Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tamaki Maori Village.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Tamaki Maori Village
Valid Reviews
210 Valid Reviews
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 44 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 54 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 53 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 27 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village valid reviews is 80.05% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
189 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 189 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 189 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 34 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 51 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 50 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 27 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village face-to-face reviews is 80.11% and is based on 189 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
68.55%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaudenz Schnell | 4/10 | 286 days | 68.76 | 100% | |
| Jessica Freeland | 6/10 | 1064 days |  |
4.28 | 6% |
| Gretha | 10/10 | 1067 days | |
5.12 | 7% |
| Bjorn Nielsen | 8/10 | 1067 days | |
4.87 | 7% |
| Tome | 8/10 | 1090 days | |
4.75 | 7% |
| Pat Dye | 7/10 | 1350 days | |
4.1 | 6% |
| Martina Cervenkova | 9/10 | 1388 days | |
4.43 | 6% |
| Rachael and Nik | 8/10 | 1397 days | |
4.19 | 6% |
| Ebony Reed | 10/10 | 1444 days | 4.32 | 6% | |
| Elizabeth Nash | 8/10 | 1445 days | |
4.1 | 6% |
| Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 1688 days | 3.65 | 5% | |
| Blandine Giusti | 8/10 | 1708 days | |
3.61 | 5% |
| Damaris Mayer | 7/10 | 1758 days | |
3.37 | 5% |
| Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 1974 days | |
3.28 | 5% |
| Jean Curry | 9/10 | 2062 days | |
3.11 | 5% |
| Sanne Meijer | 8/10 | 2067 days | |
2.94 | 4% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 2078 days | |
2.92 | 4% |
| Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 2080 days | |
3.07 | 4% |
| Joanna Mulcahy | 7/10 | 2081 days | |
2.79 | 4% |
| Libby | 9/10 | 2105 days | |
3.02 | 4% |
| Magdalene Zech | 7/10 | 2133 days | |
2.7 | 4% |
| Marco Newald | 7/10 | 2133 days | |
2.7 | 4% |
| Brian | 8/10 | 2204 days | 2.69 | 4% | |
| Silvia-Marie Bront | 10/10 | 2448 days | |
2.35 | 3% |
| Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 2449 days | 2.35 | 3% | |
| Selina Lott | 7/10 | 2453 days | |
2.13 | 3% |
| Guillot | 8/10 | 2456 days | |
2.22 | 3% |
| Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 2472 days | |
2.31 | 3% |
| Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 2477 days | 2.3 | 3% | |
| Sascha Warnken | 10/10 | 2508 days | 2.23 | 3% | |
| Farrell Burns | 10/10 | 2508 days | 2.23 | 3% | |
| Eltel | 10/10 | 2783 days | 1.7 | 2% | |
| Be Groen | 6/10 | 2806 days | |
1.37 | 2% |
| Steven Hill | 7/10 | 2810 days | |
1.5 | 2% |
| Gillian Rowe | 10/10 | 2824 days | |
1.62 | 2% |
| Sig Schrattner | 10/10 | 2826 days | |
1.61 | 2% |
| Ozgla | 10/10 | 2827 days | |
1.61 | 2% |
| Simon Fry | 9/10 | 2828 days | |
1.61 | 2% |
| Christian Apfel | 4/10 | 2831 days | |
1.27 | 2% |
| Fleur & Nils | 6/10 | 2836 days | |
1.32 | 2% |
| David Blundell | 10/10 | 2838 days | |
1.59 | 2% |
| Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 2842 days | |
1.5 | 2% |
| Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 2912 days | |
1.44 | 2% |
| Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 2914 days | |
1.37 | 2% |
| Willem & Lilian | 4/10 | 2914 days | |
1.14 | 2% |
| Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 2921 days | |
1.43 | 2% |
| JadesWorld | 3/10 | 2935 days | 1.08 | 2% | |
| Guult Ryan | 10/10 | 3166 days | |
0.95 | 1% |
| Clemens | 8/10 | 3169 days | |
0.89 | 1% |
| Peter & Angela Brown | 10/10 | 3170 days | |
0.94 | 1% |
| Dave Patterson | 9/10 | 3171 days | |
0.94 | 1% |
| Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 3177 days | |
0.84 | 1% |
| Carolin | 5/10 | 3179 days | |
0.75 | 1% |
| Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 3184 days | |
0.87 | 1% |
| Ronald Lippett | 8/10 | 3185 days | |
0.86 | 1% |
| Nadja | 9/10 | 3195 days | |
0.89 | 1% |
| Ann Thompson | 9/10 | 3196 days | |
0.89 | 1% |
| F Horrex | 4/10 | 3199 days | |
0.7 | 1% |
| Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 3200 days | |
0.88 | 1% |
| Tanner | 10/10 | 3203 days | |
0.87 | 1% |
| J G Groeneveld | 3/10 | 3204 days | |
0.67 | 1% |
| Andreas | 9/10 | 3207 days | |
0.87 | 1% |
| Michelle Booty | 9/10 | 3207 days | |
0.87 | 1% |
| Rosey834 | 10/10 | 3270 days | 0.74 | 1% | |
| Papu | 8/10 | 3300 days | 0.65 | 1% | |
| Don Keith | 8/10 | 3532 days | |
0.22 | 0% |
| Silke Seemann | 8/10 | 3536 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| Tony Killingray | 6/10 | 3548 days | |
0.17 | 0% |
| Klass | 9/10 | 3559 days | |
0.18 | 0% |
| Daryl Taylor | 8/10 | 3566 days | |
0.16 | 0% |
| Peter Ritu | 10/10 | 3579 days | |
0.14 | 0% |
| Ann Grandchamp | 10/10 | 3587 days | |
0.12 | 0% |
| warrenp | 9/10 | 3620 days | |
0.06 | 0% |
| pthreadgood | 8/10 | 3633 days | |
0.03 | 0% |
| dirkdev | 9/10 | 3639 days | |
