G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
104 Valid Reviews
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has a total of 108 reviews. There are 104 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 104 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 104 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 37 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru valid reviews is 85.38% and is based on 104 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
86.00%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| O. Muenster | 10/10 | 100 days | 100% |
| Mireille & Philippe | 8/10 | 162 days | 97% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 406 days | 90% |
| Nuala McAleer | 10/10 | 465 days | 88% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 465 days | 88% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 527 days | 85% |
| Rory | 5/10 | 557 days | 63% |
| Sue Peggs | 10/10 | 557 days | 83% |
| Symen | 7/10 | 802 days | 59% |
| Ian Garcia | 5/10 | 831 days | 46% |
| Ulli | 5/10 | 862 days | 44% |
| Pippin | 8/10 | 893 days | 54% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 893 days | 55% |
| Dan | 8/10 | 984 days | 44% |
| Marie Perret | 6/10 | 984 days | 39% |
| Varneia | 9/10 | 1107 days | 34% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 1137 days | 32% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1227 days | 25% |
| Kirsty Speers | 10/10 | 1288 days | 21% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 1288 days | 21% |
| Colin | 10/10 | 1349 days | 18% |
| Sara | 5/10 | 2079 days | 3% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
| Anton | 9/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
| Leona | 8/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2354 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2354 days | 4% |
| Tea | 9/10 | 2354 days | 4% |
| Beth Carlton | 10/10 | 2384 days | 4% |
| ShaneandJosiegoat | 9/10 | 2415 days | 3% |
| EmStems | 8/10 | 2445 days | 3% |
| Joanne | 6/10 | 2629 days | 3% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 10/10 | 2629 days | 3% |
| Flo | 9/10 | 2657 days | 3% |
| Siggi &Brian | 9/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2719 days | 3% |
| Mel | 9/10 | 2749 days | 3% |
| helen reeve | 8/10 | 2780 days | 3% |
| Melinda Pyke | 9/10 | 2810 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 7/10 | 2963 days | 2% |
| Peacock | 8/10 | 2963 days | 2% |
| sand.sarit | 10/10 | 2963 days | 2% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 2994 days | 2% |
| Ben H | 10/10 | 2994 days | 2% |
| Mark Lindeman | 10/10 | 3022 days | 2% |
| Eversons | 10/10 | 3022 days | 2% |
| Nick Cartmell | 6/10 | 3027 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Wijsman | 10/10 | 3030 days | 2% |
| Joe Trigg | 10/10 | 3132 days | 2% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 10/10 | 3133 days | 2% |
| Howard Morris | 9/10 | 3146 days | 2% |
| Michael Taing | 9/10 | 3147 days | 2% |
| Yasmin Tisdall | 10/10 | 3168 days | 2% |
| Nathan Lal | 10/10 | 3226 days | 2% |
| Jane | 9/10 | 3269 days | 2% |
| Eric Lau | 3/10 | 3316 days | 1% |
| Janet Pentelow | 9/10 | 3320 days | 2% |
| Jessica Holmes | 8/10 | 3325 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 10/10 | 3352 days | 2% |
| Valeska Lauer | 10/10 | 3359 days | 2% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 3365 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3408 days | 2% |
| Erich Brueggermann | 8/10 | 3416 days | 1% |
| Walter Neff | 9/10 | 3417 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 9/10 | 3417 days | 1% |
| Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 3437 days | 1% |
| P Rhodes | 8/10 | 3447 days | 1% |
| Rima | 10/10 | 3457 days | 1% |
| Marie Bittmann | 9/10 | 3478 days | 1% |
| Mike Guest | 8/10 | 3497 days | 1% |
| Lyle Walker | 10/10 | 3518 days | 1% |
| Jim MacDiarmid | 8/10 | 3601 days | 1% |
| Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3601 days | 1% |
| Eileen Teo | 10/10 | 3601 days | 1% |
| Jenny Sharp | 7/10 | 3602 days | 1% |
| Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
| Markus Grau | 6/10 | 3663 days | 1% |
| Julian Minnis | 10/10 | 3675 days | 1% |
| Marian K | 9/10 | 3680 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 7/10 | 3695 days | 1% |
| Matthew Francisco | 10/10 | 3713 days | 1% |
| Diana Worwood | 7/10 | 3720 days | 1% |
| Mallory Lopez | 10/10 | 3727 days | 1% |
| Lay Tyng Chan | 6/10 | 3748 days | 1% |
| Clint waters | 9/10 | 3783 days | 1% |
| veda wills | 7/10 | 3783 days | 1% |
| Zhao Lu | 10/10 | 3783 days | 1% |
| Andy Bell | 9/10 | 3814 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Hope | 9/10 | 3856 days | 1% |
| Juan Gomez | 6/10 | 3863 days | 0% |
| Amy Taylor | 8/10 | 3983 days | 0% |
| Jessie Karsif | 10/10 | 3988 days | 0% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 4005 days | 0% |
| Moira Moroney | 10/10 | 4020 days | 0% |
| AusCampa | 6/10 | 4028 days | 0% |
| Erica b | 7/10 | 4058 days | 0% |
| Mike Gornall | 7/10 | 4089 days | 0% |
| John Drake | 5/10 | 4105 days | 0% |
| Gethin Pearson | 8/10 | 4111 days | 0% |
| Kimberley Garrod | 8/10 | 4157 days | 0% |
| Bjorn Privat | 7/10 | 4171 days | 0% |
| Todd MacFarlane | 10/10 | 4179 days | 0% |
| Bert Snel | 9/10 | 4179 days | 0% |
| Matt Newby | 9/10 | 4424 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.32% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 88 days. However the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has been adjusted for 92 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 89 | -1.28% |
| 90 | -1.29% |
| 91 | -1.30% |
| 92 | -1.32% |
| 93 | -1.33% |
| 94 | -1.35% |
| 95 | -1.36% |
| … | … |
1.89% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.