Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tamaki Maori Village.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Tamaki Maori Village
Valid Reviews
210 Valid Reviews
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 44 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 54 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 27 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village valid reviews is 80.05% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
189 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 189 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 189 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 34 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 51 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 50 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 27 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village face-to-face reviews is 80.11% and is based on 189 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
70.71%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaudenz Schnell | 4/10 | 233 days | 72.2 | 100% | |
| Jessica Freeland | 6/10 | 1012 days |  |
5.06 | 7% |
| Gretha | 10/10 | 1015 days | |
6.01 | 8% |
| Bjorn Nielsen | 8/10 | 1015 days | |
5.71 | 8% |
| Tome | 8/10 | 1038 days | |
5.24 | 7% |
| Pat Dye | 7/10 | 1298 days | |
4.23 | 6% |
| Martina Cervenkova | 9/10 | 1336 days | |
4.59 | 6% |
| Rachael and Nik | 8/10 | 1345 days | |
4.34 | 6% |
| Ebony Reed | 10/10 | 1391 days | 4.49 | 6% | |
| Elizabeth Nash | 8/10 | 1393 days | |
4.27 | 6% |
| Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 1635 days | 3.87 | 5% | |
| Blandine Giusti | 8/10 | 1656 days | |
3.84 | 5% |
| Damaris Mayer | 7/10 | 1706 days | |
3.6 | 5% |
| Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 1922 days | |
3.58 | 5% |
| Jean Curry | 9/10 | 2010 days | |
3.43 | 5% |
| Sanne Meijer | 8/10 | 2015 days | |
3.25 | 5% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 2026 days | |
3.24 | 4% |
| Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 2028 days | |
3.4 | 5% |
| Joanna Mulcahy | 7/10 | 2029 days | |
3.09 | 4% |
| Libby | 9/10 | 2053 days | |
3.36 | 5% |
| Magdalene Zech | 7/10 | 2081 days | |
3.01 | 4% |
| Marco Newald | 7/10 | 2081 days | |
3.01 | 4% |
| Brian | 8/10 | 2152 days | 3.03 | 4% | |
| Silvia-Marie Bront | 10/10 | 2396 days | |
2.77 | 4% |
| Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 2397 days | 2.77 | 4% | |
| Selina Lott | 7/10 | 2401 days | |
2.51 | 3% |
| Guillot | 8/10 | 2404 days | |
2.62 | 4% |
| Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 2420 days | |
2.73 | 4% |
| Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 2425 days | 2.72 | 4% | |
| Sascha Warnken | 10/10 | 2456 days | 2.67 | 4% | |
| Farrell Burns | 10/10 | 2456 days | 2.67 | 4% | |
| Eltel | 10/10 | 2731 days | 2.2 | 3% | |
| Be Groen | 6/10 | 2754 days | |
1.79 | 2% |
| Steven Hill | 7/10 | 2758 days | |
1.96 | 3% |
| Gillian Rowe | 10/10 | 2772 days | |
2.13 | 3% |
| Sig Schrattner | 10/10 | 2774 days | |
2.13 | 3% |
| Ozgla | 10/10 | 2775 days | |
2.12 | 3% |
| Simon Fry | 9/10 | 2776 days | |
2.12 | 3% |
| Christian Apfel | 4/10 | 2779 days | |
1.67 | 2% |
| Fleur & Nils | 6/10 | 2784 days | |
1.75 | 2% |
| David Blundell | 10/10 | 2786 days | |
2.1 | 3% |
| Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 2790 days | |
1.99 | 3% |
| Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 2860 days | |
1.98 | 3% |
| Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 2862 days | |
1.88 | 3% |
| Willem & Lilian | 4/10 | 2862 days | |
1.56 | 2% |
| Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 2869 days | |
1.96 | 3% |
| JadesWorld | 3/10 | 2883 days | 1.49 | 2% | |
| Guult Ryan | 10/10 | 3114 days | |
1.54 | 2% |
| Clemens | 8/10 | 3117 days | |
1.46 | 2% |
| Peter & Angela Brown | 10/10 | 3118 days | |
1.54 | 2% |
| Dave Patterson | 9/10 | 3119 days | |
1.53 | 2% |
| Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 3125 days | |
1.39 | 2% |
| Carolin | 5/10 | 3127 days | |
1.23 | 2% |
| Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 3132 days | |
1.44 | 2% |
| Ronald Lippett | 8/10 | 3133 days | |
1.43 | 2% |
| Nadja | 9/10 | 3143 days | |
1.49 | 2% |
| Ann Thompson | 9/10 | 3144 days | |
1.49 | 2% |
| F Horrex | 4/10 | 3147 days | |
1.17 | 2% |
| Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 3148 days | |
1.48 | 2% |
| Tanner | 10/10 | 3151 days | |
1.48 | 2% |
| J G Groeneveld | 3/10 | 3152 days | |
1.14 | 2% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 3155 days | |
1.47 | 2% |
| Michelle Booty | 9/10 | 3155 days | |
1.47 | 2% |
| Rosey834 | 10/10 | 3218 days | 1.36 | 2% | |
| Papu | 8/10 | 3248 days | 1.25 | 2% | |
| Don Keith | 8/10 | 3480 days | |
0.87 | 1% |
| Silke Seemann | 8/10 | 3484 days | |
0.86 | 1% |
| Tony Killingray | 6/10 | 3496 days | |
0.74 | 1% |
| Klass | 9/10 | 3507 days | |
0.87 | 1% |
| Daryl Taylor | 8/10 | 3514 days | |
0.81 | 1% |
