Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Wanaka isite Visitor Information Centre.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Lake Wanaka isite Visitor Information Centre

Valid Reviews

66 Valid Reviews

The Lake Wanaka isite Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 67 reviews. There are 66 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 66 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
32%
9/10 14
21%
8/10 15
23%
7/10 8
12%
6/10 2
3%
5/10 2
3%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
2%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 0
0%

82.88% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Wanaka isite Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 82.88% and is based on 66 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

63 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 66 valid reviews, the experience has 63 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 63 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 19
30%
9/10 14
22%
8/10 14
22%
7/10 8
13%
6/10 2
3%
5/10 2
3%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
2%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 0
0%

82.38% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Wanaka isite Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 82.38% and is based on 63 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

85.63%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
S Weslake 10/10 2475 days 100%
Ixtaso Roncal 8/10 3329 days 54%
Christop Grepper 9/10 3558 days 43%
Regula Hammer 9/10 3558 days 43%
Charles Aubry 10/10 3593 days 41%
Elisa Felising 8/10 3595 days 40%
Barbara 10/10 3644 days 39%
Hubert Schmid 10/10 3715 days 35%
Ane Didriksen 8/10 3902 days 25%
Iris Anette Berger 7/10 3902 days 23%
Douglas Yeates 7/10 3902 days 23%
Stefanie 7/10 3904 days 23%
Martin Sajdok 10/10 3907 days 25%
Claudia Hillebrand 8/10 3909 days 24%
Mark 8/10 3918 days 24%
Petra Albrchtoval 6/10 3928 days 20%
Helene Andersen 9/10 3931 days 23%
Claudia Bauch 10/10 3934 days 23%
Daniel Robledo 9/10 3937 days 23%
Maria Camen Santos Lopez 10/10 3937 days 23%
Joris Giullemot 10/10 3938 days 23%
Mara 8/10 3938 days 23%
Olivier Carval 7/10 3938 days 22%
Bex Hyland 9/10 3945 days 23%
Mirjam Betschart 8/10 3950 days 22%
Manuela Michelbach 6/10 3953 days 19%
Lopez Anandine 8/10 3953 days 22%
Sybille Willenbrock 9/10 3958 days 22%
F Ballard 9/10 3962 days 22%
Christina Habranke 10/10 3976 days 21%
Wouter Bosch 10/10 3977 days 21%
Derek Knight 10/10 3978 days 21%
Julia Kallenbach 10/10 3981 days 21%
Gilad Itzkovitz 10/10 3984 days 21%
Doran Swartz 8/10 3985 days 20%
Hindrek Lind 5/10 3987 days 16%
Anne and Steve Bartlett 9/10 3987 days 20%
Danyelle Miller 8/10 3987 days 20%
Susser 9/10 3988 days 20%
Elly Zimmer 2/10 4002 days 9%
Paige Galbraith 7/10 4003 days 18%
hendrik king 10/10 4209 days 9%
Michael Heuer 10/10 4278 days 5%
Supiot Zudovic 10/10 4283 days 5%
Maria Klister 5/10 4285 days 4%
Bettina Fluhrer 8/10 4286 days 5%
Marie 8/10 4286 days 5%
Tom Somers 9/10 4287 days 5%
Galen Licht 7/10 4289 days 4%
Lea Scheuvens 9/10 4291 days 5%
Petra Blumberg 10/10 4307 days 4%
Enna Keet 8/10 4313 days 3%
Tim Sautter 10/10 4314 days 3%
Peter Moederer 10/10 4318 days 3%
Fabian and Teresa 3/10 4322 days 2%
Margaret and Derek McNeil 7/10 4376 days 0%
Martyn Kool 9/10 4377 days 0%
Marieke 7/10 4377 days 0%
Al Stuart 10/10 4378 days 0%
Sharon Yates 10/10 4379 days 0%
Jonathan Vondette 9/10 4382 days 27%
Natalie Nubler 4/10 4383 days 17%
Benedicte and Mathilde Colas 8/10 4394 days 26%
Alex Laidlaw 8/10 4398 days 26%
Ton Franke 4/10 4407 days 17%
Marjo Cousijn 9/10 4408 days 27%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Wanaka isite Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.70% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

87%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.