0.02 | 0% |
| Antje & Sascha Häusler | 9/10 | 3639 days | |
0.02 | 0% |
| Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 3639 days | |
0.02 | 0% |
| Christine Suess | 7/10 | 3647 days | |
0.01 | 0% |
| MV Vroenhoven | 7/10 | 3650 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 3658 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| KYinNZ | 3/10 | 3788 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 3849 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| LowerD | 8/10 | 3873 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Robert Wolf | 6/10 | 3875 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 3876 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| SBlake | 5/10 | 3884 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JuergenW | 9/10 | 3886 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| BernardK | 9/10 | 3896 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| david | 9/10 | 3897 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 3904 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hayley | 10/10 | 3904 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Abigail | 9/10 | 3904 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Johannes Kerner | 2/10 | 3910 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| IM | 8/10 | 3911 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| AndyK | 7/10 | 3912 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| SarahK | 7/10 | 3912 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| FrancesG | 5/10 | 3912 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| MartinG | 6/10 | 3912 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| TatiamT | 6/10 | 3912 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tom | 8/10 | 3913 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| PellucoFrance | 6/10 | 3913 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| John | 8/10 | 3916 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| KonterR | 5/10 | 3920 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| GH_Herrebrugh | 8/10 | 3920 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| AbigailB | 5/10 | 3924 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Yunker | 9/10 | 3928 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tessa | 10/10 | 3930 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Marianne | 8/10 | 3930 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| MattEngland | 7/10 | 3934 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Simon | 10/10 | 3942 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hazel | 9/10 | 3942 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 3942 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hannah | 7/10 | 3943 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jasmine | 10/10 | 3946 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 3946 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sabrina | 8/10 | 3948 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Annemyn | 4/10 | 3952 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nick & Jess | 10/10 | 3967 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| hanna_and_matt | 10/10 | 3978 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Zachari | 7/10 | 3984 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| mehunt | 9/10 | 3992 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Trine | 9/10 | 3998 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Paula | 9/10 | 4005 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 4011 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Marie | 9/10 | 4014 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ben | 10/10 | 4020 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kristina | 7/10 | 4054 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 4055 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lara | 9/10 | 4057 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kay | 10/10 | 4059 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Niamh | 10/10 | 4066 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Annabelle | 10/10 | 4089 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Galen | 3/10 | 4245 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ovin | 9/10 | 4255 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 4256 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Demo | 7/10 | 4263 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 4263 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 4265 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Bernie | 10/10 | 4265 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nick | 7/10 | 4265 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Alexandra Vogeli | 9/10 | 4266 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Corina | 3/10 | 4270 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Peter | 8/10 | 4270 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Tina Daly | 9/10 | 4271 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Peter Aston | 9/10 | 4271 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Georgina Mulligan | 6/10 | 4272 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ginny | 10/10 | 4276 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Bethany