G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour
Valid Reviews
96 Valid Reviews
The Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour experience has a total of 101 reviews. There are 96 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 96 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
26% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 29 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
85.94% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour valid reviews is 85.94% and is based on 96 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
84.18%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia | 8/10 | 49 days | 100% |
| CEV | 8/10 | 49 days | 100% |
| Joaie | 8/10 | 49 days | 100% |
| NomadAnna | 9/10 | 233 days | 98% |
| Will | 8/10 | 233 days | 97% |
| Felicia | 7/10 | 263 days | 91% |
| Pat | 8/10 | 353 days | 93% |
| Ro | 7/10 | 384 days | 87% |
| Milly Struthers | 8/10 | 475 days | 87% |
| Franzi | 9/10 | 567 days | 82% |
| Hazel | 9/10 | 628 days | 78% |
| Elise | 7/10 | 628 days | 73% |
| Emeline | 9/10 | 628 days | 78% |
| Pluto | 9/10 | 628 days | 78% |
| Max | 6/10 | 659 days | 65% |
| Rya | 10/10 | 688 days | 74% |
| Charlie | 9/10 | 719 days | 71% |
| Celia | 9/10 | 780 days | 65% |
| Phoebe | 6/10 | 780 days | 56% |
| Joe | 10/10 | 811 days | 63% |
| Anja | 9/10 | 841 days | 59% |
| Berthe | 9/10 | 872 days | 56% |
| Mo | 10/10 | 903 days | 54% |
| Nic | 8/10 | 933 days | 49% |
| Hugo | 8/10 | 964 days | 46% |
| Taylor Russell | 9/10 | 964 days | 47% |
| Sarah Lange | 8/10 | 964 days | 46% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 964 days | 47% |
| Zack | 10/10 | 994 days | 44% |
| Elizabeth Keller | 9/10 | 994 days | 44% |
| Sam | 10/10 | 994 days | 44% |
| MC | 8/10 | 1025 days | 40% |
| Roxie | 9/10 | 1025 days | 41% |
| Guenter | 8/10 | 1053 days | 38% |
| Mickey Smillie | 7/10 | 1053 days | 36% |
| Paige Hayward | 1/10 | 1115 days | 12% |
| Audrey & Jake | 8/10 | 1176 days | 27% |
| Lauren | 10/10 | 1176 days | 28% |
| Steven | 9/10 | 1206 days | 25% |
| Stefanie | 8/10 | 1237 days | 23% |
| Leyna H. | 8/10 | 1329 days | 17% |
| Jordan | 8/10 | 1359 days | 15% |
| Jazzy | 9/10 | 1390 days | 14% |
| Hugh | 9/10 | 1418 days | 13% |
| Tee | 10/10 | 1449 days | 11% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 1480 days | 10% |
| Gab | 8/10 | 1480 days | 10% |
| Natalie Perrett | 10/10 | 1663 days | 4% |
| Jackie | 10/10 | 1663 days | 4% |
| Bluescruize | 9/10 | 1814 days | 3% |
| Vanessa | 8/10 | 1814 days | 3% |
| Shannon | 10/10 | 1906 days | 3% |
| Ellefree | 10/10 | 1998 days | 3% |
| Gaël | 10/10 | 2149 days | 2% |
| Mona | 8/10 | 2180 days | 2% |
| Sabine | 9/10 | 2180 days | 2% |
| Backpack On Fire | 10/10 | 2180 days | 2% |
| Abraca | 10/10 | 2211 days | 2% |
| Rachelle | 8/10 | 2211 days | 2% |
| Lauren Cottle | 8/10 | 2241 days | 2% |
| Bert | 6/10 | 2241 days | 1% |
| Sean | 8/10 | 2272 days | 2% |
| Mike Sc | 9/10 | 2272 days | 2% |
| Suzanne J | 8/10 | 2302 days | 2% |
| Charlotte | 7/10 | 2364 days | 1% |
| Margaret Robinson | 10/10 | 2425 days | 2% |
| Jeff | 10/10 | 2455 days | 2% |
| Ryan | 9/10 | 2486 days | 1% |
| Matthias | 7/10 | 2514 days | 1% |
| Mona | 10/10 | 2514 days | 1% |
| Caro Del | 10/10 | 2514 days | 1% |
| Andy and Julia | 9/10 | 2514 days | 1% |
| Flatlanders | 8/10 | 2545 days | 1% |
| Dirk Taubner | 8/10 | 2576 days | 1% |
| Sharona de Bruijn | 10/10 | 2606 days | 1% |
| Jude | 10/10 | 2606 days | 1% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2606 days | 1% |
| Hyemin Park | 9/10 | 2637 days | 1% |
| john hambly | 9/10 | 2637 days | 1% |
| Kimberly | 10/10 | 2667 days | 1% |
| Amy | 7/10 | 2667 days | 1% |
| blogspot.westwardgo.com | 9/10 | 2698 days | 1% |
| Joseph | 8/10 | 2729 days | 1% |
| Antoine | 8/10 | 2729 days | 1% |
| Marcus Wyatt | 8/10 | 2790 days | 1% |
| Ryan | 8/10 | 2790 days | 1% |
| Juliane | 10/10 | 2790 days | 1% |
| Isabel van Megen | 10/10 | 2851 days | 1% |
| Fabian Hock | 8/10 | 2863 days | 1% |
| Shen Heng | 9/10 | 2924 days | 1% |
| richard maguire | 7/10 | 2953 days | 0% |
| Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 2965 days | 1% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 9/10 | 2968 days | 1% |
| Cathy Riley | 9/10 | 2969 days | 1% |
| Nathan Bosia | 10/10 | 3023 days | 0% |
| Silvana Pintao | 7/10 | 3151 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.99% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.