G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
94 Valid Reviews
The Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour experience has a total of 99 reviews. There are 94 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 94 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
29% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
86.06% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour valid reviews is 86.06% and is based on 94 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
84.53%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia | 8/10 | 34 days | 100% |
| NomadAnna | 9/10 | 218 days | 98% |
| Will | 8/10 | 218 days | 97% |
| Felicia | 7/10 | 248 days | 91% |
| Pat | 8/10 | 338 days | 93% |
| Ro | 7/10 | 369 days | 87% |
| Milly Struthers | 8/10 | 460 days | 88% |
| Franzi | 9/10 | 552 days | 83% |
| Hazel | 9/10 | 613 days | 79% |
| Elise | 7/10 | 613 days | 74% |
| Emeline | 9/10 | 613 days | 79% |
| Pluto | 9/10 | 613 days | 79% |
| Max | 6/10 | 644 days | 66% |
| Rya | 10/10 | 673 days | 75% |
| Charlie | 9/10 | 704 days | 72% |
| Celia | 9/10 | 765 days | 67% |
| Phoebe | 6/10 | 765 days | 58% |
| Joe | 10/10 | 796 days | 64% |
| Anja | 9/10 | 826 days | 61% |
| Berthe | 9/10 | 857 days | 58% |
| Mo | 10/10 | 888 days | 55% |
| Nic | 8/10 | 918 days | 51% |
| Hugo | 8/10 | 949 days | 48% |
| Taylor Russell | 9/10 | 949 days | 48% |
| Sarah Lange | 8/10 | 949 days | 48% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 949 days | 49% |
| Zack | 10/10 | 979 days | 46% |
| Elizabeth Keller | 9/10 | 979 days | 45% |
| Sam | 10/10 | 979 days | 46% |
| MC | 8/10 | 1010 days | 42% |
| Roxie | 9/10 | 1010 days | 42% |
| Guenter | 8/10 | 1038 days | 39% |
| Mickey Smillie | 7/10 | 1038 days | 37% |
| Paige Hayward | 1/10 | 1100 days | 12% |
| Audrey & Jake | 8/10 | 1161 days | 29% |
| Lauren | 10/10 | 1161 days | 29% |
| Steven | 9/10 | 1191 days | 27% |
| Stefanie | 8/10 | 1222 days | 24% |
| Leyna H. | 8/10 | 1314 days | 18% |
| Jordan | 8/10 | 1344 days | 16% |
| Jazzy | 9/10 | 1375 days | 15% |
| Hugh | 9/10 | 1403 days | 13% |
| Tee | 10/10 | 1434 days | 12% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 1465 days | 10% |
| Gab | 8/10 | 1465 days | 10% |
| Natalie Perrett | 10/10 | 1648 days | 5% |
| Jackie | 10/10 | 1648 days | 5% |
| Bluescruize | 9/10 | 1799 days | 3% |
| Vanessa | 8/10 | 1799 days | 3% |
| Shannon | 10/10 | 1891 days | 3% |
| Ellefree | 10/10 | 1983 days | 3% |
| Gaël | 10/10 | 2134 days | 2% |
| Mona | 8/10 | 2165 days | 2% |
| Sabine | 9/10 | 2165 days | 2% |
| Backpack On Fire | 10/10 | 2165 days | 2% |
| Abraca | 10/10 | 2196 days | 2% |
| Rachelle | 8/10 | 2196 days | 2% |
| Lauren Cottle | 8/10 | 2226 days | 2% |
| Bert | 6/10 | 2226 days | 1% |
| Sean | 8/10 | 2257 days | 2% |
| Mike Sc | 9/10 | 2257 days | 2% |
| Suzanne J | 8/10 | 2287 days | 2% |
| Charlotte | 7/10 | 2349 days | 1% |
| Margaret Robinson | 10/10 | 2410 days | 2% |
| Jeff | 10/10 | 2440 days | 2% |
| Ryan | 9/10 | 2471 days | 1% |
| Matthias | 7/10 | 2499 days | 1% |
| Mona | 10/10 | 2499 days | 1% |
| Caro Del | 10/10 | 2499 days | 1% |
| Andy and Julia | 9/10 | 2499 days | 1% |
| Flatlanders | 8/10 | 2530 days | 1% |
| Dirk Taubner | 8/10 | 2561 days | 1% |
| Sharona de Bruijn | 10/10 | 2591 days | 1% |
| Jude | 10/10 | 2591 days | 1% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2591 days | 1% |
| Hyemin Park | 9/10 | 2622 days | 1% |
| john hambly | 9/10 | 2622 days | 1% |
| Kimberly | 10/10 | 2652 days | 1% |
| Amy | 7/10 | 2652 days | 1% |
| blogspot.westwardgo.com | 9/10 | 2683 days | 1% |
| Joseph | 8/10 | 2714 days | 1% |
| Antoine | 8/10 | 2714 days | 1% |
| Marcus Wyatt | 8/10 | 2775 days | 1% |
| Ryan | 8/10 | 2775 days | 1% |
| Juliane | 10/10 | 2775 days | 1% |
| Isabel van Megen | 10/10 | 2836 days | 1% |
| Fabian Hock | 8/10 | 2848 days | 1% |
| Shen Heng | 9/10 | 2909 days | 1% |
| richard maguire | 7/10 | 2938 days | 0% |
| Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 2950 days | 1% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 9/10 | 2953 days | 1% |
| Cathy Riley | 9/10 | 2954 days | 1% |
| Nathan Bosia | 10/10 | 3008 days | 0% |
| Silvana Pintao | 7/10 | 3136 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.92% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.