Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru

Valid Reviews

104 Valid Reviews

The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has a total of 108 reviews. There are 104 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 104 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 104 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 37
36%
9/10 25
24%
8/10 20
19%
7/10 9
9%
6/10 7
7%
5/10 5
5%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

85.38% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru valid reviews is 85.38% and is based on 104 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

86.57%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
O. Muenster 10/10 261 days 100%
Mireille & Philippe 8/10 323 days 96%
Danielle 9/10 567 days 84%
Nuala McAleer 10/10 626 days 81%
Hannah 10/10 626 days 81%
Mladen Savov 10/10 688 days 76%
Rory 5/10 718 days 56%
Sue Peggs 10/10 718 days 73%
Symen 7/10 963 days 46%
Ian Garcia 5/10 992 days 35%
Ulli 5/10 1023 days 33%
Pippin 8/10 1054 days 40%
Anna 10/10 1054 days 40%
Dan 8/10 1145 days 32%
Marie Perret 6/10 1145 days 28%
Varneia 9/10 1268 days 23%
Liz 9/10 1298 days 21%
Julia 10/10 1388 days 16%
Kirsty Speers 10/10 1449 days 14%
Sarah 8/10 1449 days 13%
Colin 10/10 1510 days 11%
Sara 5/10 2240 days 3%
Katie 8/10 2484 days 4%
Anton 9/10 2484 days 4%
Leona 8/10 2484 days 4%
Jennifer Hebert 10/10 2515 days 4%
Jennifer Hebert 10/10 2515 days 4%
Tea 9/10 2515 days 4%
Beth Carlton 10/10 2545 days 4%
ShaneandJosiegoat 9/10 2576 days 4%
EmStems 8/10 2606 days 3%
Joanne 6/10 2790 days 3%
Stefan Miedzinski 10/10 2790 days 3%
Flo 9/10 2818 days 3%
Siggi &Brian 9/10 2849 days 3%
Marilli 8/10 2880 days 3%
Mel 9/10 2910 days 3%
helen reeve 8/10 2941 days 3%
Melinda Pyke 9/10 2971 days 3%
S Weslake 7/10 3124 days 2%
Peacock 8/10 3124 days 2%
sand.sarit 10/10 3124 days 2%
Kat 9/10 3155 days 2%
Ben H 10/10 3155 days 2%
Mark Lindeman 10/10 3183 days 2%
Eversons 10/10 3183 days 2%
Nick Cartmell 6/10 3188 days 1%
Suzanne Wijsman 10/10 3191 days 2%
Joe Trigg 10/10 3293 days 2%
Phil and Mel Rowson 10/10 3294 days 2%
Howard Morris 9/10 3307 days 2%
Michael Taing 9/10 3308 days 2%
Yasmin Tisdall 10/10 3329 days 2%
Nathan Lal 10/10 3387 days 2%
Jane 9/10 3430 days 2%
Eric Lau 3/10 3477 days 1%
Janet Pentelow 9/10 3481 days 2%
Jessica Holmes 8/10 3486 days 2%
Harriet Smith 10/10 3513 days 2%
Valeska Lauer 10/10 3520 days 2%
Kati Behrendt 10/10 3526 days 2%
Trent O'Keeffe 9/10 3569 days 2%
Erich Brueggermann 8/10 3577 days 2%
Walter Neff 9/10 3578 days 2%
Rebecca Lindsey 9/10 3578 days 2%
Sylvie Martel 10/10 3598 days 2%
P Rhodes 8/10 3608 days 1%
Rima 10/10 3618 days 1%
Marie Bittmann 9/10 3639 days 1%
Mike Guest 8/10 3658 days 1%
Lyle Walker 10/10 3679 days 1%
Jim MacDiarmid 8/10 3762 days 1%
Rawiri johnston 8/10 3762 days 1%
Eileen Teo 10/10 3762 days 1%
Jenny Sharp 7/10 3763 days 1%
Kathy Hart 10/10 3823 days 1%
Markus Grau 6/10 3824 days 1%
Julian Minnis 10/10 3836 days 1%
Marian K 9/10 3841 days 1%
Chadd Holland 7/10 3856 days 1%
Matthew Francisco 10/10 3874 days 1%
Diana Worwood 7/10 3881 days 1%
Mallory Lopez 10/10 3888 days 1%
Lay Tyng Chan 6/10 3909 days 1%
Clint waters 9/10 3944 days 1%
veda wills 7/10 3944 days 1%
Zhao Lu 10/10 3944 days 1%
Andy Bell 9/10 3975 days 1%
Rebecca Hope 9/10 4017 days 1%
Juan Gomez 6/10 4024 days 1%
Amy Taylor 8/10 4144 days 0%
Jessie Karsif 10/10 4149 days 0%
Nicole 8/10 4166 days 0%
Moira Moroney 10/10 4181 days 0%
AusCampa 6/10 4189 days 0%
Erica b 7/10 4219 days 0%
Mike Gornall 7/10 4250 days 0%
John Drake 5/10 4266 days 0%
Gethin Pearson 8/10 4272 days 0%
Kimberley Garrod 8/10 4318 days 0%
Bjorn Privat 7/10 4332 days 0%
Todd MacFarlane 10/10 4340 days 0%
Bert Snel 9/10 4340 days 0%
Matt Newby 9/10 4585 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.66% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 57 days. However the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
… …
197 -3.60%
198 -3.62%
199 -3.64%
200 -3.66%
201 -3.68%
202 -3.70%
203 -3.71%
… …

Balancing Adjustment

2.27% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

85%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.