Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Epic Campers.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
90 Valid Reviews
The Epic Campers experience has a total of 96 reviews. There are 90 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 90 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Epic Campers valid reviews is 99.44% and is based on 90 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Lubos Tomsovsky||10/10||28 days||99.88||100%|
|Emily Aras||10/10||28 days||99.88||100%|
|Taylor & Alison V.||10/10||28 days||99.88||100%|
|Markus Tanner||10/10||59 days||99.45||99%|
|Elyssa Quinton||10/10||59 days||99.45||99%|
|Roland & Julie Azor||10/10||90 days||98.72||98%|
|Connor & Natalia||10/10||90 days||98.72||98%|
|Lorna Ferlisi||10/10||90 days||98.72||98%|
|joel dawson||10/10||120 days||97.72||97%|
|Patrick and Linda||10/10||120 days||97.72||97%|
|George Pye||9/10||120 days||97.72||97%|
|Roman Parak||10/10||120 days||97.72||97%|
|Emil Halvorsrud||10/10||120 days||97.72||97%|
|Evan Reesor||10/10||120 days||97.72||97%|
|Yacob Kial||10/10||120 days||97.72||97%|
|Jennifer Morris||10/10||120 days||97.72||97%|
|Budd Nicholson||10/10||120 days||97.72||97%|
|Francis Beaudet||10/10||151 days||96.39||94%|
|Camila & Cory||10/10||151 days||96.39||94%|
|Maarten Mullens||10/10||151 days||96.39||94%|
|Sander Palmqvist||10/10||151 days||96.39||94%|
|Jemima and Sam||10/10||243 days||90.64||85%|
|Léa & Manu||10/10||243 days||90.64||85%|
|ellie booker||10/10||243 days||90.64||85%|
|Elise Billings||9/10||273 days||88.19||81%|
|Orielle Rowlands||10/10||304 days||85.36||76%|
|Steven McBain||10/10||334 days||82.32||72%|
|Francisca Muller||10/10||334 days||82.32||72%|
|Aaron and Jesse from Canada||10/10||334 days||82.32||72%|
|Thibaut LE LOC'H||10/10||334 days||82.32||72%|
|Kelly Ventress||10/10||334 days||82.32||72%|
|Matt Thomas||10/10||334 days||82.32||72%|
|Dessi Zaharieva||10/10||334 days||82.32||72%|
|Jessica Burke||10/10||334 days||82.32||72%|
|Alexander Kelly||10/10||334 days||82.32||72%|
|Jeff Mann||9/10||365 days||78.89||66%|
|Jenna Collins||10/10||365 days||78.89||66%|
|Judy Thomas||10/10||365 days||78.89||66%|
|Alecia and Jasper||10/10||365 days||78.89||66%|
|Anita & Rudy||10/10||365 days||78.89||66%|
|Janelle and Dominic||10/10||393 days||75.53||61%|
|Deb P.||10/10||393 days||75.53||61%|
|Mary morgan||10/10||393 days||75.53||61%|
|Lilla Goeser||10/10||393 days||75.53||61%|
|emma hayden||10/10||393 days||75.53||61%|
|Richard Yates||10/10||424 days||71.51||54%|
|Caitriona & Gareth||10/10||424 days||71.51||54%|
|Emma Collings||10/10||424 days||71.51||54%|
|Robin Mathieson||10/10||455 days||67.19||47%|
|Bob C||10/10||455 days||67.19||47%|
|Dee Greig-Dunn||10/10||455 days||67.19||47%|
|Daniel & Krissy||10/10||455 days||67.19||47%|
|Reinhold Rittinger||10/10||455 days||67.19||47%|
|Peter Dovey||10/10||455 days||67.19||47%|
|Judith Marsman||9/10||455 days||67.19||47%|
|Jaimy Louwaars||10/10||455 days||67.19||47%|
|Helen Knight||10/10||455 days||67.19||47%|
|Megan Miller||10/10||455 days||67.19||47%|
|Emanuela Ciupe||10/10||485 days||62.73||40%|
|Thomas Gerz||10/10||485 days||62.73||40%|
|Dan Larkin||10/10||577 days||47.52||15%|
|Zach Groves||10/10||608 days||42.58||7%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Epic Campers does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.