Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Linksview Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
121 Valid Reviews
The Linksview Holiday Park experience has a total of 126 reviews. There are 121 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 121 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 121 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 108 |
|
89% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
5% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
97.52% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Linksview Holiday Park valid reviews is 97.52% and is based on 121 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
96.24%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emily | 8/10 | 232 days | 98% |
| Kevin Izzadeen | 10/10 | 232 days | 100% |
| Judy | 10/10 | 322 days | 97% |
| Matthew | 10/10 | 352 days | 96% |
| Kyra De rooy | 10/10 | 444 days | 91% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 444 days | 91% |
| Anonymous | 8/10 | 625 days | 78% |
| Greg Caruso | 10/10 | 625 days | 80% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 625 days | 80% |
| olive | 10/10 | 656 days | 77% |
| Ellen | 9/10 | 687 days | 74% |
| 无名氏Y_3 | 10/10 | 717 days | 72% |
| Stephane | 10/10 | 778 days | 67% |
| Connie Buckley | 10/10 | 1083 days | 36% |
| Victoria | 9/10 | 1114 days | 33% |
| vabene1111 | 10/10 | 1114 days | 33% |
| Sue | 10/10 | 1297 days | 20% |
| Kristina | 6/10 | 1356 days | 13% |
| Enny Kraaijveld | 10/10 | 1387 days | 14% |
| BR | 1/10 | 1387 days | 4% |
| Florian S. | 10/10 | 1418 days | 13% |
| Alastair McQueen | 8/10 | 1418 days | 12% |
| Niels Wamsler-Jensen | 10/10 | 1448 days | 11% |
| Caolan Harvey | 10/10 | 1448 days | 11% |
| Genevieve Belliveau | 10/10 | 1448 days | 11% |
| CT | 10/10 | 1509 days | 9% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 1632 days | 5% |
| Taimi | 10/10 | 1693 days | 4% |
| Denise | 10/10 | 1693 days | 4% |
| Steph and Denise | 10/10 | 1752 days | 3% |
| Jenna | 10/10 | 1783 days | 3% |
| Karen Harper | 10/10 | 1966 days | 2% |
| Julie Sanderson | 10/10 | 1997 days | 2% |
| Nikki and B | 10/10 | 2027 days | 2% |
| Helen | 10/10 | 2027 days | 2% |
| Bethan | 10/10 | 2027 days | 2% |
| Ellie Richards | 10/10 | 2058 days | 2% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 2086 days | 2% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 2086 days | 2% |
| Johnwnz | 10/10 | 2086 days | 2% |
| Emma | 10/10 | 2117 days | 2% |
| Matt | 10/10 | 2117 days | 2% |
| Hannah Shaw | 10/10 | 2117 days | 2% |
| Keybags | 10/10 | 2148 days | 2% |
| Raquel | 10/10 | 2148 days | 2% |
| ErinLouise | 9/10 | 2148 days | 2% |
| Gemma | 10/10 | 2209 days | 2% |
| Abi | 10/10 | 2209 days | 2% |
| Jane & Peter | 10/10 | 2239 days | 2% |
| Emma | 10/10 | 2270 days | 2% |
| Rewa Pompey | 10/10 | 2270 days | 2% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 2270 days | 2% |
| Boardwalk Blss | 10/10 | 2301 days | 2% |
| Anna Swain | 8/10 | 2331 days | 2% |
| Joep Smits | 10/10 | 2423 days | 1% |
| Andrew Dickson | 10/10 | 2423 days | 1% |
| AC Koopal | 10/10 | 2423 days | 1% |
| Diane SG | 10/10 | 2423 days | 1% |
| Louise & Tom | 10/10 | 2452 days | 1% |
| Stefano | 10/10 | 2452 days | 1% |
| sara hollander | 10/10 | 2483 days | 1% |
| Anna-Lena | 10/10 | 2483 days | 1% |
| Phoebe | 10/10 | 2514 days | 1% |
| Rhianne & Rich | 10/10 | 2514 days | 1% |
| David and zoe | 10/10 | 2514 days | 1% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 2514 days | 1% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 2514 days | 1% |
| Beverley | 10/10 | 2544 days | 1% |
| Rasmus | 10/10 | 2544 days | 1% |
| A&E | 10/10 | 2544 days | 1% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 2544 days | 1% |
| Kenneth Richter | 10/10 | 2544 days | 1% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 2544 days | 1% |
| Judy | 10/10 | 2544 days | 1% |
| John | 10/10 | 2544 days | 1% |
| Laura Ridout | 10/10 | 2544 days | 1% |
| Robert G | 10/10 | 2544 days | 1% |
| Willi | 10/10 | 2544 days | 1% |
| Alex S | 10/10 | 2575 days | 1% |
| Katharina and Tom | 10/10 | 2575 days | 1% |
| Elise B | 10/10 | 2636 days | 1% |
| Silvia Andorra | 10/10 | 2636 days | 1% |
| Ruud and Susan | 10/10 | 2667 days | 1% |
| Helen | 10/10 | 2667 days | 1% |
| Charlotte | 10/10 | 2697 days | 1% |
| Christa | 10/10 | 2697 days | 1% |
| FamilyOfFourFromDenmark | 10/10 | 2758 days | 1% |
| Jen | 10/10 | 2758 days | 1% |
| Pip - UK | 10/10 | 2789 days | 1% |
| becs42 | 10/10 | 2789 days | 1% |
| Federico | 10/10 | 2789 days | 1% |
| Volker | 10/10 | 2789 days | 1% |
| Eva & Florian | 10/10 | 2789 days | 1% |
| Erik Bendtsen | 10/10 | 2789 days | 1% |
| p Schwartz | 10/10 | 2817 days | 1% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 2817 days | 1% |
| Maud | 10/10 | 2848 days | 1% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 2848 days | 1% |
| Nadja Kampfhenkel | 8/10 | 2848 days | 1% |
| Andy | 10/10 | 2848 days | 1% |
| Jorja | 10/10 | 2848 days | 1% |
| Campbell watt | 10/10 | 2848 days | 1% |
| Megan | 10/10 | 2879 days | 1% |
| Arne | 9/10 | 2879 days | 0% |
| Dirk | 10/10 | 2879 days | 1% |
| Sunny | 10/10 | 2909 days | 0% |
| Jakob Simons | 10/10 | 2909 days | 0% |
| Gary | 10/10 | 2909 days | 0% |
| Audiomigo | 8/10 | 2909 days | 0% |
| Grizzly Girl | 10/10 | 2940 days | 0% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 2940 days | 0% |
| Soenke and Christina | 10/10 | 2940 days | 0% |
| Emmy and Laurie | 9/10 | 2940 days | 0% |
| TT Tang | 10/10 | 2940 days | 0% |
| Pete | 10/10 | 2970 days | 0% |
| Baizurah and Friends | 10/10 | 2970 days | 0% |
| Cassie | 10/10 | 2970 days | 0% |
| Theresa Low | 10/10 | 2976 days | -1% |
| Theresa | 10/10 | 3001 days | 0% |
| Cindy & Henry | 10/10 | 3032 days | 0% |
| Justine | 10/10 | 3123 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Linksview Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.55% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Linksview Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Linksview Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 195 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 192 | -3.49% |
| 193 | -3.51% |
| 194 | -3.53% |
| 195 | -3.55% |
| 196 | -3.57% |
| 197 | -3.59% |
| 198 | -3.60% |
| … | … |
0.67% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.