G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
104 Valid Reviews
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has a total of 108 reviews. There are 104 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 104 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 104 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 37 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru valid reviews is 85.38% and is based on 104 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
86.12%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| O. Muenster | 10/10 | 140 days | 100% |
| Mireille & Philippe | 8/10 | 202 days | 97% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 446 days | 89% |
| Nuala McAleer | 10/10 | 505 days | 86% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 505 days | 86% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 567 days | 83% |
| Rory | 5/10 | 597 days | 61% |
| Sue Peggs | 10/10 | 597 days | 81% |
| Symen | 7/10 | 842 days | 56% |
| Ian Garcia | 5/10 | 871 days | 44% |
| Ulli | 5/10 | 902 days | 41% |
| Pippin | 8/10 | 933 days | 50% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 933 days | 51% |
| Dan | 8/10 | 1024 days | 41% |
| Marie Perret | 6/10 | 1024 days | 36% |
| Varneia | 9/10 | 1147 days | 31% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 1177 days | 29% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1267 days | 23% |
| Kirsty Speers | 10/10 | 1328 days | 19% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 1328 days | 19% |
| Colin | 10/10 | 1389 days | 16% |
| Sara | 5/10 | 2119 days | 3% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2363 days | 4% |
| Anton | 9/10 | 2363 days | 4% |
| Leona | 8/10 | 2363 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2394 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2394 days | 4% |
| Tea | 9/10 | 2394 days | 4% |
| Beth Carlton | 10/10 | 2424 days | 4% |
| ShaneandJosiegoat | 9/10 | 2455 days | 3% |
| EmStems | 8/10 | 2485 days | 3% |
| Joanne | 6/10 | 2669 days | 3% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 10/10 | 2669 days | 3% |
| Flo | 9/10 | 2697 days | 3% |
| Siggi &Brian | 9/10 | 2728 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2759 days | 3% |
| Mel | 9/10 | 2789 days | 3% |
| helen reeve | 8/10 | 2820 days | 3% |
| Melinda Pyke | 9/10 | 2850 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 7/10 | 3003 days | 2% |
| Peacock | 8/10 | 3003 days | 2% |
| sand.sarit | 10/10 | 3003 days | 2% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 3034 days | 2% |
| Ben H | 10/10 | 3034 days | 2% |
| Mark Lindeman | 10/10 | 3062 days | 2% |
| Eversons | 10/10 | 3062 days | 2% |
| Nick Cartmell | 6/10 | 3067 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Wijsman | 10/10 | 3070 days | 2% |
| Joe Trigg | 10/10 | 3172 days | 2% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 10/10 | 3173 days | 2% |
| Howard Morris | 9/10 | 3186 days | 2% |
| Michael Taing | 9/10 | 3187 days | 2% |
| Yasmin Tisdall | 10/10 | 3208 days | 2% |
| Nathan Lal | 10/10 | 3266 days | 2% |
| Jane | 9/10 | 3309 days | 2% |
| Eric Lau | 3/10 | 3356 days | 1% |
| Janet Pentelow | 9/10 | 3360 days | 2% |
| Jessica Holmes | 8/10 | 3365 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 10/10 | 3392 days | 2% |
| Valeska Lauer | 10/10 | 3399 days | 2% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 3405 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3448 days | 2% |
| Erich Brueggermann | 8/10 | 3456 days | 1% |
| Walter Neff | 9/10 | 3457 days | 2% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 9/10 | 3457 days | 2% |
| Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 3477 days | 1% |
| P Rhodes | 8/10 | 3487 days | 1% |
| Rima | 10/10 | 3497 days | 1% |
| Marie Bittmann | 9/10 | 3518 days | 1% |
| Mike Guest | 8/10 | 3537 days | 1% |
| Lyle Walker | 10/10 | 3558 days | 1% |
| Jim MacDiarmid | 8/10 | 3641 days | 1% |
| Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3641 days | 1% |
| Eileen Teo | 10/10 | 3641 days | 1% |
| Jenny Sharp | 7/10 | 3642 days | 1% |
| Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
| Markus Grau | 6/10 | 3703 days | 1% |
| Julian Minnis | 10/10 | 3715 days | 1% |
| Marian K | 9/10 | 3720 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 7/10 | 3735 days | 1% |
| Matthew Francisco | 10/10 | 3753 days | 1% |
| Diana Worwood | 7/10 | 3760 days | 1% |
| Mallory Lopez | 10/10 | 3767 days | 1% |
| Lay Tyng Chan | 6/10 | 3788 days | 1% |
| Clint waters | 9/10 | 3823 days | 1% |
| veda wills | 7/10 | 3823 days | 1% |
| Zhao Lu | 10/10 | 3823 days | 1% |
| Andy Bell | 9/10 | 3854 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Hope | 9/10 | 3896 days | 1% |
| Juan Gomez | 6/10 | 3903 days | 1% |
| Amy Taylor | 8/10 | 4023 days | 0% |
| Jessie Karsif | 10/10 | 4028 days | 0% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 4045 days | 0% |
| Moira Moroney | 10/10 | 4060 days | 0% |
| AusCampa | 6/10 | 4068 days | 0% |
| Erica b | 7/10 | 4098 days | 0% |
| Mike Gornall | 7/10 | 4129 days | 0% |
| John Drake | 5/10 | 4145 days | 0% |
| Gethin Pearson | 8/10 | 4151 days | 0% |
| Kimberley Garrod | 8/10 | 4197 days | 0% |
| Bjorn Privat | 7/10 | 4211 days | 0% |
| Todd MacFarlane | 10/10 | 4219 days | 0% |
| Bert Snel | 9/10 | 4219 days | 0% |
| Matt Newby | 9/10 | 4464 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.41% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 119 days. However the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has been adjusted for 132 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 129 | -1.38% |
| 130 | -1.39% |
| 131 | -1.40% |
| 132 | -1.41% |
| 133 | -1.42% |
| 134 | -1.43% |
| 135 | -1.44% |
| … | … |
1.88% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.