Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
104 Valid Reviews
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has a total of 108 reviews. There are 104 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 104 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 104 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 37 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru valid reviews is 85.38% and is based on 104 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
85.94%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| O. Muenster | 10/10 | 80 days | 100% |
| Mireille & Philippe | 8/10 | 142 days | 97% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 386 days | 91% |
| Nuala McAleer | 10/10 | 445 days | 89% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 445 days | 89% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 507 days | 86% |
| Rory | 5/10 | 537 days | 64% |
| Sue Peggs | 10/10 | 537 days | 84% |
| Symen | 7/10 | 782 days | 61% |
| Ian Garcia | 5/10 | 811 days | 48% |
| Ulli | 5/10 | 842 days | 45% |
| Pippin | 8/10 | 873 days | 55% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 873 days | 57% |
| Dan | 8/10 | 964 days | 46% |
| Marie Perret | 6/10 | 964 days | 41% |
| Varneia | 9/10 | 1087 days | 36% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 1117 days | 33% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1207 days | 27% |
| Kirsty Speers | 10/10 | 1268 days | 22% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 1268 days | 22% |
| Colin | 10/10 | 1329 days | 19% |
| Sara | 5/10 | 2059 days | 3% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2303 days | 4% |
| Anton | 9/10 | 2303 days | 4% |
| Leona | 8/10 | 2303 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2334 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2334 days | 4% |
| Tea | 9/10 | 2334 days | 4% |
| Beth Carlton | 10/10 | 2364 days | 4% |
| ShaneandJosiegoat | 9/10 | 2395 days | 3% |
| EmStems | 8/10 | 2425 days | 3% |
| Joanne | 6/10 | 2609 days | 3% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 10/10 | 2609 days | 3% |
| Flo | 9/10 | 2637 days | 3% |
| Siggi &Brian | 9/10 | 2668 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2699 days | 3% |
| Mel | 9/10 | 2729 days | 3% |
| helen reeve | 8/10 | 2760 days | 3% |
| Melinda Pyke | 9/10 | 2790 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 7/10 | 2943 days | 2% |
| Peacock | 8/10 | 2943 days | 2% |
| sand.sarit | 10/10 | 2943 days | 2% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 2974 days | 2% |
| Ben H | 10/10 | 2974 days | 2% |
| Mark Lindeman | 10/10 | 3002 days | 2% |
| Eversons | 10/10 | 3002 days | 2% |
| Nick Cartmell | 6/10 | 3007 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Wijsman | 10/10 | 3010 days | 2% |
| Joe Trigg | 10/10 | 3112 days | 2% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 10/10 | 3113 days | 2% |
| Howard Morris | 9/10 | 3126 days | 2% |
| Michael Taing | 9/10 | 3127 days | 2% |
| Yasmin Tisdall | 10/10 | 3148 days | 2% |
| Nathan Lal | 10/10 | 3206 days | 2% |
| Jane | 9/10 | 3249 days | 2% |
| Eric Lau | 3/10 | 3296 days | 1% |
| Janet Pentelow | 9/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
| Jessica Holmes | 8/10 | 3305 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 10/10 | 3332 days | 2% |
| Valeska Lauer | 10/10 | 3339 days | 2% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 3345 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3388 days | 2% |
| Erich Brueggermann | 8/10 | 3396 days | 1% |
| Walter Neff | 9/10 | 3397 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 9/10 | 3397 days | 1% |
| Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 3417 days | 1% |
| P Rhodes | 8/10 | 3427 days | 1% |
| Rima | 10/10 | 3437 days | 1% |
| Marie Bittmann | 9/10 | 3458 days | 1% |
| Mike Guest | 8/10 | 3477 days | 1% |
| Lyle Walker | 10/10 | 3498 days | 1% |
| Jim MacDiarmid | 8/10 | 3581 days | 1% |
| Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3581 days | 1% |
| Eileen Teo | 10/10 | 3581 days | 1% |
| Jenny Sharp | 7/10 | 3582 days | 1% |
| Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 3642 days | 1% |
| Markus Grau | 6/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
| Julian Minnis | 10/10 | 3655 days | 1% |
| Marian K | 9/10 | 3660 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 7/10 | 3675 days | 1% |
| Matthew Francisco | 10/10 | 3693 days | 1% |
| Diana Worwood | 7/10 | 3700 days | 1% |
| Mallory Lopez | 10/10 | 3707 days | 1% |
| Lay Tyng Chan | 6/10 | 3728 days | 1% |
| Clint waters | 9/10 | 3763 days | 1% |
| veda wills | 7/10 | 3763 days | 1% |
| Zhao Lu | 10/10 | 3763 days | 1% |
| Andy Bell | 9/10 | 3794 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Hope | 9/10 | 3836 days | 1% |
| Juan Gomez | 6/10 | 3843 days | 0% |
| Amy Taylor | 8/10 | 3963 days | 0% |
| Jessie Karsif | 10/10 | 3968 days | 0% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 3985 days | 0% |
| Moira Moroney | 10/10 | 4000 days | 0% |
| AusCampa | 6/10 | 4008 days | 0% |
| Erica b | 7/10 | 4038 days | 0% |
| Mike Gornall | 7/10 | 4069 days | 0% |
| John Drake | 5/10 | 4085 days | 0% |
| Gethin Pearson | 8/10 | 4091 days | 0% |
| Kimberley Garrod | 8/10 | 4137 days | 0% |
| Bjorn Privat | 7/10 | 4151 days | 0% |
| Todd MacFarlane | 10/10 | 4159 days | 0% |
| Bert Snel | 9/10 | 4159 days | 0% |
| Matt Newby | 9/10 | 4404 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.19% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 70 days. However the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has been adjusted for 72 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 69 | -1.14% |
| 70 | -1.16% |
| 71 | -1.18% |
| 72 | -1.19% |
| 73 | -1.21% |
| 74 | -1.23% |
| 75 | -1.24% |
| … | … |
1.87% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.