G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
246 Valid Reviews
The Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi experience has a total of 246 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 246 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 67 |
|
27% |
9/10 | 64 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 70 |
|
28% |
7/10 | 34 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
85.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi valid reviews is 85.33% and is based on 246 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
236 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 246 valid reviews, the experience has 236 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 236 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 62 |
|
26% |
9/10 | 62 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 68 |
|
29% |
7/10 | 34 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.34% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi face-to-face reviews is 85.34% and is based on 236 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
86.61%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Lynette Valk | 10/10 | 1427 days | 100% |
Emma | 9/10 | 1821 days | 35% |
JBUSA | 1/10 | 2278 days | 12% |
Isabel Zedelius | 10/10 | 2927 days | 20% |
Barbara Hirsch | 6/10 | 2934 days | 17% |
Colin George | 10/10 | 2976 days | 19% |
Babs Muelink | 8/10 | 2979 days | 19% |
Harry Smit | 8/10 | 2979 days | 19% |
Danny | 9/10 | 2989 days | 19% |
Miriam Gamble | 10/10 | 3024 days | 19% |
Josh Symons | 8/10 | 3260 days | 15% |
Lewis Whittle | 8/10 | 3263 days | 15% |
Max von Felde | 8/10 | 3265 days | 15% |
Gabriel Siibers | 9/10 | 3282 days | 15% |
Stephan | 8/10 | 3324 days | 14% |
Lola | 10/10 | 3952 days | 6% |
Steffen | 9/10 | 3982 days | 5% |
Helma Druyken | 7/10 | 3982 days | 5% |
Austin Johns | 10/10 | 3986 days | 5% |
Johanna Kofler | 9/10 | 3987 days | 5% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 4008 days | 5% |
Mike Majnik | 10/10 | 4008 days | 5% |
Andreas Jung | 8/10 | 4008 days | 5% |
Emilie Chanbon | 8/10 | 4015 days | 5% |
Alexis Redor | 8/10 | 4015 days | 5% |
Petra Kurcova | 8/10 | 4032 days | 5% |
Adam Balcar | 8/10 | 4032 days | 5% |
Elin Paulssen | 10/10 | 4043 days | 5% |
Monique Browne | 10/10 | 4045 days | 4% |
Hendrik Rother | 9/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
Camille Coombes | 6/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
Mathieu Maran | 6/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
Glenn Surzur | 7/10 | 4351 days | 0% |
Caderet | 8/10 | 4351 days | 0% |
Francois Marchar | 7/10 | 4359 days | 0% |
Mo Downes | 8/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
Lagunegrand | 8/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
Pink | 6/10 | 4382 days | 6% |
Nadine and Jan | 7/10 | 4421 days | 6% |
Jason | 7/10 | 4426 days | 6% |
Kohler | 9/10 | 4428 days | 7% |
Annie | 9/10 | 4432 days | 7% |
Frans Derks | 9/10 | 4432 days | 7% |
Simon Rawlinson | 9/10 | 4695 days | 7% |
Sam | 10/10 | 4718 days | 7% |
Carolee Webster | 10/10 | 4723 days | 7% |
Inge & Erik | 9/10 | 4724 days | 7% |
Cole | 9/10 | 4725 days | 7% |
Frans Roebroek | 9/10 | 4725 days | 7% |
M H Hansen | 10/10 | 4726 days | 7% |
Nick & Adele Waller | 10/10 | 4726 days | 7% |
Stefes Wencke | 9/10 | 4727 days | 7% |
Peter Holt | 9/10 | 4731 days | 7% |
Nout de Wit | 7/10 | 4735 days | 6% |
Guillaume Milcent | 7/10 | 4740 days | 6% |
J Knol | 8/10 | 4769 days | 7% |
Bradley | 9/10 | 4788 days | 7% |
Sanne Ta Stroete | 8/10 | 4794 days | 7% |
Steve & Maggie | 7/10 | 4806 days | 6% |
