Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.43%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1845 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1845 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3365 days 40%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3397 days 39%
Matt Harris 9/10 3622 days 29%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3623 days 29%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3630 days 29%
Christian Krause 10/10 3630 days 29%
Philipp 8/10 3632 days 29%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3653 days 28%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3653 days 28%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3658 days 28%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3661 days 28%
Lennox 10/10 3662 days 28%
Philip Piel 10/10 3682 days 27%
Jonas 10/10 3682 days 27%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3684 days 27%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3689 days 25%
Hans 9/10 3714 days 26%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3714 days 25%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3735 days 25%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4370 days 0%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4398 days 18%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4398 days 20%
Jake Bell 9/10 4433 days 20%
Annika 6/10 4743 days 17%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4746 days 19%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4749 days 20%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4772 days 20%
Jens Moller 10/10 5097 days 20%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 5118 days 20%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 5120 days 20%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 5125 days 20%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 5127 days 19%
Asha 10/10 5164 days 20%
dally 10/10 5409 days 20%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5409 days 20%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5435 days 20%
carol50 10/10 5439 days 20%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5458 days 20%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5468 days 19%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5491 days 13%
Clamdine 9/10 5493 days 20%
Hull 10/10 5493 days 20%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5817 days 20%
Will Jemma 10/10 5848 days 20%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5855 days 20%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5858 days 20%
John-Paul 8/10 5863 days 19%
stroalki 9/10 5894 days 20%
biene 3/10 5909 days 11%
jamesg 9/10 5923 days 20%
Mille Winther 6/10 5936 days 17%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 5986 days 20%
Neil 10/10 6097 days 20%
michellew 8/10 6117 days 19%
BryonyS 10/10 6157 days 20%
KatieR 9/10 6167 days 20%
Sally477 10/10 6170 days 20%
Katy1 8/10 6171 days 19%
ElissaH 10/10 6171 days 20%
Paul 7/10 6172 days 18%
AnneliesK 9/10 6178 days 20%
Jon Li 10/10 6181 days 20%
EleanorL 10/10 6202 days 20%
VickiS 9/10 6202 days 20%
soccaplaya14 10/10 6209 days 20%
kiwibrit86 10/10 6212 days 20%
StefanieW 10/10 6219 days 20%
NinaH1 10/10 6219 days 20%
Noamiki 9/10 6231 days 20%
Michael 10/10 6233 days 20%
Alon 10/10 6233 days 20%
Dan 10/10 6233 days 20%
Sabrina 10/10 6235 days 20%
Kelly 10/10 6235 days 20%
Chris 10/10 6236 days 20%
swizzler 10/10 6238 days 20%
Lieke 9/10 6241 days 20%
Ans 10/10 6242 days 20%
Alan 10/10 6247 days 20%
Emory 8/10 6253 days 19%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 6259 days 20%
Evi 10/10 6274 days 20%
Christian 10/10 6287 days 20%
Tim 10/10 6289 days 20%
Ben 10/10 6310 days 20%
Clare 9/10 6336 days 20%
Chris 10/10 6344 days 20%
Jimmy 9/10 6367 days 20%
Charlotte 9/10 6379 days 20%
Fiona 9/10 6388 days 20%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6499 days 20%
L1z4rd 10/10 6500 days 20%
Mark 9/10 6539 days 20%
Joanne M 9/10 6545 days 20%
Anna 9/10 6546 days 20%
Julie 8/10 6549 days 19%
Claire 10/10 6555 days 20%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6555 days 20%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6556 days 20%
Laurie 8/10 6580 days 19%
Stephanie 10/10 6581 days 20%
Katharina 9/10 6581 days 20%
Maree 9/10 6582 days 20%
Orlaith 10/10 6582 days 20%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6585 days 20%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6609 days 20%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6609 days 20%
Tim 10/10 6609 days 20%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6612 days 20%
ranker_734 10/10 6612 days 20%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6643 days 19%
marion 9/10 6650 days 20%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6651 days 20%
Kevin 10/10 6654 days 20%
dieter 9/10 6656 days 20%
Pete 10/10 6658 days 20%
Orla 9/10 6659 days 20%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6661 days 20%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6771 days 20%
Sabine 9/10 6881 days 20%
Will 9/10 6885 days 20%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6890 days 20%
Elaine 10/10 6890 days 20%
Kitsu 10/10 6893 days 20%
Valerie 5/10 6896 days 15%
Janning 8/10 6905 days 19%
Kim Holland 10/10 6905 days 20%
Sean 10/10 6909 days 20%
Mary 10/10 6920 days 20%
PamWalter 10/10 6946 days 20%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.14% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 53 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -4.08%
198 -4.10%
199 -4.12%
200 -4.14%
201 -4.16%
202 -4.19%
203 -4.21%

Balancing Adjustment

1.10% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

90%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.