Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rotorua isite Visitor Information Centre.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Rotorua isite Visitor Information Centre

Valid Reviews

62 Valid Reviews

The Rotorua isite Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 63 reviews. There are 62 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 62 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 14
23%
9/10 18
29%
8/10 11
18%
7/10 11
18%
6/10 2
3%
5/10 2
3%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 2
3%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

81.13% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua isite Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 81.13% and is based on 62 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

62 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 62 valid reviews, the experience has 62 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 62 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 14
23%
9/10 18
29%
8/10 11
18%
7/10 11
18%
6/10 2
3%
5/10 2
3%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 2
3%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

81.13% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua isite Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 81.13% and is based on 62 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

82.68%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Federica Miral 10/10 3729 days 100%
Camille Guevel 9/10 3958 days 64%
Philippe Lopez 7/10 4001 days 54%
Ben and Morgane 10/10 4002 days 58%
Marie Weber 10/10 4002 days 58%
Ives van der Sluijs 9/10 4015 days 55%
Marie Sander 10/10 4016 days 55%
Maria Ulitzsch 9/10 4043 days 51%
Lea Karl 10/10 4045 days 51%
Sophie Huybrechts 5/10 4049 days 38%
Vanessa Leverrier 10/10 4052 days 50%
Bram and Laura 7/10 4058 days 45%
Lukas, Anne and Malte 9/10 4059 days 48%
Hubert 10/10 4066 days 48%
Paul de Bruijn 6/10 4068 days 41%
Hannah Watt 7/10 4309 days 9%
Jan Legein 9/10 4310 days 10%
Jean Curry 7/10 4311 days 9%
Leonie Moeller 8/10 4311 days 9%
Josefin Lind 8/10 4312 days 9%
Herman Holmgist 8/10 4312 days 9%
Stephen Revah 9/10 4330 days 7%
Sara Clausen 6/10 4339 days 4%
Daniel Garcia Dezgado 10/10 4342 days 5%
Amanda 10/10 4343 days 5%
Derek 9/10 4343 days 5%
Hannah 9/10 4345 days 4%
Olivia 10/10 4345 days 4%
Manuel Bach 7/10 4352 days 3%
Frederic Gazzarin 9/10 4357 days 2%
Patricia Gazzarin 9/10 4357 days 2%
Rhys Williams 4/10 4357 days 1%
Jesseca Klausch 3/10 4359 days 1%
Florian Littmann 10/10 4363 days 2%
Anna 8/10 4363 days 2%
Sina Sacranie 9/10 4373 days 0%
Marco Newald 9/10 4382 days 77%
Bet 7/10 4391 days 73%
Alex Artigues 9/10 4395 days 77%
Serge Garcin 8/10 4395 days 77%
Hennk Hartke 9/10 4398 days 77%
Anton Thisted 8/10 4665 days 77%
Josefine Sjodin 8/10 4665 days 77%
Katie Fleck 10/10 4665 days 78%
Bertrand Gilles 7/10 4680 days 73%
LiseMarie Leger 8/10 4688 days 77%
Kathy Arthurs 8/10 4698 days 77%
Selina Lott 5/10 4702 days 59%
Sebastian 10/10 4702 days 78%
Rouquette 9/10 4708 days 77%
Tony Hines 4/10 4774 days 51%
Julien Bocherens 10/10 4774 days 78%
Anne Rodofsen 7/10 4778 days 73%
Roux 7/10 4778 days 73%
Hans 7/10 4778 days 73%
Adam Hassan 9/10 4793 days 77%
Gerard van de Ven 9/10 4793 days 77%
Julie Lamart 9/10 4797 days 77%
Julia Ramseier 8/10 4800 days 77%
Lotte Uneken 7/10 4800 days 73%
Thys 8/10 4800 days 77%
Megan Child 3/10 4805 days 42%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Rotorua isite Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.32% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

85%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.