Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Apex Rental Cars.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
209 Valid Reviews
The Apex Rental Cars experience has a total of 233 reviews. There are 209 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 24 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 209 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
16% |
| 8/10 | 40 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 17 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 8 |
|
4% |
| 2/10 | 10 |
|
5% |
| 1/10 | 36 |
|
17% |
66.89% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Apex Rental Cars valid reviews is 66.89% and is based on 209 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
94 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 209 valid reviews, the experience has 94 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 94 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 34 |
|
36% |
| 7/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Apex Rental Cars face-to-face reviews is 82.45% and is based on 94 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
75.08%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rene | 10/10 | 50 days | 100% |
| CB | 10/10 | 111 days | 99% |
| Ondrej | 1/10 | 721 days | 29% |
| Will | 1/10 | 750 days | 28% |
| Derek UK | 10/10 | 750 days | 68% |
| Barry | 3/10 | 812 days | 34% |
| Klm | 3/10 | 842 days | 32% |
| Steve | 10/10 | 873 days | 57% |
| Martyn | 10/10 | 873 days | 57% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 903 days | 54% |
| Melissa | 1/10 | 934 days | 20% |
| Nyah | 1/10 | 1087 days | 15% |
| David M | 3/10 | 1087 days | 20% |
| Karla, Sydney | 10/10 | 1268 days | 23% |
| Neville | 1/10 | 1452 days | 5% |
| A Tango | 10/10 | 1480 days | 12% |
| Nicholas Chin | 1/10 | 1603 days | 3% |
| Trista McLean | 10/10 | 1817 days | 5% |
| Steve | 9/10 | 1876 days | 5% |
| Kane | 1/10 | 1907 days | 2% |
| Melanie Brown | 8/10 | 1998 days | 5% |
| World Traveller | 1/10 | 2028 days | 2% |
| Dave Berry | 10/10 | 2029 days | 5% |
| RJ | 1/10 | 2029 days | 2% |
| R Woolley | 10/10 | 2182 days | 4% |
| Claire Wood | 10/10 | 2211 days | 4% |
| ALEKSANDROV Igor Avramovski | 1/10 | 2242 days | 2% |
| Luiz | 2/10 | 2242 days | 2% |
| Jorge | 1/10 | 2273 days | 2% |
| Adam Beevers | 3/10 | 2273 days | 2% |
| Megan | 1/10 | 2273 days | 2% |
| Marc | 3/10 | 2303 days | 2% |
| Howie | 9/10 | 2303 days | 4% |
| Jacques | 1/10 | 2303 days | 2% |
| Janet | 10/10 | 2334 days | 4% |
| Shelby and Matt | 10/10 | 2334 days | 4% |
| Taki Green | 1/10 | 2364 days | 2% |
| Mel | 1/10 | 2364 days | 2% |
| David | 5/10 | 2364 days | 3% |
| JS | 1/10 | 2487 days | 1% |
| Yoke | 1/10 | 2517 days | 1% |
| Kirstie Gallant | 7/10 | 2517 days | 3% |
| Yvonne M Hackenberg | 10/10 | 2517 days | 4% |
| Miss T | 1/10 | 2517 days | 1% |
| Me | 1/10 | 2517 days | 1% |
| Mike Purchas | 2/10 | 2548 days | 2% |
| Gal | 1/10 | 2548 days | 1% |
| M Reeder | 2/10 | 2576 days | 2% |
| Nikki | 10/10 | 2607 days | 3% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 2607 days | 3% |
| Reena Scobie | 1/10 | 2607 days | 1% |
| Bill Brennan | 9/10 | 2607 days | 3% |
| Jeff & Sharon | 2/10 | 2607 days | 2% |
| Craig | 5/10 | 2607 days | 3% |
| Mel B | 1/10 | 2607 days | 1% |
| David | 1/10 | 2607 days | 1% |
| JR WU | 2/10 | 2638 days | 2% |
| Kirstie Lilly | 10/10 | 2668 days | 3% |
