Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.37%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1966 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1966 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3486 days 29%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3518 days 27%
Matt Harris 9/10 3743 days 17%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3744 days 16%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3751 days 16%
Christian Krause 10/10 3751 days 16%
Philipp 8/10 3753 days 16%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3774 days 15%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3774 days 15%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3779 days 15%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3782 days 15%
Lennox 10/10 3783 days 15%
Philip Piel 10/10 3803 days 14%
Jonas 10/10 3803 days 14%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3805 days 14%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3810 days 12%
Hans 9/10 3835 days 12%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3835 days 12%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3856 days 12%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4491 days 11%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4519 days 9%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4519 days 11%
Jake Bell 9/10 4554 days 11%
Annika 6/10 4864 days 8%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4867 days 10%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4870 days 11%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4893 days 11%
Jens Moller 10/10 5218 days 11%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 5239 days 11%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 5241 days 11%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 5246 days 11%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 5248 days 10%
Asha 10/10 5285 days 11%
dally 10/10 5530 days 11%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5530 days 11%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5556 days 11%
carol50 10/10 5560 days 11%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5579 days 11%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5589 days 10%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5612 days 3%
Clamdine 9/10 5614 days 11%
Hull 10/10 5614 days 11%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5938 days 11%
Will Jemma 10/10 5969 days 11%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5976 days 11%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5979 days 11%
John-Paul 8/10 5984 days 10%
stroalki 9/10 6015 days 11%
biene 3/10 6030 days 0%
jamesg 9/10 6044 days 11%
Mille Winther 6/10 6057 days 8%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 6107 days 11%
Neil 10/10 6218 days 11%
michellew 8/10 6238 days 10%
BryonyS 10/10 6278 days 11%
KatieR 9/10 6288 days 11%
Sally477 10/10 6290 days 11%
Katy1 8/10 6292 days 10%
ElissaH 10/10 6292 days 11%
Paul 7/10 6293 days 9%
AnneliesK 9/10 6299 days 11%
Jon Li 10/10 6302 days 11%
EleanorL 10/10 6323 days 11%
VickiS 9/10 6323 days 11%
soccaplaya14 10/10 6329 days 11%
kiwibrit86 10/10 6333 days 11%
StefanieW 10/10 6340 days 11%
NinaH1 10/10 6340 days 11%
Noamiki 9/10 6352 days 11%
Michael 10/10 6353 days 11%
Alon 10/10 6354 days 11%
Dan 10/10 6354 days 11%
Sabrina 10/10 6356 days 11%
Kelly 10/10 6356 days 11%
Chris 10/10 6357 days 11%
swizzler 10/10 6359 days 11%
Lieke 9/10 6362 days 11%
Ans 10/10 6363 days 11%
Alan 10/10 6368 days 11%
Emory 8/10 6374 days 10%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 6380 days 11%
Evi 10/10 6395 days 11%
Christian 10/10 6408 days 11%
Tim 10/10 6410 days 11%
Ben 10/10 6430 days 11%
Clare 9/10 6456 days 11%
Chris 10/10 6465 days 11%
Jimmy 9/10 6487 days 11%
Charlotte 9/10 6500 days 11%
Fiona 9/10 6509 days 11%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6620 days 11%
L1z4rd 10/10 6620 days 11%
Mark 9/10 6660 days 11%
Joanne M 9/10 6666 days 11%
Anna 9/10 6667 days 11%
Julie 8/10 6670 days 10%
Claire 10/10 6676 days 11%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6676 days 11%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6677 days 11%
Laurie 8/10 6701 days 10%
Stephanie 10/10 6702 days 11%
Katharina 9/10 6702 days 11%
Maree 9/10 6703 days 11%
Orlaith 10/10 6703 days 11%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6706 days 11%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6730 days 11%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6730 days 11%
Tim 10/10 6730 days 11%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6733 days 11%
ranker_734 10/10 6733 days 11%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6764 days 10%
marion 9/10 6771 days 11%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6772 days 11%
Kevin 10/10 6775 days 11%
dieter 9/10 6777 days 11%
Pete 10/10 6779 days 11%
Orla 9/10 6780 days 11%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6782 days 11%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6892 days 11%
Sabine 9/10 7002 days 11%
Will 9/10 7006 days 11%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 7011 days 11%
Elaine 10/10 7011 days 11%
Kitsu 10/10 7014 days 11%
Valerie 5/10 7017 days 5%
Janning 8/10 7026 days 10%
Kim Holland 10/10 7026 days 11%
Sean 10/10 7030 days 11%
Mary 10/10 7041 days 11%
PamWalter 10/10 7067 days 11%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-2.14% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 119 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -2.11%
198 -2.12%
199 -2.13%
200 -2.14%
201 -2.15%
202 -2.16%
203 -2.17%

Balancing Adjustment

0.84% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

92%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.