Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taupo Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Taupo Information Centre
Valid Reviews
87 Valid Reviews
The Taupo Information Centre experience has a total of 88 reviews. There are 87 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 87 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 22 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 24 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.34% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Information Centre valid reviews is 80.34% and is based on 87 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
86 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 87 valid reviews, the experience has 86 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 86 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 24 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.12% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taupo Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 80.12% and is based on 86 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
82.77%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jane Jacobs | 10/10 | 2986 days | 100% |
| Johanna Lidel | 10/10 | 3919 days | 32% |
| Amelie Eschenbach | 10/10 | 3919 days | 32% |
| Naelan Le Borgue | 7/10 | 3922 days | 30% |
| Michael Stibor | 9/10 | 3923 days | 32% |
| Nicol | 4/10 | 3960 days | 19% |
| Marie Weber | 10/10 | 3966 days | 29% |
| Sue Hempstead | 8/10 | 3967 days | 28% |
| Lukas Dost | 8/10 | 3979 days | 28% |
| Sophie Huybrechts | 9/10 | 4013 days | 25% |
| Bram and Laura | 6/10 | 4022 days | 21% |
| Cecilia Anderson | 3/10 | 4268 days | 4% |
| Mattias | 4/10 | 4268 days | 4% |
| Doreen Gendel | 10/10 | 4276 days | 7% |
| Christina | 10/10 | 4279 days | 6% |
| Kathrin Lerch | 8/10 | 4279 days | 6% |
| Meredith Griffiths | 8/10 | 4285 days | 6% |
| Philippe Chiasson | 8/10 | 4285 days | 6% |
| Stephen Revah | 9/10 | 4294 days | 5% |
| Hadler | 9/10 | 4298 days | 5% |
| Christine Helleiner | 10/10 | 4298 days | 5% |
| Steffen | 8/10 | 4300 days | 5% |
| Sergey Pronkin | 9/10 | 4300 days | 5% |
| Nina Helmling | 8/10 | 4300 days | 5% |
| Tobias Thull | 9/10 | 4300 days | 5% |
| Sara Clausen | 8/10 | 4303 days | 5% |
| Marieke Feyteres | 8/10 | 4303 days | 5% |
| Isabelle Bohle | 10/10 | 4307 days | 4% |
| Ian Garner | 9/10 | 4310 days | 4% |
| Steven Lotrian | 7/10 | 4311 days | 4% |
| Marvin Koever | 10/10 | 4311 days | 4% |
| Max Meternich | 10/10 | 4311 days | 4% |
| Philip Donachie | 10/10 | 4313 days | 4% |
| Luisa Bach | 10/10 | 4313 days | 4% |
| Sophia | 8/10 | 4314 days | 4% |
| Lopez Anandine | 6/10 | 4314 days | 3% |
| Ruth Watkin | 8/10 | 4321 days | 3% |
| Matthias Freiling | 8/10 | 4323 days | 3% |
| Jesseca Klausch | 5/10 | 4323 days | 2% |
| Vincent Schaeflier | 9/10 | 4323 days | 3% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4324 days | 3% |
| Florian Littmann | 9/10 | 4327 days | 3% |
| Victor Herranz | 8/10 | 4328 days | 3% |
| Andreas Brodhaeker | 6/10 | 4339 days | 2% |
| Marius Buseh | 6/10 | 4339 days | 2% |
| Benedict Seite | 7/10 | 4339 days | 2% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4339 days | 2% |
| Julia Bonisch | 2/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
| Luca Willensrock | 6/10 | 4341 days | 2% |
| Mathias Butterlin | 8/10 | 4343 days | 2% |
| Alexia Greasbaum | 9/10 | 4344 days | 2% |
| Petra Kurcova | 10/10 | 4345 days | 2% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4345 days | 2% |
| Josefina Tassone | 10/10 | 4346 days | 2% |
| Camille Gagnant | 10/10 | 4346 days | 2% |
| Anne Collet | 10/10 | 4349 days | 1% |
| Alexandra Kupper | 7/10 | 4359 days | 1% |
| Carina Huhmann | 9/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| Romina Bolz | 4/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| Kellie | 10/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| Anja | 9/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
| Guillaume Boudrand | 7/10 | 4645 days | 34% |
| Debiesse | 8/10 | 4650 days | 35% |
| Katya Verikaitis | 9/10 | 4655 days | 36% |
| Clodec | 7/10 | 4657 days | 34% |
| Molly Ladd | 6/10 | 4658 days | 31% |
| Sebastian | 9/10 | 4666 days | 36% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 4666 days | 36% |
| Fabian | 9/10 | 4666 days | 36% |
| Jonas Herrmann | 8/10 | 4666 days | 35% |
| Jonas Schelbert | 7/10 | 4670 days | 34% |
| Missy and Chaz | 9/10 | 4672 days | 36% |
| Dani Wallinger | 8/10 | 4684 days | 35% |
| Kyle Guffei | 10/10 | 4685 days | 36% |
| Reinier Timmer | 9/10 | 4734 days | 36% |
| Michal | 10/10 | 4738 days | 36% |
| Ralph and Leonie | 8/10 | 4744 days | 35% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 4756 days | 35% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 4756 days | 35% |
| Doan | 8/10 | 4757 days | 35% |
| Thibault Bonenfant | 2/10 | 4758 days | 16% |
| Lutz Huuemorder | 7/10 | 4758 days | 34% |
| Shannon Taylor | 6/10 | 4761 days | 31% |
| Harald Prinz | 9/10 | 4763 days | 36% |
| Martina Posch | 8/10 | 4766 days | 35% |
| Megan Child | 3/10 | 4769 days | 19% |
| Jessica Marling | 10/10 | 5036 days | 36% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Taupo Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.