Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tamaki Maori Village.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Tamaki Maori Village
Valid Reviews
210 Valid Reviews
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 44 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 54 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 27 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village valid reviews is 80.05% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
189 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 189 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 189 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 34 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 51 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 50 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 27 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village face-to-face reviews is 80.11% and is based on 189 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
70.93%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaudenz Schnell | 4/10 | 559 days | 39.92 | 100% | |
| Jessica Freeland | 6/10 | 1337 days |  |
3.76 | 9% |
| Gretha | 10/10 | 1340 days | |
4.52 | 11% |
| Bjorn Nielsen | 8/10 | 1340 days | |
4.29 | 11% |
| Tome | 8/10 | 1363 days | |
4.25 | 11% |
| Pat Dye | 7/10 | 1623 days | |
3.61 | 9% |
| Martina Cervenkova | 9/10 | 1661 days | |
3.89 | 10% |
| Rachael and Nik | 8/10 | 1670 days | |
3.68 | 9% |
| Ebony Reed | 10/10 | 1717 days | 3.78 | 9% | |
| Elizabeth Nash | 8/10 | 1718 days | |
3.59 | 9% |
| Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 1961 days | 3.14 | 8% | |
| Blandine Giusti | 8/10 | 1981 days | |
3.1 | 8% |
| Damaris Mayer | 7/10 | 2031 days | |
2.88 | 7% |
| Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 2247 days | |
2.75 | 7% |
| Jean Curry | 9/10 | 2335 days | |
2.57 | 6% |
| Sanne Meijer | 8/10 | 2340 days | |
2.44 | 6% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 2351 days | |
2.41 | 6% |
| Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 2353 days | |
2.54 | 6% |
| Joanna Mulcahy | 7/10 | 2354 days | |
2.31 | 6% |
| Libby | 9/10 | 2378 days | |
2.49 | 6% |
| Magdalene Zech | 7/10 | 2406 days | |
2.22 | 6% |
| Marco Newald | 7/10 | 2406 days | |
2.22 | 6% |
| Brian | 8/10 | 2477 days | 2.18 | 5% | |
| Silvia-Marie Bront | 10/10 | 2721 days | |
1.82 | 5% |
| Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 2722 days | 1.82 | 5% | |
| Selina Lott | 7/10 | 2726 days | |
1.65 | 4% |
| Guillot | 8/10 | 2729 days | |
1.71 | 4% |
| Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 2745 days | |
1.77 | 4% |
| Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 2750 days | 1.76 | 4% | |
| Sascha Warnken | 10/10 | 2781 days | 1.7 | 4% | |
| Farrell Burns | 10/10 | 2781 days | 1.7 | 4% | |
| Eltel | 10/10 | 3056 days | 1.16 | 3% | |
| Be Groen | 6/10 | 3079 days | |
0.93 | 2% |
| Steven Hill | 7/10 | 3083 days | |
1.01 | 3% |
| Gillian Rowe | 10/10 | 3097 days | |
1.08 | 3% |
| Sig Schrattner | 10/10 | 3099 days | |
1.08 | 3% |
| Ozgla | 10/10 | 3100 days | |
1.08 | 3% |
| Simon Fry | 9/10 | 3101 days | |
1.07 | 3% |
| Christian Apfel | 4/10 | 3104 days | |
0.84 | 2% |
| Fleur & Nils | 6/10 | 3109 days | |
0.88 | 2% |
| David Blundell | 10/10 | 3111 days | |
1.05 | 3% |
| Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 3115 days | |
0.99 | 2% |
| Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 3185 days | |
0.91 | 2% |
| Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 3187 days | |
0.86 | 2% |
| Willem & Lilian | 4/10 | 3187 days | |
0.72 | 2% |
| Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 3194 days | |
0.89 | 2% |
| JadesWorld | 3/10 | 3208 days | 0.67 | 2% | |
| Guult Ryan | 10/10 | 3439 days | |
0.41 | 1% |
| Clemens | 8/10 | 3442 days | |
0.39 | 1% |
| Peter & Angela Brown | 10/10 | 3443 days | |
0.41 | 1% |
| Dave Patterson | 9/10 | 3444 days | |
0.4 | 1% |
| Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 3450 days | |
0.36 | 1% |
| Carolin | 5/10 | 3452 days | |
0.31 | 1% |
| Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 3457 days | |
0.36 | 1% |
| Ronald Lippett | 8/10 | 3458 days | |
0.36 | 1% |
| Nadja | 9/10 | 3468 days | |
0.36 | 1% |
| Ann Thompson | 9/10 | 3469 days | |
0.35 | 1% |
| F Horrex | 4/10 | 3472 days | |
0.28 | 1% |
| Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 3473 days | |
0.35 | 1% |
| Tanner | 10/10 | 3476 days | |
0.34 | 1% |
| J G Groeneveld | 3/10 | 3477 days | |
0.26 | 1% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 3480 days | |
0.33 | 1% |
| Michelle Booty | 9/10 | 3480 days | |
0.33 | 1% |
| Rosey834 | 10/10 | 3543 days | 0.21 | 1% | |
| Papu | 8/10 | 3573 days | 0.14 | 0% | |
| Don Keith | 8/10 | 3805 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Silke Seemann | 8/10 | 3809 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tony Killingray | 6/10 | 3821 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Klass | 9/10 | 3832 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Daryl Taylor | 8/10 | 3839 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Peter Ritu | 10/10 | 3852 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ann Grandchamp | 10/10 | 3860 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| warrenp | 9/10 | 3893 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| pthreadgood | 8/10 | 3906 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| dirkdev | 9/10 | 3912 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Antje & Sascha Häusler | 9/10 | 3912 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 3912 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Christine Suess | 7/10 | 3920 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| MV Vroenhoven | 7/10 | 3923 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 3931 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| KYinNZ | 3/10 | 4061 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 4122 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| LowerD | 8/10 | 4146 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Robert Wolf | 6/10 | 4148 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 4149 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| SBlake | 5/10 | 4157 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JuergenW | 9/10 | 4159 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| BernardK | 9/10 | 4169 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| david | 9/10 | 4170 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4176 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hayley | 10/10 | 4176 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Abigail | 9/10 | 4176 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Johannes Kerner | 2/10 | 4183 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| IM | 8/10 | 4184 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| AndyK | 7/10 | 4185 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| SarahK | 7/10 | 4185 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| FrancesG | 5/10 | 4185 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| MartinG | 6/10 | 4185 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| TatiamT | 6/10 | 4185 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tom | 8/10 | 4186 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| PellucoFrance | 6/10 | 4186 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| John | 8/10 | 4189 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| KonterR | 5/10 | 4193 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| GH_Herrebrugh | 8/10 | 4193 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| AbigailB | 5/10 | 4197 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Yunker | 9/10 | 4201 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tessa | 10/10 | 4203 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Marianne | 8/10 | 4203 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| MattEngland | 7/10 | 4207 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 4214 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hazel | 9/10 | 4214 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 4214 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hannah | 7/10 | 4216 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jasmine | 10/10 | 4218 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 4218 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sabrina | 8/10 | 4220 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Annemyn | 4/10 | 4224 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nick & Jess | 10/10 | 4240 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| hanna_and_matt | 10/10 | 4251 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Zachari | 7/10 | 4256 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| mehunt | 9/10 | 4265 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Trine | 9/10 | 4271 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Paula | 9/10 | 4278 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 4284 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Marie | 9/10 | 4287 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ben | 10/10 | 4293 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kristina | 7/10 | 4327 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 4327 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lara | 9/10 | 4330 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kay | 10/10 | 4332 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Niamh | 10/10 | 4339 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Annabelle | 10/10 | 4362 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Galen | 3/10 | 4518 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ovin | 9/10 | 4528 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 4529 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Demo | 7/10 | 4536 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 4536 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 4538 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Bernie | 10/10 | 4538 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nick | 7/10 | 4538 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Alexandra Vogeli | 9/10 | 4539 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Corina | 3/10 | 4543 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Peter | 8/10 | 4543 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tina Daly | 9/10 | 4544 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Peter Aston | 9/10 | 4544 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Georgina Mulligan | 6/10 | 4545 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ginny | 10/10 | 4549 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Bethany Webster | 8/10 | 4551 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ed | 9/10 | 4561 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Elle | 9/10 | 4561 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Issy | 9/10 | 4561 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hanna | 2/10 | 4565 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Maree | 9/10 | 4565 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Orlaith | 7/10 | 4565 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 4565 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| paulonline | 9/10 | 4567 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Eric P | 5/10 | 4571 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Melissa Steedman | 10/10 | 4591 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Stephanie Jones | 9/10 | 4592 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 4592 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 4592 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hayley | 8/10 | 4592 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jeroen | 9/10 | 4594 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Linda Mulryan | 9/10 | 4595 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Maruja | 9/10 | 4595 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Heike Julia | 8/10 | 4599 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Gav | 3/10 | 4599 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Seldam | 7/10 | 4600 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mel | 8/10 | 4604 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kay | 7/10 | 4623 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Gerber Liselotte | 8/10 | 4626 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Fiona | 8/10 | 4633 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Abbey | 9/10 | 4636 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Orla | 9/10 | 4642 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Willemien | 7/10 | 4644 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Vern | 7/10 | 4754 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| James | 8/10 | 4754 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Bridgy | 10/10 | 4842 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Caroline | 8/10 | 4858 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Diane | 8/10 | 4859 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Clive | 8/10 | 4868 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jane | 8/10 | 4868 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Miles | 9/10 | 4868 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 4870 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Matt | 7/10 | 4870 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Richard | 8/10 | 4870 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Shin | 7/10 | 4875 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 4875 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| andrew julie | 9/10 | 4876 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nancy Bill | 9/10 | 4876 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| LauraMarini | 8/10 | 4877 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Valerie | 9/10 | 4879 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mike Shirley | 8/10 | 4880 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Fred Highsmith | 9/10 | 4882 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Svenja | 8/10 | 4882 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| TrineLyst | 7/10 | 4889 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sarah | 7/10 | 4889 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ed | 8/10 | 4889 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Elena Babitcheva | 9/10 | 4899 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Maninder | 8/10 | 4907 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Katherine | 10/10 | 4908 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JonathanBayle | 10/10 | 4908 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Rietveld | 8/10 | 4910 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Suzy | 8/10 | 4922 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| LeaDeJong | 4/10 | 4926 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Johanne | 3/10 | 4928 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| johan | 5/10 | 4935 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| ranker_410 | 10/10 | 4941 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kylie | 9/10 | 4943 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| straw64 | 4/10 | 6465 days | 0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Tamaki Maori Village experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-2.28% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 115 days. However the Tamaki Maori Village experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.24% |
| 198 | -2.26% |
| 199 | -2.27% |
| 200 | -2.28% |
| 201 | -2.29% |
| 202 | -2.30% |
| 203 | -2.31% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
69%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.