G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Okarito Kiwi Tours.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
198 Valid Reviews
The Okarito Kiwi Tours experience has a total of 200 reviews. There are 198 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 198 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 184 |
|
93% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
5% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
98.64% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Okarito Kiwi Tours valid reviews is 98.64% and is based on 198 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
11 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 198 valid reviews, the experience has 11 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 11 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
64% |
| 9/10 | 2 |
|
18% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
94.55% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Okarito Kiwi Tours face-to-face reviews is 94.55% and is based on 11 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
98.50%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Havard and Carolyn | 10/10 | 961 days | 100% |
| Amanda Burns | 2/10 | 2391 days | 4% |
| Raphaele | 10/10 | 2818 days | 6% |
| Erika Rosenfeld | 5/10 | 3092 days | 4% |
| Rob Wiedenmann | 10/10 | 3120 days | 5% |
| Leonie Aulbers | 10/10 | 3200 days | 5% |
| Terry Kirkhope | 9/10 | 3212 days | 5% |
| Lars Grosse | 10/10 | 3431 days | 2% |
| Melanie and Pascal | 9/10 | 3461 days | 2% |
| Ian Reid | 10/10 | 3516 days | 3% |
| Ben Jackson | 10/10 | 3547 days | 3% |
| dkr | 10/10 | 3547 days | 3% |
| Pete Russell | 10/10 | 3943 days | 2% |
| Bryce Hain | 10/10 | 3974 days | 2% |
| Mica&Inspector | 10/10 | 4188 days | 1% |
| Lois Harter | 10/10 | 4247 days | 0% |
| Dennis Seijts | 10/10 | 4278 days | 0% |
| Craig Steed | 10/10 | 4278 days | 0% |
| Patrick_Mirta | 10/10 | 4308 days | 0% |
| Jana Ahrens | 10/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
| Joerg_and_Susan | 10/10 | 4554 days | 2% |
| K P | 10/10 | 4582 days | 2% |
| Arjun Chandna | 10/10 | 4582 days | 2% |
| Paul I | 10/10 | 4582 days | 2% |
| Terry Seaman | 10/10 | 4582 days | 2% |
| Marilyn Cossey | 10/10 | 4582 days | 2% |
| Ludvig Fagerstrom | 10/10 | 4601 days | 1% |
| Johanna Bak | 10/10 | 4601 days | 1% |
| John Gray | 10/10 | 4612 days | 2% |
| doris parker | 10/10 | 4613 days | 2% |
| Andrew Lowton | 10/10 | 4613 days | 2% |
| Stephan Tegtmeier | 10/10 | 4613 days | 2% |
| Joyce Davidse | 10/10 | 4613 days | 2% |
| ben de with | 10/10 | 4644 days | 2% |
| Jennifer Valder | 10/10 | 4644 days | 2% |
| anemone678 | 10/10 | 4644 days | 2% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 4644 days | 2% |
| Pam&Steve | 10/10 | 4644 days | 2% |
| Götz Winguth | 10/10 | 4644 days | 2% |
| François | 10/10 | 4674 days | 2% |
| Adam Moore | 10/10 | 4705 days | 2% |
| birderdavid | 10/10 | 4735 days | 2% |
| Murray Lord | 10/10 | 4735 days | 2% |
| Andrea Thiemann | 10/10 | 4735 days | 2% |
| kellie francis | 10/10 | 4858 days | 2% |
| Johanna Loehlein | 10/10 | 4888 days | 2% |
| Rhys Bowen | 10/10 | 4888 days | 2% |
| Erica Emes | 10/10 | 4947 days | 2% |
