Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.40%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1885 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1885 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3405 days 31%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3437 days 30%
Matt Harris 9/10 3662 days 20%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3663 days 19%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3670 days 19%
Christian Krause 10/10 3670 days 19%
Philipp 8/10 3672 days 19%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3693 days 18%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3693 days 18%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3698 days 18%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3701 days 18%
Lennox 10/10 3702 days 18%
Philip Piel 10/10 3722 days 17%
Jonas 10/10 3722 days 17%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3724 days 17%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3729 days 15%
Hans 9/10 3754 days 15%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3754 days 15%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3775 days 15%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4410 days 10%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4438 days 9%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4438 days 10%
Jake Bell 9/10 4473 days 10%
Annika 6/10 4783 days 7%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4786 days 10%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4789 days 10%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4812 days 10%
Jens Moller 10/10 5137 days 10%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 5158 days 10%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 5160 days 10%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 5165 days 10%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 5167 days 10%
Asha 10/10 5204 days 10%
dally 10/10 5449 days 10%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5449 days 10%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5475 days 10%
carol50 10/10 5479 days 10%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5498 days 10%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5508 days 10%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5531 days 3%
Clamdine 9/10 5533 days 10%
Hull 10/10 5533 days 10%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5857 days 10%
Will Jemma 10/10 5888 days 10%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5895 days 10%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5898 days 10%
John-Paul 8/10 5903 days 10%
stroalki 9/10 5934 days 10%
biene 3/10 5949 days 0%
jamesg 9/10 5963 days 10%
Mille Winther 6/10 5976 days 7%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 6026 days 10%
Neil 10/10 6137 days 10%
michellew 8/10 6157 days 10%
BryonyS 10/10 6197 days 10%
KatieR 9/10 6207 days 10%
Sally477 10/10 6210 days 10%
Katy1 8/10 6211 days 10%
ElissaH 10/10 6211 days 10%
Paul 7/10 6212 days 9%
AnneliesK 9/10 6218 days 10%
Jon Li 10/10 6221 days 10%
EleanorL 10/10 6242 days 10%
VickiS 9/10 6242 days 10%
soccaplaya14 10/10 6249 days 10%
kiwibrit86 10/10 6252 days 10%
StefanieW 10/10 6259 days 10%
NinaH1 10/10 6259 days 10%
Noamiki 9/10 6271 days 10%
Michael 10/10 6273 days 10%
Alon 10/10 6273 days 10%
Dan 10/10 6273 days 10%
Sabrina 10/10 6275 days 10%
Kelly 10/10 6275 days 10%
Chris 10/10 6276 days 10%
swizzler 10/10 6278 days 10%
Lieke 9/10 6281 days 10%
Ans 10/10 6282 days 10%
Alan 10/10 6287 days 10%
Emory 8/10 6293 days 10%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 6299 days 10%
Evi 10/10 6314 days 10%
Christian 10/10 6327 days 10%
Tim 10/10 6329 days 10%
Ben 10/10 6350 days 10%
Clare 9/10 6376 days 10%
Chris 10/10 6384 days 10%
Jimmy 9/10 6406 days 10%
Charlotte 9/10 6419 days 10%
Fiona 9/10 6428 days 10%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6539 days 10%
L1z4rd 10/10 6539 days 10%
Mark 9/10 6579 days 10%
Joanne M 9/10 6585 days 10%
Anna 9/10 6586 days 10%
Julie 8/10 6589 days 10%
Claire 10/10 6595 days 10%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6595 days 10%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6596 days 10%
Laurie 8/10 6620 days 10%
Stephanie 10/10 6621 days 10%
Katharina 9/10 6621 days 10%
Maree 9/10 6622 days 10%
Orlaith 10/10 6622 days 10%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6625 days 10%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6649 days 10%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6649 days 10%
Tim 10/10 6649 days 10%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6652 days 10%
ranker_734 10/10 6652 days 10%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6683 days 10%
marion 9/10 6690 days 10%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6691 days 10%
Kevin 10/10 6694 days 10%
dieter 9/10 6696 days 10%
Pete 10/10 6698 days 10%
Orla 9/10 6699 days 10%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6701 days 10%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6811 days 10%
Sabine 9/10 6921 days 10%
Will 9/10 6925 days 10%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6930 days 10%
Elaine 10/10 6930 days 10%
Kitsu 10/10 6933 days 10%
Valerie 5/10 6936 days 5%
Janning 8/10 6945 days 10%
Kim Holland 10/10 6945 days 10%
Sean 10/10 6949 days 10%
Mary 10/10 6960 days 10%
PamWalter 10/10 6986 days 10%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.74% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.68%
198 -3.70%
199 -3.72%
200 -3.74%
201 -3.76%
202 -3.77%
203 -3.79%

Balancing Adjustment

1.05% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.