Chris & Susanna | 4/10 | 4806 days | 4% |
Moniek Roelots | 8/10 | 4812 days | 7% |
Eri & Udo Seifert | 9/10 | 4814 days | 7% |
Caroline | 8/10 | 4814 days | 7% |
Jane Stalker | 8/10 | 4820 days | 7% |
Andreas & Sonja | 7/10 | 4821 days | 6% |
Remco te Lintum | 8/10 | 4821 days | 7% |
Janet Arber | 9/10 | 5030 days | 7% |
Michael Welscheubach | 10/10 | 5031 days | 7% |
Lisa Milton | 10/10 | 5042 days | 7% |
Karsten Tannhauser | 10/10 | 5063 days | 7% |
Lynn | 10/10 | 5068 days | 7% |
Jackie MacRostie | 10/10 | 5070 days | 7% |
Nathalie Verzeletti | 8/10 | 5070 days | 7% |
Jen Fyfe | 7/10 | 5071 days | 6% |
David and Karen | 10/10 | 5072 days | 7% |
Michaela Strohmarer | 10/10 | 5072 days | 7% |
Alan Jeffery | 8/10 | 5076 days | 7% |
Rachel Kent-Lawton | 9/10 | 5080 days | 7% |
Bart & Kim | 10/10 | 5081 days | 7% |
M Holierhoek | 7/10 | 5082 days | 6% |
Mark Irwin | 7/10 | 5091 days | 6% |
Andrew Koster | 8/10 | 5093 days | 7% |
Bernard Gastaud | 9/10 | 5093 days | 7% |
G Elliason | 9/10 | 5094 days | 7% |
Ruben and Jetske | 7/10 | 5098 days | 6% |
Trov & Liz Warren | 10/10 | 5100 days | 7% |
Heike Toepelt | 10/10 | 5100 days | 7% |
Michael Eck | 9/10 | 5101 days | 7% |
Markus Richert | 8/10 | 5102 days | 7% |
Jean-Paul Le Clair | 6/10 | 5102 days | 6% |
Pam de Vos | 8/10 | 5104 days | 7% |
Katherine Bernsdorf | 9/10 | 5104 days | 7% |
Claudia | 10/10 | 5372 days | 7% |
Martina Pankova | 9/10 | 5420 days | 7% |
Kevin F | 9/10 | 5427 days | 7% |
Dwight Odland | 9/10 | 5431 days | 7% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 10/10 | 5431 days | 7% |
Siobhan Lorgena | 8/10 | 5442 days | 7% |
NZ_Nana | 10/10 | 5445 days | 7% |
hughesW | 8/10 | 5445 days | 7% |
Ian Watson | 10/10 | 5446 days | 7% |
Tony Killingray | 8/10 | 5448 days | 7% |
Mark Ashton | 10/10 | 5451 days | 7% |
Senel | 8/10 | 5452 days | 7% |
Haitsma | 7/10 | 5453 days | 6% |
Mark | 9/10 | 5453 days | 7% |
Hans de Rijk | 9/10 | 5455 days | 7% |
Lynn Tichauer | 10/10 | 5456 days | 7% |
Bunnik | 9/10 | 5458 days | 7% |
Eva | 8/10 | 5462 days | 7% |
Brenda Brelinski | 10/10 | 5467 days | 7% |
Fam Schuijers | 8/10 | 5468 days | 7% |
Irene Turley | 9/10 | 5468 days | 7% |
Alex Baxter | 4/10 | 5469 days | 4% |
Groen | 7/10 | 5470 days | 6% |
Mark Marg | 8/10 | 5472 days | 7% |
Yvonne Ing | 9/10 | 5472 days | 7% |
Otto | 7/10 | 5472 days | 6% |
Annette Friskopp | 8/10 | 5473 days | 7% |
Vu Thi Lan | 6/10 | 5490 days | 6% |
marylus | 8/10 | 5519 days | 7% |
elskeb | 7/10 | 5523 days | 6% |
djrogers | 8/10 | 5528 days | 7% |
Jane | 10/10 | 5535 days | 7% |
Seiler | 10/10 | 5537 days | 7% |
mdarras | 7/10 | 5539 days | 6% |
Hanne Wichmann | 10/10 | 5539 days | 7% |
Jansen | 8/10 | 5539 days | 7% |
Hans & Karin | 8/10 | 5539 days | 7% |
Bert Wierzy | 8/10 | 5542 days | 7% |
Gaelle | 8/10 | 5545 days | 7% |
Ricarda | 8/10 | 5545 days | 7% |
Alexis De Wilde | 9/10 | 5545 days | 7% |
Malinka Nuefeld | 9/10 | 5545 days | 7% |
Philip Ryott | 9/10 | 5545 days | 7% |
Vicki Cashmore | 9/10 | 5547 days | 7% |
Flavia Mionelli | 10/10 | 5547 days | 7% |
J Keimel | 8/10 | 5547 days | 7% |
Ana Garcia | 9/10 | 5548 days | 7% |
TomM | 9/10 | 5771 days | 7% |
MorganK | 9/10 | 5771 days | 7% |
YohanM | 8/10 | 5774 days | 7% |
Dirk | 7/10 | 5778 days | 6% |
IanM | 7/10 | 5779 days | 6% |
CornelissenS | 8/10 | 5796 days | 7% |
Fred | 8/10 | 5802 days | 7% |
Wouter Muller | 7/10 | 5802 days | 6% |
Ian | 10/10 | 5802 days | 7% |
Nick | 9/10 | 5807 days | 7% |
Halley | 9/10 | 5809 days | 7% |
Brian | 10/10 | 5809 days | 7% |
StephC | 7/10 | 5812 days | 6% |
RokP | 10/10 | 5812 days | 7% |
NikolaGermany | 8/10 | 5812 days | 7% |
FrankFlemming | 10/10 | 5813 days | 7% |
