Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Apex Rental Cars.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
209 Valid Reviews
The Apex Rental Cars experience has a total of 233 reviews. There are 209 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 24 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 209 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
16% |
| 8/10 | 40 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 17 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 8 |
|
4% |
| 2/10 | 10 |
|
5% |
| 1/10 | 36 |
|
17% |
66.89% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Apex Rental Cars valid reviews is 66.89% and is based on 209 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
94 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 209 valid reviews, the experience has 94 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 94 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 34 |
|
36% |
| 7/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Apex Rental Cars face-to-face reviews is 82.45% and is based on 94 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
76.64%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rene | 10/10 | 251 days | 100% |
| CB | 10/10 | 312 days | 98% |
| Ondrej | 1/10 | 922 days | 22% |
| Will | 1/10 | 951 days | 20% |
| Derek UK | 10/10 | 951 days | 50% |
| Barry | 3/10 | 1013 days | 24% |
| Klm | 3/10 | 1043 days | 22% |
| Steve | 10/10 | 1074 days | 39% |
| Martyn | 10/10 | 1074 days | 39% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1104 days | 36% |
| Melissa | 1/10 | 1135 days | 13% |
| Nyah | 1/10 | 1288 days | 9% |
| David M | 3/10 | 1288 days | 12% |
| Karla, Sydney | 10/10 | 1469 days | 13% |
| Neville | 1/10 | 1653 days | 3% |
| A Tango | 10/10 | 1681 days | 6% |
| Nicholas Chin | 1/10 | 1804 days | 2% |
| Trista McLean | 10/10 | 2018 days | 5% |
| Steve | 9/10 | 2077 days | 5% |
| Kane | 1/10 | 2108 days | 2% |
| Melanie Brown | 8/10 | 2199 days | 4% |
| World Traveller | 1/10 | 2230 days | 2% |
| Dave Berry | 10/10 | 2230 days | 4% |
| RJ | 1/10 | 2230 days | 2% |
| R Woolley | 10/10 | 2383 days | 4% |
| Claire Wood | 10/10 | 2412 days | 4% |
| ALEKSANDROV Igor Avramovski | 1/10 | 2443 days | 2% |
| Luiz | 2/10 | 2443 days | 2% |
| Jorge | 1/10 | 2474 days | 2% |
| Adam Beevers | 3/10 | 2474 days | 2% |
| Megan | 1/10 | 2474 days | 2% |
| Marc | 3/10 | 2504 days | 2% |
| Howie | 9/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
| Jacques | 1/10 | 2504 days | 1% |
| Janet | 10/10 | 2535 days | 4% |
| Shelby and Matt | 10/10 | 2535 days | 4% |
| Taki Green | 1/10 | 2565 days | 1% |
| Mel | 1/10 | 2565 days | 1% |
| David | 5/10 | 2565 days | 3% |
| JS | 1/10 | 2688 days | 1% |
| Yoke | 1/10 | 2718 days | 1% |
| Kirstie Gallant | 7/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
| Yvonne M Hackenberg | 10/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
| Miss T | 1/10 | 2718 days | 1% |
| Me | 1/10 | 2718 days | 1% |
| Mike Purchas | 2/10 | 2749 days | 1% |
| Gal | 1/10 | 2749 days | 1% |
| M Reeder | 2/10 | 2777 days | 1% |
| Nikki | 10/10 | 2808 days | 3% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 2808 days | 3% |
| Reena Scobie | 1/10 | 2808 days | 1% |
| Bill Brennan | 9/10 | 2808 days | 3% |
| Jeff & Sharon | 2/10 | 2808 days | 1% |
| Craig | 5/10 | 2808 days | 2% |
| Mel B | 1/10 | 2808 days | 1% |
| David | 1/10 | 2808 days | 1% |
| JR WU | 2/10 | 2839 days | 1% |
