Kia ora there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tamaki Maori Village.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
210 Valid Reviews
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has a total of 211 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 44 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 54 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 53 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village valid reviews is 80.05% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
189 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 189 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 189 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 34 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 51 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 50 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 27 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tamaki Maori Village face-to-face reviews is 80.11% and is based on 189 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
80.58%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Gaudenz Schnell | 4/10 | 1294 days | 100% |
Jessica Freeland | 6/10 | 2072 days | 68% |
Gretha | 10/10 | 2075 days | 83% |
Bjorn Nielsen | 8/10 | 2075 days | 79% |
Tome | 8/10 | 2098 days | 78% |
Pat Dye | 7/10 | 2358 days | 60% |
Martina Cervenkova | 9/10 | 2396 days | 65% |
Rachael and Nik | 8/10 | 2405 days | 61% |
Ebony Reed | 10/10 | 2452 days | 62% |
Elizabeth Nash | 8/10 | 2453 days | 58% |
Emma Keegan | 8/10 | 2696 days | 45% |
Blandine Giusti | 8/10 | 2716 days | 44% |
Damaris Mayer | 7/10 | 2766 days | 39% |
Lea Darotchetche | 9/10 | 2982 days | 31% |
Jean Curry | 9/10 | 3070 days | 26% |
Sanne Meijer | 8/10 | 3075 days | 24% |
Laura | 8/10 | 3086 days | 23% |
Charlotte Casey | 9/10 | 3088 days | 25% |
Joanna Mulcahy | 7/10 | 3089 days | 22% |
Libby | 9/10 | 3113 days | 23% |
Magdalene Zech | 7/10 | 3141 days | 19% |
Marco Newald | 7/10 | 3141 days | 19% |
Brian | 8/10 | 3212 days | 16% |
Silvia-Marie Bront | 10/10 | 3456 days | 3% |
Bonnie and David Appleby | 9/10 | 3457 days | 3% |
Selina Lott | 7/10 | 3461 days | 2% |
Guillot | 8/10 | 3464 days | 2% |
Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 3480 days | 2% |
Jill Fischer | 10/10 | 3485 days | 2% |
Sascha Warnken | 10/10 | 3516 days | 0% |
Farrell Burns | 10/10 | 3516 days | 0% |
Eltel | 10/10 | 3791 days | 22% |
Be Groen | 6/10 | 3814 days | 17% |
Steven Hill | 7/10 | 3818 days | 19% |
Gillian Rowe | 10/10 | 3832 days | 22% |
Sig Schrattner | 10/10 | 3834 days | 22% |
Ozgla | 10/10 | 3835 days | 22% |
Simon Fry | 9/10 | 3836 days | 22% |
Christian Apfel | 4/10 | 3839 days | 16% |
Fleur & Nils | 6/10 | 3844 days | 17% |
David Blundell | 10/10 | 3846 days | 22% |
Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 3850 days | 20% |
Ross Cooke | 10/10 | 3920 days | 22% |
Eri & Udo Seifert | 8/10 | 3922 days | 20% |
Willem & Lilian | 4/10 | 3922 days | 16% |
Andreas & Sonja | 9/10 | 3929 days | 22% |
JadesWorld | 3/10 | 3943 days | 15% |
Guult Ryan | 10/10 | 4174 days | 22% |
Clemens | 8/10 | 4177 days | 20% |
Peter & Angela Brown | 10/10 | 4178 days | 22% |
Dave Patterson | 9/10 | 4179 days | 22% |
