Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
104 Valid Reviews
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has a total of 108 reviews. There are 104 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 104 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 104 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 37 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru valid reviews is 85.38% and is based on 104 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
85.83%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| O. Muenster | 10/10 | 39 days | 100% |
| Mireille & Philippe | 8/10 | 101 days | 98% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 345 days | 92% |
| Nuala McAleer | 10/10 | 404 days | 91% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 404 days | 91% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 466 days | 88% |
| Rory | 5/10 | 496 days | 66% |
| Sue Peggs | 10/10 | 496 days | 86% |
| Symen | 7/10 | 741 days | 64% |
| Ian Garcia | 5/10 | 770 days | 50% |
| Ulli | 5/10 | 801 days | 48% |
| Pippin | 8/10 | 832 days | 59% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 832 days | 61% |
| Dan | 8/10 | 923 days | 50% |
| Marie Perret | 6/10 | 923 days | 44% |
| Varneia | 9/10 | 1046 days | 39% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 1076 days | 37% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1166 days | 30% |
| Kirsty Speers | 10/10 | 1227 days | 25% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 1227 days | 25% |
| Colin | 10/10 | 1288 days | 21% |
| Sara | 5/10 | 2018 days | 3% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2262 days | 4% |
| Anton | 9/10 | 2262 days | 4% |
| Leona | 8/10 | 2262 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2293 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2293 days | 4% |
| Tea | 9/10 | 2293 days | 4% |
| Beth Carlton | 10/10 | 2323 days | 4% |
| ShaneandJosiegoat | 9/10 | 2354 days | 4% |
| EmStems | 8/10 | 2384 days | 4% |
| Joanne | 6/10 | 2568 days | 3% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 10/10 | 2568 days | 4% |
| Flo | 9/10 | 2596 days | 3% |
| Siggi &Brian | 9/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2658 days | 3% |
| Mel | 9/10 | 2688 days | 3% |
| helen reeve | 8/10 | 2719 days | 3% |
| Melinda Pyke | 9/10 | 2749 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 7/10 | 2902 days | 3% |
| Peacock | 8/10 | 2902 days | 3% |
| sand.sarit | 10/10 | 2902 days | 3% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 2933 days | 3% |
| Ben H | 10/10 | 2933 days | 3% |
| Mark Lindeman | 10/10 | 2961 days | 3% |
| Eversons | 10/10 | 2961 days | 3% |
| Nick Cartmell | 6/10 | 2966 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Wijsman | 10/10 | 2969 days | 3% |
| Joe Trigg | 10/10 | 3071 days | 3% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 10/10 | 3072 days | 3% |
| Howard Morris | 9/10 | 3085 days | 2% |
| Michael Taing | 9/10 | 3086 days | 2% |
| Yasmin Tisdall | 10/10 | 3107 days | 2% |
| Nathan Lal | 10/10 | 3165 days | 2% |
| Jane | 9/10 | 3208 days | 2% |
| Eric Lau | 3/10 | 3255 days | 1% |
| Janet Pentelow | 9/10 | 3259 days | 2% |
| Jessica Holmes | 8/10 | 3264 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 10/10 | 3291 days | 2% |
| Valeska Lauer | 10/10 | 3298 days | 2% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 3304 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3347 days | 2% |
| Erich Brueggermann | 8/10 | 3355 days | 2% |
| Walter Neff | 9/10 | 3357 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 9/10 | 3357 days | 2% |
| Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 3376 days | 2% |
| P Rhodes | 8/10 | 3386 days | 2% |
| Rima | 10/10 | 3396 days | 2% |
| Marie Bittmann | 9/10 | 3418 days | 2% |
| Mike Guest | 8/10 | 3436 days | 2% |
| Lyle Walker | 10/10 | 3457 days | 2% |
| Jim MacDiarmid | 8/10 | 3541 days | 2% |
| Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3541 days | 2% |
| Eileen Teo | 10/10 | 3541 days | 2% |
| Jenny Sharp | 7/10 | 3541 days | 1% |
| Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 3602 days | 1% |
| Markus Grau | 6/10 | 3602 days | 1% |
| Julian Minnis | 10/10 | 3614 days | 1% |
| Marian K | 9/10 | 3619 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 7/10 | 3634 days | 1% |
| Matthew Francisco | 10/10 | 3652 days | 1% |
| Diana Worwood | 7/10 | 3659 days | 1% |
| Mallory Lopez | 10/10 | 3666 days | 1% |
| Lay Tyng Chan | 6/10 | 3687 days | 1% |
| Clint waters | 9/10 | 3723 days | 1% |
| veda wills | 7/10 | 3723 days | 1% |
| Zhao Lu | 10/10 | 3723 days | 1% |
| Andy Bell | 9/10 | 3754 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Hope | 9/10 | 3795 days | 1% |
| Juan Gomez | 6/10 | 3802 days | 1% |
| Amy Taylor | 8/10 | 3922 days | 1% |
| Jessie Karsif | 10/10 | 3927 days | 1% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 3944 days | 1% |
| Moira Moroney | 10/10 | 3959 days | 1% |
| AusCampa | 6/10 | 3968 days | 1% |
| Erica b | 7/10 | 3998 days | 1% |
| Mike Gornall | 7/10 | 4029 days | 1% |
| John Drake | 5/10 | 4044 days | 0% |
| Gethin Pearson | 8/10 | 4050 days | 1% |
| Kimberley Garrod | 8/10 | 4096 days | 1% |
| Bjorn Privat | 7/10 | 4110 days | 0% |
| Todd MacFarlane | 10/10 | 4119 days | 0% |
| Bert Snel | 9/10 | 4119 days | 0% |
| Matt Newby | 9/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.64% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has been adjusted for 32 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 29 | -0.58% |
| 30 | -0.60% |
| 31 | -0.62% |
| 32 | -0.64% |
| 33 | -0.66% |
| 34 | -0.68% |
| 35 | -0.70% |
| … | … |
1.78% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.