| Kirstie Lilly | 10/10 | 2869 days | 3% |
| Arlene | 8/10 | 2930 days | 3% |
| Penny Mackay | 10/10 | 2930 days | 3% |
| Laura | 3/10 | 2992 days | 1% |
| Bharat | 10/10 | 3053 days | 3% |
| Gandalf | 4/10 | 3083 days | 2% |
| siti fatimah adnan | 10/10 | 3114 days | 3% |
| Katie | 1/10 | 3114 days | 1% |
| Giovanni | 5/10 | 3114 days | 2% |
| Aileen Davies | 2/10 | 3114 days | 1% |
| Nicola | 1/10 | 3114 days | 1% |
| Dane | 1/10 | 3114 days | 1% |
| David williams | 3/10 | 3114 days | 1% |
| Yan Xiao | 3/10 | 3114 days | 1% |
| Peter Dawkins | 10/10 | 3142 days | 2% |
| David | 2/10 | 3142 days | 1% |
| David Elliott | 10/10 | 3173 days | 2% |
| You Joon Kim | 1/10 | 3173 days | 1% |
| Chris Monk | 8/10 | 3204 days | 2% |
| Helen Burgess | 2/10 | 3234 days | 1% |
| Carol Smith | 1/10 | 3234 days | 1% |
| Richard Hunter | 1/10 | 3234 days | 1% |
| peter hendry | 1/10 | 3265 days | 1% |
| Katharina Koch | 8/10 | 3491 days | 2% |
| Luna Tarius | 1/10 | 3507 days | 1% |
| Carly Biedul | 10/10 | 3516 days | 2% |
| Guillaume Deleuze | 6/10 | 3532 days | 1% |
| Brad Dean | 2/10 | 3538 days | 1% |
| dave car | 1/10 | 3538 days | 1% |
| Rhydian Templer | 8/10 | 3548 days | 2% |
| Amy | 9/10 | 3551 days | 2% |
| Nina Kaspar | 6/10 | 3569 days | 1% |
| Silvia Hermosillo | 1/10 | 3569 days | 1% |
| Tony Algie | 8/10 | 3569 days | 2% |
| diane wong | 8/10 | 3599 days | 1% |
| Maryanne Wardlaw | 2/10 | 3660 days | 1% |
| Hans Dersch | 1/10 | 3722 days | 0% |
| Kuldeep Nandurkar | 9/10 | 3783 days | 1% |
| Emily Noyd | 10/10 | 3832 days | 1% |
| Christofer Cronholm | 6/10 | 3873 days | 1% |
| Taylor Fabricius | 9/10 | 3876 days | 1% |
| Cecile | 7/10 | 3900 days | 1% |
| Geoff Plunkett | 10/10 | 3904 days | 1% |
| Pawa | 7/10 | 3935 days | 1% |
| James Norcliffe | 10/10 | 3996 days | 1% |
| Andrew Barnden | 10/10 | 4026 days | 1% |
| Sheila Wee | 10/10 | 4179 days | 0% |
| Joana | 8/10 | 4226 days | 0% |
| Lea Karl | 8/10 | 4287 days | 0% |
| Travelgirl | 1/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Vanessa | 8/10 | 4572 days | 1% |
| Natalie Boehm | 8/10 | 4591 days | 1% |
| Bradford Young | 1/10 | 4665 days | 0% |
| regi kiwi | 10/10 | 4665 days | 1% |
| Jeremy Eng | 9/10 | 4940 days | 1% |
| Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4944 days | 1% |
| Anna Neuenfeldt | 10/10 | 4946 days | 1% |
| Maja Bogdanowicz | 10/10 | 4947 days | 1% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5301 days | 1% |
| Wright | 7/10 | 5309 days | 1% |
| Denise & Maciej Holzer | 8/10 | 5309 days | 1% |
| Deana Peters | 9/10 | 5317 days | 1% |
| Jeroen Bartos | 8/10 | 5318 days | 1% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 8/10 | 5319 days | 1% |
| Aled | 9/10 | 5323 days | 1% |
| Ute Rogawski | 6/10 | 5326 days | 1% |
| Asha | 7/10 | 5365 days | 1% |
| Rene Rypkema | 8/10 | 5379 days | 1% |
| Judith | 8/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
| ZubZubZub | 10/10 | 5487 days | 1% |
| Mascot | 9/10 | 5487 days | 1% |
| joE | 10/10 | 5487 days | 1% |
| Sherbertdip | 8/10 | 5487 days | 1% |
| tj10128 | 10/10 | 5518 days | 1% |
| Nicky Bell | 9/10 | 5616 days | 1% |
| Gerryq Winters | 9/10 | 5642 days | 1% |
| A Jones | 6/10 | 5643 days | 1% |
| Katarina Bokor | 8/10 | 5648 days | 1% |
| Sue Carren | 8/10 | 5648 days | 1% |
| Karen Stephens | 7/10 | 5648 days | 1% |
| M Bigras | 8/10 | 5653 days | 1% |
| Binder | 7/10 | 5655 days | 1% |
| Jo Meekley | 8/10 | 5655 days | 1% |
