Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.39%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1906 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1906 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3426 days 31%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3458 days 29%
Matt Harris 9/10 3683 days 19%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3684 days 19%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3691 days 19%
Christian Krause 10/10 3691 days 19%
Philipp 8/10 3693 days 18%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3714 days 17%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3714 days 17%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3719 days 17%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3722 days 17%
Lennox 10/10 3723 days 17%
Philip Piel 10/10 3743 days 16%
Jonas 10/10 3743 days 16%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3745 days 16%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3750 days 14%
Hans 9/10 3775 days 15%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3775 days 14%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3796 days 14%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4431 days 10%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4459 days 9%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4459 days 11%
Jake Bell 9/10 4494 days 10%
Annika 6/10 4804 days 7%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4807 days 10%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4810 days 10%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4833 days 10%
Jens Moller 10/10 5158 days 11%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 5179 days 11%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 5181 days 10%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 5186 days 10%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 5188 days 10%
Asha 10/10 5225 days 11%
dally 10/10 5470 days 11%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5470 days 11%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5496 days 10%
carol50 10/10 5500 days 11%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5519 days 11%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5529 days 10%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5552 days 3%
Clamdine 9/10 5554 days 10%
Hull 10/10 5554 days 11%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5878 days 11%
Will Jemma 10/10 5909 days 11%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5916 days 10%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5919 days 11%
John-Paul 8/10 5924 days 10%
stroalki 9/10 5955 days 10%
biene 3/10 5970 days 0%
jamesg 9/10 5984 days 10%
Mille Winther 6/10 5997 days 7%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 6047 days 11%
Neil 10/10 6158 days 11%
michellew 8/10 6178 days 10%
BryonyS 10/10 6218 days 11%
KatieR 9/10 6228 days 10%
Sally477 10/10 6231 days 11%
Katy1 8/10 6232 days 10%
ElissaH 10/10 6232 days 11%
Paul 7/10 6233 days 9%
AnneliesK 9/10 6239 days 10%
Jon Li 10/10 6242 days 11%
EleanorL 10/10 6263 days 11%
VickiS 9/10 6263 days 10%
soccaplaya14 10/10 6270 days 11%
kiwibrit86 10/10 6273 days 11%
StefanieW 10/10 6280 days 11%
NinaH1 10/10 6280 days 11%
Noamiki 9/10 6292 days 10%
Michael 10/10 6293 days 11%
Alon 10/10 6294 days 11%
Dan 10/10 6294 days 11%
Sabrina 10/10 6296 days 11%
Kelly 10/10 6296 days 11%
Chris 10/10 6297 days 11%
swizzler 10/10 6299 days 11%
Lieke 9/10 6302 days 10%
Ans 10/10 6303 days 11%
Alan 10/10 6308 days 11%
Emory 8/10 6314 days 10%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 6320 days 10%
Evi 10/10 6335 days 11%
Christian 10/10 6348 days 11%
Tim 10/10 6350 days 11%
Ben 10/10 6370 days 11%
Clare 9/10 6396 days 10%
Chris 10/10 6405 days 11%
Jimmy 9/10 6427 days 10%
Charlotte 9/10 6440 days 10%
Fiona 9/10 6449 days 10%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6560 days 11%
L1z4rd 10/10 6560 days 11%
Mark 9/10 6600 days 10%
Joanne M 9/10 6606 days 10%
Anna 9/10 6607 days 10%
Julie 8/10 6610 days 10%
Claire 10/10 6616 days 11%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6616 days 10%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6617 days 10%
Laurie 8/10 6641 days 10%
Stephanie 10/10 6642 days 11%
Katharina 9/10 6642 days 10%
Maree 9/10 6643 days 10%
Orlaith 10/10 6643 days 11%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6646 days 11%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6670 days 11%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6670 days 10%
Tim 10/10 6670 days 11%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6673 days 11%
ranker_734 10/10 6673 days 11%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6704 days 10%
marion 9/10 6711 days 10%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6712 days 11%
Kevin 10/10 6715 days 11%
dieter 9/10 6717 days 10%
Pete 10/10 6719 days 11%
Orla 9/10 6720 days 10%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6722 days 11%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6832 days 11%
Sabine 9/10 6942 days 10%
Will 9/10 6946 days 10%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6951 days 10%
Elaine 10/10 6951 days 11%
Kitsu 10/10 6954 days 11%
Valerie 5/10 6957 days 5%
Janning 8/10 6966 days 10%
Kim Holland 10/10 6966 days 11%
Sean 10/10 6970 days 11%
Mary 10/10 6981 days 11%
PamWalter 10/10 7007 days 11%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.31% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 70 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.26%
198 -3.28%
199 -3.30%
200 -3.31%
201 -3.33%
202 -3.35%
203 -3.36%

Balancing Adjustment

0.99% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.