Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Apex Rental Cars.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
208 Valid Reviews
The Apex Rental Cars experience has a total of 232 reviews. There are 208 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 24 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 208 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 48 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
16% |
| 8/10 | 40 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 17 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 8 |
|
4% |
| 2/10 | 10 |
|
5% |
| 1/10 | 36 |
|
17% |
66.73% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Apex Rental Cars valid reviews is 66.73% and is based on 208 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
94 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 208 valid reviews, the experience has 94 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 94 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 34 |
|
36% |
| 7/10 | 14 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Apex Rental Cars face-to-face reviews is 82.45% and is based on 94 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
71.81%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| CB | 10/10 | 49 days | 100% |
| Ondrej | 1/10 | 659 days | 31% |
| Will | 1/10 | 688 days | 30% |
| Derek UK | 10/10 | 688 days | 73% |
| Barry | 3/10 | 750 days | 37% |
| Klm | 3/10 | 780 days | 36% |
| Steve | 10/10 | 811 days | 63% |
| Martyn | 10/10 | 811 days | 63% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 841 days | 60% |
| Melissa | 1/10 | 872 days | 23% |
| Nyah | 1/10 | 1025 days | 17% |
| David M | 3/10 | 1025 days | 23% |
| Karla, Sydney | 10/10 | 1206 days | 27% |
| Neville | 1/10 | 1390 days | 6% |
| A Tango | 10/10 | 1418 days | 14% |
| Nicholas Chin | 1/10 | 1541 days | 4% |
| Trista McLean | 10/10 | 1755 days | 5% |
| Steve | 9/10 | 1814 days | 5% |
| Kane | 1/10 | 1845 days | 2% |
| Melanie Brown | 8/10 | 1936 days | 5% |
| World Traveller | 1/10 | 1966 days | 2% |
| Dave Berry | 10/10 | 1967 days | 5% |
| RJ | 1/10 | 1967 days | 2% |
| R Woolley | 10/10 | 2120 days | 4% |
| Claire Wood | 10/10 | 2149 days | 4% |
| ALEKSANDROV Igor Avramovski | 1/10 | 2180 days | 2% |
| Luiz | 2/10 | 2180 days | 2% |
| Jorge | 1/10 | 2211 days | 2% |
| Adam Beevers | 3/10 | 2211 days | 2% |
| Megan | 1/10 | 2211 days | 2% |
| Marc | 3/10 | 2241 days | 2% |
| Howie | 9/10 | 2241 days | 4% |
| Jacques | 1/10 | 2241 days | 2% |
| Janet | 10/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
| Shelby and Matt | 10/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
| Taki Green | 1/10 | 2302 days | 2% |
| Mel | 1/10 | 2302 days | 2% |
| David | 5/10 | 2302 days | 3% |
| JS | 1/10 | 2425 days | 1% |
| Yoke | 1/10 | 2455 days | 1% |
| Kirstie Gallant | 7/10 | 2455 days | 3% |
| Yvonne M Hackenberg | 10/10 | 2455 days | 4% |
| Miss T | 1/10 | 2455 days | 1% |
| Me | 1/10 | 2455 days | 1% |
| Mike Purchas | 2/10 | 2486 days | 2% |
| Gal | 1/10 | 2486 days | 1% |
| M Reeder | 2/10 | 2514 days | 2% |
| Nikki | 10/10 | 2545 days | 3% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 2545 days | 3% |
| Reena Scobie | 1/10 | 2545 days | 1% |
| Bill Brennan | 9/10 | 2545 days | 3% |
| Jeff & Sharon | 2/10 | 2545 days | 2% |
| Craig | 5/10 | 2545 days | 3% |
| Mel B | 1/10 | 2545 days | 1% |
| David | 1/10 | 2545 days | 1% |
| JR WU | 2/10 | 2576 days | 2% |
