Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour

Valid Reviews

94 Valid Reviews

The Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour experience has a total of 99 reviews. There are 94 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 94 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 25
27%
9/10 29
31%
8/10 27
29%
7/10 9
10%
6/10 3
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

86.06% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour valid reviews is 86.06% and is based on 94 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

84.53%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Natalia 8/10 34 days 100%
NomadAnna 9/10 218 days 98%
Will 8/10 218 days 97%
Felicia 7/10 248 days 91%
Pat 8/10 338 days 93%
Ro 7/10 369 days 87%
Milly Struthers 8/10 460 days 88%
Franzi 9/10 552 days 83%
Hazel 9/10 613 days 79%
Elise 7/10 613 days 74%
Emeline 9/10 613 days 79%
Pluto 9/10 613 days 79%
Max 6/10 644 days 66%
Rya 10/10 673 days 75%
Charlie 9/10 704 days 72%
Celia 9/10 765 days 67%
Phoebe 6/10 765 days 58%
Joe 10/10 796 days 64%
Anja 9/10 826 days 61%
Berthe 9/10 857 days 58%
Mo 10/10 888 days 55%
Nic 8/10 918 days 51%
Hugo 8/10 949 days 48%
Taylor Russell 9/10 949 days 48%
Sarah Lange 8/10 949 days 48%
Paul 10/10 949 days 49%
Zack 10/10 979 days 46%
Elizabeth Keller 9/10 979 days 45%
Sam 10/10 979 days 46%
MC 8/10 1010 days 42%
Roxie 9/10 1010 days 42%
Guenter 8/10 1038 days 39%
Mickey Smillie 7/10 1038 days 37%
Paige Hayward 1/10 1100 days 12%
Audrey & Jake 8/10 1161 days 29%
Lauren 10/10 1161 days 29%
Steven 9/10 1191 days 27%
Stefanie 8/10 1222 days 24%
Leyna H. 8/10 1314 days 18%
Jordan 8/10 1344 days 16%
Jazzy 9/10 1375 days 15%
Hugh 9/10 1403 days 13%
Tee 10/10 1434 days 12%
Alex 9/10 1465 days 10%
Gab 8/10 1465 days 10%
Natalie Perrett 10/10 1648 days 5%
Jackie 10/10 1648 days 5%
Bluescruize 9/10 1799 days 3%
Vanessa 8/10 1799 days 3%
Shannon 10/10 1891 days 3%
Ellefree 10/10 1983 days 3%
Gaël 10/10 2134 days 2%
Mona 8/10 2165 days 2%
Sabine 9/10 2165 days 2%
Backpack On Fire 10/10 2165 days 2%
Abraca 10/10 2196 days 2%
Rachelle 8/10 2196 days 2%
Lauren Cottle 8/10 2226 days 2%
Bert 6/10 2226 days 1%
Sean 8/10 2257 days 2%
Mike Sc 9/10 2257 days 2%
Suzanne J 8/10 2287 days 2%
Charlotte 7/10 2349 days 1%
Margaret Robinson 10/10 2410 days 2%
Jeff 10/10 2440 days 2%
Ryan 9/10 2471 days 1%
Matthias 7/10 2499 days 1%
Mona 10/10 2499 days 1%
Caro Del 10/10 2499 days 1%
Andy and Julia 9/10 2499 days 1%
Flatlanders 8/10 2530 days 1%
Dirk Taubner 8/10 2561 days 1%
Sharona de Bruijn 10/10 2591 days 1%
Jude 10/10 2591 days 1%
Markus 9/10 2591 days 1%
Hyemin Park 9/10 2622 days 1%
john hambly 9/10 2622 days 1%
Kimberly 10/10 2652 days 1%
Amy 7/10 2652 days 1%
blogspot.westwardgo.com 9/10 2683 days 1%
Joseph 8/10 2714 days 1%
Antoine 8/10 2714 days 1%
Marcus Wyatt 8/10 2775 days 1%
Ryan 8/10 2775 days 1%
Juliane 10/10 2775 days 1%
Isabel van Megen 10/10 2836 days 1%
Fabian Hock 8/10 2848 days 1%
Shen Heng 9/10 2909 days 1%
richard maguire 7/10 2938 days 0%
Joe Trigg 9/10 2950 days 1%
Phil and Mel Rowson 9/10 2953 days 1%
Cathy Riley 9/10 2954 days 1%
Nathan Bosia 10/10 3008 days 0%
Silvana Pintao 7/10 3136 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.92% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

86%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.