Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mad Campers.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Nick Morrison
Rankers owner
Mad Campers
Valid Reviews
49 Valid Reviews
The Mad Campers experience has a total of 52 reviews. There are 49 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 38 |
|
78% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
16% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
6% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
97.14% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mad Campers valid reviews is 97.14% and is based on 49 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
97.34%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorrie Kaplan | 10/10 | 24 days | 99.91 | 100% | |
| Stephanie Hill | 10/10 | 24 days | 99.91 | 100% | |
| Will Johnson | 10/10 | 24 days | 99.91 | 100% | |
| Bob Bergman | 10/10 | 55 days | 99.52 | 100% | |
| Milena Tkotz | 10/10 | 55 days | 99.52 | 100% | |
| William Nash | 10/10 | 55 days | 99.52 | 100% | |
| Alan Whitlock | 10/10 | 55 days | 99.52 | 100% | |
| Sean Seguin | 10/10 | 83 days | 98.91 | 99% | |
| Chris Bollington | 8/10 | 83 days | 98.91 | 99% | |
| Laura Morley | 10/10 | 114 days | 97.94 | 98% | |
| Kristen Rodgers | 10/10 | 114 days | 97.94 | 98% | |
| fabien Lafond | 9/10 | 114 days | 97.94 | 98% | |
| Matthijs de Jong | 10/10 | 114 days | 97.94 | 98% | |
| Caroline Creekman | 10/10 | 145 days | 96.67 | 97% | |
| Julie Robinson | 10/10 | 145 days | 96.67 | 97% | |
| William Swann | 10/10 | 145 days | 96.67 | 97% | |
| Catherine Henry | 10/10 | 145 days | 96.67 | 97% | |
| Richard Arnot | 10/10 | 175 days | 95.15 | 95% | |
| Tety Kusuma Wardani Tety | 9/10 | 175 days | 95.15 | 95% | |
| Benjamin Becker | 10/10 | 175 days | 95.15 | 95% | |
| Marieke & Wieteke | 10/10 | 206 days | 93.28 | 93% | |
| Nurrin Akhyar Nurrinanuwar | 9/10 | 236 days | 91.17 | 91% | |
| James Campos | 10/10 | 267 days | 88.7 | 89% | |
| Fernando & Andrea | 9/10 | 267 days | 88.7 | 89% | |
| Andrew Korson | 10/10 | 298 days | 85.93 | 86% | |
| jarren Verbeek | 10/10 | 328 days | 82.95 | 83% | |
| Hamish Wedd | 8/10 | 389 days | 76.02 | 76% | |
| María Casanova | 10/10 | 389 days | 76.02 | 76% | |
| Janine Shaw | 10/10 | 420 days | 72.05 | 72% | |
| Karine | 9/10 | 420 days | 72.05 | 72% | |
| Maria Sol Fresard Disselkoen | 10/10 | 420 days | 72.05 | 72% | |
| Logan | 10/10 | 420 days | 72.05 | 72% | |
| Nick | 10/10 | 420 days | 72.05 | 72% | |
| Sandi Fukumoto | 10/10 | 448 days | 68.2 | 68% | |
| Theo and Rachel | 10/10 | 448 days | 68.2 | 68% | |
| Peter & Vicki | 10/10 | 448 days | 68.2 | 68% | |
| BoRoTravel | 10/10 | 448 days | 68.2 | 68% | |
| Stefano Muratore | 10/10 | 448 days | 68.2 | 68% | |
| Jane | 10/10 | 448 days | 68.2 | 68% | |
| Rick Karsten | 10/10 | 479 days | 63.64 | 63% | |
| Joel McDowell | 10/10 | 479 days | 63.64 | 63% | |
| Rogier van Hei | 8/10 | 479 days | 63.64 | 63% | |
| Hayley Diakiw | 9/10 | 540 days | 53.79 | 53% | |
| LIZ WATKINS | 9/10 | 540 days | 53.79 | 53% | |
| Olli-Pekka Heinimäki | 10/10 | 540 days | 53.79 | 53% | |
| Sam Pillidge | 10/10 | 601 days | 43.67 | 43% | |
| Jason Longhos | 10/10 | 601 days | 43.67 | 43% | |
| Nakita | 10/10 | 754 days | 23.43 | 22% | |
| Charles E Wilber | 9/10 | 3797 days | 1.3 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Mad Campers does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
97%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.