| Guy Cohen | 8/10 | 5657 days | 1% |
| Ven | 8/10 | 5657 days | 1% |
| Wouter Moui | 7/10 | 5663 days | 1% |
| Jerven and Kim | 7/10 | 5664 days | 1% |
| Tanya & Florian | 9/10 | 5665 days | 1% |
| Niklas Ronnino | 8/10 | 5669 days | 1% |
| Gael Romain | 8/10 | 5671 days | 1% |
| Diana Clipsham | 6/10 | 5690 days | 1% |
| Roger Lows | 9/10 | 5690 days | 1% |
| Lynn Leitch | 9/10 | 5692 days | 1% |
| Stephen Leitch | 9/10 | 5692 days | 1% |
| Claus Olsen | 10/10 | 5694 days | 1% |
| hellsknipe356 | 10/10 | 5822 days | 1% |
| chumfft | 10/10 | 5914 days | 1% |
| Elisabeth | 10/10 | 5999 days | 1% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 6005 days | 1% |
| Hana Vokata | 8/10 | 6010 days | 1% |
| Ralph | 8/10 | 6033 days | 1% |
| Senel | 10/10 | 6043 days | 1% |
| Cheryl Gorman | 10/10 | 6049 days | 1% |
| Stefan | 8/10 | 6058 days | 1% |
| Eva | 6/10 | 6062 days | 1% |
| Alain Deslandres | 7/10 | 6077 days | 1% |
| Ross & Catherine Litherland | 8/10 | 6077 days | 1% |
| graemeh1 | 7/10 | 6110 days | 1% |
| martinab | 8/10 | 6110 days | 1% |
| taupoguy | 10/10 | 6126 days | 1% |
| carolineder | 8/10 | 6126 days | 1% |
| Robert Hausser | 9/10 | 6130 days | 1% |
| Thomas Rust | 9/10 | 6130 days | 1% |
| X Otte | 8/10 | 6134 days | 1% |
| kymberlyw | 9/10 | 6371 days | 1% |
| stephen | 9/10 | 6371 days | 1% |
| StijmH | 8/10 | 6387 days | 1% |
| StijnH | 8/10 | 6387 days | 1% |
| Rene | 9/10 | 6394 days | 1% |
| BrzezinskaM | 10/10 | 6395 days | 1% |
| AndreB | 9/10 | 6395 days | 1% |
| Dalibor | 9/10 | 6404 days | 1% |
| Pavel | 8/10 | 6406 days | 1% |
| LeaM | 9/10 | 6440 days | 1% |
| AndreM | 9/10 | 6440 days | 1% |
| JohannesE | 7/10 | 6440 days | 1% |
| Eugen | 9/10 | 6442 days | 1% |
| Maike | 9/10 | 6442 days | 1% |
| Mary | 7/10 | 6443 days | 1% |
| purplekat99 | 10/10 | 6460 days | 1% |
| Emilie | 9/10 | 6545 days | 1% |
| Kristina | 7/10 | 6545 days | 1% |
| Vanessa | 5/10 | 6559 days | 1% |
| chubby69 | 10/10 | 6613 days | 1% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 6618 days | 1% |
| David Fowler | 7/10 | 6637 days | 1% |
| Karen C | 6/10 | 6702 days | 1% |
| Menashe | 7/10 | 6740 days | 1% |
| Bryony Wilson | 8/10 | 6750 days | 1% |
| Beate Sinn | 9/10 | 6754 days | 1% |
| Richard | 5/10 | 6754 days | 1% |
| Smith | 6/10 | 6763 days | 1% |
| Carmen Dolny | 8/10 | 6771 days | 1% |
| Lisa Tame | 8/10 | 6771 days | 1% |
| Gustavo | 9/10 | 6771 days | 1% |
| Kilsby | 9/10 | 6798 days | 1% |
| Juerg | 9/10 | 6811 days | 1% |
| Tanya | 9/10 | 6813 days | 1% |
| Kehoe | 7/10 | 6816 days | 1% |
| Iain | 8/10 | 6817 days | 1% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 6841 days | 1% |
| Dennis | 10/10 | 7117 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Apex Rental Cars experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-5.78% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 85 days. The Apex Rental Cars experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
| Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| 0 | -3.00% |
| 1 | -2.63% |
| 2 | -1.50% |
| 3 | -0.38% |
| 4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Apex Rental Cars experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.74% |
| 198 | -2.76% |
| 199 | -2.77% |
| 200 | -2.78% |
| 201 | -2.80% |
| 202 | -2.81% |
| 203 | -2.83% |
| … | … |
6.53% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
77%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.