Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour

Valid Reviews

89 Valid Reviews

The Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour experience has a total of 94 reviews. There are 89 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 89 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 25
28%
9/10 28
31%
8/10 24
27%
7/10 8
9%
6/10 3
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
1%

86.40% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour valid reviews is 86.40% and is based on 89 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

85.79%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Ro 7/10 50 days 96%
Milly Struthers 8/10 141 days 100%
Franzi 9/10 233 days 99%
Hazel 9/10 294 days 97%
Elise 7/10 294 days 91%
Emeline 9/10 294 days 97%
Pluto 9/10 294 days 97%
Max 6/10 325 days 83%
Rya 10/10 354 days 96%
Charlie 9/10 385 days 93%
Celia 9/10 446 days 90%
Phoebe 6/10 446 days 78%
Joe 10/10 477 days 89%
Anja 9/10 507 days 87%
Berthe 9/10 538 days 85%
Mo 10/10 569 days 84%
Nic 8/10 599 days 80%
Hugo 8/10 630 days 78%
Taylor Russell 9/10 630 days 78%
Sarah Lange 8/10 630 days 78%
Paul 10/10 630 days 79%
Zack 10/10 660 days 77%
Elizabeth Keller 9/10 660 days 76%
Sam 10/10 660 days 77%
MC 8/10 691 days 73%
Roxie 9/10 691 days 74%
Guenter 8/10 719 days 70%
Mickey Smillie 7/10 719 days 67%
Paige Hayward 1/10 781 days 25%
Audrey & Jake 8/10 842 days 59%
Lauren 10/10 842 days 60%
Steven 9/10 872 days 57%
Stefanie 8/10 903 days 53%
Leyna H. 8/10 995 days 43%
Jordan 8/10 1025 days 40%
Jazzy 9/10 1056 days 38%
Hugh 9/10 1084 days 35%
Tee 10/10 1115 days 33%
Alex 9/10 1146 days 30%
Gab 8/10 1146 days 30%
Natalie Perrett 10/10 1329 days 17%
Jackie 10/10 1329 days 17%
Bluescruize 9/10 1480 days 9%
Vanessa 8/10 1480 days 9%
Shannon 10/10 1572 days 6%
Ellefree 10/10 1664 days 4%
Gaël 10/10 1815 days 2%
Mona 8/10 1846 days 2%
Sabine 9/10 1846 days 2%
Backpack On Fire 10/10 1846 days 2%
Abraca 10/10 1877 days 2%
Rachelle 8/10 1877 days 2%
Lauren Cottle 8/10 1907 days 2%
Bert 6/10 1907 days 1%
Sean 8/10 1938 days 2%
Mike Sc 9/10 1938 days 2%
Suzanne J 8/10 1968 days 2%
Charlotte 7/10 2030 days 2%
Margaret Robinson 10/10 2091 days 2%
Jeff 10/10 2121 days 2%
Ryan 9/10 2152 days 2%
Matthias 7/10 2180 days 1%
Mona 10/10 2180 days 2%
Caro Del 10/10 2180 days 2%
Andy and Julia 9/10 2180 days 2%
Flatlanders 8/10 2211 days 1%
Dirk Taubner 8/10 2242 days 1%
Sharona de Bruijn 10/10 2272 days 1%
Jude 10/10 2272 days 1%
Markus 9/10 2272 days 1%
Hyemin Park 9/10 2303 days 1%
john hambly 9/10 2303 days 1%
Kimberly 10/10 2333 days 1%
Amy 7/10 2333 days 1%
blogspot.westwardgo.com 9/10 2364 days 1%
Joseph 8/10 2395 days 1%
Antoine 8/10 2395 days 1%
Marcus Wyatt 8/10 2456 days 1%
Ryan 8/10 2456 days 1%
Juliane 10/10 2456 days 1%
Isabel van Megen 10/10 2517 days 1%
Fabian Hock 8/10 2529 days 1%
Shen Heng 9/10 2590 days 1%
richard maguire 7/10 2619 days 0%
Joe Trigg 9/10 2631 days 1%
Phil and Mel Rowson 9/10 2634 days 1%
Cathy Riley 9/10 2635 days 1%
Nathan Bosia 10/10 2689 days 0%
Silvana Pintao 7/10 2817 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Laurie Southwick Parade, Gulf Harbour does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.67% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

87%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.