Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Touchdown Car Rentals.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
39 Valid Reviews
The Touchdown Car Rentals experience has a total of 41 reviews. There are 39 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Touchdown Car Rentals valid reviews is 99.49% and is based on 39 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Gregor Potts||10/10||28 days||99.88||100%|
|Tracey Feldcamp||10/10||243 days||90.64||91%|
|Nicholas Thompson||10/10||334 days||82.32||82%|
|Diana, Pittsburgh PA, USA||10/10||485 days||62.73||62%|
|Kathy Probets||9/10||699 days||29.85||28%|
|Michael Teasdale||10/10||911 days||10.36||9%|
|Nick G||10/10||942 days||8.71||7%|
|Tamsin Wilkins||10/10||973 days||7.36||5%|
|Mike David||10/10||1003 days||6.34||4%|
|Kevin O'Neill||10/10||1185 days||4.82||3%|
|George Lucas||10/10||1338 days||4.52||3%|
|Campbell Gibson||10/10||1368 days||4.47||2%|
|Liam Glubb||10/10||1429 days||4.35||2%|
|Hani Girgis||10/10||1429 days||4.35||2%|
|Christian Cunneen||10/10||1520 days||4.17||2%|
|andy jamieson||10/10||1612 days||3.99||2%|
|Grace Hopkins||10/10||1642 days||3.93||2%|
|Tiffany Boa||10/10||1673 days||3.87||2%|
|Paul McNamara||10/10||1704 days||3.81||2%|
|Caroline Griffin||10/10||1704 days||3.81||2%|
|Craig Richmond||10/10||1854 days||3.51||2%|
|Pete Robson||10/10||1854 days||3.51||2%|
|Murray Quartly||10/10||1885 days||3.45||1%|
|M Factor Events||10/10||1946 days||3.33||1%|
|Rupert Deans||10/10||2069 days||3.09||1%|
|Laura Alleway||10/10||2099 days||3.04||1%|
|Sue Seeley||10/10||2191 days||2.86||1%|
|Tony Gloag||10/10||2191 days||2.86||1%|
|Anna Jenkins||10/10||2219 days||2.8||1%|
|Shane Farrell||10/10||2250 days||2.74||1%|
|Simon Adams||10/10||2342 days||2.56||1%|
|Catherine Forsey||10/10||2372 days||2.5||0%|
|Maree Harris||10/10||2372 days||2.5||0%|
|Regan Tullett||10/10||2464 days||2.32||0%|
|Logan McMillan||10/10||2615 days||2.03||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Touchdown Car Rentals experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner. There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days.
The Touchdown Car Rentals experience has 1 recent ranking. Adjustments are according to the following table:
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. However the Touchdown Car Rentals experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.