Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Polynesian Spa.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
132 Valid Reviews
The Polynesian Spa experience has a total of 134 reviews. There are 132 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 132 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Polynesian Spa valid reviews is 78.86% and is based on 132 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
122 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 132 valid reviews, the experience has 122 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 122 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Polynesian Spa face-to-face reviews is 78.61% and is based on 122 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Joonas Lehtomaki||4/10||1201 days||3.79||80%|
|Philip Sheridan||7/10||1213 days||4.34||92%|
|John Edwards||9/10||1230 days||4.74||100%|
|Cathy La Frenais||8/10||1471 days||4.05||86%|
|Marie Bocquier||8/10||1480 days||4.03||85%|
|Franziska and Sabine||8/10||1534 days||3.93||83%|
|Jessie Sabine||7/10||2242 days||2.51||53%|
|Matthew Trezise||7/10||2242 days||2.51||53%|
|Frederic Gazzarin||10/10||2247 days||2.75||58%|
|Patricia Gazzarin||9/10||2247 days||2.75||58%|
|Melissa Hermansson||8/10||2250 days||2.6||55%|
|Thi Baut||9/10||2287 days||2.67||56%|
|Alice Berg||8/10||2581 days||1.99||42%|
|Peter Kent||9/10||2940 days||1.39||29%|
|Antoine Lacoste||6/10||2946 days||1.14||24%|
|Hanna Clement||6/10||2947 days||1.14||24%|
|Numa Brouimet||8/10||2949 days||1.3||28%|
|Darina Kvasnicova||8/10||2955 days||1.29||27%|
|Richard Harvey||9/10||2962 days||1.35||28%|
|Mark Bogton||9/10||2962 days||1.35||28%|
|Hannah Bean||7/10||2964 days||1.22||26%|
|Elise Violet||7/10||2966 days||1.22||26%|
|Kimberley Mills||10/10||2969 days||1.33||28%|
|John Reynolds||8/10||2977 days||1.25||26%|
|Kurt Furuskar||9/10||2993 days||1.29||27%|
|Barsch, Arwed & Gertrud||10/10||3013 days||1.25||26%|
|Jan & Marian||10/10||3056 days||1.16||25%|
|Natascha Rachel||3/10||3264 days||0.58||12%|
|P Bukal||10/10||3298 days||0.69||15%|
|Michael Simmang||10/10||3307 days||0.67||14%|
|Dave Patterson||8/10||3310 days||0.63||13%|
|Jerven and Kim||3/10||3312 days||0.51||11%|
|Katy Bourne||7/10||3313 days||0.6||13%|
|Walter Peters||9/10||3331 days||0.62||13%|
|Claire Hoyland||9/10||3334 days||0.62||13%|
|Eva Stauderova||9/10||3338 days||0.61||13%|
|Amanda Craig||7/10||3341 days||0.55||12%|
|D Oostrum||8/10||3342 days||0.57||12%|
|C Gobl||8/10||3346 days||0.57||12%|
|Victoria Slater||10/10||3658 days||0.0||0%|
|Andy & Louise Dutton||10/10||3671 days||0.0||0%|
|Leonard Vans||7/10||3684 days||0.0||0%|
|Maria Lorentzen||9/10||3691 days||0.0||0%|
|Sue Bennett||9/10||3694 days||0.0||0%|
|Robert Trostle||10/10||3697 days||0.0||0%|
|Bram-Jan M||8/10||3711 days||0.0||0%|
|Sebastian Kramer||4/10||3718 days||0.0||0%|
|Trisha T||9/10||3774 days||0.0||0%|
|Bue Verrept||8/10||3781 days||0.0||0%|
|Wim Put||9/10||3800 days||0.0||0%|
|Poonam Patel||10/10||3915 days||0.0||0%|
|Bonny Doon||6/10||4281 days||0.0||0%|
|Toni Keown||3/10||4373 days||0.0||0%|
|Olaf Penn||7/10||4409 days||0.0||0%|
|Mie Toft Pedersen||10/10||4414 days||0.0||0%|
|Tobias Rahm||6/10||4423 days||0.0||0%|
|Amanda Finger||9/10||4466 days||0.0||0%|
|Desiree Muri||10/10||4466 days||0.0||0%|
|Andrew Porter||8/10||4466 days||0.0||0%|
|Martin Nigschit||6/10||4492 days||0.0||0%|
|lawrence Walker||8/10||4492 days||0.0||0%|
|Neil Cooke||7/10||4500 days||0.0||0%|
|Kimberley Mayer||9/10||4510 days||0.0||0%|
|Bas Marieke||8/10||4759 days||0.0||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Polynesian Spa experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Polynesian Spa experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 199 days.
The Polynesian Spa experience has been adjusted for 199 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.