| Peter Ritu | 10/10 | 3527 days | |
0.84 | 1% |
| Ann Grandchamp | 10/10 | 3535 days | |
0.82 | 1% |
| warrenp | 9/10 | 3568 days | |
0.77 | 1% |
| pthreadgood | 8/10 | 3581 days | |
0.71 | 1% |
| dirkdev | 9/10 | 3587 days | |
0.73 | 1% |
| Antje & Sascha Häusler | 9/10 | 3587 days | |
0.73 | 1% |
| Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 3587 days | |
0.73 | 1% |
| Christine Suess | 7/10 | 3595 days | |
0.65 | 1% |
| MV Vroenhoven | 7/10 | 3598 days | |
0.65 | 1% |
| Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 3606 days | |
0.67 | 1% |
| KYinNZ | 3/10 | 3736 days | 0.37 | 1% | |
| Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 3797 days | 0.37 | 1% | |
| LowerD | 8/10 | 3821 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Robert Wolf | 6/10 | 3823 days | |
0.27 | 0% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 3824 days | |
0.31 | 0% |
| SBlake | 5/10 | 3832 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| JuergenW | 9/10 | 3834 days | |
0.31 | 0% |
| BernardK | 9/10 | 3844 days | |
0.29 | 0% |
| david | 9/10 | 3844 days | |
0.29 | 0% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 3851 days | |
0.28 | 0% |
| Hayley | 10/10 | 3851 days | |
0.28 | 0% |
| Abigail | 9/10 | 3851 days | |
0.28 | 0% |
| Johannes Kerner | 2/10 | 3858 days | 0.2 | 0% | |
| IM | 8/10 | 3858 days | |
0.26 | 0% |
| AndyK | 7/10 | 3860 days | |
0.24 | 0% |
| SarahK | 7/10 | 3860 days | |
0.24 | 0% |
| FrancesG | 5/10 | 3860 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| MartinG | 6/10 | 3860 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| TatiamT | 6/10 | 3860 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| Tom | 8/10 | 3860 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| PellucoFrance | 6/10 | 3861 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| John | 8/10 | 3863 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| KonterR | 5/10 | 3868 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| GH_Herrebrugh | 8/10 | 3868 days | |
0.24 | 0% |
| AbigailB | 5/10 | 3872 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| Yunker | 9/10 | 3875 days | |
0.24 | 0% |
| Tessa | 10/10 | 3877 days | |
0.24 | 0% |
| Marianne | 8/10 | 3877 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| MattEngland | 7/10 | 3882 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 3889 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| Hazel | 9/10 | 3889 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 3889 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| Hannah | 7/10 | 3890 days | |
0.19 | 0% |
| Jasmine | 10/10 | 3893 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 3893 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| Sabrina | 8/10 | 3895 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| Annemyn | 4/10 | 3899 days | |
0.16 | 0% |
| Nick & Jess | 10/10 | 3914 days | 0.17 | 0% | |
| hanna_and_matt | 10/10 | 3926 days | 0.15 | 0% | |
| Zachari | 7/10 | 3931 days | |
0.13 | 0% |
| mehunt | 9/10 | 3939 days | 0.13 | 0% | |
| Trine | 9/10 | 3945 days | |
0.12 | 0% |
| Paula | 9/10 | 3952 days | |
0.11 | 0% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 3958 days | |
0.1 | 0% |
| Marie | 9/10 | 3961 days | |
0.09 | 0% |
| Ben | 10/10 | 3967 days | |
0.08 | 0% |
| Kristina | 7/10 | 4001 days | |
0.02 | 0% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 4002 days | |
0.02 | 0% |
| Lara | 9/10 | 4004 days | |
0.02 | 0% |
| Kay | 10/10 | 4006 days | |
0.02 | 0% |
| Niamh | 10/10 | 4013 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Annabelle | 10/10 | 4036 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Galen | 3/10 | 4193 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ovin | 9/10 | 4203 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 4204 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Demo | 7/10 | 4211 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 4211 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 4213 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Bernie | 10/10 | 4213 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nick | 7/10 | 4213 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Alexandra Vogeli | 9/10 | 4214 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Corina | 3/10 | 4218 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Peter | 8/10 | 4218 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tina Daly | 9/10 | 4219 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Peter Aston | 9/10 | 4219 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Georgina Mulligan | 6/10 | 4220 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ginny | 10/10 | 4224 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Bethany Webster | 8/10 | 4226 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ed | 9/10 | 4236 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Elle | 9/10 | 4236 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Issy | 9/10 | 