| Kat88 | 10/10 | 4947 days | 2% |
| antje fricke | 10/10 | 4947 days | 2% |
| Michaela A. | 10/10 | 4978 days | 2% |
| MartinJ | 10/10 | 4978 days | 2% |
| Andrea Wollmann | 10/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
| Romain_Emilie | 10/10 | 5009 days | 2% |
| lej | 10/10 | 5039 days | 2% |
| mneise | 10/10 | 5039 days | 2% |
| annaterc | 10/10 | 5070 days | 2% |
| kjredstart | 10/10 | 5070 days | 2% |
| emptybeach | 10/10 | 5131 days | 2% |
| dag | 10/10 | 5131 days | 2% |
| tonydoy | 10/10 | 5162 days | 2% |
| MJB | 10/10 | 5162 days | 2% |
| chk | 9/10 | 5253 days | 2% |
| melemele | 10/10 | 5253 days | 2% |
| evasch | 10/10 | 5253 days | 2% |
| batzi | 10/10 | 5253 days | 2% |
| Thorsten | 10/10 | 5284 days | 2% |
| Marjie905 | 10/10 | 5284 days | 2% |
| garycrusan | 10/10 | 5284 days | 2% |
| bongo_travellers | 10/10 | 5284 days | 2% |
| prbkiwi | 10/10 | 5313 days | 2% |
| sav | 10/10 | 5313 days | 2% |
| Ritchie | 10/10 | 5313 days | 2% |
| DavidLim | 10/10 | 5313 days | 2% |
| Phyl_Dave | 9/10 | 5313 days | 2% |
| suzanna | 10/10 | 5313 days | 2% |
| KandJ | 10/10 | 5344 days | 2% |
| magpiemareth | 9/10 | 5344 days | 2% |
| cpope | 10/10 | 5344 days | 2% |
| jbunn185 | 10/10 | 5344 days | 2% |
| jenny_a | 10/10 | 5344 days | 2% |
| Trace | 10/10 | 5375 days | 2% |
| eboese | 10/10 | 5375 days | 2% |
| trentworr | 10/10 | 5375 days | 2% |
| topshotone | 10/10 | 5375 days | 2% |
| thomasW346 | 10/10 | 5375 days | 2% |
| dgi3005 | 10/10 | 5405 days | 2% |
| willemenlilian | 10/10 | 5405 days | 2% |
| Sander | 10/10 | 5405 days | 2% |
| David47 | 10/10 | 5436 days | 2% |
| taffski | 10/10 | 5436 days | 2% |
| justus | 10/10 | 5436 days | 2% |
| thebraininjane | 10/10 | 5436 days | 2% |
| Susi_Lars | 10/10 | 5466 days | 2% |
| pepette31 | 10/10 | 5466 days | 2% |
| jenckes | 10/10 | 5466 days | 2% |
| Louise Bush | 10/10 | 5466 days | 2% |
| damaca | 10/10 | 5466 days | 2% |
| KatieW85 | 10/10 | 5497 days | 2% |
| Fuzziefay | 10/10 | 5497 days | 2% |
| northernbird7 | 10/10 | 5497 days | 2% |
| Garlu | 10/10 | 5497 days | 2% |
| EvaandJulian11 | 10/10 | 5528 days | 2% |
| jasmin | 10/10 | 5558 days | 2% |
| Jasmin Loeffler | 10/10 | 5595 days | 1% |
| B_mckenz118 | 10/10 | 5619 days | 2% |
| JennyAndFelix | 10/10 | 5619 days | 2% |
| K4thy | 10/10 | 5619 days | 2% |
| topsy08 | 10/10 | 5619 days | 2% |
| kyle802 | 10/10 | 5619 days | 2% |
| alangshaw | 10/10 | 5619 days | 2% |
| Snowythecat | 10/10 | 5619 days | 2% |
| JenandHeinz | 10/10 | 5619 days | 2% |
| David Taylor | 8/10 | 5624 days | 1% |
| Judith | 9/10 | 5636 days | 1% |
| geoffbutton | 10/10 | 5650 days | 2% |
| Chouchat | 10/10 | 5650 days | 2% |
| Binita | 10/10 | 5650 days | 2% |
| CynthiaPeng | 10/10 | 5650 days | 2% |
| jlgavin | 10/10 | 5650 days | 2% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5665 days | 1% |
| Teknik151 | 10/10 | 5678 days | 2% |
| Seonaid | 10/10 | 5678 days | 2% |
| chrisbell | 10/10 | 5709 days | 2% |
| mnm | 10/10 | 5709 days | 2% |
| MikeG | 10/10 | 5709 days | 2% |
| ThomasHarley | 9/10 | 5709 days | 2% |
| martin_kohls | 10/10 | 5709 days | 2% |
| jms73 | 10/10 | 5709 days | 2% |
| Bjorn1 | 10/10 | 5709 days | 2% |
| nzhoneymoon2010 | 10/10 | 5740 days | 2% |
