Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
103 Valid Reviews
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has a total of 108 reviews. There are 103 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 103 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 103 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 36 |
|
35% |
| 9/10 | 26 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.34% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru valid reviews is 85.34% and is based on 103 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
85.03%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle | 9/10 | 248 days | 100% |
| Nuala McAleer | 10/10 | 307 days | 99% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 307 days | 99% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 369 days | 97% |
| Rory | 5/10 | 399 days | 72% |
| Sue Peggs | 10/10 | 399 days | 95% |
| Symen | 7/10 | 644 days | 74% |
| Ian Garcia | 5/10 | 673 days | 59% |
| Ulli | 5/10 | 704 days | 57% |
| Pippin | 8/10 | 735 days | 71% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 735 days | 72% |
| Dan | 8/10 | 826 days | 63% |
| Marie Perret | 6/10 | 826 days | 55% |
| Varneia | 9/10 | 949 days | 50% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 979 days | 47% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1069 days | 39% |
| Kirsty Speers | 10/10 | 1130 days | 34% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 1130 days | 33% |
| Colin | 10/10 | 1191 days | 29% |
| Sara | 5/10 | 1921 days | 4% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2165 days | 4% |
| Anton | 9/10 | 2165 days | 4% |
| Leona | 8/10 | 2165 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2196 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2196 days | 4% |
| Tea | 9/10 | 2196 days | 4% |
| Beth Carlton | 10/10 | 2226 days | 4% |
| ShaneandJosiegoat | 9/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| ShaneandJosiegoat | 9/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| EmStems | 8/10 | 2287 days | 4% |
| Joanne | 6/10 | 2471 days | 3% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 10/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
| Flo | 9/10 | 2499 days | 4% |
| Siggi &Brian | 9/10 | 2530 days | 4% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2561 days | 3% |
| Mel | 9/10 | 2591 days | 3% |
| helen reeve | 8/10 | 2622 days | 3% |
| Melinda Pyke | 9/10 | 2652 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 7/10 | 2805 days | 3% |
| Peacock | 8/10 | 2805 days | 3% |
| sand.sarit | 10/10 | 2805 days | 3% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 2836 days | 3% |
| Ben H | 10/10 | 2836 days | 3% |
| Mark Lindeman | 10/10 | 2864 days | 3% |
| Eversons | 10/10 | 2864 days | 3% |
| Nick Cartmell | 6/10 | 2869 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Wijsman | 10/10 | 2872 days | 3% |
| Joe Trigg | 10/10 | 2974 days | 3% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 10/10 | 2975 days | 3% |
| Howard Morris | 9/10 | 2988 days | 3% |
| Michael Taing | 9/10 | 2989 days | 3% |
| Yasmin Tisdall | 10/10 | 3010 days | 3% |
| Nathan Lal | 10/10 | 3068 days | 2% |
| Jane | 9/10 | 3111 days | 2% |
| Eric Lau | 3/10 | 3158 days | 1% |
| Janet Pentelow | 9/10 | 3162 days | 2% |
| Jessica Holmes | 8/10 | 3167 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 10/10 | 3194 days | 2% |
| Valeska Lauer | 10/10 | 3201 days | 2% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 3207 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3250 days | 2% |
| Erich Brueggermann | 8/10 | 3258 days | 2% |
| Walter Neff | 9/10 | 3259 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 9/10 | 3259 days | 2% |
| Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 3279 days | 2% |
| P Rhodes | 8/10 | 3289 days | 2% |
| Rima | 10/10 | 3299 days | 2% |
| Marie Bittmann | 9/10 | 3320 days | 2% |
| Mike Guest | 8/10 | 3339 days | 2% |
| Lyle Walker | 10/10 | 3360 days | 2% |
| Jim MacDiarmid | 8/10 | 3443 days | 2% |
| Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3443 days | 2% |
| Eileen Teo | 10/10 | 3443 days | 2% |
| Jenny Sharp | 7/10 | 3444 days | 2% |
| Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 3504 days | 2% |
| Markus Grau | 6/10 | 3505 days | 1% |
| Julian Minnis | 10/10 | 3517 days | 2% |
| Marian K | 9/10 | 3522 days | 2% |
| Chadd Holland | 7/10 | 3537 days | 1% |
| Matthew Francisco | 10/10 | 3555 days | 1% |
| Diana Worwood | 7/10 | 3562 days | 1% |
| Mallory Lopez | 10/10 | 3569 days | 1% |
| Lay Tyng Chan | 6/10 | 3590 days | 1% |
| Clint waters | 9/10 | 3625 days | 1% |
| veda wills | 7/10 | 3625 days | 1% |
| Zhao Lu | 10/10 | 3625 days | 1% |
| Andy Bell | 9/10 | 3656 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Hope | 9/10 | 3698 days | 1% |
| Juan Gomez | 6/10 | 3705 days | 1% |
| Amy Taylor | 8/10 | 3825 days | 1% |
| Jessie Karsif | 10/10 | 3830 days | 1% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 3847 days | 1% |
| Moira Moroney | 10/10 | 3862 days | 1% |
| AusCampa | 6/10 | 3870 days | 1% |
| Erica b | 7/10 | 3900 days | 1% |
| Mike Gornall | 7/10 | 3931 days | 1% |
| John Drake | 5/10 | 3947 days | 0% |
| Gethin Pearson | 8/10 | 3953 days | 1% |
| Kimberley Garrod | 8/10 | 3999 days | 1% |
| Bjorn Privat | 7/10 | 4013 days | 0% |
| Todd MacFarlane | 10/10 | 4021 days | 1% |
| Bert Snel | 9/10 | 4021 days | 0% |
| Matt Newby | 9/10 | 4266 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -4.01% |
| 198 | -4.03% |
| 199 | -4.05% |
| 200 | -4.07% |
| 201 | -4.09% |
| 202 | -4.11% |
| 203 | -4.13% |
| … | … |
2.74% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.