| Arlene | 8/10 | 2729 days | 3% |
| Penny Mackay | 10/10 | 2729 days | 3% |
| Laura | 3/10 | 2791 days | 2% |
| Bharat | 10/10 | 2852 days | 3% |
| Gandalf | 4/10 | 2882 days | 2% |
| siti fatimah adnan | 10/10 | 2912 days | 3% |
| Katie | 1/10 | 2913 days | 1% |
| Giovanni | 5/10 | 2913 days | 2% |
| Aileen Davies | 2/10 | 2913 days | 1% |
| Nicola | 1/10 | 2913 days | 1% |
| Dane | 1/10 | 2913 days | 1% |
| David williams | 3/10 | 2913 days | 2% |
| Yan Xiao | 3/10 | 2913 days | 2% |
| Peter Dawkins | 10/10 | 2940 days | 3% |
| David | 2/10 | 2941 days | 1% |
| David Elliott | 10/10 | 2971 days | 3% |
| You Joon Kim | 1/10 | 2972 days | 1% |
| Chris Monk | 8/10 | 3002 days | 3% |
| Helen Burgess | 2/10 | 3032 days | 1% |
| Carol Smith | 1/10 | 3032 days | 1% |
| Richard Hunter | 1/10 | 3032 days | 1% |
| peter hendry | 1/10 | 3063 days | 1% |
| Katharina Koch | 8/10 | 3290 days | 2% |
| Luna Tarius | 1/10 | 3306 days | 1% |
| Carly Biedul | 10/10 | 3315 days | 2% |
| Guillaume Deleuze | 6/10 | 3331 days | 2% |
| Brad Dean | 2/10 | 3336 days | 1% |
| dave car | 1/10 | 3336 days | 1% |
| Rhydian Templer | 8/10 | 3347 days | 2% |
| Amy | 9/10 | 3350 days | 2% |
| Nina Kaspar | 6/10 | 3367 days | 2% |
| Silvia Hermosillo | 1/10 | 3367 days | 1% |
| Tony Algie | 8/10 | 3367 days | 2% |
| diane wong | 8/10 | 3397 days | 2% |
| Maryanne Wardlaw | 2/10 | 3458 days | 1% |
| Hans Dersch | 1/10 | 3520 days | 1% |
| Kuldeep Nandurkar | 9/10 | 3581 days | 2% |
| Emily Noyd | 10/10 | 3631 days | 1% |
| Christofer Cronholm | 6/10 | 3671 days | 1% |
| Taylor Fabricius | 9/10 | 3675 days | 1% |
| Cecile | 7/10 | 3699 days | 1% |
| Geoff Plunkett | 10/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
| Pawa | 7/10 | 3733 days | 1% |
| James Norcliffe | 10/10 | 3794 days | 1% |
| Andrew Barnden | 10/10 | 3824 days | 1% |
| Sheila Wee | 10/10 | 3977 days | 1% |
| Joana | 8/10 | 4025 days | 1% |
| Lea Karl | 8/10 | 4086 days | 1% |
| Travelgirl | 1/10 | 4098 days | 0% |
| Vanessa | 8/10 | 4371 days | 0% |
| Natalie Boehm | 8/10 | 4390 days | 1% |
| Bradford Young | 1/10 | 4464 days | 0% |
| regi kiwi | 10/10 | 4464 days | 1% |
| Jeremy Eng | 9/10 | 4739 days | 1% |
| Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4743 days | 1% |
| Anna Neuenfeldt | 10/10 | 4745 days | 1% |
| Maja Bogdanowicz | 10/10 | 4746 days | 1% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5100 days | 1% |
| Wright | 7/10 | 5108 days | 1% |
| Denise & Maciej Holzer | 8/10 | 5108 days | 1% |
| Deana Peters | 9/10 | 5116 days | 1% |
| Jeroen Bartos | 8/10 | 5117 days | 1% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 8/10 | 5118 days | 1% |
| Aled | 9/10 | 5122 days | 1% |
| Ute Rogawski | 6/10 | 5125 days | 1% |
| Asha | 7/10 | 5164 days | 1% |
| Rene Rypkema | 8/10 | 5178 days | 1% |
| Judith | 8/10 | 5184 days | 1% |
| ZubZubZub | 10/10 | 5286 days | 1% |
| Mascot | 9/10 | 5286 days | 1% |
| joE | 10/10 | 5286 days | 1% |
| Sherbertdip | 8/10 | 5286 days | 1% |
| tj10128 | 10/10 | 5317 days | 1% |
| Nicky Bell | 9/10 | 5415 days | 1% |
| Gerryq Winters | 9/10 | 5441 days | 1% |
| A Jones | 6/10 | 5442 days | 1% |
| Katarina Bokor | 8/10 | 5447 days | 1% |
| Sue Carren | 8/10 | 5447 days | 1% |
| Karen Stephens | 7/10 | 5447 days | 1% |
| M Bigras | 8/10 | 5452 days | 1% |
| Binder | 7/10 | 5454 days | 1% |
| Jo Meekley | 8/10 | 5454 days | 1% |
| Guy Cohen | 8/10 | 5456 days | 1% |
