Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mad Campers.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
77 Valid Reviews
The Mad Campers experience has a total of 82 reviews. There are 77 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 58 |
|
75% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
5% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
97.01% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mad Campers valid reviews is 97.01% and is based on 77 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
97.76%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy | 10/10 | 374 days | 100% |
| Ada | 9/10 | 435 days | 96% |
| Zoe Shipley | 10/10 | 527 days | 91% |
| Leigh Buckingham | 10/10 | 832 days | 65% |
| Alex Marinets | 10/10 | 924 days | 55% |
| Cory Spencer | 10/10 | 985 days | 49% |
| Bobbie | 10/10 | 1046 days | 42% |
| Ace Metivier | 10/10 | 1166 days | 32% |
| Libby Simmonds | 9/10 | 1804 days | 4% |
| Diana | 10/10 | 1804 days | 4% |
| Franco Sabadini | 9/10 | 1835 days | 4% |
| louise peel | 10/10 | 1866 days | 4% |
| Brooke O'Connell | 10/10 | 2049 days | 4% |
| Ann Boekstegers | 10/10 | 2141 days | 4% |
| Kat Suddaby | 10/10 | 2170 days | 4% |
| Adam Mitchell | 10/10 | 2170 days | 4% |
| Alexander Ruhland | 10/10 | 2201 days | 4% |
| Silvere VERACRUZ | 8/10 | 2201 days | 4% |
| Lizzie Lacey-Brennan | 9/10 | 2232 days | 3% |
| Jonas Gemmel | 10/10 | 2232 days | 4% |
| Valerie LaCrosse | 10/10 | 2262 days | 3% |
| Laura Collins | 10/10 | 2323 days | 3% |
| Amandine CHATAIN | 9/10 | 2354 days | 3% |
| Justine Senée | 9/10 | 2354 days | 3% |
| Indra Prasetyo | 10/10 | 2446 days | 3% |
| SCOTT HASSLER | 9/10 | 2446 days | 3% |
| Summer Peterman | 10/10 | 2446 days | 3% |
| Lorrie Kaplan | 10/10 | 2476 days | 3% |
| Stephanie Hill | 10/10 | 2476 days | 3% |
| Will Johnson | 10/10 | 2476 days | 3% |
| Bob Bergman | 10/10 | 2507 days | 3% |
| Milena Tkotz | 10/10 | 2507 days | 3% |
| William Nash | 10/10 | 2507 days | 3% |
| Alan Whitlock | 10/10 | 2507 days | 3% |
| Sean Seguin | 10/10 | 2535 days | 3% |
| Chris Bollington | 8/10 | 2535 days | 3% |
| Sam Atkins | 10/10 | 2535 days | 3% |
| Laura Morley | 10/10 | 2566 days | 3% |
| Kristen Rodgers | 10/10 | 2566 days | 3% |
| fabien Lafond | 9/10 | 2566 days | 3% |
| Matthijs de Jong | 10/10 | 2566 days | 3% |
| Caroline Creekman | 10/10 | 2597 days | 3% |
| Julie Robinson | 10/10 | 2597 days | 3% |
| William Swann | 10/10 | 2597 days | 3% |
| Catherine Henry | 10/10 | 2597 days | 3% |
| Richard Arnot | 10/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Tety Kusuma Wardani Tety | 9/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Benjamin Becker | 10/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Marieke & Wieteke | 10/10 | 2658 days | 3% |
| Nurrin Akhyar Nurrinanuwar | 9/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| James Campos | 10/10 | 2719 days | 2% |
| Fernando & Andrea | 9/10 | 2719 days | 2% |
| Andrew Korson | 10/10 | 2750 days | 2% |
| jarren Verbeek | 10/10 | 2780 days | 2% |
| Hamish Wedd | 8/10 | 2841 days | 2% |
| María Casanova | 10/10 | 2841 days | 2% |
| Janine Shaw | 10/10 | 2872 days | 2% |
| Karine | 9/10 | 2872 days | 2% |
| Maria Sol Fresard Disselkoen | 10/10 | 2872 days | 2% |
| Logan | 10/10 | 2872 days | 2% |
| Nick | 10/10 | 2872 days | 2% |
| Sandi Fukumoto | 10/10 | 2900 days | 2% |
| Theo and Rachel | 10/10 | 2900 days | 2% |
| Peter & Vicki | 10/10 | 2900 days | 2% |
| BoRoTravel | 10/10 | 2900 days | 2% |
| Stefano Muratore | 10/10 | 2900 days | 2% |
| Jane | 10/10 | 2900 days | 2% |
| Rick Karsten | 10/10 | 2931 days | 2% |
| Joel McDowell | 10/10 | 2931 days | 2% |
| Rogier van Hei | 8/10 | 2931 days | 2% |
| Hayley Diakiw | 9/10 | 2992 days | 2% |
| LIZ WATKINS | 9/10 | 2992 days | 2% |
| Olli-Pekka Heinimäki | 10/10 | 2992 days | 2% |
| Sam Pillidge | 10/10 | 3053 days | 2% |
| Jason Longhos | 10/10 | 3053 days | 2% |
| Nakita | 10/10 | 3206 days | 1% |
| Charles E Wilber | 9/10 | 6249 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mad Campers experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-7.05% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 44 days. The Mad Campers experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
| Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| 0 | -3.00% |
| 1 | -2.63% |
| 2 | -1.50% |
| 3 | -0.38% |
| 4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mad Campers experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
0.91% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
This rating is about customer service and camper availability. It measures aspects of the customer journey that are often missing from online ratings. It includes performances based on: pre-booking communication, product availability and responsiveness to customer enquiries.
All metrics come from actual customer interactions.
Details are calculated daily from statistics over several years and merged with the score derived from customer reviews - to then form the final ranking score.
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.