Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.45%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1400 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1400 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 2920 days 18%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 2952 days 18%
Matt Harris 9/10 3177 days 15%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3178 days 15%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3185 days 15%
Christian Krause 10/10 3185 days 15%
Philipp 8/10 3187 days 14%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3208 days 14%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3208 days 14%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3213 days 14%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3216 days 14%
Lennox 10/10 3217 days 14%
Philip Piel 10/10 3237 days 14%
Jonas 10/10 3237 days 14%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3239 days 14%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3244 days 13%
Hans 9/10 3269 days 13%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3269 days 13%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3290 days 13%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 3925 days 5%
Rhys Williams 7/10 3953 days 4%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 3953 days 5%
Jake Bell 9/10 3988 days 4%
Annika 6/10 4298 days 0%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4301 days 0%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4304 days 0%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4327 days 0%
Jens Moller 10/10 4652 days 6%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 4673 days 6%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 4675 days 6%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 4680 days 6%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 4682 days 6%
Asha 10/10 4719 days 6%
dally 10/10 4964 days 6%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 4964 days 6%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 4990 days 6%
carol50 10/10 4994 days 6%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5013 days 6%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5023 days 6%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5046 days 4%
Clamdine 9/10 5048 days 6%
Hull 10/10 5048 days 6%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5372 days 6%
Will Jemma 10/10 5403 days 6%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5410 days 6%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5413 days 6%
John-Paul 8/10 5418 days 6%
stroalki 9/10 5449 days 6%
biene 3/10 5464 days 3%
jamesg 9/10 5478 days 6%
Mille Winther 6/10 5491 days 5%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 5541 days 6%
Neil 10/10 5652 days 6%
michellew 8/10 5672 days 6%
BryonyS 10/10 5712 days 6%
KatieR 9/10 5722 days 6%
Sally477 10/10 5725 days 6%
Katy1 8/10 5726 days 6%
ElissaH 10/10 5726 days 6%
Paul 7/10 5727 days 5%
AnneliesK 9/10 5733 days 6%
Jon Li 10/10 5736 days 6%
EleanorL 10/10 5757 days 6%
VickiS 9/10 5757 days 6%
soccaplaya14 10/10 5763 days 6%
kiwibrit86 10/10 5767 days 6%
StefanieW 10/10 5774 days 6%
NinaH1 10/10 5774 days 6%
Noamiki 9/10 5786 days 6%
Michael 10/10 5787 days 6%
Alon 10/10 5788 days 6%
Dan 10/10 5788 days 6%
Sabrina 10/10 5790 days 6%
Kelly 10/10 5790 days 6%
Chris 10/10 5791 days 6%
swizzler 10/10 5793 days 6%
Lieke 9/10 5796 days 6%
Ans 10/10 5797 days 6%
Alan 10/10 5802 days 6%
Emory 8/10 5808 days 6%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 5814 days 6%
Evi 10/10 5829 days 6%
Christian 10/10 5842 days 6%
Tim 10/10 5844 days 6%
Ben 10/10 5864 days 6%
Clare 9/10 5890 days 6%
Chris 10/10 5899 days 6%
Jimmy 9/10 5921 days 6%
Charlotte 9/10 5934 days 6%
Fiona 9/10 5943 days 6%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6054 days 6%
L1z4rd 10/10 6054 days 6%
Mark 9/10 6094 days 6%
Joanne M 9/10 6100 days 6%
Anna 9/10 6101 days 6%
Julie 8/10 6104 days 6%
Claire 10/10 6110 days 6%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6110 days 6%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6111 days 6%
Laurie 8/10 6135 days 6%
Stephanie 10/10 6136 days 6%
Katharina 9/10 6136 days 6%
Maree 9/10 6137 days 6%
Orlaith 10/10 6137 days 6%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6140 days 6%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6164 days 6%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6164 days 6%
Tim 10/10 6164 days 6%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6167 days 6%
ranker_734 10/10 6167 days 6%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6198 days 6%
marion 9/10 6205 days 6%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6206 days 6%
Kevin 10/10 6209 days 6%
dieter 9/10 6211 days 6%
Pete 10/10 6213 days 6%
Orla 9/10 6214 days 6%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6216 days 6%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6326 days 6%
Sabine 9/10 6436 days 6%
Will 9/10 6440 days 6%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6445 days 6%
Elaine 10/10 6445 days 6%
Kitsu 10/10 6448 days 6%
Valerie 5/10 6451 days 4%
Janning 8/10 6460 days 6%
Kim Holland 10/10 6460 days 6%
Sean 10/10 6464 days 6%
Mary 10/10 6475 days 6%
PamWalter 10/10 6501 days 6%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.07% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -4.01%
198 -4.03%
199 -4.05%
200 -4.07%
201 -4.09%
202 -4.11%
203 -4.13%

Balancing Adjustment

0.95% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.