| Anja_Chris | 10/10 | 5740 days | 2% |
| Barbara | 10/10 | 5770 days | 2% |
| Birderdave | 10/10 | 5770 days | 2% |
| gbanddennymac | 10/10 | 5770 days | 2% |
| Wendy | 10/10 | 5770 days | 2% |
| Zorni | 10/10 | 5770 days | 2% |
| Vanellus01 | 10/10 | 5770 days | 2% |
| BrentCain | 10/10 | 5801 days | 2% |
| dantunder | 10/10 | 5801 days | 2% |
| SergeiNZ | 10/10 | 5862 days | 2% |
| PaulJames | 10/10 | 5862 days | 2% |
| jakepconcordiaUSA | 10/10 | 5893 days | 2% |
| mozell | 10/10 | 5893 days | 2% |
| France_s | 10/10 | 5923 days | 2% |
| nicovm26 | 10/10 | 5984 days | 2% |
| Cbarrass | 10/10 | 5984 days | 2% |
| Marcia & Bruce | 10/10 | 6005 days | 1% |
| Keith Martin | 10/10 | 6015 days | 2% |
| Mike & Kirsty Wilmott | 10/10 | 6015 days | 2% |
| susanne brighouse | 10/10 | 6043 days | 2% |
| soldenborg | 10/10 | 6043 days | 2% |
| Linley Faulkner | 10/10 | 6043 days | 2% |
| DavidLapointe | 10/10 | 6043 days | 2% |
| Stephanie K | 8/10 | 6056 days | 1% |
| JamesWatson_1 | 10/10 | 6074 days | 2% |
| Jytte | 10/10 | 6074 days | 2% |
| Korky | 10/10 | 6074 days | 2% |
| wueppke | 10/10 | 6074 days | 2% |
| Jim Scarff | 10/10 | 6074 days | 2% |
| Tim Hawley | 10/10 | 6105 days | 2% |
| Nancy | 10/10 | 6105 days | 2% |
| Peter Williams | 10/10 | 6105 days | 2% |
| AndyL | 10/10 | 6105 days | 2% |
| Duncan Watson | 10/10 | 6135 days | 2% |
| ajsivers | 10/10 | 6135 days | 2% |
| memphis_T | 10/10 | 6135 days | 2% |
| TonyS | 10/10 | 6135 days | 2% |
| snodge | 10/10 | 6135 days | 2% |
| DaveWilliamson | 10/10 | 6135 days | 2% |
| Kathleen Kealey | 10/10 | 6166 days | 2% |
| Beth Lenoble | 10/10 | 6166 days | 2% |
| Rachel Smith | 10/10 | 6166 days | 2% |
| Jonathan Manson | 10/10 | 6166 days | 2% |
| Gerry Richards | 10/10 | 6166 days | 2% |
| Pedro Menendez | 10/10 | 6166 days | 2% |
| siui | 9/10 | 6196 days | 2% |
| Kristen Smith | 10/10 | 6196 days | 2% |
| Erik Forsyth | 10/10 | 6227 days | 2% |
| ash cotter | 10/10 | 6227 days | 2% |
| David | 10/10 | 6349 days | 2% |
| Nicola Illsley | 10/10 | 6349 days | 2% |
| harryjarv | 10/10 | 6380 days | 2% |
| Jill | 10/10 | 6406 days | 2% |
| Linda319 | 10/10 | 6439 days | 2% |
| jason grundy | 10/10 | 6450 days | 2% |
| Heidi Grether | 10/10 | 6460 days | 2% |
| dkluza | 10/10 | 6470 days | 2% |
| Jeff | 10/10 | 6470 days | 2% |
| angelacass | 10/10 | 6498 days | 2% |
| Robert Hutchinson | 10/10 | 6500 days | 2% |
| hypercritic | 10/10 | 6554 days | 2% |
| Tipene | 10/10 | 6564 days | 2% |
| richardr | 10/10 | 6630 days | 2% |
| amh | 9/10 | 6637 days | 2% |
| belle | 10/10 | 6640 days | 2% |
| Karen | 9/10 | 6640 days | 2% |
| rh8mpo | 10/10 | 6642 days | 2% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Okarito Kiwi Tours experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.36% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 110 days. However the Okarito Kiwi Tours experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Okarito Kiwi Tours experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.33% |
| 198 | -2.34% |
| 199 | -2.35% |
| 200 | -2.36% |
| 201 | -2.37% |
| 202 | -2.39% |
| 203 | -2.40% |
| … | … |
0.33% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
97%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.