G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.33%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 2107 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 2107 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3627 days 24%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3659 days 22%
Matt Harris 9/10 3884 days 11%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3885 days 11%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3892 days 11%
Christian Krause 10/10 3892 days 11%
Philipp 8/10 3894 days 10%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3915 days 9%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3915 days 9%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3920 days 9%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3923 days 9%
Lennox 10/10 3924 days 9%
Philip Piel 10/10 3944 days 8%
Jonas 10/10 3944 days 8%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3946 days 8%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3951 days 6%
Hans 9/10 3976 days 6%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3976 days 6%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3997 days 5%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4632 days 11%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4660 days 10%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4660 days 12%
Jake Bell 9/10 4695 days 11%
Annika 6/10 5005 days 8%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 5008 days 11%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 5011 days 11%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 5034 days 11%
Jens Moller 10/10 5359 days 12%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 5380 days 12%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 5382 days 11%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 5387 days 11%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 5389 days 11%
Asha 10/10 5426 days 12%
dally 10/10 5671 days 12%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5671 days 12%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5697 days 11%
carol50 10/10 5701 days 12%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5720 days 12%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5730 days 11%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5753 days 3%
Clamdine 9/10 5755 days 11%
Hull 10/10 5755 days 12%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 6079 days 12%
Will Jemma 10/10 6110 days 12%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 6117 days 11%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 6120 days 12%
John-Paul 8/10 6125 days 11%
stroalki 9/10 6156 days 11%
biene 3/10 6171 days 0%
jamesg 9/10 6185 days 11%
Mille Winther 6/10 6198 days 8%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 6248 days 12%
Neil 10/10 6359 days 12%
michellew 8/10 6379 days 11%
BryonyS 10/10 6419 days 12%
KatieR 9/10 6429 days 11%
Sally477 10/10 6432 days 12%
Katy1 8/10 6433 days 11%
ElissaH 10/10 6433 days 12%
Paul 7/10 6434 days 10%
AnneliesK 9/10 6440 days 11%
Jon Li 10/10 6443 days 12%
EleanorL 10/10 6464 days 12%
VickiS 9/10 6464 days 11%
soccaplaya14 10/10 6471 days 12%
kiwibrit86 10/10 6474 days 12%
StefanieW 10/10 6481 days 12%
NinaH1 10/10 6481 days 12%
Noamiki 9/10 6493 days 11%
Michael 10/10 6495 days 12%
Alon 10/10 6495 days 12%
Dan 10/10 6495 days 12%
Sabrina 10/10 6497 days 12%
Kelly 10/10 6497 days 12%
Chris 10/10 6498 days 12%
swizzler 10/10 6500 days 12%
Lieke 9/10 6503 days 11%
Ans 10/10 6504 days 12%
Alan 10/10 6509 days 12%
Emory 8/10 6515 days 11%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 6521 days 11%
Evi 10/10 6536 days 12%
Christian 10/10 6549 days 12%
Tim 10/10 6551 days 12%
Ben 10/10 6572 days 12%
Clare 9/10 6598 days 11%
Chris 10/10 6606 days 12%
Jimmy 9/10 6628 days 11%
Charlotte 9/10 6641 days 11%
Fiona 9/10 6650 days 11%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6761 days 12%
L1z4rd 10/10 6761 days 12%
Mark 9/10 6801 days 11%
Joanne M 9/10 6807 days 11%
Anna 9/10 6808 days 11%
Julie 8/10 6811 days 11%
Claire 10/10 6817 days 12%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6817 days 11%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6818 days 11%
Laurie 8/10 6842 days 11%
Stephanie 10/10 6843 days 12%
Katharina 9/10 6843 days 11%
Maree 9/10 6844 days 11%
Orlaith 10/10 6844 days 12%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6847 days 12%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6871 days 12%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6871 days 11%
Tim 10/10 6871 days 12%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6874 days 12%
ranker_734 10/10 6874 days 12%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6905 days 11%
marion 9/10 6912 days 11%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6913 days 12%
Kevin 10/10 6916 days 12%
dieter 9/10 6918 days 11%
Pete 10/10 6920 days 12%
Orla 9/10 6921 days 11%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6923 days 12%
Jessica Callen 10/10 7033 days 12%
Sabine 9/10 7143 days 11%
Will 9/10 7147 days 11%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 7152 days 11%
Elaine 10/10 7152 days 12%
Kitsu 10/10 7155 days 12%
Valerie 5/10 7158 days 6%
Janning 8/10 7167 days 11%
Kim Holland 10/10 7167 days 12%
Sean 10/10 7171 days 12%
Mary 10/10 7182 days 12%
PamWalter 10/10 7208 days 12%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.95% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 47 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
… …
197 -3.89%
198 -3.91%
199 -3.93%
200 -3.95%
201 -3.97%
202 -3.99%
203 -4.01%
… …

Balancing Adjustment

1.09% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

90%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.