Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for AJ Hackett Taupo.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

AJ Hackett Taupo

Valid Reviews

63 Valid Reviews

The AJ Hackett Taupo experience has a total of 66 reviews. There are 63 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 63 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 27
43%
9/10 11
17%
8/10 18
29%
7/10 3
5%
6/10 1
2%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

87.78% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the AJ Hackett Taupo valid reviews is 87.78% and is based on 63 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

52 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 63 valid reviews, the experience has 52 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 52 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 24
46%
9/10 9
17%
8/10 15
29%
7/10 3
6%
6/10 1
2%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

90.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the AJ Hackett Taupo face-to-face reviews is 90.00% and is based on 52 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

89.18%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Michael Bley 8/10 3373 days 100%
Lucie Revay 10/10 3412 days 98%
Philipp 9/10 3696 days 64%
Gerardo Furtado 10/10 3724 days 62%
Charlie Noon 10/10 3734 days 61%
David Schelensky 10/10 3736 days 60%
Henry Wichler 8/10 3737 days 59%
Ruven Rintelmann 10/10 3737 days 60%
Maria Brauherr 10/10 3739 days 60%
Tamara 8/10 3739 days 59%
Martina Cervenkova 10/10 3742 days 60%
Gessica 8/10 3831 days 48%
Cedrick Poirier 5/10 4224 days 0%
Franz Birkefeld 9/10 4417 days 45%
Sebastian Russell-Smits 10/10 4791 days 45%
Collacott 10/10 4817 days 45%
David Prendergast 7/10 5149 days 41%
Franziska & Katrin 8/10 5189 days 44%
Anika 9/10 5196 days 45%
Asha 9/10 5228 days 45%
Craig Hathaway 10/10 5502 days 45%
Jagiellowicz 10/10 5520 days 45%
Jason & Beth Berlin 9/10 5520 days 45%
Guult Ryan 10/10 5520 days 45%
Sandra 9/10 5539 days 45%
Dan Aldridge 10/10 5555 days 45%
Leslie Aldridge 10/10 5555 days 45%
Douggie 4/10 5714 days 25%
quazy 9/10 5899 days 45%
Annemiek and Rianne 8/10 5940 days 44%
deanlaw 10/10 5972 days 45%
lee 10/10 6141 days 45%
Debra-anne Signal 8/10 6171 days 44%
funfairguy 4/10 6202 days 25%
Alanna 8/10 6234 days 44%
Keith 7/10 6256 days 41%
Amanda Williams 10/10 6273 days 45%
Kay 8/10 6276 days 44%
Hironori 10/10 6309 days 45%
Helen 9/10 6345 days 45%
Paula 8/10 6358 days 44%
jfletch 9/10 6363 days 45%
Evelyn 10/10 6367 days 45%
jessandtom 8/10 6556 days 44%
Adam Richards 7/10 6613 days 41%
Yumi 10/10 6626 days 45%
Amy 10/10 6642 days 45%
Laurie 8/10 6644 days 44%
paulonline 8/10 6650 days 44%
Melissa Steedman 10/10 6672 days 45%
Laura Sutton 6/10 6673 days 37%
Tim 10/10 6673 days 45%
Karin Hell 9/10 6674 days 45%
Jane 10/10 6948 days 45%
Helen 8/10 6950 days 44%
Gillian 10/10 6961 days 45%
Rosemary 9/10 6962 days 45%
Peter 8/10 6962 days 44%
Susan 10/10 6983 days 45%
Mary 10/10 6984 days 45%
Nissa 8/10 6998 days 44%
Louise 8/10 7013 days 44%
KristianRye 8/10 7022 days 44%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The AJ Hackett Taupo experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.27% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 72 days. However the AJ Hackett Taupo experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The AJ Hackett Taupo experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.22%
198 -3.24%
199 -3.25%
200 -3.27%
201 -3.29%
202 -3.30%
203 -3.32%

Balancing Adjustment

1.65% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

88%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.