Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Kopua Whanau Camping Ground.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Te Kopua Whanau Camping Ground

Valid Reviews

51 Valid Reviews

The Te Kopua Whanau Camping Ground experience has a total of 54 reviews. There are 51 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 51 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 9
18%
9/10 10
20%
8/10 7
14%
7/10 9
18%
6/10 6
12%
5/10 3
6%
4/10 3
6%
3/10 4
8%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

73.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Kopua Whanau Camping Ground valid reviews is 73.33% and is based on 51 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

5 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 51 valid reviews, the experience has 5 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 5 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 1
20%
9/10 1
20%
8/10 0
0%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 1
20%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 2
40%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

62.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Kopua Whanau Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 62.00% and is based on 5 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

74.79%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Klara 9/10 141 days 100%
Felicia 4/10 324 days 63%
Emi Z 8/10 355 days 93%
Eline 8/10 355 days 93%
Mark Harding 7/10 383 days 87%
Carolina 9/10 414 days 91%
Teo 5/10 475 days 68%
Lea 7/10 475 days 83%
Howards 8/10 689 days 73%
Vojta 8/10 749 days 68%
Jorian 6/10 749 days 60%
Coral West 7/10 780 days 62%
Nalu 9/10 811 days 63%
Bobbie 7/10 964 days 45%
Taylor Russell 4/10 1025 days 28%
Katie 9/10 1055 days 39%
Cameron Hunter 7/10 1114 days 32%
Cicada 10/10 1420 days 15%
Emma 5/10 1451 days 10%
Taimi 10/10 1451 days 13%
Amelie 6/10 1510 days 9%
Mauro 9/10 1541 days 10%
Gemma 10/10 1844 days 5%
C Stafford 9/10 1875 days 5%
Rebecca 7/10 1997 days 4%
Michael 10/10 2059 days 5%
Dom 10/10 2210 days 4%
Reba 8/10 2210 days 4%
Bartezz 7/10 2272 days 4%
Zoe 9/10 2516 days 4%
Carolyn Jackson 10/10 2606 days 4%
Ma 10/10 2637 days 3%
R Stuart Nicholson 4/10 2637 days 2%
Annice 8/10 2881 days 3%
Spike Thorne 7/10 2893 days 3%
Eddie Howell 9/10 3007 days 3%
Manuela Loza 6/10 3415 days 2%
Connie Hopper 10/10 3616 days 1%
Loic Journet 6/10 3678 days 1%
Chiara Magelli 5/10 3899 days 1%
Jason Robus 3/10 3922 days 0%
Amber Johnson 9/10 4067 days 1%
Graeme 3/10 4067 days 0%
Patricia Erni 3/10 4351 days 0%
Andrew Luke 3/10 4387 days 0%
Jordan and Marielle 6/10 4432 days 1%
Katherine 10/10 4731 days 1%
Ben Martin 9/10 4731 days 1%
Will and Taylor 7/10 4766 days 1%
Clive 8/10 4766 days 1%
Bart Slingerland 6/10 5087 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Te Kopua Whanau Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

4.73% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

80%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.