Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.34%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 2086 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 2086 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3606 days 25%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3638 days 23%
Matt Harris 9/10 3863 days 12%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3864 days 12%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3871 days 11%
Christian Krause 10/10 3871 days 11%
Philipp 8/10 3873 days 11%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3894 days 10%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3894 days 10%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3899 days 10%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3902 days 10%
Lennox 10/10 3903 days 10%
Philip Piel 10/10 3923 days 9%
Jonas 10/10 3923 days 9%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3925 days 9%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3930 days 7%
Hans 9/10 3955 days 7%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3955 days 7%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3976 days 6%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4611 days 11%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4639 days 10%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4639 days 12%
Jake Bell 9/10 4674 days 11%
Annika 6/10 4984 days 8%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4987 days 11%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4990 days 11%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 5013 days 11%
Jens Moller 10/10 5338 days 12%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 5359 days 12%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 5361 days 11%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 5366 days 11%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 5368 days 11%
Asha 10/10 5405 days 12%
dally 10/10 5650 days 12%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5650 days 12%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5676 days 11%
carol50 10/10 5680 days 12%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5699 days 12%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5709 days 11%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5732 days 3%
Clamdine 9/10 5734 days 11%
Hull 10/10 5734 days 12%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 6058 days 12%
Will Jemma 10/10 6089 days 12%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 6096 days 11%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 6099 days 12%
John-Paul 8/10 6104 days 11%
stroalki 9/10 6135 days 11%
biene 3/10 6150 days 0%
jamesg 9/10 6164 days 11%
Mille Winther 6/10 6177 days 8%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 6227 days 12%
Neil 10/10 6338 days 12%
michellew 8/10 6358 days 11%
BryonyS 10/10 6398 days 12%
KatieR 9/10 6408 days 11%
Sally477 10/10 6411 days 12%
Katy1 8/10 6412 days 11%
ElissaH 10/10 6413 days 12%
Paul 7/10 6414 days 10%
AnneliesK 9/10 6420 days 11%
Jon Li 10/10 6422 days 12%
EleanorL 10/10 6443 days 12%
VickiS 9/10 6443 days 11%
soccaplaya14 10/10 6450 days 12%
kiwibrit86 10/10 6454 days 12%
StefanieW 10/10 6460 days 12%
NinaH1 10/10 6460 days 12%
Noamiki 9/10 6473 days 11%
Michael 10/10 6474 days 12%
Alon 10/10 6475 days 12%
Dan 10/10 6475 days 12%
Sabrina 10/10 6477 days 12%
Kelly 10/10 6477 days 12%
Chris 10/10 6478 days 12%
swizzler 10/10 6480 days 12%
Lieke 9/10 6483 days 11%
Ans 10/10 6484 days 12%
Alan 10/10 6489 days 12%
Emory 8/10 6495 days 11%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 6500 days 11%
Evi 10/10 6516 days 12%
Christian 10/10 6529 days 12%
Tim 10/10 6531 days 12%
Ben 10/10 6551 days 12%
Clare 9/10 6577 days 11%
Chris 10/10 6586 days 12%
Jimmy 9/10 6608 days 11%
Charlotte 9/10 6621 days 11%
Fiona 9/10 6630 days 11%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6741 days 12%
L1z4rd 10/10 6741 days 12%
Mark 9/10 6780 days 11%
Joanne M 9/10 6786 days 11%
Anna 9/10 6787 days 11%
Julie 8/10 6790 days 11%
Claire 10/10 6796 days 12%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6796 days 11%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6797 days 11%
Laurie 8/10 6821 days 11%
Stephanie 10/10 6822 days 12%
Katharina 9/10 6822 days 11%
Maree 9/10 6823 days 11%
Orlaith 10/10 6823 days 12%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6826 days 12%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6850 days 12%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6850 days 11%
Tim 10/10 6850 days 12%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6853 days 12%
ranker_734 10/10 6853 days 12%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6884 days 11%
marion 9/10 6891 days 11%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6892 days 12%
Kevin 10/10 6895 days 12%
dieter 9/10 6898 days 11%
Pete 10/10 6899 days 12%
Orla 9/10 6900 days 11%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6902 days 12%
Jessica Callen 10/10 7012 days 12%
Sabine 9/10 7122 days 11%
Will 9/10 7126 days 11%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 7131 days 11%
Elaine 10/10 7131 days 12%
Kitsu 10/10 7134 days 12%
Valerie 5/10 7137 days 6%
Janning 8/10 7146 days 11%
Kim Holland 10/10 7146 days 12%
Sean 10/10 7150 days 12%
Mary 10/10 7161 days 12%
PamWalter 10/10 7187 days 12%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.64% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
… …
197 -3.59%
198 -3.60%
199 -3.62%
200 -3.64%
201 -3.66%
202 -3.68%
203 -3.70%
… …

Balancing Adjustment

1.04% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.