G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Linksview Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Linksview Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
119 Valid Reviews
The Linksview Holiday Park experience has a total of 124 reviews. There are 119 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 119 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 119 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 107 |
|
90% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
| 8/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
97.65% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Linksview Holiday Park valid reviews is 97.65% and is based on 119 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
96.46%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judy | 10/10 | 17 days | 100% |
| Matthew | 10/10 | 47 days | 100% |
| Kyra De rooy | 10/10 | 139 days | 99% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 139 days | 99% |
| Anonymous | 8/10 | 320 days | 92% |
| Greg Caruso | 10/10 | 320 days | 94% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 320 days | 94% |
| olive | 10/10 | 351 days | 93% |
| Ellen | 9/10 | 382 days | 90% |
| 无名氏Y_3 | 10/10 | 412 days | 90% |
| Stephane | 10/10 | 473 days | 87% |
| Connie Buckley | 10/10 | 778 days | 64% |
| Victoria | 9/10 | 809 days | 61% |
| vabene1111 | 10/10 | 809 days | 61% |
| Sue | 10/10 | 992 days | 43% |
| Kristina | 6/10 | 1051 days | 32% |
| Enny Kraaijveld | 10/10 | 1082 days | 34% |
| BR | 1/10 | 1082 days | 12% |
| Florian S. | 10/10 | 1113 days | 32% |
| Alastair McQueen | 8/10 | 1113 days | 31% |
| Niels Wamsler-Jensen | 10/10 | 1143 days | 29% |
| Caolan Harvey | 10/10 | 1143 days | 29% |
| Genevieve Belliveau | 10/10 | 1143 days | 29% |
| CT | 10/10 | 1204 days | 25% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 1327 days | 17% |
| Taimi | 10/10 | 1388 days | 13% |
| Denise | 10/10 | 1388 days | 13% |
| Steph and Denise | 10/10 | 1447 days | 10% |
| Jenna | 10/10 | 1478 days | 9% |
| Karen Harper | 10/10 | 1661 days | 4% |
| Julie Sanderson | 10/10 | 1692 days | 3% |
| Nikki and B | 10/10 | 1722 days | 3% |
| Helen | 10/10 | 1722 days | 3% |
| Bethan | 10/10 | 1722 days | 3% |
| Ellie Richards | 10/10 | 1753 days | 2% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 1781 days | 2% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 1781 days | 2% |
| Johnwnz | 10/10 | 1781 days | 2% |
| Emma | 10/10 | 1812 days | 2% |
| Matt | 10/10 | 1812 days | 2% |
| Hannah Shaw | 10/10 | 1812 days | 2% |
| Keybags | 10/10 | 1843 days | 2% |
| Raquel | 10/10 | 1843 days | 2% |
| ErinLouise | 9/10 | 1843 days | 2% |
| Gemma | 10/10 | 1904 days | 2% |
| Abi | 10/10 | 1904 days | 2% |
| Jane & Peter | 10/10 | 1934 days | 2% |
| Emma | 10/10 | 1965 days | 2% |
| Rewa Pompey | 10/10 | 1965 days | 2% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 1965 days | 2% |
| Boardwalk Blss | 10/10 | 1996 days | 2% |
| Anna Swain | 8/10 | 2026 days | 2% |
| Joep Smits | 10/10 | 2118 days | 1% |
| Andrew Dickson | 10/10 | 2118 days | 1% |
| AC Koopal | 10/10 | 2118 days | 1% |
| Diane SG | 10/10 | 2118 days | 1% |
| Louise & Tom | 10/10 | 2147 days | 1% |
| Stefano | 10/10 | 2147 days | 1% |
| sara hollander | 10/10 | 2178 days | 1% |
| Anna-Lena | 10/10 | 2178 days | 1% |
| Phoebe | 10/10 | 2209 days | 1% |
| Rhianne & Rich | 10/10 | 2209 days | 1% |
| David and zoe | 10/10 | 2209 days | 1% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 2209 days | 1% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 2209 days | 1% |
| Beverley | 10/10 | 2239 days | 1% |
| Rasmus | 10/10 | 2239 days | 1% |
| A&E | 10/10 | 2239 days | 1% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 2239 days | 1% |
| Kenneth Richter | 10/10 | 2239 days | 1% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 2239 days | 1% |
| Judy | 10/10 | 2239 days | 1% |
| John | 10/10 | 2239 days | 1% |
| Laura Ridout | 10/10 | 2239 days | 1% |
| Robert G | 10/10 | 2239 days | 1% |
| Willi | 10/10 | 2239 days | 1% |
| Alex S | 10/10 | 2270 days | 1% |
| Katharina and Tom | 10/10 | 2270 days | 1% |
| Elise B | 10/10 | 2331 days | 1% |
| Silvia Andorra | 10/10 | 2331 days | 1% |
| Ruud and Susan | 10/10 | 2362 days | 1% |
| Helen | 10/10 | 2362 days | 1% |
| Charlotte | 10/10 | 2392 days | 1% |
| Christa | 10/10 | 2392 days | 1% |
| FamilyOfFourFromDenmark | 10/10 | 2453 days | 1% |
| Jen | 10/10 | 2453 days | 1% |
| Pip - UK | 10/10 | 2484 days | 1% |
| becs42 | 10/10 | 2484 days | 1% |
| Federico | 10/10 | 2484 days | 1% |
| Volker | 10/10 | 2484 days | 1% |
| Eva & Florian | 10/10 | 2484 days | 1% |
| Erik Bendtsen | 10/10 | 2484 days | 1% |
| p Schwartz | 10/10 | 2512 days | 1% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 2512 days | 1% |
| Maud | 10/10 | 2543 days | 1% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 2543 days | 1% |
| Nadja Kampfhenkel | 8/10 | 2543 days | 0% |
| Andy | 10/10 | 2543 days | 1% |
| Jorja | 10/10 | 2543 days | 1% |
| Campbell watt | 10/10 | 2543 days | 1% |
| Megan | 10/10 | 2574 days | 0% |
| Arne | 9/10 | 2574 days | 0% |
| Dirk | 10/10 | 2574 days | 0% |
| Sunny | 10/10 | 2604 days | 0% |
| Jakob Simons | 10/10 | 2604 days | 0% |
| Gary | 10/10 | 2604 days | 0% |
| Audiomigo | 8/10 | 2604 days | 0% |
| Grizzly Girl | 10/10 | 2635 days | 0% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 2635 days | 0% |
| Soenke and Christina | 10/10 | 2635 days | 0% |
| Emmy and Laurie | 9/10 | 2635 days | 0% |
| TT Tang | 10/10 | 2635 days | 0% |
| Pete | 10/10 | 2665 days | 0% |
| Baizurah and Friends | 10/10 | 2665 days | 0% |
| Cassie | 10/10 | 2665 days | 0% |
| Theresa Low | 10/10 | 2671 days | -1% |
| Theresa | 10/10 | 2696 days | 0% |
| Cindy & Henry | 10/10 | 2727 days | 0% |
| Justine | 10/10 | 2818 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Linksview Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.14% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Linksview Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Linksview Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 7 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 4 | -0.08% |
| 5 | -0.10% |
| 6 | -0.12% |
| 7 | -0.14% |
| 8 | -0.16% |
| 9 | -0.18% |
| 10 | -0.20% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.31% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
95%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.