Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Epic Campers.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Epic Campers
Valid Reviews
52 Valid Reviews
The Epic Campers experience has a total of 56 reviews. There are 52 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 52 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 50 |
|
96% |
| 9/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
99.62% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Epic Campers valid reviews is 99.62% and is based on 52 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
99.61%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orielle Rowlands | 10/10 | 48 days | 99.63 | 100% | |
| Steven McBain | 10/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 97% | |
| Francisca Muller | 10/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 97% | |
| Aaron and Jesse from Canada | 10/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 97% | |
| Thibaut LE LOC'H | 10/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 97% | |
| Dan | 10/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 97% | |
| Kelly Ventress | 10/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 97% | |
| Matt Thomas | 10/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 97% | |
| Dessi Zaharieva | 10/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 97% | |
| Brianna | 10/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 97% | |
| Jessica Burke | 10/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 97% | |
| Alexander Kelly | 10/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 97% | |
| Jeff Mann | 9/10 | 109 days | 98.12 | 93% | |
| Jenna Collins | 10/10 | 109 days | 98.12 | 93% | |
| Luke | 10/10 | 109 days | 98.12 | 93% | |
| Sean | 10/10 | 109 days | 98.12 | 93% | |
| Adrienne | 10/10 | 109 days | 98.12 | 93% | |
| Judy Thomas | 10/10 | 109 days | 98.12 | 93% | |
| Alecia and Jasper | 10/10 | 109 days | 98.12 | 93% | |
| Anita & Rudy | 10/10 | 109 days | 98.12 | 93% | |
| Janelle and Dominic | 10/10 | 137 days | 97.03 | 89% | |
| Theresa | 10/10 | 137 days | 97.03 | 89% | |
| Harrison | 10/10 | 137 days | 97.03 | 89% | |
| Deb P. | 10/10 | 137 days | 97.03 | 89% | |
| Mary morgan | 10/10 | 137 days | 97.03 | 89% | |
| Lilla Goeser | 10/10 | 137 days | 97.03 | 89% | |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 137 days | 97.03 | 89% | |
| Brent | 10/10 | 168 days | 95.53 | 82% | |
| Richard Yates | 10/10 | 168 days | 95.53 | 82% | |
| Anna+Tom | 10/10 | 168 days | 95.53 | 82% | |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 168 days | 95.53 | 82% | |
| Caitriona & Gareth | 10/10 | 168 days | 95.53 | 82% | |
| Emma Collings | 10/10 | 168 days | 95.53 | 82% | |
| Robin Mathieson | 10/10 | 199 days | 93.72 | 74% | |
| Bob C | 10/10 | 199 days | 93.72 | 74% | |
| Dee Greig-Dunn | 10/10 | 199 days | 93.72 | 74% | |
| Daniel & Krissy | 10/10 | 199 days | 93.72 | 74% | |
| Reinhold Rittinger | 10/10 | 199 days | 93.72 | 74% | |
| Peter Dovey | 10/10 | 199 days | 93.72 | 74% | |
| Judith Marsman | 9/10 | 199 days | 93.72 | 74% | |
| Jaimy Louwaars | 10/10 | 199 days | 93.72 | 74% | |
| Helen Knight | 10/10 | 199 days | 93.72 | 74% | |
| Megan Miller | 10/10 | 199 days | 93.72 | 74% | |
| Wendy | 10/10 | 229 days | 91.69 | 65% | |
| Marguerite | 10/10 | 229 days | 91.69 | 65% | |
| Emanuela Ciupe | 10/10 | 229 days | 91.69 | 65% | |
| Eric | 10/10 | 229 days | 91.69 | 65% | |
| Thomas Gerz | 10/10 | 229 days | 91.69 | 65% | |
| Dan Larkin | 10/10 | 321 days | 83.67 | 30% | |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 352 days | 80.37 | 15% | |
| Zach Groves | 10/10 | 352 days | 80.37 | 15% | |
| Brett | 10/10 | 382 days | 76.88 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Epic Campers experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.08% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Epic Campers experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.
The Epic Campers experience has been adjusted for 4 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 1 | -0.02% |
| 2 | -0.04% |
| 3 | -0.06% |
| 4 | -0.08% |
| 5 | -0.10% |
| 6 | -0.12% |
| 7 | -0.14% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
99%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.