| Kirstie Lilly | 10/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
| Arlene | 8/10 | 2667 days | 3% |
| Penny Mackay | 10/10 | 2667 days | 3% |
| Laura | 3/10 | 2729 days | 2% |
| Bharat | 10/10 | 2790 days | 3% |
| Gandalf | 4/10 | 2820 days | 2% |
| siti fatimah adnan | 10/10 | 2850 days | 3% |
| Katie | 1/10 | 2851 days | 1% |
| Giovanni | 5/10 | 2851 days | 2% |
| Aileen Davies | 2/10 | 2851 days | 1% |
| Nicola | 1/10 | 2851 days | 1% |
| Dane | 1/10 | 2851 days | 1% |
| David williams | 3/10 | 2851 days | 2% |
| Yan Xiao | 3/10 | 2851 days | 2% |
| Peter Dawkins | 10/10 | 2878 days | 3% |
| David | 2/10 | 2879 days | 1% |
| David Elliott | 10/10 | 2909 days | 3% |
| You Joon Kim | 1/10 | 2910 days | 1% |
| Chris Monk | 8/10 | 2940 days | 3% |
| Helen Burgess | 2/10 | 2970 days | 1% |
| Carol Smith | 1/10 | 2970 days | 1% |
| Richard Hunter | 1/10 | 2970 days | 1% |
| peter hendry | 1/10 | 3001 days | 1% |
| Katharina Koch | 8/10 | 3228 days | 2% |
| Luna Tarius | 1/10 | 3244 days | 1% |
| Carly Biedul | 10/10 | 3253 days | 2% |
| Guillaume Deleuze | 6/10 | 3269 days | 2% |
| Brad Dean | 2/10 | 3274 days | 1% |
| dave car | 1/10 | 3274 days | 1% |
| Rhydian Templer | 8/10 | 3285 days | 2% |
| Amy | 9/10 | 3288 days | 2% |
| Nina Kaspar | 6/10 | 3305 days | 2% |
| Silvia Hermosillo | 1/10 | 3305 days | 1% |
| Tony Algie | 8/10 | 3305 days | 2% |
| diane wong | 8/10 | 3335 days | 2% |
| Maryanne Wardlaw | 2/10 | 3396 days | 1% |
| Hans Dersch | 1/10 | 3458 days | 1% |
| Kuldeep Nandurkar | 9/10 | 3519 days | 2% |
| Emily Noyd | 10/10 | 3569 days | 1% |
| Christofer Cronholm | 6/10 | 3609 days | 1% |
| Taylor Fabricius | 9/10 | 3613 days | 1% |
| Cecile | 7/10 | 3637 days | 1% |
| Geoff Plunkett | 10/10 | 3640 days | 1% |
| Pawa | 7/10 | 3671 days | 1% |
| James Norcliffe | 10/10 | 3732 days | 1% |
| Andrew Barnden | 10/10 | 3762 days | 1% |
| Sheila Wee | 10/10 | 3915 days | 1% |
| Joana | 8/10 | 3963 days | 1% |
| Lea Karl | 8/10 | 4024 days | 1% |
| Travelgirl | 1/10 | 4036 days | 0% |
| Vanessa | 8/10 | 4309 days | 0% |
| Natalie Boehm | 8/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Bradford Young | 1/10 | 4402 days | 0% |
| regi kiwi | 10/10 | 4402 days | 1% |
| Jeremy Eng | 9/10 | 4677 days | 1% |
| Justin Leest | 10/10 | 4681 days | 1% |
| Anna Neuenfeldt | 10/10 | 4683 days | 1% |
| Maja Bogdanowicz | 10/10 | 4684 days | 1% |
| Alex Ross | 10/10 | 5038 days | 1% |
| Wright | 7/10 | 5046 days | 1% |
| Denise & Maciej Holzer | 8/10 | 5046 days | 1% |
| Deana Peters | 9/10 | 5054 days | 1% |
| Jeroen Bartos | 8/10 | 5055 days | 1% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 8/10 | 5056 days | 1% |
| Aled | 9/10 | 5060 days | 1% |
| Ute Rogawski | 6/10 | 5063 days | 1% |
| Asha | 7/10 | 5102 days | 1% |
| Rene Rypkema | 8/10 | 5116 days | 1% |
| Judith | 8/10 | 5122 days | 1% |
| ZubZubZub | 10/10 | 5224 days | 1% |
| Mascot | 9/10 | 5224 days | 1% |
| joE | 10/10 | 5224 days | 1% |
| Sherbertdip | 8/10 | 5224 days | 1% |
| tj10128 | 10/10 | 5255 days | 1% |
| Nicky Bell | 9/10 | 5353 days | 1% |
| Gerryq Winters | 9/10 | 5379 days | 1% |
| A Jones | 6/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| Katarina Bokor | 8/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
| Sue Carren | 8/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
| Karen Stephens | 7/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
| M Bigras | 8/10 | 5390 days | 1% |
| Binder | 7/10 | 5392 days | 1% |
| Jo Meekley | 8/10 | 5392 days | 1% |
