G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
104 Valid Reviews
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has a total of 109 reviews. There are 104 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 104 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 104 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 36 |
|
35% |
| 9/10 | 26 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru valid reviews is 85.29% and is based on 104 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
84.72%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mireille & Philippe | 8/10 | 41 days | 100% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 285 days | 96% |
| Nuala McAleer | 10/10 | 344 days | 95% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 344 days | 95% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 406 days | 93% |
| Rory | 5/10 | 436 days | 69% |
| Sue Peggs | 10/10 | 436 days | 91% |
| Symen | 7/10 | 681 days | 70% |
| Ian Garcia | 5/10 | 710 days | 55% |
| Ulli | 5/10 | 741 days | 53% |
| Pippin | 8/10 | 772 days | 66% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 772 days | 67% |
| Dan | 8/10 | 863 days | 58% |
| Marie Perret | 6/10 | 863 days | 51% |
| Varneia | 9/10 | 986 days | 46% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 1016 days | 43% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1106 days | 35% |
| Kirsty Speers | 10/10 | 1167 days | 30% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 1167 days | 30% |
| Colin | 10/10 | 1228 days | 26% |
| Sara | 5/10 | 1958 days | 4% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2202 days | 4% |
| Anton | 9/10 | 2202 days | 4% |
| Leona | 8/10 | 2202 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2233 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2233 days | 4% |
| Tea | 9/10 | 2233 days | 4% |
| Beth Carlton | 10/10 | 2263 days | 4% |
| ShaneandJosiegoat | 9/10 | 2294 days | 4% |
| ShaneandJosiegoat | 9/10 | 2294 days | 4% |
| EmStems | 8/10 | 2324 days | 4% |
| Joanne | 6/10 | 2508 days | 3% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 10/10 | 2508 days | 4% |
| Flo | 9/10 | 2536 days | 4% |
| Siggi &Brian | 9/10 | 2567 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2598 days | 3% |
| Mel | 9/10 | 2628 days | 3% |
| helen reeve | 8/10 | 2659 days | 3% |
| Melinda Pyke | 9/10 | 2689 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 7/10 | 2842 days | 3% |
| Peacock | 8/10 | 2842 days | 3% |
| sand.sarit | 10/10 | 2842 days | 3% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 2873 days | 3% |
| Ben H | 10/10 | 2873 days | 3% |
| Mark Lindeman | 10/10 | 2901 days | 3% |
| Eversons | 10/10 | 2901 days | 3% |
| Nick Cartmell | 6/10 | 2906 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Wijsman | 10/10 | 2909 days | 3% |
| Joe Trigg | 10/10 | 3011 days | 3% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 10/10 | 3012 days | 3% |
| Howard Morris | 9/10 | 3025 days | 3% |
| Michael Taing | 9/10 | 3026 days | 3% |
| Yasmin Tisdall | 10/10 | 3047 days | 3% |
| Nathan Lal | 10/10 | 3105 days | 2% |
| Jane | 9/10 | 3148 days | 2% |
| Eric Lau | 3/10 | 3195 days | 1% |
| Janet Pentelow | 9/10 | 3199 days | 2% |
| Jessica Holmes | 8/10 | 3204 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 10/10 | 3231 days | 2% |
| Valeska Lauer | 10/10 | 3238 days | 2% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 3244 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3287 days | 2% |
| Erich Brueggermann | 8/10 | 3295 days | 2% |
| Walter Neff | 9/10 | 3296 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 9/10 | 3296 days | 2% |
| Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 3316 days | 2% |
| P Rhodes | 8/10 | 3326 days | 2% |
| Rima | 10/10 | 3336 days | 2% |
| Marie Bittmann | 9/10 | 3357 days | 2% |
| Mike Guest | 8/10 | 3376 days | 2% |
| Lyle Walker | 10/10 | 3397 days | 2% |
| Jim MacDiarmid | 8/10 | 3480 days | 2% |
| Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3480 days | 2% |
| Eileen Teo | 10/10 | 3480 days | 2% |
| Jenny Sharp | 7/10 | 3481 days | 2% |
| Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 3541 days | 2% |
| Markus Grau | 6/10 | 3542 days | 1% |
| Julian Minnis | 10/10 | 3554 days | 2% |
| Marian K | 9/10 | 3559 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 7/10 | 3574 days | 1% |
| Matthew Francisco | 10/10 | 3592 days | 1% |
| Diana Worwood | 7/10 | 3599 days | 1% |
| Mallory Lopez | 10/10 | 3606 days | 1% |
| Lay Tyng Chan | 6/10 | 3627 days | 1% |
| Clint waters | 9/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
| veda wills | 7/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
| Zhao Lu | 10/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
| Andy Bell | 9/10 | 3693 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Hope | 9/10 | 3735 days | 1% |
| Juan Gomez | 6/10 | 3742 days | 1% |
| Amy Taylor | 8/10 | 3862 days | 1% |
| Jessie Karsif | 10/10 | 3867 days | 1% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 3884 days | 1% |
| Moira Moroney | 10/10 | 3899 days | 1% |
| AusCampa | 6/10 | 3907 days | 1% |
| Erica b | 7/10 | 3937 days | 1% |
| Mike Gornall | 7/10 | 3968 days | 1% |
| John Drake | 5/10 | 3984 days | 0% |
| Gethin Pearson | 8/10 | 3990 days | 1% |
| Kimberley Garrod | 8/10 | 4036 days | 1% |
| Bjorn Privat | 7/10 | 4050 days | 0% |
| Todd MacFarlane | 10/10 | 4058 days | 0% |
| Bert Snel | 9/10 | 4058 days | 0% |
| Matt Newby | 9/10 | 4303 days | 0% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.47% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has been adjusted for 23 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 20 | -0.41% |
| 21 | -0.43% |
| 22 | -0.45% |
| 23 | -0.47% |
| 24 | -0.49% |
| 25 | -0.51% |
| 26 | -0.53% |
| … | … |
1.97% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.