Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour

Valid Reviews

96 Valid Reviews

The Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour experience has a total of 101 reviews. There are 96 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 96 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 25
26%
9/10 29
30%
8/10 29
30%
7/10 9
9%
6/10 3
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

85.94% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour valid reviews is 85.94% and is based on 96 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

83.92%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Natalia 8/10 171 days 100%
CEV 8/10 171 days 100%
Joaie 8/10 171 days 100%
NomadAnna 9/10 355 days 95%
Will 8/10 355 days 94%
Felicia 7/10 385 days 88%
Pat 8/10 475 days 88%
Ro 7/10 506 days 82%
Milly Struthers 8/10 597 days 81%
Franzi 9/10 689 days 74%
Hazel 9/10 750 days 69%
Elise 7/10 750 days 65%
Emeline 9/10 750 days 69%
Pluto 9/10 750 days 69%
Max 6/10 781 days 57%
Rya 10/10 810 days 64%
Charlie 9/10 841 days 60%
Celia 9/10 902 days 54%
Phoebe 6/10 902 days 47%
Joe 10/10 933 days 51%
Anja 9/10 963 days 48%
Berthe 9/10 994 days 44%
Mo 10/10 1025 days 42%
Nic 8/10 1055 days 38%
Hugo 8/10 1086 days 35%
Taylor Russell 9/10 1086 days 36%
Sarah Lange 8/10 1086 days 35%
Paul 10/10 1086 days 36%
Zack 10/10 1116 days 34%
Elizabeth Keller 9/10 1116 days 33%
Sam 10/10 1116 days 34%
MC 8/10 1147 days 30%
Roxie 9/10 1147 days 31%
Guenter 8/10 1175 days 28%
Mickey Smillie 7/10 1175 days 27%
Paige Hayward 1/10 1237 days 8%
Audrey & Jake 8/10 1298 days 20%
Lauren 10/10 1298 days 20%
Steven 9/10 1328 days 18%
Stefanie 8/10 1359 days 16%
Leyna H. 8/10 1451 days 11%
Jordan 8/10 1481 days 10%
Jazzy 9/10 1512 days 9%
Hugh 9/10 1540 days 8%
Tee 10/10 1571 days 7%
Alex 9/10 1602 days 6%
Gab 8/10 1602 days 6%
Natalie Perrett 10/10 1785 days 3%
Jackie 10/10 1785 days 3%
Bluescruize 9/10 1936 days 3%
Vanessa 8/10 1936 days 3%
Shannon 10/10 2028 days 3%
Ellefree 10/10 2120 days 3%
Gaël 10/10 2271 days 2%
Mona 8/10 2302 days 2%
Sabine 9/10 2302 days 2%
Backpack On Fire 10/10 2302 days 2%
Abraca 10/10 2333 days 2%
Rachelle 8/10 2333 days 2%
Lauren Cottle 8/10 2363 days 2%
Bert 6/10 2363 days 1%
Sean 8/10 2394 days 2%
Mike Sc 9/10 2394 days 2%
Suzanne J 8/10 2424 days 2%
Charlotte 7/10 2486 days 2%
Margaret Robinson 10/10 2547 days 2%
Jeff 10/10 2577 days 2%
Ryan 9/10 2608 days 2%
Matthias 7/10 2636 days 1%
Mona 10/10 2636 days 1%
Caro Del 10/10 2636 days 1%
Andy and Julia 9/10 2636 days 1%
Flatlanders 8/10 2667 days 1%
Dirk Taubner 8/10 2698 days 1%
Sharona de Bruijn 10/10 2728 days 1%
Jude 10/10 2728 days 1%
Markus 9/10 2728 days 1%
Hyemin Park 9/10 2759 days 1%
john hambly 9/10 2759 days 1%
Kimberly 10/10 2789 days 1%
Amy 7/10 2789 days 1%
blogspot.westwardgo.com 9/10 2820 days 1%
Joseph 8/10 2851 days 1%
Antoine 8/10 2851 days 1%
Marcus Wyatt 8/10 2912 days 1%
Ryan 8/10 2912 days 1%
Juliane 10/10 2912 days 1%
Isabel van Megen 10/10 2973 days 1%
Fabian Hock 8/10 2985 days 1%
Shen Heng 9/10 3046 days 1%
richard maguire 7/10 3075 days 0%
Joe Trigg 9/10 3087 days 1%
Phil and Mel Rowson 9/10 3090 days 1%
Cathy Riley 9/10 3091 days 1%
Nathan Bosia 10/10 3145 days 0%
Silvana Pintao 7/10 3273 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.05% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

86%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.