Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.40%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1865 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1865 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3385 days 32%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3417 days 31%
Matt Harris 9/10 3642 days 20%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3643 days 20%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3650 days 20%
Christian Krause 10/10 3650 days 20%
Philipp 8/10 3652 days 19%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3673 days 19%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3673 days 19%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3678 days 19%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3681 days 19%
Lennox 10/10 3682 days 19%
Philip Piel 10/10 3702 days 18%
Jonas 10/10 3702 days 18%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3704 days 18%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3709 days 15%
Hans 9/10 3734 days 16%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3734 days 16%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3755 days 16%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4390 days 10%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4418 days 9%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4418 days 10%
Jake Bell 9/10 4453 days 10%
Annika 6/10 4763 days 7%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4766 days 10%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4769 days 10%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4792 days 10%
Jens Moller 10/10 5117 days 10%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 5138 days 10%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 5140 days 10%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 5145 days 10%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 5147 days 10%
Asha 10/10 5184 days 10%
dally 10/10 5429 days 10%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5429 days 10%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5455 days 10%
carol50 10/10 5459 days 10%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5478 days 10%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5488 days 10%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5511 days 2%
Clamdine 9/10 5513 days 10%
Hull 10/10 5513 days 10%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5837 days 10%
Will Jemma 10/10 5868 days 10%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5875 days 10%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5878 days 10%
John-Paul 8/10 5883 days 10%
stroalki 9/10 5914 days 10%
biene 3/10 5929 days 0%
jamesg 9/10 5943 days 10%
Mille Winther 6/10 5956 days 7%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 6006 days 10%
Neil 10/10 6117 days 10%
michellew 8/10 6137 days 10%
BryonyS 10/10 6177 days 10%
KatieR 9/10 6187 days 10%
Sally477 10/10 6190 days 10%
Katy1 8/10 6191 days 10%
ElissaH 10/10 6191 days 10%
Paul 7/10 6193 days 9%
AnneliesK 9/10 6199 days 10%
Jon Li 10/10 6201 days 10%
EleanorL 10/10 6222 days 10%
VickiS 9/10 6222 days 10%
soccaplaya14 10/10 6229 days 10%
kiwibrit86 10/10 6233 days 10%
StefanieW 10/10 6239 days 10%
NinaH1 10/10 6239 days 10%
Noamiki 9/10 6251 days 10%
Michael 10/10 6253 days 10%
Alon 10/10 6254 days 10%
Dan 10/10 6254 days 10%
Sabrina 10/10 6255 days 10%
Kelly 10/10 6255 days 10%
Chris 10/10 6256 days 10%
swizzler 10/10 6259 days 10%
Lieke 9/10 6262 days 10%
Ans 10/10 6263 days 10%
Alan 10/10 6268 days 10%
Emory 8/10 6274 days 10%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 6279 days 10%
Evi 10/10 6295 days 10%
Christian 10/10 6308 days 10%
Tim 10/10 6310 days 10%
Ben 10/10 6330 days 10%
Clare 9/10 6356 days 10%
Chris 10/10 6365 days 10%
Jimmy 9/10 6387 days 10%
Charlotte 9/10 6400 days 10%
Fiona 9/10 6409 days 10%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6520 days 10%
L1z4rd 10/10 6520 days 10%
Mark 9/10 6559 days 10%
Joanne M 9/10 6565 days 10%
Anna 9/10 6566 days 10%
Julie 8/10 6569 days 10%
Claire 10/10 6575 days 10%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6575 days 10%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6576 days 10%
Laurie 8/10 6600 days 10%
Stephanie 10/10 6601 days 10%
Katharina 9/10 6601 days 10%
Maree 9/10 6602 days 10%
Orlaith 10/10 6602 days 10%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6605 days 10%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6629 days 10%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6629 days 10%
Tim 10/10 6629 days 10%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6632 days 10%
ranker_734 10/10 6632 days 10%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6663 days 10%
marion 9/10 6670 days 10%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6671 days 10%
Kevin 10/10 6674 days 10%
dieter 9/10 6676 days 10%
Pete 10/10 6678 days 10%
Orla 9/10 6679 days 10%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6681 days 10%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6791 days 10%
Sabine 9/10 6901 days 10%
Will 9/10 6905 days 10%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6910 days 10%
Elaine 10/10 6910 days 10%
Kitsu 10/10 6913 days 10%
Valerie 5/10 6916 days 5%
Janning 8/10 6925 days 10%
Kim Holland 10/10 6925 days 10%
Sean 10/10 6929 days 10%
Mary 10/10 6940 days 10%
PamWalter 10/10 6966 days 10%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.02% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.96%
198 -3.98%
199 -4.00%
200 -4.02%
201 -4.04%
202 -4.06%
203 -4.08%

Balancing Adjustment

1.09% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

90%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.