Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
104 Valid Reviews
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has a total of 108 reviews. There are 104 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 104 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 104 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 37 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru valid reviews is 85.38% and is based on 104 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
85.79%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| O. Muenster | 10/10 | 19 days | 100% |
| Mireille & Philippe | 8/10 | 81 days | 98% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 325 days | 93% |
| Nuala McAleer | 10/10 | 384 days | 92% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 384 days | 92% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 446 days | 89% |
| Rory | 5/10 | 476 days | 66% |
| Sue Peggs | 10/10 | 476 days | 87% |
| Symen | 7/10 | 721 days | 65% |
| Ian Garcia | 5/10 | 750 days | 52% |
| Ulli | 5/10 | 781 days | 50% |
| Pippin | 8/10 | 812 days | 61% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 812 days | 62% |
| Dan | 8/10 | 903 days | 52% |
| Marie Perret | 6/10 | 903 days | 46% |
| Varneia | 9/10 | 1026 days | 41% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 1056 days | 38% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1146 days | 31% |
| Kirsty Speers | 10/10 | 1207 days | 27% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 1207 days | 26% |
| Colin | 10/10 | 1268 days | 23% |
| Sara | 5/10 | 1998 days | 3% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
| Anton | 9/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
| Leona | 8/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2273 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2273 days | 4% |
| Tea | 9/10 | 2273 days | 4% |
| Beth Carlton | 10/10 | 2303 days | 4% |
| ShaneandJosiegoat | 9/10 | 2334 days | 4% |
| EmStems | 8/10 | 2364 days | 4% |
| Joanne | 6/10 | 2548 days | 3% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 10/10 | 2548 days | 4% |
| Flo | 9/10 | 2576 days | 3% |
| Siggi &Brian | 9/10 | 2607 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2638 days | 3% |
| Mel | 9/10 | 2668 days | 3% |
| helen reeve | 8/10 | 2699 days | 3% |
| Melinda Pyke | 9/10 | 2729 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 7/10 | 2882 days | 3% |
| Peacock | 8/10 | 2882 days | 3% |
| sand.sarit | 10/10 | 2882 days | 3% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 2913 days | 3% |
| Ben H | 10/10 | 2913 days | 3% |
| Mark Lindeman | 10/10 | 2941 days | 3% |
| Eversons | 10/10 | 2941 days | 3% |
| Nick Cartmell | 6/10 | 2946 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Wijsman | 10/10 | 2949 days | 3% |
| Joe Trigg | 10/10 | 3051 days | 3% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 10/10 | 3052 days | 3% |
| Howard Morris | 9/10 | 3065 days | 2% |
| Michael Taing | 9/10 | 3066 days | 2% |
| Yasmin Tisdall | 10/10 | 3087 days | 2% |
| Nathan Lal | 10/10 | 3145 days | 2% |
| Jane | 9/10 | 3188 days | 2% |
| Eric Lau | 3/10 | 3235 days | 1% |
| Janet Pentelow | 9/10 | 3239 days | 2% |
| Jessica Holmes | 8/10 | 3244 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 10/10 | 3271 days | 2% |
| Valeska Lauer | 10/10 | 3278 days | 2% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 3284 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3327 days | 2% |
| Erich Brueggermann | 8/10 | 3335 days | 2% |
| Walter Neff | 9/10 | 3336 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 9/10 | 3336 days | 2% |
| Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 3356 days | 2% |
| P Rhodes | 8/10 | 3366 days | 2% |
| Rima | 10/10 | 3376 days | 2% |
| Marie Bittmann | 9/10 | 3397 days | 2% |
| Mike Guest | 8/10 | 3416 days | 2% |
| Lyle Walker | 10/10 | 3437 days | 2% |
| Jim MacDiarmid | 8/10 | 3520 days | 2% |
| Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3520 days | 2% |
| Eileen Teo | 10/10 | 3520 days | 2% |
| Jenny Sharp | 7/10 | 3521 days | 1% |
| Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 3581 days | 1% |
| Markus Grau | 6/10 | 3582 days | 1% |
| Julian Minnis | 10/10 | 3594 days | 1% |
| Marian K | 9/10 | 3599 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 7/10 | 3614 days | 1% |
| Matthew Francisco | 10/10 | 3632 days | 1% |
| Diana Worwood | 7/10 | 3639 days | 1% |
| Mallory Lopez | 10/10 | 3646 days | 1% |
| Lay Tyng Chan | 6/10 | 3667 days | 1% |
| Clint waters | 9/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
| veda wills | 7/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
| Zhao Lu | 10/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
| Andy Bell | 9/10 | 3733 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Hope | 9/10 | 3775 days | 1% |
| Juan Gomez | 6/10 | 3782 days | 1% |
| Amy Taylor | 8/10 | 3902 days | 1% |
| Jessie Karsif | 10/10 | 3907 days | 1% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 3924 days | 1% |
| Moira Moroney | 10/10 | 3939 days | 1% |
| AusCampa | 6/10 | 3947 days | 1% |
| Erica b | 7/10 | 3977 days | 1% |
| Mike Gornall | 7/10 | 4008 days | 1% |
| John Drake | 5/10 | 4024 days | 0% |
| Gethin Pearson | 8/10 | 4030 days | 1% |
| Kimberley Garrod | 8/10 | 4076 days | 1% |
| Bjorn Privat | 7/10 | 4090 days | 0% |
| Todd MacFarlane | 10/10 | 4098 days | 0% |
| Bert Snel | 9/10 | 4098 days | 0% |
| Matt Newby | 9/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.23% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 53 days. However the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has been adjusted for 11 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 8 | -0.17% |
| 9 | -0.19% |
| 10 | -0.21% |
| 11 | -0.23% |
| 12 | -0.25% |
| 13 | -0.27% |
| 14 | -0.29% |
| … | … |
1.71% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.