Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
210 Valid Reviews
The Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 44 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 54 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience valid reviews is 80.05% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
189 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 189 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 189 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 34 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 51 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 50 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience face-to-face reviews is 80.11% and is based on 189 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.73%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Gaudenz Schnell | 4/10 | 2269 days | 100% |
Jessica Freeland | 6/10 | 3048 days | 81% |
Gretha | 10/10 | 3051 days | 96% |
Bjorn Nielsen | 8/10 | 3051 days | 94% |
Tome | 8/10 | 3074 days | 92% |
Pat Dye | 7/10 | 3334 days | 66% |
Martina Cervenkova | 9/10 | 3372 days | 68% |
Rachael and Nik | 8/10 | 3381 days | 66% |
Ebony Reed | 10/10 | 3427 days | 64% |
Elizabeth Nash | 8/10 | 3429 days | 62% |
Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 3671 days | 43% |
Blandine Giusti | 8/10 | 3692 days | 41% |
Damaris Mayer | 7/10 | 3742 days | 34% |
Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 3958 days | 19% |
Jean Curry | 9/10 | 4046 days | 12% |
Sanne Meijer | 8/10 | 4051 days | 11% |
Laura | 8/10 | 4062 days | 10% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 4064 days | 10% |
Joanna Mulcahy | 7/10 | 4065 days | 9% |
Libby | 9/10 | 4089 days | 8% |
Magdalene Zech | 7/10 | 4117 days | 5% |
Marco Newald | 7/10 | 4117 days | 5% |
Brian | 8/10 | 4188 days | 0% |
Silvia-Marie Bront | 10/10 | 4432 days | 27% |
Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 4433 days | 27% |
Selina Lott | 7/10 | 4437 days | 24% |
Guillot | 8/10 | 4440 days | 26% |
Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4456 days | 27% |
Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 4461 days | 27% |
Sascha Warnken | 10/10 | 4492 days | 27% |
Farrell Burns | 10/10 | 4492 days | 27% |
Eltel | 10/10 | 4767 days | 27% |
Be Groen | 6/10 | 4790 days | 21% |
Steven Hill | 7/10 | 4794 days | 24% |
Gillian Rowe | 10/10 | 4808 days | 27% |
Sig Schrattner | 10/10 | 4810 days | 27% |
Ozgla | 10/10 | 4811 days | 27% |
Simon Fry | 9/10 | 4812 days | 27% |
Christian Apfel | 4/10 | 4815 days | 12% |
Fleur & Nils | 6/10 | 4820 days | 21% |
David Blundell | 10/10 | 4822 days | 27% |
Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 4826 days | 26% |
Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 4896 days | 27% |
Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 4898 days | 26% |
Willem & Lilian | 4/10 | 4898 days | 12% |
Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 4905 days | 27% |
JadesWorld | 3/10 | 4919 days | 8% |
Guult Ryan | 10/10 | 5150 days | 27% |
Clemens | 8/10 | 5153 days | 26% |
Peter & Angela Brown | 10/10 | 5154 days | 27% |
Dave Patterson | 9/10 | 5155 days | 27% |
Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 5161 days | 24% |
Carolin | 5/10 | 5163 days | 17% |
Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 5168 days | 26% |
Ronald Lippett | 8/10 | 5169 days | 26% |
Nadja | 9/10 | 5179 days | 27% |
Ann Thompson | 9/10 | 5180 days | 27% |
F Horrex | 4/10 | 5183 days | 12% |
Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 5184 days | 27% |
Tanner | 10/10 | 5187 days | 27% |
J G Groeneveld | 3/10 | 5188 days | 8% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 5191 days | 27% |
Michelle Booty | 9/10 | 5191 days | 27% |
Rosey834 | 10/10 | 5254 days | 27% |
Papu | 8/10 | 5284 days | 26% |
Don Keith | 8/10 | 5516 days | 26% |
Silke Seemann | 8/10 | 5520 days | 26% |
Tony Killingray | 6/10 | 5532 days | 21% |
Klass | 9/10 | 5543 days | 27% |
Daryl Taylor | 8/10 | 5550 days | 26% |
Peter Ritu | 10/10 | 5563 days | 27% |
Ann Grandchamp | 10/10 | 5571 days | 27% |
warrenp | 9/10 | 5604 days | 27% |
pthreadgood | 8/10 | 5617 days | 26% |
dirkdev | 9/10 | 5623 days | 27% |
Antje & Sascha Häusler | 9/10 | 5623 days | 27% |
Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 5623 days | 27% |
Christine Suess | 7/10 | 5631 days | 24% |
MV Vroenhoven | 7/10 | 5634 days | 24% |
Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 5642 days | 26% |
KYinNZ | 3/10 | 5772 days | 8% |
Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 5833 days | 27% |
LowerD | 8/10 | 5857 days | 26% |
Robert Wolf | 6/10 | 5859 days | 21% |
Laura | 8/10 | 5860 days | 26% |
SBlake | 5/10 | 5868 days | 17% |
JuergenW | 9/10 | 5870 days | 27% |
BernardK | 9/10 | 5880 days | 27% |
david | 9/10 | 5880 days | 27% |
Anna | 9/10 | 5887 days | 27% |
Hayley | 10/10 | 5887 days | 27% |
Abigail | 9/10 | 5887 days | 27% |
Johannes Kerner | 2/10 | 5894 days | 4% |
IM | 8/10 | 5894 days | 26% |
AndyK | 7/10 | 5896 days | 24% |
SarahK | 7/10 | 5896 days | 24% |
FrancesG | 5/10 | 5896 days | 17% |
MartinG | 6/10 | 5896 days | 21% |
TatiamT | 6/10 | 5896 days | 21% |
Tom | 8/10 | 5896 days | 26% |
PellucoFrance | 6/10 | 5897 days | 21% |
John | 8/10 | 5899 days | 26% |
KonterR | 5/10 | 5904 days | 17% |
GH_Herrebrugh | 8/10 | 5904 days | 26% |
AbigailB | 5/10 | 5908 days | 17% |
Yunker | 9/10 | 5911 days | 27% |
Tessa | 10/10 | 5913 days | 27% |
Marianne | 8/10 | 5913 days | 26% |
MattEngland | 7/10 | 5918 days | 24% |
Simon | 10/10 | 5925 days | 27% |
Hazel | 9/10 | 5925 days | 27% |
Amy | 10/10 | 5925 days | 27% |
Hannah | 7/10 | 5926 days | 24% |
Jasmine | 10/10 | 5929 days | 27% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 5929 days | 27% |
Sabrina | 8/10 | 5931 days | 26% |
Annemyn | 4/10 | 5935 days | 12% |
Nick & Jess | 10/10 | 5950 days | 27% |
hanna_and_matt | 10/10 | 5962 days | 27% |
Zachari | 7/10 | 5967 days | 24% |
mehunt | 9/10 | 5976 days | 27% |
Trine | 9/10 | 5981 days | 27% |
Paula | 9/10 | 5988 days | 27% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 5994 days | 27% |
Marie | 9/10 | 5997 days | 27% |
Ben | 10/10 | 6003 days | 27% |
Kristina | 7/10 | 6037 days | 24% |
Chris | 10/10 | 6038 days | 27% |
Lara | 9/10 | 6040 days | 27% |
Kay | 10/10 | 6042 days | 27% |
Niamh | 10/10 | 6049 days | 27% |
Annabelle | 10/10 | 6072 days | 27% |
Galen | 3/10 | 6229 days | 8% |
Ovin | 9/10 | 6239 days | 27% |
Anna | 10/10 | 6240 days | 27% |
Demo | 7/10 | 6247 days | 24% |
Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 6247 days | 26% |
Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 6249 days | 26% |
Bernie | 10/10 | 6249 days | 27% |
Nick | 7/10 | 6249 days | 24% |
Alexandra Vogeli | 9/10 | 6250 days | 27% |
Corina | 3/10 | 6254 days | 8% |
Peter | 8/10 | 6254 days | 26% |
Tina Daly | 9/10 | 6255 days | 27% |
Peter Aston | 9/10 | 6255 days | 27% |
Georgina Mulligan | 6/10 | 6256 days | 21% |
Ginny | 10/10 | 6260 days | 27% |
Bethany Webster | 8/10 | 6262 days | 26% |
Ed | 9/10 | 6272 days | 27% |
Elle | 9/10 | 6272 days | 27% |
Issy | 9/10 | 6272 days | 27% |
Hanna | 2/10 | 6276 days | 4% |
Maree | 9/10 | 6276 days | 27% |
Orlaith | 7/10 | 6276 days | 24% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 6276 days | 27% |
paulonline | 9/10 | 6278 days | 27% |
Eric P | 5/10 | 6282 days | 17% |
Melissa Steedman | 10/10 | 6302 days | 27% |
Stephanie Jones | 9/10 | 6303 days | 27% |
Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 6303 days | 27% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 6303 days | 27% |
Hayley | 8/10 | 6303 days | 26% |
Jeroen | 9/10 | 6305 days | 27% |
Linda Mulryan | 9/10 | 6306 days | 27% |
Maruja | 9/10 | 6306 days | 27% |
Heike Julia | 8/10 | 6310 days | 26% |
Gav | 3/10 | 6310 days | 8% |
Seldam | 7/10 | 6311 days | 24% |
Mel | 8/10 | 6315 days | 26% |
Kay | 7/10 | 6334 days | 24% |
Gerber Liselotte | 8/10 | 6337 days | 26% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 6344 days | 26% |
Abbey | 9/10 | 6347 days | 27% |
Orla | 9/10 | 6353 days | 27% |
Willemien | 7/10 | 6355 days | 24% |
Vern | 7/10 | 6465 days | 24% |
James | 8/10 | 6465 days | 26% |
Bridgy | 10/10 | 6553 days | 27% |
Caroline | 8/10 | 6569 days | 26% |
Diane | 8/10 | 6570 days | 26% |
Clive | 8/10 | 6579 days | 26% |
Jane | 8/10 | 6579 days | 26% |
Miles | 9/10 | 6579 days | 27% |
Helen | 8/10 | 6581 days | 26% |
Matt | 7/10 | 6581 days | 24% |
Richard | 8/10 | 6581 days | 26% |
Shin | 7/10 | 6586 days | 24% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 6586 days | 26% |
andrew julie | 9/10 | 6587 days | 27% |
Nancy Bill | 9/10 | 6587 days | 27% |
LauraMarini | 8/10 | 6588 days | 26% |
Valerie | 9/10 | 6590 days | 27% |
Mike Shirley | 8/10 | 6591 days | 26% |
Fred Highsmith | 9/10 | 6593 days | 27% |
Svenja | 8/10 | 6593 days | 26% |
TrineLyst | 7/10 | 6600 days | 24% |
Sarah | 7/10 | 6600 days | 24% |
Ed | 8/10 | 6600 days | 26% |
Elena Babitcheva | 9/10 | 6610 days | 27% |
Maninder | 8/10 | 6618 days | 26% |
Katherine | 10/10 | 6619 days | 27% |
JonathanBayle | 10/10 | 6619 days | 27% |
Rietveld | 8/10 | 6621 days | 26% |
Suzy | 8/10 | 6633 days | 26% |
LeaDeJong | 4/10 | 6637 days | 12% |
Johanne | 3/10 | 6639 days | 8% |
johan | 5/10 | 6646 days | 17% |
ranker_410 | 10/10 | 6652 days | 27% |
Kylie | 9/10 | 6654 days | 27% |
straw64 | 4/10 | 8176 days | 12% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.36% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 69 days. However the Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Pa Tu Maori Cultural Experience experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.31% |
198 | -3.32% |
199 | -3.34% |
200 | -3.36% |
201 | -3.37% |
202 | -3.39% |
203 | -3.41% |
… | … |
3.48% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.