G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Tandem Skydiving.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Taupo Tandem Skydiving

Valid Reviews

132 Valid Reviews

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 71
54%
9/10 40
30%
8/10 13
10%
7/10 3
2%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving valid reviews is 92.35% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

113 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 113 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 113 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 58
51%
9/10 36
32%
8/10 11
10%
7/10 3
3%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 1
1%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Tandem Skydiving face-to-face reviews is 91.77% and is based on 113 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.36%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Margaret 10/10 2006 days 100%
ILDIKO JUHASZ 10/10 2006 days 100%
Sandra Reynders 10/10 3526 days 27%
Jessica Nasstrom 10/10 3558 days 26%
Matt Harris 9/10 3783 days 15%
Nadja Guiliani 9/10 3784 days 15%
Laerke Soee 10/10 3791 days 15%
Christian Krause 10/10 3791 days 15%
Philipp 8/10 3793 days 14%
Matt Irwin 9/10 3814 days 13%
Tom Hurst 9/10 3814 days 13%
Luca Herzig 10/10 3819 days 13%
Natasha Harbinson 10/10 3822 days 13%
Lennox 10/10 3823 days 13%
Philip Piel 10/10 3843 days 12%
Jonas 10/10 3843 days 12%
Mikkel Palleson 10/10 3845 days 12%
Asborn Damgaard 7/10 3850 days 10%
Hans 9/10 3875 days 11%
Raviv Regev 8/10 3875 days 10%
Sophie Jenkins 10/10 3896 days 10%
Charlotte Casey 9/10 4531 days 11%
Rhys Williams 7/10 4559 days 9%
Ruth Watkin 10/10 4559 days 11%
Jake Bell 9/10 4594 days 11%
Annika 6/10 4904 days 8%
Courtney Quintrell 8/10 4907 days 11%
Neele & Philipp 9/10 4910 days 11%
Christina Rodewald 9/10 4933 days 11%
Jens Moller 10/10 5258 days 11%
Yves & Sylvia 10/10 5279 days 11%
Nelly & Lisa 9/10 5281 days 11%
Franziska & Katrin 9/10 5286 days 11%
Graham Swinyard 8/10 5288 days 11%
Asha 10/10 5325 days 11%
dally 10/10 5570 days 11%
Ryan_Packer 10/10 5570 days 11%
Stefanny Ling 9/10 5596 days 11%
carol50 10/10 5600 days 11%
Kate Morgan 10/10 5619 days 11%
Ann-Katrine & Sille 8/10 5629 days 11%
Leslie Aldridge 4/10 5652 days 3%
Clamdine 9/10 5654 days 11%
Hull 10/10 5654 days 11%
Family_Thomsen 10/10 5978 days 11%
Will Jemma 10/10 6009 days 11%
Martÿn Steenvoorden 9/10 6016 days 11%
Lisa Beauchemin 10/10 6019 days 11%
John-Paul 8/10 6024 days 11%
stroalki 9/10 6055 days 11%
biene 3/10 6070 days 0%
jamesg 9/10 6084 days 11%
Mille Winther 6/10 6097 days 8%
Matty Boombatty 10/10 6147 days 11%
Neil 10/10 6258 days 11%
michellew 8/10 6278 days 11%
BryonyS 10/10 6318 days 11%
KatieR 9/10 6328 days 11%
Sally477 10/10 6331 days 11%
Katy1 8/10 6332 days 11%
ElissaH 10/10 6332 days 11%
Paul 7/10 6334 days 9%
AnneliesK 9/10 6340 days 11%
Jon Li 10/10 6342 days 11%
EleanorL 10/10 6363 days 11%
VickiS 9/10 6363 days 11%
soccaplaya14 10/10 6370 days 11%
kiwibrit86 10/10 6374 days 11%
StefanieW 10/10 6380 days 11%
NinaH1 10/10 6380 days 11%
Noamiki 9/10 6392 days 11%
Michael 10/10 6394 days 11%
Alon 10/10 6395 days 11%
Dan 10/10 6395 days 11%
Sabrina 10/10 6396 days 11%
Kelly 10/10 6396 days 11%
Chris 10/10 6397 days 11%
swizzler 10/10 6400 days 11%
Lieke 9/10 6403 days 11%
Ans 10/10 6403 days 11%
Alan 10/10 6409 days 11%
Emory 8/10 6415 days 11%
Bonnie Turner 9/10 6420 days 11%
Evi 10/10 6436 days 11%
Christian 10/10 6449 days 11%
Tim 10/10 6451 days 11%
Ben 10/10 6471 days 11%
Clare 9/10 6497 days 11%
Chris 10/10 6505 days 11%
Jimmy 9/10 6528 days 11%
Charlotte 9/10 6541 days 11%
Fiona 9/10 6550 days 11%
Naki_Girlz 10/10 6661 days 11%
L1z4rd 10/10 6661 days 11%
Mark 9/10 6700 days 11%
Joanne M 9/10 6706 days 11%
Anna 9/10 6707 days 11%
Julie 8/10 6710 days 11%
Claire 10/10 6716 days 11%
Sarah Maudsley 9/10 6716 days 11%
Kelly Noirin 9/10 6717 days 11%
Laurie 8/10 6741 days 11%
Stephanie 10/10 6742 days 11%
Katharina 9/10 6742 days 11%
Maree 9/10 6743 days 11%
Orlaith 10/10 6743 days 11%
Marc Hertogs 10/10 6746 days 11%
Stephanie Jones 10/10 6770 days 11%
Laura Sutton 9/10 6770 days 11%
Tim 10/10 6770 days 11%
Aske Helbor 10/10 6773 days 11%
ranker_734 10/10 6773 days 11%
Martin Nigschit 8/10 6804 days 11%
marion 9/10 6811 days 11%
Michelle Orr 10/10 6812 days 11%
Kevin 10/10 6815 days 11%
dieter 9/10 6817 days 11%
Pete 10/10 6819 days 11%
Orla 9/10 6820 days 11%
Richard Kindgren 10/10 6822 days 11%
Jessica Callen 10/10 6932 days 11%
Sabine 9/10 7042 days 11%
Will 9/10 7046 days 11%
ShoshanaAbrams 9/10 7051 days 11%
Elaine 10/10 7051 days 11%
Kitsu 10/10 7054 days 11%
Valerie 5/10 7057 days 5%
Janning 8/10 7066 days 11%
Kim Holland 10/10 7066 days 11%
Sean 10/10 7070 days 11%
Mary 10/10 7081 days 11%
PamWalter 10/10 7107 days 11%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-2.09% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 123 days. However the Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Taupo Tandem Skydiving experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -2.06%
198 -2.07%
199 -2.08%
200 -2.09%
201 -2.10%
202 -2.12%
203 -2.13%

Balancing Adjustment

0.84% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

92%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.