Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.87%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1539 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1539 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3059 days 23%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3091 days 22%
Matt Harris 9/10 3316 days 17%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3317 days 17%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3324 days 17%
Christian Krause 10/10 3324 days 17%
Philipp 8/10 3326 days 17%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3347 days 16%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3347 days 16%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3352 days 17%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3355 days 17%
Lennox 10/10 3356 days 16%
Philip Piel 10/10 3376 days 16%
Jonas 10/10 3376 days 16%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3378 days 16%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3383 days 14%
Hans 9/10 3408 days 15%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3408 days 15%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3429 days 15%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4064 days 1%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4092 days 0%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4092 days 1%
Jake Bell 9/10 4127 days 0%
Annika 6/10 4437 days 4%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4440 days 5%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4443 days 5%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4466 days 5%
Jens Moller 10/10 4791 days 6%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 4812 days 6%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 4814 days 5%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 4819 days 5%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 4821 days 5%
Asha 10/10 4858 days 6%
dally 10/10 5103 days 6%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5103 days 6%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5129 days 5%
carol50 10/10 5133 days 6%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5152 days 6%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5162 days 5%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5185 days 2%
Clamdine 9/10 5187 days 5%
Hull 10/10 5187 days 6%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5511 days 6%
Will Jemma 10/10 5542 days 6%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5549 days 5%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5552 days 6%
John-Paul 8/10 5557 days 5%
stroalki 9/10 5588 days 5%
biene 3/10 5603 days 1%
jamesg 9/10 5617 days 5%
Mille Winther 6/10 5630 days 4%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 5680 days 6%
Neil 10/10 5791 days 6%
michellew 8/10 5811 days 5%
BryonyS 10/10 5851 days 6%
KatieR 9/10 5861 days 5%
Sally477 10/10 5864 days 6%
Katy1 8/10 5865 days 5%
ElissaH 10/10 5865 days 6%
Paul 7/10 5866 days 5%
AnneliesK 9/10 5873 days 5%
Jon Li 10/10 5875 days 6%
EleanorL 10/10 5896 days 6%
VickiS 9/10 5896 days 5%
soccaplaya14 10/10 5903 days 6%
kiwibrit86 10/10 5907 days 6%
StefanieW 10/10 5913 days 6%
NinaH1 10/10 5913 days 6%
Noamiki 9/10 5925 days 5%
Michael 10/10 5927 days 6%
Alon 10/10 5928 days 6%
Dan 10/10 5928 days 6%
Sabrina 10/10 5929 days 6%
Kelly 10/10 5929 days 6%
Chris 10/10 5930 days 6%
swizzler 10/10 5933 days 6%
Lieke 9/10 5935 days 5%
Ans 10/10 5936 days 6%
Alan 10/10 5941 days 6%
Emory 8/10 5948 days 5%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 5953 days 5%
Evi 10/10 5968 days 6%
Christian 10/10 5981 days 6%
Tim 10/10 5983 days 6%
Ben 10/10 6004 days 6%
Clare 9/10 6030 days 5%
Chris 10/10 6038 days 6%
Jimmy 9/10 6061 days 5%
Charlotte 9/10 6074 days 5%
Fiona 9/10 6082 days 5%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6194 days 6%
L1z4rd 10/10 6194 days 6%
Mark 9/10 6233 days 5%
Joanne M 9/10 6239 days 5%
Anna 9/10 6240 days 5%
Julie 8/10 6243 days 5%
Claire 10/10 6249 days 6%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6249 days 5%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6250 days 5%
Laurie 8/10 6274 days 5%
Stephanie 10/10 6275 days 6%
Katharina 9/10 6275 days 5%
Maree 9/10 6276 days 5%
Orlaith 10/10 6276 days 6%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6279 days 6%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6303 days 6%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6303 days 5%
Tim 10/10 6303 days 6%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6306 days 6%
ranker_734 10/10 6306 days 6%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6337 days 5%
marion 9/10 6344 days 5%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6345 days 6%
Kevin 10/10 6348 days 6%
dieter 9/10 6350 days 5%
Pete 10/10 6352 days 6%
Orla 9/10 6353 days 5%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6355 days 6%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6465 days 6%
Sabine 9/10 6575 days 5%
Will 9/10 6579 days 5%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6584 days 5%
Elaine 10/10 6584 days 6%
Kitsu 10/10 6587 days 6%
Valerie 5/10 6590 days 3%
Janning 8/10 6599 days 5%
Kim Holland 10/10 6599 days 6%
Sean 10/10 6603 days 6%
Mary 10/10 6614 days 6%
PamWalter 10/10 6640 days 6%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.36% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 69 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.31%
198 -3.32%
199 -3.34%
200 -3.36%
201 -3.37%
202 -3.39%
203 -3.41%

Balancing Adjustment

0.93% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.