Fam de Kruyf | 7/10 | 4185 days | 19% |
Carolin | 5/10 | 4187 days | 16% |
Justin Pearce | 8/10 | 4192 days | 20% |
Ronald Lippett | 8/10 | 4193 days | 20% |
Nadja | 9/10 | 4203 days | 22% |
Ann Thompson | 9/10 | 4204 days | 22% |
F Horrex | 4/10 | 4207 days | 16% |
Caroline & Jochen | 9/10 | 4208 days | 22% |
Tanner | 10/10 | 4211 days | 22% |
J G Groeneveld | 3/10 | 4212 days | 15% |
Andreas | 9/10 | 4215 days | 22% |
Michelle Booty | 9/10 | 4215 days | 22% |
Rosey834 | 10/10 | 4278 days | 22% |
Papu | 8/10 | 4308 days | 20% |
Don Keith | 8/10 | 4540 days | 20% |
Silke Seemann | 8/10 | 4544 days | 20% |
Tony Killingray | 6/10 | 4556 days | 17% |
Klass | 9/10 | 4567 days | 22% |
Daryl Taylor | 8/10 | 4574 days | 20% |
Peter Ritu | 10/10 | 4587 days | 22% |
Ann Grandchamp | 10/10 | 4595 days | 22% |
warrenp | 9/10 | 4628 days | 22% |
pthreadgood | 8/10 | 4641 days | 20% |
dirkdev | 9/10 | 4647 days | 22% |
Antje & Sascha Häusler | 9/10 | 4647 days | 22% |
Susann Koschmeider | 10/10 | 4647 days | 22% |
Christine Suess | 7/10 | 4655 days | 19% |
MV Vroenhoven | 7/10 | 4658 days | 19% |
Fer Bonsel | 8/10 | 4666 days | 20% |
KYinNZ | 3/10 | 4796 days | 15% |
Ingrid Thijssen | 10/10 | 4857 days | 22% |
LowerD | 8/10 | 4881 days | 20% |
Robert Wolf | 6/10 | 4883 days | 17% |
Laura | 8/10 | 4884 days | 20% |
SBlake | 5/10 | 4892 days | 16% |
JuergenW | 9/10 | 4894 days | 22% |
BernardK | 9/10 | 4904 days | 22% |
david | 9/10 | 4905 days | 22% |
Anna | 9/10 | 4911 days | 22% |
Hayley | 10/10 | 4911 days | 22% |
Abigail | 9/10 | 4911 days | 22% |
Johannes Kerner | 2/10 | 4918 days | 14% |
IM | 8/10 | 4919 days | 20% |
AndyK | 7/10 | 4920 days | 19% |
SarahK | 7/10 | 4920 days | 19% |
FrancesG | 5/10 | 4920 days | 16% |
MartinG | 6/10 | 4920 days | 17% |
TatiamT | 6/10 | 4920 days | 17% |
Tom | 8/10 | 4921 days | 20% |
PellucoFrance | 6/10 | 4921 days | 17% |
John | 8/10 | 4924 days | 20% |
KonterR | 5/10 | 4928 days | 16% |
GH_Herrebrugh | 8/10 | 4928 days | 20% |
AbigailB | 5/10 | 4932 days | 16% |
Yunker | 9/10 | 4936 days | 22% |
Tessa | 10/10 | 4938 days | 22% |
Marianne | 8/10 | 4938 days | 20% |
MattEngland | 7/10 | 4942 days | 19% |
Simon | 10/10 | 4949 days | 22% |
Hazel | 9/10 | 4949 days | 22% |
Amy | 10/10 | 4949 days | 22% |
Hannah | 7/10 | 4951 days | 19% |
Jasmine | 10/10 | 4953 days | 22% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 4953 days | 22% |
Sabrina | 8/10 | 4955 days | 20% |
Annemyn | 4/10 | 4960 days | 16% |
Nick & Jess | 10/10 | 4975 days | 22% |
hanna_and_matt | 10/10 | 4986 days | 22% |
Zachari | 7/10 | 4992 days | 19% |
mehunt | 9/10 | 5000 days | 22% |
Trine | 9/10 | 5006 days | 22% |
Paula | 9/10 | 5013 days | 22% |
Lisa | 10/10 | 5019 days | 22% |
Marie | 9/10 | 5022 days | 22% |
Ben | 10/10 | 5028 days | 22% |
Kristina | 7/10 | 5062 days | 19% |
Chris | 10/10 | 5063 days | 22% |
Lara | 9/10 | 5065 days | 22% |
Kay | 10/10 | 5067 days | 22% |
Niamh | 10/10 | 5074 days | 22% |
Annabelle | 10/10 | 5097 days | 22% |
Galen | 3/10 | 5253 days | 15% |
Ovin | 9/10 | 5263 days | 22% |
Anna | 10/10 | 5264 days | 22% |
Demo | 7/10 | 5271 days | 19% |
Ted Sebastian | 8/10 | 5271 days | 20% |
Jessica Jahn | 8/10 | 5273 days | 20% |
