Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Nelson Lakes National Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
36 Valid Reviews
The Nelson Lakes National Park experience has a total of 36 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 36 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Nelson Lakes National Park valid reviews is 83.89% and is based on 36 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
36 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 36 valid reviews, the experience has 36 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 36 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Nelson Lakes National Park face-to-face reviews is 83.89% and is based on 36 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Sophie Kalnymsky||9/10||1448 days||4.31||100%|
|Jonathan Brunetti||8/10||1498 days||4.0||86%|
|Sophie Arru||8/10||1504 days||3.99||85%|
|Philipp Richter||8/10||1554 days||3.9||81%|
|Simon Quass||10/10||1555 days||4.1||90%|
|Esther Itier||7/10||1787 days||3.32||55%|
|Maria Schober||9/10||1809 days||3.6||68%|
|Sibylle and Nadine||8/10||1874 days||3.3||54%|
|Fanny DeBon||6/10||1881 days||2.87||34%|
|Bartlomiej Berger||7/10||1888 days||3.14||46%|
|Florian Klein||9/10||2110 days||3.01||41%|
|Sanne Meijer||8/10||2141 days||2.81||31%|
|Anne Haenchen||9/10||2158 days||2.92||36%|
|Leon Courtney||7/10||2165 days||2.64||24%|
|Wayne Schist||8/10||2181 days||2.73||28%|
|David Krasner||10/10||2183 days||2.87||34%|
|Matthias Freiling||10/10||2184 days||2.87||34%|
|Max Tetzlaff||9/10||2184 days||2.87||34%|
|Alexis Redor||7/10||2189 days||2.6||22%|
|Ngaire Davies||8/10||2200 days||2.7||26%|
|Paul Davies||8/10||2200 days||2.7||26%|
|Mayan Goddat||9/10||2206 days||2.83||32%|
|Daniel Naveh||9/10||2206 days||2.83||32%|
|Jean Batiste Le meur||9/10||2206 days||2.83||32%|
|Clara Hayes||7/10||2212 days||2.56||20%|
|Michael Rohn||10/10||2214 days||2.81||31%|
|Evian Bolz||10/10||2215 days||2.81||31%|
|Giles Leonard||8/10||2505 days||2.13||0%|
|Sian Bolderson||9/10||2506 days||2.24||5%|
|Stu Murray||10/10||2523 days||2.21||4%|
|Gerard Berote||9/10||2524 days||2.2||3%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Nelson Lakes National Park does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.