JoanneM | 8/10 | 5814 days | 7% |
NikkiB1 | 10/10 | 5814 days | 7% |
Daniel | 10/10 | 5815 days | 7% |
Rafael | 7/10 | 5815 days | 6% |
Laura | 10/10 | 5818 days | 7% |
HelenP | 10/10 | 5822 days | 7% |
Trevor | 10/10 | 5822 days | 7% |
John | 9/10 | 5822 days | 7% |
RoseyUK | 8/10 | 5826 days | 7% |
Yunker | 8/10 | 5827 days | 7% |
Christina | 10/10 | 5827 days | 7% |
Kirsty | 7/10 | 5829 days | 6% |
David | 8/10 | 5829 days | 7% |
KuntzGermany | 10/10 | 5834 days | 7% |
Helen | 7/10 | 5843 days | 6% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5843 days | 7% |
Martha | 9/10 | 5846 days | 7% |
Rory | 7/10 | 5847 days | 6% |
LeaM | 10/10 | 5849 days | 7% |
Penwell | 9/10 | 5850 days | 7% |
Thierry | 8/10 | 5851 days | 7% |
Mary | 7/10 | 5852 days | 6% |
Ruben | 7/10 | 5852 days | 6% |
FeliciaO | 10/10 | 5858 days | 7% |
Martin | 7/10 | 5863 days | 6% |
Watermann | 8/10 | 5896 days | 7% |
Julia | 10/10 | 5909 days | 7% |
Mathew | 10/10 | 5913 days | 7% |
RhysandSteffi | 8/10 | 5929 days | 7% |
Kristina | 8/10 | 5953 days | 7% |
garrick | 9/10 | 5968 days | 7% |
Kees | 8/10 | 6003 days | 7% |
Cory Fusco | 9/10 | 6003 days | 7% |
Katie Wise | 10/10 | 6011 days | 7% |
Steffi | 10/10 | 6014 days | 7% |
Kerstin | 8/10 | 6018 days | 7% |
Nikki Gray | 5/10 | 6029 days | 5% |
Salome | 8/10 | 6087 days | 7% |
Liz Brown | 10/10 | 6115 days | 7% |
Erin White | 8/10 | 6142 days | 7% |
Toby | 8/10 | 6151 days | 7% |
Amy Lumsden | 8/10 | 6155 days | 7% |
Rob and Leo | 9/10 | 6156 days | 7% |
Caroline Cole | 9/10 | 6156 days | 7% |
Ellie Koss | 7/10 | 6156 days | 6% |
Omer Harron | 8/10 | 6159 days | 7% |
Maria Fahlander | 8/10 | 6169 days | 7% |
Graham | 7/10 | 6171 days | 6% |
Phil Connelly | 9/10 | 6171 days | 7% |
Anja | 9/10 | 6172 days | 7% |
Trinkler | 9/10 | 6172 days | 7% |
Ohad | 10/10 | 6172 days | 7% |
Kristine | 10/10 | 6176 days | 7% |
Mariska | 8/10 | 6177 days | 7% |
Ralph Schnizer | 10/10 | 6178 days | 7% |
Mike | 10/10 | 6184 days | 7% |
Mark | 9/10 | 6191 days | 7% |
Juerg | 10/10 | 6220 days | 7% |
Evelyn | 9/10 | 6221 days | 7% |
Tanya | 8/10 | 6222 days | 7% |
Andy | 10/10 | 6222 days | 7% |
Roger Mills | 8/10 | 6222 days | 7% |
Tony and Ken | 10/10 | 6226 days | 7% |
Christian Arnot | 10/10 | 6248 days | 7% |
Anita | 10/10 | 6248 days | 7% |
Francesco | 9/10 | 6253 days | 7% |
Alexis | 8/10 | 6253 days | 7% |
Sarah Wilton | 7/10 | 6254 days | 6% |
ranker_46 | 8/10 | 6381 days | 7% |
Stephanie | 10/10 | 6490 days | 7% |
Will | 7/10 | 6495 days | 6% |
Michael | 9/10 | 6502 days | 7% |
sven | 5/10 | 6504 days | 5% |
Adi | 9/10 | 6505 days | 7% |
John | 9/10 | 6512 days | 7% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6515 days | 7% |
Silke | 10/10 | 6516 days | 7% |
Heather | 9/10 | 6516 days | 7% |
Ian | 8/10 | 6533 days | 7% |
Karla | 8/10 | 6538 days | 7% |
Meyer | 9/10 | 6542 days | 7% |
Shirely | 9/10 | 6544 days | 7% |
Andreas | 8/10 | 6545 days | 7% |
Herman&Ineke | 10/10 | 6548 days | 7% |
Jensen | 10/10 | 6549 days | 7% |
Stefan | 7/10 | 6553 days | 6% |
Henrich | 8/10 | 6554 days | 7% |
Frank | 9/10 | 6555 days | 7% |
Deirdre | 9/10 | 6557 days | 7% |
Kate&Steve Jones | 9/10 | 6557 days | 7% |
ranker_410 | 9/10 | 6568 days | 7% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.13% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 48 days. However the Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Abel Tasman Aqua Taxi experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -4.06% |
198 | -4.08% |
199 | -4.10% |
200 | -4.13% |
201 | -4.15% |
202 | -4.17% |
203 | -4.19% |
… | … |
2.36% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.