Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
104 Valid Reviews
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has a total of 108 reviews. There are 104 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 104 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 104 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 37 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru valid reviews is 85.38% and is based on 104 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
86.65%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| O. Muenster | 10/10 | 281 days | 100% |
| Mireille & Philippe | 8/10 | 343 days | 96% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 587 days | 83% |
| Nuala McAleer | 10/10 | 646 days | 80% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 646 days | 80% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 708 days | 75% |
| Rory | 5/10 | 738 days | 55% |
| Sue Peggs | 10/10 | 738 days | 72% |
| Symen | 7/10 | 983 days | 44% |
| Ian Garcia | 5/10 | 1012 days | 34% |
| Ulli | 5/10 | 1043 days | 32% |
| Pippin | 8/10 | 1074 days | 38% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 1074 days | 39% |
| Dan | 8/10 | 1165 days | 31% |
| Marie Perret | 6/10 | 1165 days | 27% |
| Varneia | 9/10 | 1288 days | 22% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 1318 days | 20% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1408 days | 16% |
| Kirsty Speers | 10/10 | 1469 days | 13% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 1469 days | 13% |
| Colin | 10/10 | 1530 days | 10% |
| Sara | 5/10 | 2260 days | 3% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
| Anton | 9/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
| Leona | 8/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2535 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2535 days | 4% |
| Tea | 9/10 | 2535 days | 4% |
| Beth Carlton | 10/10 | 2565 days | 4% |
| ShaneandJosiegoat | 9/10 | 2596 days | 4% |
| EmStems | 8/10 | 2626 days | 3% |
| Joanne | 6/10 | 2810 days | 3% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 10/10 | 2810 days | 3% |
| Flo | 9/10 | 2838 days | 3% |
| Siggi &Brian | 9/10 | 2869 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2900 days | 3% |
| Mel | 9/10 | 2930 days | 3% |
| helen reeve | 8/10 | 2961 days | 3% |
| Melinda Pyke | 9/10 | 2991 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 7/10 | 3144 days | 2% |
| Peacock | 8/10 | 3144 days | 2% |
| sand.sarit | 10/10 | 3144 days | 2% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 3175 days | 2% |
| Ben H | 10/10 | 3175 days | 2% |
| Mark Lindeman | 10/10 | 3203 days | 2% |
| Eversons | 10/10 | 3203 days | 2% |
| Nick Cartmell | 6/10 | 3208 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Wijsman | 10/10 | 3211 days | 2% |
| Joe Trigg | 10/10 | 3313 days | 2% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 10/10 | 3314 days | 2% |
| Howard Morris | 9/10 | 3327 days | 2% |
| Michael Taing | 9/10 | 3328 days | 2% |
| Yasmin Tisdall | 10/10 | 3349 days | 2% |
| Nathan Lal | 10/10 | 3407 days | 2% |
| Jane | 9/10 | 3450 days | 2% |
| Eric Lau | 3/10 | 3497 days | 1% |
| Janet Pentelow | 9/10 | 3501 days | 2% |
| Jessica Holmes | 8/10 | 3506 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 10/10 | 3533 days | 2% |
| Valeska Lauer | 10/10 | 3540 days | 2% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 3546 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3589 days | 2% |
| Erich Brueggermann | 8/10 | 3597 days | 2% |
| Walter Neff | 9/10 | 3598 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 9/10 | 3598 days | 2% |
| Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 3618 days | 2% |
| P Rhodes | 8/10 | 3628 days | 1% |
| Rima | 10/10 | 3638 days | 1% |
| Marie Bittmann | 9/10 | 3659 days | 1% |
| Mike Guest | 8/10 | 3678 days | 1% |
| Lyle Walker | 10/10 | 3699 days | 1% |
| Jim MacDiarmid | 8/10 | 3782 days | 1% |
| Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3782 days | 1% |
| Eileen Teo | 10/10 | 3782 days | 1% |
| Jenny Sharp | 7/10 | 3783 days | 1% |
| Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 3843 days | 1% |
| Markus Grau | 6/10 | 3844 days | 1% |
| Julian Minnis | 10/10 | 3856 days | 1% |
| Marian K | 9/10 | 3861 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 7/10 | 3876 days | 1% |
| Matthew Francisco | 10/10 | 3894 days | 1% |
| Diana Worwood | 7/10 | 3901 days | 1% |
| Mallory Lopez | 10/10 | 3908 days | 1% |
| Lay Tyng Chan | 6/10 | 3929 days | 1% |
| Clint waters | 9/10 | 3964 days | 1% |
| veda wills | 7/10 | 3964 days | 1% |
| Zhao Lu | 10/10 | 3964 days | 1% |
| Andy Bell | 9/10 | 3995 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Hope | 9/10 | 4037 days | 1% |
| Juan Gomez | 6/10 | 4044 days | 1% |
| Amy Taylor | 8/10 | 4164 days | 0% |
| Jessie Karsif | 10/10 | 4169 days | 0% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 4186 days | 0% |
| Moira Moroney | 10/10 | 4201 days | 0% |
| AusCampa | 6/10 | 4209 days | 0% |
| Erica b | 7/10 | 4239 days | 0% |
| Mike Gornall | 7/10 | 4270 days | 0% |
| John Drake | 5/10 | 4286 days | 0% |
| Gethin Pearson | 8/10 | 4292 days | 0% |
| Kimberley Garrod | 8/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| Bjorn Privat | 7/10 | 4352 days | 0% |
| Todd MacFarlane | 10/10 | 4360 days | 0% |
| Bert Snel | 9/10 | 4360 days | 0% |
| Matt Newby | 9/10 | 4605 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.95% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 47 days. However the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.89% |
| 198 | -3.91% |
| 199 | -3.93% |
| 200 | -3.95% |
| 201 | -3.97% |
| 202 | -3.99% |
| 203 | -4.01% |
| … | … |
2.32% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.