Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Linksview Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Linksview Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
121 Valid Reviews
The Linksview Holiday Park experience has a total of 126 reviews. There are 121 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 121 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 121 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 108 |
|
89% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
5% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
97.52% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Linksview Holiday Park valid reviews is 97.52% and is based on 121 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
96.05%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emily | 8/10 | 70 days | 98% |
| Kevin Izzadeen | 10/10 | 70 days | 100% |
| Judy | 10/10 | 160 days | 99% |
| Matthew | 10/10 | 190 days | 98% |
| Kyra De rooy | 10/10 | 282 days | 96% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 282 days | 96% |
| Anonymous | 8/10 | 463 days | 86% |
| Greg Caruso | 10/10 | 463 days | 88% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 463 days | 88% |
| olive | 10/10 | 494 days | 86% |
| Ellen | 9/10 | 525 days | 83% |
| 无名氏Y_3 | 10/10 | 555 days | 82% |
| Stephane | 10/10 | 616 days | 78% |
| Connie Buckley | 10/10 | 921 days | 50% |
| Victoria | 9/10 | 952 days | 47% |
| vabene1111 | 10/10 | 952 days | 47% |
| Sue | 10/10 | 1135 days | 30% |
| Kristina | 6/10 | 1194 days | 22% |
| Enny Kraaijveld | 10/10 | 1225 days | 23% |
| BR | 1/10 | 1225 days | 8% |
| Florian S. | 10/10 | 1256 days | 21% |
| Alastair McQueen | 8/10 | 1256 days | 21% |
| Niels Wamsler-Jensen | 10/10 | 1286 days | 19% |
| Caolan Harvey | 10/10 | 1286 days | 19% |
| Genevieve Belliveau | 10/10 | 1286 days | 19% |
| CT | 10/10 | 1347 days | 16% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 1470 days | 10% |
| Taimi | 10/10 | 1531 days | 7% |
| Denise | 10/10 | 1531 days | 7% |
| Steph and Denise | 10/10 | 1590 days | 6% |
| Jenna | 10/10 | 1621 days | 5% |
| Karen Harper | 10/10 | 1804 days | 2% |
| Julie Sanderson | 10/10 | 1835 days | 2% |
| Nikki and B | 10/10 | 1865 days | 2% |
| Helen | 10/10 | 1865 days | 2% |
| Bethan | 10/10 | 1865 days | 2% |
| Ellie Richards | 10/10 | 1896 days | 2% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 1924 days | 2% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 1924 days | 2% |
| Johnwnz | 10/10 | 1924 days | 2% |
| Emma | 10/10 | 1955 days | 2% |
| Matt | 10/10 | 1955 days | 2% |
| Hannah Shaw | 10/10 | 1955 days | 2% |
| Keybags | 10/10 | 1986 days | 2% |
| Raquel | 10/10 | 1986 days | 2% |
| ErinLouise | 9/10 | 1986 days | 2% |
| Gemma | 10/10 | 2047 days | 2% |
| Abi | 10/10 | 2047 days | 2% |
| Jane & Peter | 10/10 | 2077 days | 2% |
| Emma | 10/10 | 2108 days | 2% |
| Rewa Pompey | 10/10 | 2108 days | 2% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 2108 days | 2% |
| Boardwalk Blss | 10/10 | 2139 days | 2% |
| Anna Swain | 8/10 | 2169 days | 2% |
| Joep Smits | 10/10 | 2261 days | 1% |
| Andrew Dickson | 10/10 | 2261 days | 1% |
| AC Koopal | 10/10 | 2261 days | 1% |
| Diane SG | 10/10 | 2261 days | 1% |
| Louise & Tom | 10/10 | 2290 days | 1% |
| Stefano | 10/10 | 2290 days | 1% |
| sara hollander | 10/10 | 2320 days | 1% |
| Anna-Lena | 10/10 | 2321 days | 1% |
| Phoebe | 10/10 | 2352 days | 1% |
| Rhianne & Rich | 10/10 | 2352 days | 1% |
| David and zoe | 10/10 | 2352 days | 1% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 2352 days | 1% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 2352 days | 1% |
| Beverley | 10/10 | 2382 days | 1% |
| Rasmus | 10/10 | 2382 days | 1% |
| A&E | 10/10 | 2382 days | 1% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 2382 days | 1% |
| Kenneth Richter | 10/10 | 2382 days | 1% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 2382 days | 1% |
| Judy | 10/10 | 2382 days | 1% |
| John | 10/10 | 2382 days | 1% |
| Laura Ridout | 10/10 | 2382 days | 1% |
| Robert G | 10/10 | 2382 days | 1% |
| Willi | 10/10 | 2382 days | 1% |
| Alex S | 10/10 | 2413 days | 1% |
| Katharina and Tom | 10/10 | 2413 days | 1% |
| Elise B | 10/10 | 2474 days | 1% |
| Silvia Andorra | 10/10 | 2474 days | 1% |
| Ruud and Susan | 10/10 | 2505 days | 1% |
| Helen | 10/10 | 2505 days | 1% |
| Charlotte | 10/10 | 2535 days | 1% |
| Christa | 10/10 | 2535 days | 1% |
| FamilyOfFourFromDenmark | 10/10 | 2596 days | 1% |
| Jen | 10/10 | 2596 days | 1% |
| Pip - UK | 10/10 | 2627 days | 1% |
| becs42 | 10/10 | 2627 days | 1% |
| Federico | 10/10 | 2627 days | 1% |
| Volker | 10/10 | 2627 days | 1% |
| Eva & Florian | 10/10 | 2627 days | 1% |
| Erik Bendtsen | 10/10 | 2627 days | 1% |
| p Schwartz | 10/10 | 2655 days | 1% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 2655 days | 1% |
| Maud | 10/10 | 2686 days | 1% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 2686 days | 1% |
| Nadja Kampfhenkel | 8/10 | 2686 days | 0% |
| Andy | 10/10 | 2686 days | 1% |
| Jorja | 10/10 | 2686 days | 1% |
| Campbell watt | 10/10 | 2686 days | 1% |
| Megan | 10/10 | 2717 days | 0% |
| Arne | 9/10 | 2717 days | 0% |
| Dirk | 10/10 | 2717 days | 0% |
| Sunny | 10/10 | 2747 days | 0% |
| Jakob Simons | 10/10 | 2747 days | 0% |
| Gary | 10/10 | 2747 days | 0% |
| Audiomigo | 8/10 | 2747 days | 0% |
| Grizzly Girl | 10/10 | 2778 days | 0% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 2778 days | 0% |
| Soenke and Christina | 10/10 | 2778 days | 0% |
| Emmy and Laurie | 9/10 | 2778 days | 0% |
| TT Tang | 10/10 | 2778 days | 0% |
| Pete | 10/10 | 2808 days | 0% |
| Baizurah and Friends | 10/10 | 2808 days | 0% |
| Cassie | 10/10 | 2808 days | 0% |
| Theresa Low | 10/10 | 2814 days | -1% |
| Theresa | 10/10 | 2839 days | 0% |
| Cindy & Henry | 10/10 | 2870 days | 0% |
| Justine | 10/10 | 2961 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Linksview Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.48% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 86 days. However the Linksview Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Linksview Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 33 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 30 | -0.44% |
| 31 | -0.45% |
| 32 | -0.47% |
| 33 | -0.48% |
| 34 | -0.50% |
| 35 | -0.51% |
| 36 | -0.52% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.38% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
96%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.