Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rotorua isite Visitor Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Rotorua isite Visitor Information Centre
Valid Reviews
62 Valid Reviews
The Rotorua isite Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 63 reviews. There are 62 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 62 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
18% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua isite Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 81.13% and is based on 62 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
62 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 62 valid reviews, the experience has 62 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 62 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
18% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.13% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua isite Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 81.13% and is based on 62 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
81.78%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federica Miral | 10/10 | 3990 days | 74% |
| Camille Guevel | 9/10 | 4219 days | 25% |
| Philippe Lopez | 7/10 | 4262 days | 14% |
| Ben and Morgane | 10/10 | 4263 days | 16% |
| Marie Weber | 10/10 | 4263 days | 16% |
| Ives van der Sluijs | 9/10 | 4276 days | 13% |
| Marie Sander | 10/10 | 4277 days | 13% |
| Maria Ulitzsch | 9/10 | 4304 days | 7% |
| Lea Karl | 10/10 | 4306 days | 6% |
| Sophie Huybrechts | 5/10 | 4310 days | 2% |
| Vanessa Leverrier | 10/10 | 4313 days | 5% |
| Bram and Laura | 7/10 | 4319 days | 3% |
| Lukas, Anne and Malte | 9/10 | 4320 days | 3% |
| Hubert | 10/10 | 4327 days | 2% |
| Paul de Bruijn | 6/10 | 4329 days | 0% |
| Hannah Watt | 7/10 | 4570 days | 92% |
| Jan Legein | 9/10 | 4571 days | 99% |
| Jean Curry | 7/10 | 4572 days | 92% |
| Leonie Moeller | 8/10 | 4572 days | 98% |
| Josefin Lind | 8/10 | 4573 days | 98% |
| Herman Holmgist | 8/10 | 4573 days | 98% |
| Stephen Revah | 9/10 | 4591 days | 99% |
| Sara Clausen | 6/10 | 4600 days | 85% |
| Daniel Garcia Dezgado | 10/10 | 4603 days | 100% |
| Amanda | 10/10 | 4604 days | 100% |
| Derek | 9/10 | 4604 days | 99% |
| Hannah | 9/10 | 4606 days | 99% |
| Olivia | 10/10 | 4606 days | 100% |
| Manuel Bach | 7/10 | 4613 days | 92% |
| Frederic Gazzarin | 9/10 | 4618 days | 99% |
| Patricia Gazzarin | 9/10 | 4618 days | 99% |
| Rhys Williams | 4/10 | 4618 days | 62% |
| Jesseca Klausch | 3/10 | 4620 days | 50% |
| Florian Littmann | 10/10 | 4624 days | 100% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 4624 days | 98% |
| Sina Sacranie | 9/10 | 4634 days | 99% |
| Marco Newald | 9/10 | 4643 days | 99% |
| Bet | 7/10 | 4652 days | 92% |
| Alex Artigues | 9/10 | 4656 days | 99% |
| Serge Garcin | 8/10 | 4656 days | 98% |
| Hennk Hartke | 9/10 | 4659 days | 99% |
| Anton Thisted | 8/10 | 4926 days | 98% |
| Josefine Sjodin | 8/10 | 4926 days | 98% |
| Katie Fleck | 10/10 | 4926 days | 100% |
| Bertrand Gilles | 7/10 | 4941 days | 92% |
| LiseMarie Leger | 8/10 | 4949 days | 98% |
| Kathy Arthurs | 8/10 | 4959 days | 98% |
| Selina Lott | 5/10 | 4963 days | 74% |
| Sebastian | 10/10 | 4963 days | 100% |
| Rouquette | 9/10 | 4969 days | 99% |
| Tony Hines | 4/10 | 5035 days | 62% |
| Julien Bocherens | 10/10 | 5035 days | 100% |
| Anne Rodofsen | 7/10 | 5039 days | 92% |
| Roux | 7/10 | 5039 days | 92% |
| Hans | 7/10 | 5039 days | 92% |
| Adam Hassan | 9/10 | 5054 days | 99% |
| Gerard van de Ven | 9/10 | 5054 days | 99% |
| Julie Lamart | 9/10 | 5058 days | 99% |
| Julia Ramseier | 8/10 | 5061 days | 98% |
| Lotte Uneken | 7/10 | 5061 days | 92% |
| Thys | 8/10 | 5061 days | 98% |
| Megan Child | 3/10 | 5066 days | 50% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Rotorua isite Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.54% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.