Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.54%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1804 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1804 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3324 days 41%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3356 days 39%
Matt Harris 9/10 3581 days 30%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3582 days 30%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3589 days 30%
Christian Krause 10/10 3589 days 30%
Philipp 8/10 3591 days 30%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3612 days 29%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3612 days 29%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3617 days 29%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3620 days 29%
Lennox 10/10 3621 days 29%
Philip Piel 10/10 3641 days 28%
Jonas 10/10 3641 days 28%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3643 days 28%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3648 days 26%
Hans 9/10 3673 days 27%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3673 days 26%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3694 days 26%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4329 days 1%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4357 days 0%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4357 days 0%
Jake Bell 9/10 4392 days 19%
Annika 6/10 4702 days 16%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4705 days 19%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4708 days 19%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4731 days 19%
Jens Moller 10/10 5056 days 19%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 5077 days 19%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 5079 days 19%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 5084 days 19%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 5086 days 19%
Asha 10/10 5123 days 19%
dally 10/10 5368 days 19%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5368 days 19%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5394 days 19%
carol50 10/10 5398 days 19%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5417 days 19%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5427 days 19%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5450 days 12%
Clamdine 9/10 5452 days 19%
Hull 10/10 5452 days 19%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5776 days 19%
Will Jemma 10/10 5807 days 19%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5814 days 19%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5817 days 19%
John-Paul 8/10 5822 days 19%
stroalki 9/10 5853 days 19%
biene 3/10 5868 days 10%
jamesg 9/10 5882 days 19%
Mille Winther 6/10 5895 days 16%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 5945 days 19%
Neil 10/10 6056 days 19%
michellew 8/10 6076 days 19%
BryonyS 10/10 6116 days 19%
KatieR 9/10 6126 days 19%
Sally477 10/10 6129 days 19%
Katy1 8/10 6130 days 19%
ElissaH 10/10 6131 days 19%
Paul 7/10 6132 days 18%
AnneliesK 9/10 6138 days 19%
Jon Li 10/10 6140 days 19%
EleanorL 10/10 6161 days 19%
VickiS 9/10 6161 days 19%
soccaplaya14 10/10 6168 days 19%
kiwibrit86 10/10 6172 days 19%
StefanieW 10/10 6178 days 19%
NinaH1 10/10 6178 days 19%
Noamiki 9/10 6191 days 19%
Michael 10/10 6192 days 19%
Alon 10/10 6193 days 19%
Dan 10/10 6193 days 19%
Sabrina 10/10 6195 days 19%
Kelly 10/10 6195 days 19%
Chris 10/10 6196 days 19%
swizzler 10/10 6198 days 19%
Lieke 9/10 6201 days 19%
Ans 10/10 6202 days 19%
Alan 10/10 6207 days 19%
Emory 8/10 6213 days 19%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 6218 days 19%
Evi 10/10 6234 days 19%
Christian 10/10 6247 days 19%
Tim 10/10 6249 days 19%
Ben 10/10 6269 days 19%
Clare 9/10 6295 days 19%
Chris 10/10 6304 days 19%
Jimmy 9/10 6326 days 19%
Charlotte 9/10 6339 days 19%
Fiona 9/10 6348 days 19%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6459 days 19%
L1z4rd 10/10 6459 days 19%
Mark 9/10 6498 days 19%
Joanne M 9/10 6504 days 19%
Anna 9/10 6505 days 19%
Julie 8/10 6508 days 19%
Claire 10/10 6514 days 19%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6514 days 19%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6515 days 19%
Laurie 8/10 6539 days 19%
Stephanie 10/10 6540 days 19%
Katharina 9/10 6540 days 19%
Maree 9/10 6541 days 19%
Orlaith 10/10 6541 days 19%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6544 days 19%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6568 days 19%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6568 days 19%
Tim 10/10 6568 days 19%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6571 days 19%
ranker_734 10/10 6571 days 19%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6602 days 19%
marion 9/10 6609 days 19%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6610 days 19%
Kevin 10/10 6613 days 19%
dieter 9/10 6616 days 19%
Pete 10/10 6617 days 19%
Orla 9/10 6618 days 19%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6620 days 19%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6730 days 19%
Sabine 9/10 6840 days 19%
Will 9/10 6844 days 19%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6849 days 19%
Elaine 10/10 6849 days 19%
Kitsu 10/10 6852 days 19%
Valerie 5/10 6855 days 14%
Janning 8/10 6864 days 19%
Kim Holland 10/10 6864 days 19%
Sean 10/10 6868 days 19%
Mary 10/10 6879 days 19%
PamWalter 10/10 6905 days 19%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.05% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.99%
198 -4.01%
199 -4.03%
200 -4.05%
201 -4.07%
202 -4.09%
203 -4.11%

Balancing Adjustment

1.07% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.