Webster | 8/10 | 4278 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ed | 9/10 | 4288 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Elle | 9/10 | 4288 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Issy | 9/10 | 4288 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hanna | 2/10 | 4292 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Maree | 9/10 | 4292 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Orlaith | 7/10 | 4292 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lisa | 9/10 | 4292 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| paulonline | 9/10 | 4294 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Eric P | 5/10 | 4298 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Melissa Steedman | 10/10 | 4318 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Stephanie Jones | 9/10 | 4319 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 4319 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 4319 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hayley | 8/10 | 4319 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jeroen | 9/10 | 4321 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Linda Mulryan | 9/10 | 4322 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Maruja | 9/10 | 4322 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Heike Julia | 8/10 | 4326 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Gav | 3/10 | 4326 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Seldam | 7/10 | 4327 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mel | 8/10 | 4331 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kay | 7/10 | 4350 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Gerber Liselotte | 8/10 | 4353 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Fiona | 8/10 | 4360 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Abbey | 9/10 | 4363 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Orla | 9/10 | 4369 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Willemien | 7/10 | 4371 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Vern | 7/10 | 4481 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| James | 8/10 | 4481 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Bridgy | 10/10 | 4569 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Caroline | 8/10 | 4585 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Diane | 8/10 | 4586 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Clive | 8/10 | 4595 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jane | 8/10 | 4595 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Miles | 9/10 | 4595 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Helen | 8/10 | 4597 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Matt | 7/10 | 4597 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Richard | 8/10 | 4597 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Shin | 7/10 | 4602 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 4602 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| andrew julie | 9/10 | 4603 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nancy Bill | 9/10 | 4603 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| LauraMarini | 8/10 | 4604 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Valerie | 9/10 | 4606 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mike Shirley | 8/10 | 4607 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Fred Highsmith | 9/10 | 4609 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Svenja | 8/10 | 4609 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| TrineLyst | 7/10 | 4616 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sarah | 7/10 | 4616 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ed | 8/10 | 4616 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Elena Babitcheva | 9/10 | 4626 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Maninder | 8/10 | 4634 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Katherine | 10/10 | 4635 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JonathanBayle | 10/10 | 4635 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Rietveld | 8/10 | 4637 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Suzy | 8/10 | 4649 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| LeaDeJong | 4/10 | 4653 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Johanne | 3/10 | 4655 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| johan | 5/10 | 4662 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| ranker_410 | 10/10 | 4668 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kylie | 9/10 | 4670 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| straw64 | 4/10 | 6192 days | 0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Tamaki Maori Village experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.98% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Tamaki Maori Village experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has been adjusted for 199 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 196 | -3.92% |
| 197 | -3.94% |
| 198 | -3.96% |
| 199 | -3.98% |
| 200 | -4.00% |
| 201 | -4.02% |
| 202 | -4.04% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
65%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.