| Guy Cohen | 8/10 | 5394 days | 1% |
| Ven | 8/10 | 5394 days | 1% |
| Wouter Moui | 7/10 | 5400 days | 1% |
| Jerven and Kim | 7/10 | 5401 days | 1% |
| Tanya & Florian | 9/10 | 5402 days | 1% |
| Niklas Ronnino | 8/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
| Gael Romain | 8/10 | 5408 days | 1% |
| Diana Clipsham | 6/10 | 5427 days | 1% |
| Roger Lows | 9/10 | 5427 days | 1% |
| Lynn Leitch | 9/10 | 5429 days | 1% |
| Stephen Leitch | 9/10 | 5429 days | 1% |
| Claus Olsen | 10/10 | 5431 days | 1% |
| hellsknipe356 | 10/10 | 5559 days | 1% |
| chumfft | 10/10 | 5651 days | 1% |
| Elisabeth | 10/10 | 5736 days | 1% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 5742 days | 1% |
| Hana Vokata | 8/10 | 5747 days | 1% |
| Ralph | 8/10 | 5770 days | 1% |
| Senel | 10/10 | 5780 days | 1% |
| Cheryl Gorman | 10/10 | 5786 days | 1% |
| Stefan | 8/10 | 5795 days | 1% |
| Eva | 6/10 | 5799 days | 1% |
| Alain Deslandres | 7/10 | 5814 days | 1% |
| Ross & Catherine Litherland | 8/10 | 5814 days | 1% |
| graemeh1 | 7/10 | 5847 days | 1% |
| martinab | 8/10 | 5847 days | 1% |
| taupoguy | 10/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
| carolineder | 8/10 | 5863 days | 1% |
| Robert Hausser | 9/10 | 5867 days | 1% |
| Thomas Rust | 9/10 | 5867 days | 1% |
| X Otte | 8/10 | 5871 days | 1% |
| kymberlyw | 9/10 | 6108 days | 1% |
| stephen | 9/10 | 6108 days | 1% |
| StijmH | 8/10 | 6124 days | 1% |
| StijnH | 8/10 | 6124 days | 1% |
| Rene | 9/10 | 6130 days | 1% |
| BrzezinskaM | 10/10 | 6132 days | 1% |
| AndreB | 9/10 | 6132 days | 1% |
| Dalibor | 9/10 | 6141 days | 1% |
| Pavel | 8/10 | 6143 days | 1% |
| LeaM | 9/10 | 6177 days | 1% |
| AndreM | 9/10 | 6177 days | 1% |
| JohannesE | 7/10 | 6177 days | 1% |
| Eugen | 9/10 | 6179 days | 1% |
| Maike | 9/10 | 6179 days | 1% |
| Mary | 7/10 | 6180 days | 1% |
| purplekat99 | 10/10 | 6197 days | 1% |
| Emilie | 9/10 | 6281 days | 1% |
| Kristina | 7/10 | 6281 days | 1% |
| Vanessa | 5/10 | 6296 days | 1% |
| chubby69 | 10/10 | 6350 days | 1% |
| Christine | 10/10 | 6355 days | 1% |
| David Fowler | 7/10 | 6374 days | 1% |
| Karen C | 6/10 | 6438 days | 1% |
| Menashe | 7/10 | 6477 days | 1% |
| Bryony Wilson | 8/10 | 6487 days | 1% |
| Beate Sinn | 9/10 | 6491 days | 1% |
| Richard | 5/10 | 6491 days | 1% |
| Smith | 6/10 | 6500 days | 1% |
| Carmen Dolny | 8/10 | 6508 days | 1% |
| Lisa Tame | 8/10 | 6508 days | 1% |
| Gustavo | 9/10 | 6508 days | 1% |
| Kilsby | 9/10 | 6535 days | 1% |
| Juerg | 9/10 | 6548 days | 1% |
| Tanya | 9/10 | 6550 days | 1% |
| Kehoe | 7/10 | 6553 days | 1% |
| Iain | 8/10 | 6554 days | 1% |
| Petra | 8/10 | 6578 days | 1% |
| Dennis | 10/10 | 6854 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Apex Rental Cars experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.23% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 41 days. The Apex Rental Cars experience has 1 recent ranking. Adjustments are according to the following table:
| Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| 0 | -3.00% |
| 1 | -2.63% |
| 2 | -1.50% |
| 3 | -0.38% |
| 4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Apex Rental Cars experience has been adjusted for 30 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 27 | -0.55% |
| 28 | -0.57% |
| 29 | -0.59% |
| 30 | -0.61% |
| 31 | -0.63% |
| 32 | -0.65% |
| 33 | -0.67% |
| … | … |
7.83% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
76%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.