G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour
Valid Reviews
96 Valid Reviews
The Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour experience has a total of 101 reviews. There are 96 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 96 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 29 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
85.94% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour valid reviews is 85.94% and is based on 96 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
84.18%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia | 8/10 | 48 days | 100% |
| CEV | 8/10 | 48 days | 100% |
| Joaie | 8/10 | 48 days | 100% |
| NomadAnna | 9/10 | 232 days | 98% |
| Will | 8/10 | 232 days | 97% |
| Felicia | 7/10 | 262 days | 91% |
| Pat | 8/10 | 352 days | 93% |
| Ro | 7/10 | 383 days | 87% |
| Milly Struthers | 8/10 | 474 days | 87% |
| Franzi | 9/10 | 566 days | 82% |
| Hazel | 9/10 | 627 days | 78% |
| Elise | 7/10 | 627 days | 73% |
| Emeline | 9/10 | 627 days | 78% |
| Pluto | 9/10 | 627 days | 78% |
| Max | 6/10 | 658 days | 65% |
| Rya | 10/10 | 687 days | 74% |
| Charlie | 9/10 | 718 days | 71% |
| Celia | 9/10 | 779 days | 65% |
| Phoebe | 6/10 | 779 days | 57% |
| Joe | 10/10 | 810 days | 63% |
| Anja | 9/10 | 840 days | 60% |
| Berthe | 9/10 | 871 days | 56% |
| Mo | 10/10 | 902 days | 54% |
| Nic | 8/10 | 932 days | 49% |
| Hugo | 8/10 | 963 days | 46% |
| Taylor Russell | 9/10 | 963 days | 47% |
| Sarah Lange | 8/10 | 963 days | 46% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 963 days | 47% |
| Zack | 10/10 | 993 days | 44% |
| Elizabeth Keller | 9/10 | 993 days | 44% |
| Sam | 10/10 | 993 days | 44% |
| MC | 8/10 | 1024 days | 40% |
| Roxie | 9/10 | 1024 days | 41% |
| Guenter | 8/10 | 1052 days | 38% |
| Mickey Smillie | 7/10 | 1052 days | 36% |
| Paige Hayward | 1/10 | 1114 days | 12% |
| Audrey & Jake | 8/10 | 1175 days | 27% |
| Lauren | 10/10 | 1175 days | 28% |
| Steven | 9/10 | 1205 days | 26% |
| Stefanie | 8/10 | 1236 days | 23% |
| Leyna H. | 8/10 | 1328 days | 17% |
| Jordan | 8/10 | 1358 days | 16% |
| Jazzy | 9/10 | 1389 days | 14% |
| Hugh | 9/10 | 1417 days | 13% |
| Tee | 10/10 | 1448 days | 11% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 1479 days | 10% |
| Gab | 8/10 | 1479 days | 10% |
| Natalie Perrett | 10/10 | 1662 days | 4% |
| Jackie | 10/10 | 1662 days | 4% |
| Bluescruize | 9/10 | 1813 days | 3% |
| Vanessa | 8/10 | 1813 days | 3% |
| Shannon | 10/10 | 1905 days | 3% |
| Ellefree | 10/10 | 1997 days | 3% |
| Gaël | 10/10 | 2148 days | 2% |
| Mona | 8/10 | 2179 days | 2% |
| Sabine | 9/10 | 2179 days | 2% |
| Backpack On Fire | 10/10 | 2179 days | 2% |
| Abraca | 10/10 | 2210 days | 2% |
| Rachelle | 8/10 | 2210 days | 2% |
| Lauren Cottle | 8/10 | 2240 days | 2% |
| Bert | 6/10 | 2240 days | 1% |
| Sean | 8/10 | 2271 days | 2% |
| Mike Sc | 9/10 | 2271 days | 2% |
| Suzanne J | 8/10 | 2301 days | 2% |
| Charlotte | 7/10 | 2363 days | 1% |
| Margaret Robinson | 10/10 | 2424 days | 2% |
| Jeff | 10/10 | 2454 days | 2% |
| Ryan | 9/10 | 2485 days | 1% |
| Matthias | 7/10 | 2513 days | 1% |
| Mona | 10/10 | 2513 days | 1% |
| Caro Del | 10/10 | 2513 days | 1% |
| Andy and Julia | 9/10 | 2513 days | 1% |
| Flatlanders | 8/10 | 2544 days | 1% |
| Dirk Taubner | 8/10 | 2575 days | 1% |
| Sharona de Bruijn | 10/10 | 2605 days | 1% |
| Jude | 10/10 | 2605 days | 1% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2605 days | 1% |
| Hyemin Park | 9/10 | 2636 days | 1% |
| john hambly | 9/10 | 2636 days | 1% |
| Kimberly | 10/10 | 2666 days | 1% |
| Amy | 7/10 | 2666 days | 1% |
| blogspot.westwardgo.com | 9/10 | 2697 days | 1% |
| Joseph | 8/10 | 2728 days | 1% |
| Antoine | 8/10 | 2728 days | 1% |
| Marcus Wyatt | 8/10 | 2789 days | 1% |
| Ryan | 8/10 | 2789 days | 1% |
| Juliane | 10/10 | 2789 days | 1% |
| Isabel van Megen | 10/10 | 2850 days | 1% |
| Fabian Hock | 8/10 | 2862 days | 1% |
| Shen Heng | 9/10 | 2923 days | 1% |
| richard maguire | 7/10 | 2952 days | 0% |
| Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 2964 days | 1% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 9/10 | 2967 days | 1% |
| Cathy Riley | 9/10 | 2968 days | 1% |
| Nathan Bosia | 10/10 | 3022 days | 0% |
| Silvana Pintao | 7/10 | 3150 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.99% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.