Bernie | 10/10 | 5273 days | 22% |
Nick | 7/10 | 5273 days | 19% |
Alexandra Vogeli | 9/10 | 5274 days | 22% |
Corina | 3/10 | 5278 days | 15% |
Peter | 8/10 | 5278 days | 20% |
Tina Daly | 9/10 | 5279 days | 22% |
Peter Aston | 9/10 | 5279 days | 22% |
Georgina Mulligan | 6/10 | 5280 days | 17% |
Ginny | 10/10 | 5284 days | 22% |
Bethany Webster | 8/10 | 5286 days | 20% |
Ed | 9/10 | 5296 days | 22% |
Elle | 9/10 | 5296 days | 22% |
Issy | 9/10 | 5296 days | 22% |
Hanna | 2/10 | 5300 days | 14% |
Maree | 9/10 | 5300 days | 22% |
Orlaith | 7/10 | 5300 days | 19% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 5300 days | 22% |
paulonline | 9/10 | 5302 days | 22% |
Eric P | 5/10 | 5306 days | 16% |
Melissa Steedman | 10/10 | 5326 days | 22% |
Stephanie Jones | 9/10 | 5327 days | 22% |
Andre Obineche | 10/10 | 5327 days | 22% |
Laura Sutton | 9/10 | 5327 days | 22% |
Hayley | 8/10 | 5327 days | 20% |
Jeroen | 9/10 | 5329 days | 22% |
Linda Mulryan | 9/10 | 5330 days | 22% |
Maruja | 9/10 | 5330 days | 22% |
Heike Julia | 8/10 | 5334 days | 20% |
Gav | 3/10 | 5334 days | 15% |
Seldam | 7/10 | 5335 days | 19% |
Mel | 8/10 | 5339 days | 20% |
Kay | 7/10 | 5358 days | 19% |
Gerber Liselotte | 8/10 | 5361 days | 20% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 5368 days | 20% |
Abbey | 9/10 | 5371 days | 22% |
Orla | 9/10 | 5377 days | 22% |
Willemien | 7/10 | 5379 days | 19% |
Vern | 7/10 | 5489 days | 19% |
James | 8/10 | 5489 days | 20% |
Bridgy | 10/10 | 5577 days | 22% |
Caroline | 8/10 | 5593 days | 20% |
Diane | 8/10 | 5594 days | 20% |
Clive | 8/10 | 5603 days | 20% |
Jane | 8/10 | 5603 days | 20% |
Miles | 9/10 | 5603 days | 22% |
Helen | 8/10 | 5605 days | 20% |
Matt | 7/10 | 5605 days | 19% |
Richard | 8/10 | 5605 days | 20% |
Shin | 7/10 | 5610 days | 19% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 5610 days | 20% |
andrew julie | 9/10 | 5611 days | 22% |
Nancy Bill | 9/10 | 5611 days | 22% |
LauraMarini | 8/10 | 5612 days | 20% |
Valerie | 9/10 | 5614 days | 22% |
Mike Shirley | 8/10 | 5615 days | 20% |
Fred Highsmith | 9/10 | 5617 days | 22% |
Svenja | 8/10 | 5617 days | 20% |
TrineLyst | 7/10 | 5624 days | 19% |
Sarah | 7/10 | 5624 days | 19% |
Ed | 8/10 | 5624 days | 20% |
Elena Babitcheva | 9/10 | 5634 days | 22% |
Maninder | 8/10 | 5642 days | 20% |
Katherine | 10/10 | 5643 days | 22% |
JonathanBayle | 10/10 | 5643 days | 22% |
Rietveld | 8/10 | 5645 days | 20% |
Suzy | 8/10 | 5657 days | 20% |
LeaDeJong | 4/10 | 5661 days | 16% |
Johanne | 3/10 | 5663 days | 15% |
johan | 5/10 | 5670 days | 16% |
ranker_410 | 10/10 | 5676 days | 22% |
Kylie | 9/10 | 5678 days | 22% |
straw64 | 4/10 | 7200 days | 16% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Tamaki Maori Village experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.35% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 111 days. However the Tamaki Maori Village experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Tamaki Maori Village experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -2.31% |
198 | -2.32% |
199 | -2.33% |
200 | -2.35% |
201 | -2.36% |
202 | -2.37% |
203 | -2.38% |
… | … |
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.