Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.43%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 1834 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 1834 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3354 days 40%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3386 days 39%
Matt Harris 9/10 3611 days 29%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3612 days 29%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3619 days 29%
Christian Krause 10/10 3619 days 29%
Philipp 8/10 3621 days 29%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3642 days 28%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3642 days 28%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3647 days 28%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3650 days 28%
Lennox 10/10 3651 days 28%
Philip Piel 10/10 3671 days 27%
Jonas 10/10 3671 days 27%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3673 days 27%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3678 days 25%
Hans 9/10 3703 days 26%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3703 days 25%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3724 days 25%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4359 days 0%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4387 days 18%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4387 days 19%
Jake Bell 9/10 4422 days 19%
Annika 6/10 4732 days 17%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4735 days 19%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4738 days 19%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4761 days 19%
Jens Moller 10/10 5086 days 19%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 5107 days 19%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 5109 days 19%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 5114 days 19%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 5116 days 19%
Asha 10/10 5153 days 19%
dally 10/10 5398 days 19%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5398 days 19%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5424 days 19%
carol50 10/10 5428 days 19%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5447 days 19%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5457 days 19%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5480 days 12%
Clamdine 9/10 5482 days 19%
Hull 10/10 5482 days 19%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5806 days 19%
Will Jemma 10/10 5837 days 19%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 5844 days 19%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 5847 days 19%
John-Paul 8/10 5852 days 19%
stroalki 9/10 5883 days 19%
biene 3/10 5898 days 10%
jamesg 9/10 5912 days 19%
Mille Winther 6/10 5925 days 17%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 5975 days 19%
Neil 10/10 6086 days 19%
michellew 8/10 6106 days 19%
BryonyS 10/10 6146 days 19%
KatieR 9/10 6156 days 19%
Sally477 10/10 6159 days 19%
Katy1 8/10 6160 days 19%
ElissaH 10/10 6161 days 19%
Paul 7/10 6162 days 18%
AnneliesK 9/10 6168 days 19%
Jon Li 10/10 6170 days 19%
EleanorL 10/10 6191 days 19%
VickiS 9/10 6191 days 19%
soccaplaya14 10/10 6198 days 19%
kiwibrit86 10/10 6202 days 19%
StefanieW 10/10 6208 days 19%
NinaH1 10/10 6208 days 19%
Noamiki 9/10 6220 days 19%
Michael 10/10 6222 days 19%
Alon 10/10 6223 days 19%
Dan 10/10 6223 days 19%
Sabrina 10/10 6224 days 19%
Kelly 10/10 6225 days 19%
Chris 10/10 6225 days 19%
swizzler 10/10 6228 days 19%
Lieke 9/10 6231 days 19%
Ans 10/10 6232 days 19%
Alan 10/10 6237 days 19%
Emory 8/10 6243 days 19%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 6248 days 19%
Evi 10/10 6264 days 19%
Christian 10/10 6277 days 19%
Tim 10/10 6279 days 19%
Ben 10/10 6299 days 19%
Clare 9/10 6325 days 19%
Chris 10/10 6334 days 19%
Jimmy 9/10 6356 days 19%
Charlotte 9/10 6369 days 19%
Fiona 9/10 6378 days 19%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6489 days 19%
L1z4rd 10/10 6489 days 19%
Mark 9/10 6528 days 19%
Joanne M 9/10 6534 days 19%
Anna 9/10 6535 days 19%
Julie 8/10 6538 days 19%
Claire 10/10 6544 days 19%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6544 days 19%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6545 days 19%
Laurie 8/10 6569 days 19%
Stephanie 10/10 6570 days 19%
Katharina 9/10 6570 days 19%
Maree 9/10 6571 days 19%
Orlaith 10/10 6571 days 19%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6574 days 19%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6598 days 19%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6598 days 19%
Tim 10/10 6598 days 19%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6601 days 19%
ranker_734 10/10 6601 days 19%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6632 days 19%
marion 9/10 6639 days 19%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6640 days 19%
Kevin 10/10 6643 days 19%
dieter 9/10 6646 days 19%
Pete 10/10 6647 days 19%
Orla 9/10 6648 days 19%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6650 days 19%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6760 days 19%
Sabine 9/10 6870 days 19%
Will 9/10 6874 days 19%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 6879 days 19%
Elaine 10/10 6879 days 19%
Kitsu 10/10 6882 days 19%
Valerie 5/10 6885 days 15%
Janning 8/10 6894 days 19%
Kim Holland 10/10 6894 days 19%
Sean 10/10 6898 days 19%
Mary 10/10 6909 days 19%
PamWalter 10/10 6935 days 19%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-4.15% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 51 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -4.09%
198 -4.11%
199 -4.13%
200 -4.15%
201 -4.18%
202 -4.20%
203 -4.22%

Balancing Adjustment

1.10% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

90%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.