
| purplekat99 | 10/10 | 6359 days | 1% |
| Emilie | 9/10 | 6444 days | 1% |
| Kristina | 7/10 | 6444 days | 1% |
| Vanessa | 5/10 | 6459 days | 1% |
| chubby69 | 10/10 | 6512 days | 1% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 6518 days | 1% |
| David Fowler | 7/10 | 6537 days | 1% |
| Karen C | 6/10 | 6601 days | 1% |
| Menashe | 7/10 | 6639 days | 1% |
| Bryony Wilson | 8/10 | 6649 days | 1% |
| Beate Sinn | 9/10 | 6653 days | 1% |
| Richard | 5/10 | 6653 days | 1% |
| Smith | 6/10 | 6662 days | 1% |
| Carmen Dolny | 8/10 | 6670 days | 1% |
| Lisa Tame | 8/10 | 6670 days | 1% |
| Gustavo | 9/10 | 6670 days | 1% |
| Kilsby | 9/10 | 6697 days | 1% |
| Juerg | 9/10 | 6710 days | 1% |
| Tanya | 9/10 | 6712 days | 1% |
| Kehoe | 7/10 | 6715 days | 1% |
| Iain | 8/10 | 6716 days | 1% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 6740 days | 1% |
| Dennis | 10/10 | 7016 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Apex Rental Cars experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.42% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 105 days. The Apex Rental Cars experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
| Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| 0 | -3.00% |
| 1 | -2.63% |
| 2 | -1.50% |
| 3 | -0.38% |
| 4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Apex Rental Cars experience has been adjusted for 115 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 112 | -1.38% |
| 113 | -1.40% |
| 114 | -1.41% |
| 115 | -1.42% |
| 116 | -1.43% |
| 117 | -1.45% |
| 118 | -1.46% |
| … | … |
6.26% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.