4236 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hanna | 2/10 | 4240 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Maree | 9/10 | 4240 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Orlaith | 7/10 | 4240 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 4240 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| paulonline | 9/10 | 4241 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Eric P | 5/10 | 4246 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Melissa Steedman | 10/10 | 4266 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Stephanie Jones | 9/10 | 4267 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 4267 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 4267 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hayley | 8/10 | 4267 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jeroen | 9/10 | 4269 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Linda Mulryan | 9/10 | 4270 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Maruja | 9/10 | 4270 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Heike Julia | 8/10 | 4274 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Gav | 3/10 | 4274 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Seldam | 7/10 | 4275 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mel | 8/10 | 4279 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kay | 7/10 | 4298 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Gerber Liselotte | 8/10 | 4301 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Fiona | 8/10 | 4308 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Abbey | 9/10 | 4311 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Orla | 9/10 | 4317 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Willemien | 7/10 | 4319 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Vern | 7/10 | 4429 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| James | 8/10 | 4429 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Bridgy | 10/10 | 4517 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Caroline | 8/10 | 4533 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Diane | 8/10 | 4534 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Clive | 8/10 | 4543 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jane | 8/10 | 4543 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Miles | 9/10 | 4543 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 4545 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Matt | 7/10 | 4545 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Richard | 8/10 | 4545 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Shin | 7/10 | 4550 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 4550 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| andrew julie | 9/10 | 4551 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nancy Bill | 9/10 | 4551 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| LauraMarini | 8/10 | 4552 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Valerie | 9/10 | 4554 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mike Shirley | 8/10 | 4555 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Fred Highsmith | 9/10 | 4557 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Svenja | 8/10 | 4557 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| TrineLyst | 7/10 | 4564 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sarah | 7/10 | 4564 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ed | 8/10 | 4564 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Elena Babitcheva | 9/10 | 4574 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Maninder | 8/10 | 4582 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Katherine | 10/10 | 4583 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JonathanBayle | 10/10 | 4583 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Rietveld | 8/10 | 4585 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Suzy | 8/10 | 4597 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| LeaDeJong | 4/10 | 4601 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Johanne | 3/10 | 4603 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| johan | 5/10 | 4610 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| ranker_410 | 10/10 | 4616 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kylie | 9/10 | 4618 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| straw64 | 4/10 | 6140 days | 0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Tamaki Maori Village experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.38% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Tamaki Maori Village experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has been adjusted for 169 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 166 | -3.32% |
| 167 | -3.34% |
| 168 | -3.36% |
| 169 | -3.38% |
| 170 | -3.40% |
| 171 | -3.42% |
| 172 | -3.44% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
67%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.