| Ven | 8/10 | 5456 days | 1% |
| Wouter Moui | 7/10 | 5462 days | 1% |
| Jerven and Kim | 7/10 | 5463 days | 1% |
| Tanya & Florian | 9/10 | 5464 days | 1% |
| Niklas Ronnino | 8/10 | 5468 days | 1% |
| Gael Romain | 8/10 | 5470 days | 1% |
| Diana Clipsham | 6/10 | 5489 days | 1% |
| Roger Lows | 9/10 | 5489 days | 1% |
| Lynn Leitch | 9/10 | 5491 days | 1% |
| Stephen Leitch | 9/10 | 5491 days | 1% |
| Claus Olsen | 10/10 | 5493 days | 1% |
| hellsknipe356 | 10/10 | 5621 days | 1% |
| chumfft | 10/10 | 5713 days | 1% |
| Elisabeth | 10/10 | 5798 days | 1% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 5804 days | 1% |
| Hana Vokata | 8/10 | 5809 days | 1% |
| Ralph | 8/10 | 5832 days | 1% |
| Senel | 10/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
| Cheryl Gorman | 10/10 | 5848 days | 1% |
| Stefan | 8/10 | 5857 days | 1% |
| Eva | 6/10 | 5861 days | 1% |
| Alain Deslandres | 7/10 | 5876 days | 1% |
| Ross & Catherine Litherland | 8/10 | 5876 days | 1% |
| graemeh1 | 7/10 | 5909 days | 1% |
| martinab | 8/10 | 5909 days | 1% |
| taupoguy | 10/10 | 5925 days | 1% |
| carolineder | 8/10 | 5925 days | 1% |
| Robert Hausser | 9/10 | 5929 days | 1% |
| Thomas Rust | 9/10 | 5929 days | 1% |
| X Otte | 8/10 | 5933 days | 1% |
| kymberlyw | 9/10 | 6170 days | 1% |
| stephen | 9/10 | 6170 days | 1% |
| StijmH | 8/10 | 6186 days | 1% |
| StijnH | 8/10 | 6186 days | 1% |
| Rene | 9/10 | 6192 days | 1% |
| BrzezinskaM | 10/10 | 6194 days | 1% |
| AndreB | 9/10 | 6194 days | 1% |
| Dalibor | 9/10 | 6203 days | 1% |
| Pavel | 8/10 | 6205 days | 1% |
| LeaM | 9/10 | 6239 days | 1% |
| AndreM | 9/10 | 6239 days | 1% |
| JohannesE | 7/10 | 6239 days | 1% |
| Eugen | 9/10 | 6241 days | 1% |
| Maike | 9/10 | 6241 days | 1% |
| Mary | 7/10 | 6242 days | 1% |
| purplekat99 | 10/10 | 6259 days | 1% |
| Emilie | 9/10 | 6343 days | 1% |
| Kristina | 7/10 | 6343 days | 1% |
| Vanessa | 5/10 | 6358 days | 1% |
| chubby69 | 10/10 | 6412 days | 1% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 6417 days | 1% |
| David Fowler | 7/10 | 6436 days | 1% |
| Karen C | 6/10 | 6500 days | 1% |
| Menashe | 7/10 | 6539 days | 1% |
| Bryony Wilson | 8/10 | 6549 days | 1% |
| Beate Sinn | 9/10 | 6553 days | 1% |
| Richard | 5/10 | 6553 days | 1% |
| Smith | 6/10 | 6562 days | 1% |
| Carmen Dolny | 8/10 | 6570 days | 1% |
| Lisa Tame | 8/10 | 6570 days | 1% |
| Gustavo | 9/10 | 6570 days | 1% |
| Kilsby | 9/10 | 6597 days | 1% |
| Juerg | 9/10 | 6610 days | 1% |
| Tanya | 9/10 | 6612 days | 1% |
| Kehoe | 7/10 | 6615 days | 1% |
| Iain | 8/10 | 6616 days | 1% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 6640 days | 1% |
| Dennis | 10/10 | 6916 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Apex Rental Cars experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.94% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 53 days. The Apex Rental Cars experience has 1 recent ranking. Adjustments are according to the following table:
| Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| 0 | -3.00% |
| 1 | -2.63% |
| 2 | -1.50% |
| 3 | -0.38% |
| 4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Apex Rental Cars experience has been adjusted for 15 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 12 | -0.25% |
| 13 | -0.27% |
| 14 | -0.29% |
| 15 | -0.31% |
| 16 | -0.33% |
| 17 | -0.35% |
| 18 | -0.37% |
| … | … |
5.89% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.