Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
104 Valid Reviews
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has a total of 108 reviews. There are 104 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 104 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 104 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 37 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru valid reviews is 85.38% and is based on 104 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
85.88%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| O. Muenster | 10/10 | 60 days | 100% |
| Mireille & Philippe | 8/10 | 122 days | 97% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 366 days | 92% |
| Nuala McAleer | 10/10 | 425 days | 90% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 425 days | 90% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 487 days | 87% |
| Rory | 5/10 | 517 days | 65% |
| Sue Peggs | 10/10 | 517 days | 85% |
| Symen | 7/10 | 762 days | 62% |
| Ian Garcia | 5/10 | 791 days | 49% |
| Ulli | 5/10 | 822 days | 47% |
| Pippin | 8/10 | 853 days | 57% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 853 days | 58% |
| Dan | 8/10 | 944 days | 48% |
| Marie Perret | 6/10 | 944 days | 42% |
| Varneia | 9/10 | 1067 days | 37% |
| Liz | 9/10 | 1097 days | 35% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1187 days | 28% |
| Kirsty Speers | 10/10 | 1248 days | 24% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 1248 days | 23% |
| Colin | 10/10 | 1309 days | 20% |
| Sara | 5/10 | 2039 days | 3% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2283 days | 4% |
| Anton | 9/10 | 2283 days | 4% |
| Leona | 8/10 | 2283 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2314 days | 4% |
| Jennifer Hebert | 10/10 | 2314 days | 4% |
| Tea | 9/10 | 2314 days | 4% |
| Beth Carlton | 10/10 | 2344 days | 4% |
| ShaneandJosiegoat | 9/10 | 2375 days | 3% |
| EmStems | 8/10 | 2405 days | 3% |
| Joanne | 6/10 | 2589 days | 3% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 10/10 | 2589 days | 3% |
| Flo | 9/10 | 2617 days | 3% |
| Siggi &Brian | 9/10 | 2648 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2679 days | 3% |
| Mel | 9/10 | 2709 days | 3% |
| helen reeve | 8/10 | 2740 days | 3% |
| Melinda Pyke | 9/10 | 2770 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 7/10 | 2923 days | 2% |
| Peacock | 8/10 | 2923 days | 2% |
| sand.sarit | 10/10 | 2923 days | 2% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 2954 days | 2% |
| Ben H | 10/10 | 2954 days | 2% |
| Mark Lindeman | 10/10 | 2982 days | 2% |
| Eversons | 10/10 | 2982 days | 2% |
| Nick Cartmell | 6/10 | 2987 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Wijsman | 10/10 | 2990 days | 2% |
| Joe Trigg | 10/10 | 3092 days | 2% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 10/10 | 3093 days | 2% |
| Howard Morris | 9/10 | 3106 days | 2% |
| Michael Taing | 9/10 | 3107 days | 2% |
| Yasmin Tisdall | 10/10 | 3128 days | 2% |
| Nathan Lal | 10/10 | 3186 days | 2% |
| Jane | 9/10 | 3229 days | 2% |
| Eric Lau | 3/10 | 3276 days | 1% |
| Janet Pentelow | 9/10 | 3280 days | 2% |
| Jessica Holmes | 8/10 | 3285 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 10/10 | 3312 days | 2% |
| Valeska Lauer | 10/10 | 3319 days | 2% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 3325 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3368 days | 2% |
| Erich Brueggermann | 8/10 | 3376 days | 1% |
| Walter Neff | 9/10 | 3377 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Lindsey | 9/10 | 3377 days | 1% |
| Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 3397 days | 1% |
| P Rhodes | 8/10 | 3407 days | 1% |
| Rima | 10/10 | 3417 days | 1% |
| Marie Bittmann | 9/10 | 3438 days | 1% |
| Mike Guest | 8/10 | 3457 days | 1% |
| Lyle Walker | 10/10 | 3478 days | 1% |
| Jim MacDiarmid | 8/10 | 3561 days | 1% |
| Rawiri johnston | 8/10 | 3561 days | 1% |
| Eileen Teo | 10/10 | 3561 days | 1% |
| Jenny Sharp | 7/10 | 3562 days | 1% |
| Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 3622 days | 1% |
| Markus Grau | 6/10 | 3623 days | 1% |
| Julian Minnis | 10/10 | 3635 days | 1% |
| Marian K | 9/10 | 3640 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 7/10 | 3655 days | 1% |
| Matthew Francisco | 10/10 | 3673 days | 1% |
| Diana Worwood | 7/10 | 3680 days | 1% |
| Mallory Lopez | 10/10 | 3687 days | 1% |
| Lay Tyng Chan | 6/10 | 3708 days | 1% |
| Clint waters | 9/10 | 3743 days | 1% |
| veda wills | 7/10 | 3743 days | 1% |
| Zhao Lu | 10/10 | 3743 days | 1% |
| Andy Bell | 9/10 | 3774 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Hope | 9/10 | 3816 days | 1% |
| Juan Gomez | 6/10 | 3823 days | 0% |
| Amy Taylor | 8/10 | 3943 days | 0% |
| Jessie Karsif | 10/10 | 3948 days | 0% |
| Nicole | 8/10 | 3965 days | 0% |
| Moira Moroney | 10/10 | 3980 days | 0% |
| AusCampa | 6/10 | 3988 days | 0% |
| Erica b | 7/10 | 4018 days | 0% |
| Mike Gornall | 7/10 | 4049 days | 0% |
| John Drake | 5/10 | 4065 days | 0% |
| Gethin Pearson | 8/10 | 4071 days | 0% |
| Kimberley Garrod | 8/10 | 4117 days | 0% |
| Bjorn Privat | 7/10 | 4131 days | 0% |
| Todd MacFarlane | 10/10 | 4139 days | 0% |
| Bert Snel | 9/10 | 4139 days | 0% |
| Matt Newby | 9/10 | 4384 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.97% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Harbour Tourist Park Oamaru experience has been adjusted for 52 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 49 | -0.91% |
| 50 | -0.93% |
| 51 | -0.95% |
| 52 | -0.97% |
| 53 | -0.99% |
| 54 | -1.00% |
| 55 | -1.02% |
| … | … |
1.84% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.